Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Creator York County (Va.) Circuit Court. Remove constraint Creator: York County (Va.) Circuit Court. Subjects Chancery causes -- Virginia -- York County. Remove constraint Subjects: Chancery causes -- Virginia -- York County.

Search Results

York County (Va.) Chancery Cause, Kate Nelson vs. Martha Bryan, 1885

Abstract Or Scope

York County (Va.) Chancery Cause, Kate Nelson vs. Martha Bryan, 1885. This cause concerns a dispute over the ownership of the Nelson House in Yorktown, VA. Plaintiff Kate Nelson was the daughter of William Nelson the Elder (died 1849) and had inherited the house at the death of her brother William Nelson the Younger in 1877. The defendant in the case was the widow of William Nelson the Elder who had subsequently married George W. Bryan. Martha Bryan had a life right to live in the house which was then sold by her second husband to her son William Nelson the Younger. Various other court suits over the house are mentioned.

1 result

York County (Va.) Chancery Cause, Kate Nelson vs. Martha Bryan, 1885

York County (Va.) Chancery Cause Mutual Assurance Society Against Fire on Buildings of the State of Virginia vs. Kate Nelson, etc., 1887

Abstract Or Scope

York County (Va.) Chancery Cause Mutual Assurance Society Against Fire on Buildings of the State of Virginia vs. Kate Nelson, etc., 1887. This cause concerns a dispute between the Mutual Assurance Society and the heirs of William Nelson (the Elder) over unpaid insurance bills for the years 1862-1885 for the Nelson House in Yorktown.

1 result

York County (Va.) Chancery Cause Mutual Assurance Society Against Fire on Buildings of the State of Virginia vs. Kate Nelson, etc., 1887

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.