Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Subjects Blacksmiths--1860-1870 Remove constraint Subjects: Blacksmiths--1860-1870

Search Results

John A. Cave Ledger

0.01 Linear Foot
Abstract Or Scope

This collection consists of a ledger that once belonged to John A Cave, a Blacksmith in Page County, Virginia. The entries primarily deal with Cave's accounts with Joshua Buracker from 1858 through 1861. Some of the items listed include shoes, shovels, and nails.

1 result

John A. Cave Ledger 0.01 Linear Foot

Thomas K. McCutchans Ledgers

0.25 Linear Feet
Abstract Or Scope

This collection consists of two ledgers kept by Thomas K. McCutchans, a blacksmith in Rockbridge, VA. The first ledger, from 1852-1867, lists the names of people McCutchans has accounts with and mostly deals with the purchases of household goods. Most of the pages are either blank or have been ripped out of the ledger. The second ledger, from 1866-1888, contains an index to all the accounts in the ledger, and most of the accounts are for household goods but there are some for spokes, harnesses, and welding shoes. Only one third of the ledger is completed with a few accounts in the back of the ledger.

1 result

Thomas K. McCutchans Ledgers 0.25 Linear Feet

Title:: William O. Towns Ledger 1860-1870

0.03
Abstract Or Scope

Ledger of a blacksmith from Mount Olive, Shenandoah County, Virginia, 1860-1870, recording accounts with customers for such services as shoeing horses, repairing shears and wagons, etc. The name 'William O. Towns' is written several times in the front and back cover of the volume, suggesting that he may have been the one who kept the ledger.Names of customers are indexed in the back.

1 result

Title:: William O. Towns Ledger 1860-1870 0.03

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.