Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Date range 1969 Remove constraint Date range: 1969 Subjects Genealogy Remove constraint Subjects: Genealogy

Search Results

Theodor R. and Helen V. Swem Papers, 1856/1996, bulk 1950/1970 1.00 Linear Feet

United Daughters of the Confederacy, General Jenkins Chapter, Scrapbooks of Records, 1899/1972 1.25 Linear Feet 1 ft. 3 in. (3 document cases, 5 in. each)

Violette S. Machir, Compiler, Revolutionary War Pension Applications and Genealogies (Mason County), 1828/1995 1.25 Linear Feet 1 ft. 3 in. (3 document cases, 5 in. each)

Webb Family Papers, 1790/1975 6.70 Linear Feet 11 Hollinger document cases, 1 oversize box boxes

White Day Glades Tannery Records, 1855/1977 0.1 Linear Feet Summary: 1 in.

William A. Moreland, Political Papers, World War II Records, and Other Material, 1824/2008 27.2 Linear Feet Summary: (22 document cases, 5 in. each); (4 document cases, 2 1/2 in. each); (4 records cartons, 15 in. each); (6 large flat storage boxes, 3 in. each); (4 small flat storage boxes, 3 in. each); (3 small flat storage boxes, 1 1/2 in. each); (1 newspaper box, 3 in.); (1 card index box 4 1/2 in.); (1 flag box, 23 in.); (2 roll storage box, 5 in.) (2 roll storage box, 4 in.); (1 roll storage box, 6 in.); (1 steamer trunk, 30 in.); (1 large wooden clothes pin, 27 in.); (2 oversized folders 0.1 in.)

Willis Guy Tetrick, Jr. Genealogy Research Papers, 1708/1997 131.6 Linear Feet 131 ft. 7 in. (41 record cartons, 15 in. each); (1 oversize record carton, 18 in.); (1 flat storage box, 3 in.); (274 unboxed ledgers and notebooks, 78 ft. 7 in.)

Wingfield-Britton family papers, 1857/1983 1.17 Linear Feet

Zinn Family Genealogy, 1808/1994, bulk 1832/1888 0.25 Linear Feet Summary: 2 1/2 in. (1 document case)

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.