Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Subjects King George County (Va.)--History Remove constraint Subjects: King George County (Va.)--History

Search Results

Dade Family Papers

0.01 Linear Foot
Abstract Or Scope

Papers, 1826-1843, of the Dade family of King George County, Va. Includes letters received by General John B. Dade, his wife, Eliza Dade, and their daughter, Margaret S. Dade as well as letters to another relative Edward Smith. The collection includes a genealogical column, 1910, from the Richmond Times-Dispatch, which concerns the Dade, Daingerfield, Battaile, Hove, and Fitzhugh families.

1 result

Dade Family Papers 0.01 Linear Foot

Land Indenture between Rev. John Dixon and Charles Mortimer

0.01 Linear Feet
Abstract Or Scope

Contemporary copy of a land indenture between Rev. John Dixon, "Professor of Divinity at William & Mary College" and Charles Mortimer for Dixon's Mill in King George County, Virginia.

1 result

Land Indenture between Rev. John Dixon and Charles Mortimer 0.01 Linear Feet

Plat of "Marmion" in King George County, Virginia

0.01 Linear Feet
Abstract Or Scope

Plat of "Marmion", King George County,Virginia, property of Dangerfield Lewis. Drawn by Gilbert Harrow, surveyor, September 1797. Other parcels noted are: Fowkes's Land, Chatterton, Bomberry's and Eagle's Nest. Much of this area is part of the original patent of Ashtons.

1 result

Plat of "Marmion" in King George County, Virginia 0.01 Linear Feet

Virginia Counties Collection

30.00 Linear Feet
Abstract Or Scope

Artificial collection of papers relating to various counties in the Commonwealth of Virginia.

1 result

Virginia Counties Collection 30.00 Linear Feet

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.