Search

Start Over Date range 1965 Subjects Judges
University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.

Donald K. Duvall papers, 1930/1996

5.5 Cubic Feet 14 archival boxes

Donald K. Duvall's papers consist of cases and other materials pertaining to his tenure as an administrative law judge and later as an attorney to Kenyon and Kenyon, working with Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The papers are divided in two series:

1 result

Donald K. Duvall papers, 1930/1996 5.5 Cubic Feet 14 archival boxes

Duvall, Donald K.

Donald K. Duvall's papers consist of cases and other materials pertaining to his tenure as an administrative law judge and later as an attorney to Kenyon and Kenyon, working with Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The papers are divided in two series:

University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.

Edward S. Smith papers, 1964/1997

3.75 Cubic Feet 9 archival boxes

These papers document Edward S. Smith's service on the US Court of Claims, his appointment to the court, court administration, articles and speeches, and the federal court re-organization of the late 1970s that concluded with the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1979, and the creation of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

1 result

Edward S. Smith papers, 1964/1997 3.75 Cubic Feet 9 archival boxes

Smith, Edward S., 1919-2001

These papers document Edward S. Smith's service on the US Court of Claims, his appointment to the court, court administration, articles and speeches, and the federal court re-organization of the late 1970s that concluded with the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1979, and the creation of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.

George H. Revercomb papers, 1942/1994

27 Cubic Feet 50 archival boxes, plus some oversize materials.

The papers of Judge George H. Revercomb consist of the chambers files for his US district judgeship and memorabilia. They are organized in four groups, maintaining the excellent order imposed in the judge's office. The papers bear witness to Revercomb's reputation as an efficient, hard-working, and well-organized judge.

1 result

George H. Revercomb papers, 1942/1994 27 Cubic Feet 50 archival boxes, plus some oversize materials.

Revercomb, George Hughes, 1929-1993

The papers of Judge George H. Revercomb consist of the chambers files for his US district judgeship and memorabilia. They are organized in four groups, maintaining the excellent order imposed in the judge's office. The papers bear witness to Revercomb's reputation as an efficient, hard-working, and well-organized judge.

University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.

Thomas C. Gordon Jr. papers, 1965/1997

3 Cubic Feet 3 archival boxes, 11 paintings

This collection contains notebooks, memoranda, and correspondence between Judge Gordon and the University of Virginia School of Law, the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, the Virginia Law Review, and the law firm of McGuire Woods. The use of language is a recurrent topic in this collection. There are extensive articles and newspaper clippings about the use of plain English and legal writing, as well as a collection of Gordon's speeches and lecture notes on legal writing.

1 result

Thomas C. Gordon Jr. papers, 1965/1997 3 Cubic Feet 3 archival boxes, 11 paintings

Gordon, Thomas C., Jr., 1915-2003

This collection contains notebooks, memoranda, and correspondence between Judge Gordon and the University of Virginia School of Law, the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, the Virginia Law Review, and the law firm of McGuire Woods. The use of language is a recurrent topic in this collection. There are extensive articles and newspaper clippings about the use of plain English and legal writing, as well as a collection of Gordon's speeches and lecture notes on legal writing.

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.