Search

Start Over Subjects Bark peeling -- Environmental aspects
James Madison University

Shenandoah Valley Regional Studies Seminar Records

1.65 cubic feet 5 boxes
This collection consists of administrative records and papers by scholars from colleges, libraries and other institutions for the monthly presentations of the Shenandoah Valley Regional Studies Seminar (SVRSS). The collection contains financial records, announcements, correspondence, information about presenters, and academic papers.
1 result
James Madison University

Tanbark industry in the Shenandoah Valley oral history collection

0.25 cubic feet 4 folders; 4 audiocassettes
This collection is comprised of a background paper on the tanbark industry and three oral history interviews recorded in 1987 and 1991 with individuals familiar with the tanbark industry in the central Shenandoah Valley. The 1987 interview was conducted jointly by Chris Bolgiano and John Coleman, and the subsequent two interviews were conducted in 1991 by Mia Barb as part of an oral history project internship.
1 result

Tanbark industry in the Shenandoah Valley oral history collection 0.25 cubic feet 4 folders; 4 audiocassettes

Barb, Mia
This collection is comprised of a background paper on the tanbark industry and three oral history interviews recorded in 1987 and 1991 with individuals familiar with the tanbark industry in the central Shenandoah Valley. The 1987 interview was conducted jointly by Chris Bolgiano and John Coleman, and the subsequent two interviews were conducted in 1991 by Mia Barb as part of an oral history project internship.
James Madison University

U.S. Forest Service, George Washington National Forest, Lost River and Massanutten Working Circles Reports

0.08 cubic feet 1 folder
This collection consists of photocopies of four public-domain documents which relate to the U.S. Forest Service.
1 result

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.