Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Date range 1921 Remove constraint Date range: 1921 Subjects Botany and botanists. Remove constraint Subjects: Botany and botanists.

Search Results

Perry D. Strausbaugh (1886-1965) Papers

3.3 Linear Feet Summary: 1 ft. 3 in. (4 document cases, 5 in. each)
Abstract Or Scope

Four boxes of correspondence from 1920-1948.

1 result

Perry D. Strausbaugh (1886-1965) Papers 3.3 Linear Feet Summary: 1 ft. 3 in. (4 document cases, 5 in. each)

Perry D. Strausbaugh (1886-1965) Papers

4.2 Linear Feet Summary: 4 ft. 2 in. (10 document cases, 5 in. each)
Abstract Or Scope

Papers of P. D. Strausbaugh, former head of the Department of Botany, author of a biology textbook, and professor of Botany at WVU.

1 result

Perry D. Strausbaugh (1886-1965) Papers 4.2 Linear Feet Summary: 4 ft. 2 in. (10 document cases, 5 in. each)

Robert C. Spangler (1892-1974) Papers

3.5 Linear Feet Summary: 3 ft. 5 1/2 in. (4 document cases, 5 in, each); (1 document case, 2 1/2 in.); (6 small flat storage boxes, 3 in. each); (1 wrapped ledger, 1 in.)
Abstract Or Scope
Correspondence, research notes, photographs, and other papers of a former Professor of Biology at West Virginia University (1914-1955). Includes some materials relating to Spangler's theory of sex determination and his famous debate in 1922 with William Jennings Bryan regarding the theory of evolution. Bryan had offered a $100.00 prize to any professor who could reconcile evolution with the Bible and Spangler took up the challenge.
1 result

Robert C. Spangler (1892-1974) Papers 3.5 Linear Feet Summary: 3 ft. 5 1/2 in. (4 document cases, 5 in, each); (1 document case, 2 1/2 in.); (6 small flat storage boxes, 3 in. each); (1 wrapped ledger, 1 in.)

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.