Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Subjects Civil War - Virginia 27th Infantry. Remove constraint Subjects: Civil War - Virginia 27th Infantry.

Search Results

Julius G. Lorence, Soldier, Civil War Letter Regarding Stonewall Brigade in Jackson's Romney Campaign, 1862

0.01 Linear Feet Summary: 1 page (1 folder)
Abstract Or Scope
Letter written by Confederate soldier Julius G. Lorence (also spelled Lorenz and Lowrence), who served in the 27th Regiment Virginia Infantry, Company E, which was part of the "Stonewall Brigade". The letter is dated 12 January 186[2] and is addressed to Lorence's friend "Charley" and describes Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson's attack against Dam No. 5 of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal. See "Scope and Content Note" for further information.
1 result

Julius G. Lorence, Soldier, Civil War Letter Regarding Stonewall Brigade in Jackson's Romney Campaign, 1862 0.01 Linear Feet Summary: 1 page (1 folder)

Sallie Davis, Civil War Letter Regarding Union Troops in Fayette and Raleigh Counties, 1862

0.01 Linear Feet Summary: 1 page (1 folder)
Abstract Or Scope
Letter written by Sallie Davis, sister of Confederate soldier Charles Davis. The letter is dated 19 March 186[2] and addressed to a Mr. Anderson. The letter regards the presence of Union troops in the local area (Greenbrier and neighboring counties), their seizing of property, and how many of Davis' neighbors and friends have moved away for fear of the Union soldiers. Please see "Scope and Content Note" for further information.
1 result

Sallie Davis, Civil War Letter Regarding Union Troops in Fayette and Raleigh Counties, 1862 0.01 Linear Feet Summary: 1 page (1 folder)

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.