Search

Start Over Subjects Clergy--Virginia--Loudoun County.
Library of Virginia

Loudoun County (Va.) Marriage Bonds, Consents, Ordination Bonds and Index, 1772-1852 (bulk 1785-1852)

Loudoun County (Va.) Marriage Bonds, Consents, Ordination Bonds and Index, 1772-1852 (bulk 1785-1852) is comprised of negative photostatic copies of original marriage bonds, consents and ordination bonds. The volume is divided into three sections. The first section, pages 1-4, records marriages found in the Account Book of David Griffith (Accession number 23609) who was minister of Shelbourne Parish during those years. This section covers the years 1772-1775. The second section presents the marriage bonds and consents. These records, which cover the years 1786-1799, are found on pages 5-175. The bonds and consents indicate the names of the parties intending to marry.

1 result

Loudoun County (Va.) Marriage Bonds, Consents, Ordination Bonds and Index, 1772-1852 (bulk 1785-1852)

Loudoun County (Va.) Circuit Court.

Loudoun County (Va.) Marriage Bonds, Consents, Ordination Bonds and Index, 1772-1852 (bulk 1785-1852) is comprised of negative photostatic copies of original marriage bonds, consents and ordination bonds. The volume is divided into three sections. The first section, pages 1-4, records marriages found in the Account Book of David Griffith (Accession number 23609) who was minister of Shelbourne Parish during those years. This section covers the years 1772-1775. The second section presents the marriage bonds and consents. These records, which cover the years 1786-1799, are found on pages 5-175. The bonds and consents indicate the names of the parties intending to marry.

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.