Collections

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Date range 1952 Remove constraint Date range: 1952 Subjects Glass industry. Remove constraint Subjects: Glass industry. Level Collection Remove constraint Level: Collection

Search Results

American Flint Glass Workers Union, Archives, 1951/1975 1.7 Linear Feet Summary: 1 ft. 8 in. (4 document cases, 5 in. each)

American Flint Glass Workers Union Papers, 1878/1986 11.5 Linear Feet Summary: 11 ft. 5 3/4 in. (23 document cases, 5 in. each); (1 document case, 2 1/2 in.); (1 clamshell box, 3 in.); (2 books, 1 in. each); (1 record carton, 15 in.); (1 oversize folder, 1/4 in.)

American Flint Glass Workers Union, Papers, 1894/1977 1.7 Linear Feet Summary: 1 ft. 8 in. (4 document cases, 5 in. each)

Demeester Family Papers, 1883/1996 0 Linear Feet Summary: 77 pages (photocopies)

Douglas Underkoffler, Imperial Glass Corporation Sales Representative, Papers, 1950/1984 0.25 Linear Feet Summary: 2 1/2 in. (1 document case, 2 1/2 in.); (1 oversize folder, 17 leaves)

Fourco Glass Company Records, 1924/1973 1.4 Linear Feet Summary: 1 ft. 5 in. (2 document cases, 5 in. each); (2 scrapbooks, 7 in.)

Glass Workers' Protective League, Records, 1947/1976 1.25 Linear Feet Summary: 1 ft. 3 in. (3 document cases, 5 in, each)

Glen W. McCabe, Union Organizer, Records of the Window Glass Cutters League of America, 1905/1958 0.7 Linear Feet Summary: 8 in. (1 document case, 5 in.); (1 small flat storage box, 3 in.)

Harglo Glass Company Records, 1950/1970 2.6 Linear Feet Summary: 2 ft. 7 in. (1 records carton, 15 in.); (1 records carton, 17 in.)

John Cuthbert, Collector, Virginia B. Evans Glassware, 1942/1970 11.3 Linear Feet 11 ft. 2 1/2 in. (6 record cartons, 15 in. each); (2 document cases, 5 in.); (3 artifact boxes, 6 1/2 in. each); (2 artifact boxes, 4 in. each); (2 flat storage boxes, 3 1/2 in.)

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.