Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Date range 1974 Remove constraint Date range: 1974 Subjects Annexation (County government) -- Virginia -- Chesterfield County. Remove constraint Subjects: Annexation (County government) -- Virginia -- Chesterfield County.

Search Results

Henry L. Valentine II papers

1.68 Linear Feet
Abstract Or Scope

The Henry L. Valentine papers, 1970-1989, is a collection of materials used by Valentine during his tenure on the Richmond City Council and as Vice Mayor of Richmond. The papers provide insight into the administrative duties of local government in the Richmond area during the 1970s and 1980s. The materials which cover Valentine's tenure during the years 1977-1978 are of particular note due to the demographic shift of the City Council to include its first-ever Black majority of members. This collection provides a unique look into a local politician's agenda and actions during a time of pivotal changes in the representation of Black citizens of Richmond, VA.

1 result

Henry L. Valentine II papers 1.68 Linear Feet

Richmond annexation files

18.2 Linear Feet
Abstract Or Scope

The materials cover the period 1942 to 1976 with the majority of the collection focusing on the period 1969-1975. Primarily notes, briefs, motions, replies and questions, the documents reflect the scope of the annexation trials of the 1970s of the City of Richmond. A large portion of the materials are not dated and others, because of the interdependency of the multiple trials described above, are as easily placed in one series as another. Documentation that may be of interest aside from the trial proceedings include; comparative population studies, master plans, financial reports for the City of Richmond, school board budgets and reports, and city budgets.

1 result

Richmond annexation files 18.2 Linear Feet

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.