Search

Start Over Creator Lough, Sarah Jane Subjects Civil War - Union sympathizers.
West Virginia and Regional History Center

Sarah Jane Lough Civil War Letter regarding Confederate Activity in Morgantown, 1863

0.01 Linear Feet 4 pages (1 folder)
Letter dated 3 May 1863, written by Sarah Jane Lough of Morgantown, (West) Virginia to her brother Elza T. Lough, a private in the 3rd West Virginia Cavalry Regiment. Lough reports the entry of Confederate troops into Morgantown on 27 April 1863 and the Confederates' activities in the Morgantown and Fairmont areas during the following week. Subjects of note include the taking of horses and other property; a skirmish at Fairmont; spies passing through the town; and detailed accounts of various interactions between locals and Confederates. The collection includes a transcript and user copies. See "Scope and Content Note" and "Historical Note" for further information.
1 result

Sarah Jane Lough Civil War Letter regarding Confederate Activity in Morgantown, 1863 0.01 Linear Feet 4 pages (1 folder)

Lough, Sarah Jane
Letter dated 3 May 1863, written by Sarah Jane Lough of Morgantown, (West) Virginia to her brother Elza T. Lough, a private in the 3rd West Virginia Cavalry Regiment. Lough reports the entry of Confederate troops into Morgantown on 27 April 1863 and the Confederates' activities in the Morgantown and Fairmont areas during the following week. Subjects of note include the taking of horses and other property; a skirmish at Fairmont; spies passing through the town; and detailed accounts of various interactions between locals and Confederates. The collection includes a transcript and user copies. See "Scope and Content Note" and "Historical Note" for further information.

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.