Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Subjects Court records--Virginia--Montgomery County. Remove constraint Subjects: Court records--Virginia--Montgomery County.

Search Results

Montgomery County (Va.) Attachment, 1779

Abstract Or Scope

Montgomery County (Va.) Attachment, 1779. Consists of an attachment against the estate of John Gordon to secure a debt of twelve pounds owed to William Hanley, from the case Hanley vs. Gordon.

1 result

Montgomery County (Va.) Attachment, 1779

Montgomery County (Va.) Attachment, 1801

Abstract Or Scope

Montgomery County (Va.) Attachment, 1801. Consists of an attachment against the estate of William Robinson to secure a debt of one hundred thirty-three dollars to John Preston.

1 result

Montgomery County (Va.) Attachment, 1801

Montgomery County (Va.) Deposition of John George, ca. 1800

Abstract Or Scope

Montgomery County (Va.) Deposition of John George, ca. 1800. Consists of a deposition of John George pertaining to a burglary of George's store house.

1 result

Montgomery County (Va.) Deposition of John George, ca. 1800

Montgomery County (Va.) Deposition of William Simpson, Jr., 1812

Abstract Or Scope

Montgomery County (Va.) Deposition of William Simpson, Jr., 1812. Consists of a deposition from the suit, Simpson vs. Hornbarger. Simpson's testimony pertains to personal property owned by William Simpson, Sr.

1 result

Montgomery County (Va.) Deposition of William Simpson, Jr., 1812

Montgomery County (Va.) Depositions of Sarah Glen and John Glen, 1801

Abstract Or Scope

Montgomery County (Va.) Depositions of Sarah Glen and John Glen, 1801. Consists of depositions pertaining to a complaint against John Anderson for employing a scam and paying bad money to Sarah Glen.

1 result

Montgomery County (Va.) Depositions of Sarah Glen and John Glen, 1801

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.