Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Subjects Coal mining - Labor organization. Remove constraint Subjects: Coal mining - Labor organization.

Search Results

Keith Dix, Papers regarding Labor History, 1923/1976 4.58 Linear Feet 4 ft. 7 in. (5 document cases, 5 in. each); (2 records cartons, 15 in. each)

Major W. P. Tams, Jr. Transcript of an Interview, 1825/1934 0 Linear Feet Summary: 1 folder

Mary "Mother" Jones Letter, 1920 0 Linear Feet Summary: 1 item

Miners for Democracy Papers, 1972 0.1 Linear Feet Summary: 1 in. (photocopies)

Miners' Treason Trials, Records, 1921/1923 0.88 Linear Feet Summary: 10 1/2 in. (6 reels of microfilm, 1.75 in. each)

Monongah Mine Disaster Papers, 1907/1952 0.45 Linear Feet Summary: 5 1/3 in. (1 small flat storage box, 3 in.); (1 folder, 1/2 in.); (1 oversize folder, 5 items); (1 reel of microfilm, 1.75 in.)

Mother Jones Typescript Memoir, 1938 0.25 Linear Feet Summary: 3 in. (1 small flat storage box)

Paul Nyden, Collector, Five Unpublished Manuscripts Dealing with Coal Mining, Miners, and Unions, 1932/1975 0.77 Linear Feet 9 1/4 in. (1 document case, 5 in.); (1 document case, 2 1/2 in.); (1 reel of microfilm, 1.75 in.)

Progressive Mine Workers of America, Archives, 1932/1965 16.94 Linear Feet Summary: 16 ft. 11 1/4 in. (35 document cases, 5 in.); (2 ledger books, 2 1/2 in.); (3 bound volumes, 10 in.); (1 oversize folder, 1/4 in.); (2 artifact storage boxes, 3/4 in.); (8 reels of microfilm, 1.75 in. each)

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.