{"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47532","prev":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47531","next":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47533","last":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47544"},"meta":{"pages":{"current_page":47532,"next_page":47533,"prev_page":47531,"total_pages":47544,"limit_value":10,"offset_value":475310,"total_count":475431,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false}},"data":[{"id":"vi_vi00037_c01_c256","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Zellner, John Robert","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi00037_c01_c256#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi00037_c01_c256","ref_ssm":["vi_vi00037_c01_c256"],"id":"vi_vi00037_c01_c256","ead_ssi":"vi_vi00037","_root_":"vi_vi00037","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi00037_c01","parent_ssi":"vi_vi00037_c01","parent_ssim":["vi_vi00037","vi_vi00037_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi00037","vi_vi00037_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Danville (Va.) Civil Rights Case\n         Files, \n         \n         1963-1973","Series I: Individual Case Files,\n               A-Z"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Danville (Va.) Civil Rights Case\n         Files, \n         \n         1963-1973","Series I: Individual Case Files,\n               A-Z"],"text":["Danville (Va.) Civil Rights Case\n         Files, \n         \n         1963-1973","Series I: Individual Case Files,\n               A-Z","Zellner, John Robert"],"title_filing_ssi":"\tZellner, John Robert\t","title_ssm":["Zellner, John Robert"],"title_tesim":["Zellner, John Robert"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Zellner, John Robert"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Danville (Va.) Civil Rights Case\n         Files, \n         \n         1963-1973"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":257,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#255","timestamp":"2026-05-21T08:50:16.294Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi00037","ead_ssi":"vi_vi00037","_root_":"vi_vi00037","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi00037","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi00037.xml","title_ssm":["Danville (Va.) Civil Rights Case\n         Files, \n         \n         1963-1973"],"title_tesim":["Danville (Va.) Civil Rights Case\n         Files, \n         \n         1963-1973"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["38099"],"text":["38099","Danville (Va.) Civil Rights Case\n         Files, \n         \n         1963-1973","Digital images and audio files","Danville (Va.) Civil Rights Case\n         Files, 1963-1973 physical materials and audio recordings have been digitized and are available through  Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery   page on the Library of Virginia website. Please use digital collection. Links to each section are included in the section description under the Content List.","This collection is arranged into the following series:\n\n Series I: Individual Case Files, A-Z  individual files of persons arrested during the civil rights demonstrations of 1963.  Series II: Howard Johnson Trespassing Case, 1963,  concerning the trial for those arrested for trespassing on January 1, 1963 at the Howard Johnson restaurant on Route 29 south of Danville.  Series III:Correspondence, 1963-1967   of clerk of the Danville Corporation Court and clerk of the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals.  Series IV: Corporation Court Dockets,1963-1967   related to the demonstration cases.  Series V: Court Orders, 1963-1973    issued by the Danville Corporation Court and U.S. District Court, Western District of Virginia.  Series VI: Evidence, 1963   used in various cases.  Series VII: Notes, undated   concerning cases and sentencing.  Series VIII: Petitions, 1963   Petition for Removal filed with the court.  Series IX: Receipts   bonds and court costs related to various charges.  Series X: Special Grand Jury, 1963   indictments and subpoenas concerning \"John Brown's Law.\"  Series XI: Transcripts, 1963   transcripts of testimony in various cases. Series XII: Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, 1965-1972.\n   decisions handed down by the court of appeals. Series XIII: Dictabelt Records, 1966-1973  audio records of various cases heard in the Danville Corporation Court."," Contents arranged alphabetically by last name\n"," Contents arranged chronologically\n"," Contents arranged chronologically\n"," Contents arranged chronologically\n"," Contents arranged chronologically\n"," Contents arranged alphabetically by material type\n"," Contents arranged loosely by the charge \n"," Contents arranged chronologically\n"," Contents arranged by case\n"," Contents arranged chronologically\n","Context for Records:  The summer of 1963 witnessed a wave of civil rights\n         demonstrations throughout the nation. In Danville, Virginia,\n         the leaders of the Danville Christian Progressive Association (DCPA), an affiliate of the Southern Christian Leadership\n         Conference (SCLC), organized a series of protests. Rev. Lawrence G.\n         Campbell, Rev. Alexander I. Dunlap, Julius E. Adams, and\n         Arthur Pinchback, Jr., believing that the Danville NAACP under the\n         leadership of Doyle Thomas was too conservative, had founded\n         the DCPA in 1960. These men, along with Rev. Lendall\n         W. Chase, president of the Danville SCLC, took the lead in\n         promoting civil rights in Danville, a city deep in Virginia's\n         Black Belt with decades of systemic racism shaped by Jim Crow era polcies and therefore strong in segregationist sentiment.","Throughout 1962, the leaders repeatedly appeared before the\n         Danville City Council to demand Black representation on the\n         boards of city agencies and the end of segregation. In August\n         1962, with the help of Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) lawyer Len W. Holt, Campbell, Dunlap, Adams, and Chase filed the Danville\n         Omnibus Integration Suit in federal court. The suit called\n         for the integration of Danville's hospitals, schools,\n         cemeteries, public buildings, public housing projects,\n         teaching assignments, and city employment opportunities. On\n         January 1, 1963, Dunlap, Chase, Campbell, Adams, and Pinchback\n         were arrested at a segregated Howard Johnson's restaurant for\n         trespassing after refusing to leave when the manager asked\n         them to do so. In March, Martin Luther King, Jr., spoke at a\n         meeting of the Danville SCLC.","On May 31, the Danville civil rights demonstrations began\n         peacefully and ended without incident. Police did not make any\n         arrests and the local press ignored the demonstration. The\n         majority of the demonstrators were teenagers led by Thurman\n         Echols and Ezell Barksdale. On June 5, the demonstrators\n         changed tactics as the participants marched into City Hall and occupied the city manger's office, and the next day jointly impeded traffic by sitting down in the middle of a busy city street. Judge Archibald M. Aiken, Jr., judge\n         of the Danville Corporation Court, was summoned by police to\n         the scene and commanded the demonstrators to disperse. The\n         demonstrators, however, refused, prompting Aiken to issue a\n         temporary injunction that ordered the\n         demonstrators to desist from, among other things, assembling\n         in an unlawful manner, interfering with traffic and business,\n         obstructing entrances to businesses and public buildings,\n         participating and inciting \"mob violence,\" and using loud\n         language that disrupts the peace. The injunction, made\n         permanent a few weeks later, formed the basis for many of the\n         arrests made that summer.","In addition to the injunction, Danville officials used other methods\n         to quell the demonstrations. A special grand jury, convened by\n         Aiken, indicted the demonstration leaders on June 7 under the 1859 statute called the \"John Brown's Law,\" that made inciting\n         \"the colored population to acts of violence or war against the\n         white population\" illegal. This set the bond for the leaders at $5,000 each. In mid-June and early July, the\n         Danville city council, under the leadership of councilman John\n         W. Carter, an attorney and staunch segregationist, adopted two\n         ordinances designed to limit the demonstrations. One limited\n         the size, place, and time of demonstrations and the other\n         required a permit to parade.","Despite Aiken's and the city council's attempts, the\n         demonstrations continued. Civil rights activists from the\n         SNCC and the\n         Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), including field\n         secretaries Bob Zellner, Ivanhoe Donaldson, Avon Rollins, and\n         Daniel Foss (SNCC), and Bruce Baines and Claudia Edwards (CORE) arrived in Danville to participate in the demonstrations.\n         Civil rights lawyers affiliated with the National Lawyer's\n         Guild and the NAACP, including William M. Kunstler, Dean Robb,\n         Nathan Conyers, and Samuel W. Tuckers, also arrived in\n         Danville to help represent the demonstrators. On June 10,\n         after a full day of protests, the police and deputized city workers, with nightsticks and\n         fire hoses, attacked a group of Black community members holding a vigil for individuals detained in the city jail. Forty-seven of the fifty or so people in attendance required medical\n         attention. The next day, July 11, Martin Luther King, Jr., visited Danville in a show of support for the demonstrators, although he decided to not hold a march during the appearance.","The demonstrations continued, however, and by mid-July over\n         250 people had been arrested on charges of contempt,\n         trespassing, disorderly conduct, assault, parading without a\n         permit, and resisting arrest. When parents\n         went to the jail to post bail for their children, some of them were arrested and charged with\n         contributing to the delinquency of a minor by not providing\n         adequate supervision.","The defense lawyers, including Len W. Holt, Ruth L. Harvey,\n         Jerry Williams, and Harry I. Wood, in addition to those from\n         the National Lawyer's Guild and the NAACP, attempted to remove\n         the cases from the corporation court to federal court, but to\n         no avail. Each defendant demanded an individual trial causing\n         the corporation court's dockets to be filled to such an extent\n         that no cases other than the demonstrator's could not be\n         heard. The prosecutor requested a change of venue to alleviate\n         the crowded docket and Aiken transferred about 124 cases to\n         other courts throughout Virginia. This posed signigicant financial stress on many of the defendants who were then required to travel to a different court. In some cases, more than a hundred miles distant.","The defense lawyers again sought an order from the federal\n         courts to stay all arrests, trials, and other proceedings for\n         violation of the injunction and city ordinance. On August 8,\n         the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals halted these trials\n         pending the outcome of the appeal. Judge Aiken, however,\n         continued hearing the cases for disorderly conduct, parading\n         without a permit, resisting arrest, and trespassing. He\n         generally sentenced the guilty parties to two to five days in\n         jail and a fine, suspending execution of the sentences pending\n         an appeal. In September, defense counsel agreed to consolidate\n         the cases and Aiken rescinded his orders for change of\n         venue.","By mid-August, the demonstrations had largely waned due to\n         Danville's unwillingness to yield to the protests. A year\n         later, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal dissolved the\n         injunction, but, by a 3-2 margin and with a strong dissent,\n         declared Aiken's injunction constitutional. Moreover, the\n         cases were remanded to the corporation court where the\n         Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals could hear the necessary\n         appeals. The United States Supreme Court upheld the decision\n         by a five-four margin.","In December 1966, Judge Aiken resumed the trials of those\n         who violated his injunction. The trials proceeded quickly.\n         Aiken did not find all the defendants guilty and dismissed\n         some cases for lack of evidence. The usual sentence was eight\n         days in jail and a fine of twenty dollars. The demonstration\n         leaders received the stiffest penalties with Rev. Lawrence G.\n         Campbell receiving the worst, being sentenced 250 days in jail\n         and a $2,500 fine.","In early 1967, the Virginia Supreme Court began deciding\n         the first of the appeals from the Danville Corporation Court.\n         In Thomas v. City of Danville, the Court ruled Judge Aiken's\n         injunction constitutional. In York v. City of Danville, they\n         ruled that a parade can be subject to \"reasonable and\n         nondiscriminatory regulation,\" but that the city's time\n         requirement for applying for a permit was too harsh. In 1970,\n         the Court ruled in Rollins v. Commonwealth that the state must\n         prove that a defendant not named in the injunction had\n         knowledge of the injunction before violating its orders. In\n         January 1973, the Supreme Court of Appeals heard the last of\n         the cases associated with the demonstrations and requested\n         that the Commonwealth's Attorney for Danville review the cases\n         under appeal in light of the court's previous rulings. As a\n         result, the Court overturned the convictions of almost 270\n         people. However, the Court upheld the convictions of those\n         named in the injunction and for trespassing, obstructing\n         traffic, and illegal picketing.","On February 9, 1973, the court proceedings involving the\n         Danville demonstrations of 1963 came to end. Judge Glynn R.\n         Phillips, Jr., of Clintwood was assigned to hear the defense\n         motion to suspend the jail sentences and fines of those whose\n         convictions had been upheld. Judge Aiken died in 1971, and\n         the new Danville Corporation Court judge had recused\n         himself. Against the prosecutor's objections, Judge Phillips\n         suspended the jail sentences on condition of good behavior for\n         two years, but ordered payment of fines that totaled more than\n         $5,000.","Locality History:  Danville (Va.), in Pittsylvania County, was named for the Dan River on which the city is located. Danville was established in 1793, was incorporated as a town in 1830, and became a city in 1890. The town of North Danville, incorporated in 1877 and renamed Neopolis in 1894, was added in 1896. ","Original court records(6 boxes of records and 130 Dictabelt recordings)retained by the Danville (Va.) Circuit Court. \n"," The Danville (Va.) Circuit Court Clerk lent the Library of Virginia the original case files and Dictabelts for microfilming and digitial conversion in 1999. The microfiliming was performed by Henry Micrographics in 1999 and produced Miscellaneous Microfilm reels 2325-2329 and preservation microfilm reels 1-5; however, it was determined Miscellaneous Microfilm reels 2327-2329 (or Reels 3-5) did not meet microfilm quality standards, and the records were refilmed in 2000-2001, creating new Reels 3-5 which were stored at the State Records Center. Service copies of the new reels were never created. The Library of Virginia used the security microfilm, Reels 1-5, to scan and create digitial images of the documents and at this time it was detemined that the service copy film (Miscellaneous Microfilm reels 2325-2329) were different from the preservation microfilm (Reels 1-5), as more material was include on Reels 1-5. \n"," A project was completed around 2000 by Dictaphone Corporation to record and transfer the audio contents and the inserts of these Dictabelts onto compact disks. "," As of 2024, upon conversion of the microfilmed material to digital images and the conversion of the CD audio to audio files 2021-2022, the Local Records manager deteremined the service copies of the microfilm and audio CDs to be redudent records in LVA holdings. These copies were removed from the collections.","In 2023 M. Mason and V. Brooks went through the approximately 4,300 digital images to arrange them so they would pair with the finding aid. At this time duplicate, blank, and microflim imaging targets were removed from the digital files. Corrections were made to alphabetical and chronological orders and misidentified or newly discovered material was identified."," Encoded by Jay Gaidmore, 1999; updated by Alex Lorch, 2003; updated by M. Mason; May 2024 "," See also: Virginia.    Virginia.Governor (1962-1966 : Harrison) Executive Papers, 1962-1966.   at the Library of Virginia \n","Danville (Va.) Civil Rights Case Files, 1963-1973, consists of\n         court papers and legal files relating to the 1963 Civil Rights\n         demonstrations in Danville. These files include bills of\n         particulars, bond records, correspondence, court dockets,\n         court orders, Dictabelts, evidence, judgments, petitions,\n         photographs, receipts, subpoenas, and transcripts of testimony\n         that document the legal aspects of the demonstrations from the\n         Danville Corporation Court to the Virginia Supreme Court of\n         Appeals.","Consists of the individual files of persons arrested\n               during the civil rights demonstrations of 1963. Files\n               include bills of particulars, bond records, judgments,\n               receipts and subpoenas. The files of juveniles arrested\n               include biographical information, including age,\n               education, prior arrests, and family history. "," Digital files available Here: Series I: Individual Case Files, A-Z  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery","Includes transcript of testimony and a notice of\n               appeal and assignment of errors relating to the trial of\n               Julius E. Adams, Lawrence G. Campbell, Lendall W. Chase,\n               Alexander I. Dunlap, and Arthur Pinchback, Jr., arrested for\n               trespassing on January 1, 1963 at the Howard Johnson\n               restaurant on Route 29 south of Danville."," Digital files available Here: Series II: Howard Johnson Trespassing Case, 1963   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery","Primarily consists of correspondence between the\n               clerk of the Danville Corporation Court and defense\n               attorney, Ruth L. Harvey, regarding notices of appeal\n               and assignments of errors, and designation of parts of\n               the record. The latter of which she requests the clerk\n               to forward to the clerk of the Virginia Supreme Court of\n               Appeals. Also, includes correspondence from the clerk of\n               the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals indicating receipt\n               of specified materials, and a telegram from the Seattle,\n               Washington, branch of the NAACP requesting information on\n               the arrest of Lawrence G. Campbell and Richard D.\n               Goodwin."," Digital files available Here: Series III: Correspondence, 1963-1967   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Includes the Corporation Court's dockets for the\n               demonstration cases from June 1963-April 1967. Lists\n               name of defendant, alleged offense, date of offense,\n               date of trial and disposition of case."," Digital files available Here: Series IV: Corporation Court Dockets  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Consists of continuances, court orders, judgments,\n               and sentences, issued by the Danville Corporation Court\n               from June 1963-February 1973. Judge Aiken, from June\n               1963-May 1967, ordered the arrest of demonstrators for\n               violating his injunction and inciting the colored\n               populace, the appearance of demonstrators before the\n               court to answer these violations, the investigation of\n               the juvenile defendants, the serving of jail time and\n               payment of fines, the acquittals of defendants, the\n               consolidation of cases, and the changes of venue. The\n               court orders issued January-February 1973 involved the\n               disqualifying and recusing of the Danville Corporation\n               Judge Stuart L. Craig, the selection of Judge Phillips\n               to replace Craig, the subpoenaing of defense witnesses,\n               and the suspension of jail sentences for the remaining\n               defendants. Also, includes judgements issued by Judge\n               Ted Dalton of the United States District Court for the\n               Western District of Virginia in May 1967."," Digital files available Here: Series V: Court Orders  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Includes the June 7, 1963 issue of the Danville Bee\n               and a note from the paper's general manager indicating\n               the writer and photographer of the June 10, 1963 article\n               entitled. \"Thirty Demonstrators Jailed.\" Also includes\n               excerpts from the July 10, 1963 meeting of the Danville\n               City Council during which it passed an ordinance\n               governing parades, a photocopy of the temporary\n               injunction and restraining order issued by Judge Aiken,\n               and photographs. The photographs show the demonstrators\n               on the steps of city hall, and the arrest of Rev.\n               Lawrence G. Campbell and Thurman Echols."," Digital files available Here: Series VI: Evidence  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Includes pieces of paper and lists indicating court\n               cases, dates and places of offenses, trial dates,\n               disposition of cases, and sentences."," Digital files available Here: Series VII: Notes  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Consists of the Petition for Removal filed with the\n               clerk of the United States District Court for the\n               Western District of Virginia on June 17, 1963, by defense\n               lawyers Len W. Holt and William M. Kunstler. The\n               petition tried to remove the demonstration cases to\n               federal court."," Digital files available Here: Series VIII: Petitions through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Includes receipts for bond refunds and payment of\n               fines."," Digital files available Here: Series IX: Receipts  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Includes indictments and subpoenas from the Special\n               Grand Jury responsible for indicting the demonstration\n               leaders under \"John Brown's Law.\" Contains names of the\n               members of the grand jury."," Digital files available Here: Series X: Special Grand Jury  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Contains transcripts of testimony from: ","Commonwealth of Virginia v. Lawrence G. Campbell, Alexander I. Dunlap, Arthur Pinchback, Jr., and Julius Adams, September 19, 1963","Commonwealth of Virginia v. Lawrence G. Campbell and Alexander I. Dunlap, Violation of Sections 18.1-14 and 18.1-254, October 22, 1963","Commonwealth of Virginia v. Avon Williams Rollins, August 6, 1963","City of Danville v. Lawrence G.Campbell, et als, October 1963 "," Digital files available Here: Series XI: Transcripts  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Consists of decisions handed down from October\n               1965-December 1972. Primarily includes writs of error\n               and supersedeas.","Digital files vailable Here: Series XII: Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","This series consists of full case recordings from many of the Civil Rights demonstrations cases heard in the Danville Corporation Court from December 1966 through April 1967. The recordings include witnesses' testimony, defense attorney's motions and arguments, Commonwealth and Danville City attorney's arguments, rulings and sentences of Judge Archibald M. Aiken, Jr., witness and recorder oaths, and the calling of the court docket."," This series is organized into 27 subseries (subseries A-AA), with each subseries representing one case. A majority of the cases documented in these audio recordings consist of dozens of individual cases consolidated and heard together on the charges of Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order. See the \"defendants named\" section in each subseries for the full list of individuals included in these consolidated cases. Names are listed in the order they occur in the audio, generally through the courts roll call. If abesent, the reason for the defendant's absence in placed in ( ) following the name. Additionally each subseries contains the belt list with information on the runtime and contents for each belt.","Also contained herein is the recording of the 1973 February 9 Corporation Court hearing concerning the defense motion to suspend the sentences for those defendants whose sentences had been upheld on appeal by the Supreme Court of Appeals. ","The original Dictabelts included wrapper containing written summaries of their audio contents, noting the approximate time the content appears in the recording.  In some cases, copies of the original court docket also accompany the original Dictabelt.  These wrappers and docket records are now digitized and available with the audio files available through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery",""," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Irvin Christopher Bethel, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order ","Defendants Named:  Irvin Christopher Bethel; Lendbury Bradshaw; Donald Jerome Brandon (indicate as in Vietnam); Harrison Brown Jr.; Everett Bruce Jr. (college); Victor Hugo Burton; Barbara Cardwell (in Washington); James Cobb Jr.; John Roland Coleman; Lawrence Coleman; Clifton Henry Davis (armed forces); David Lea Davis (college); Wayne Rochelle Davis; Ellis Newton Dodson; Charlie Henry Echols (in New York); Daniel Aaron Foss (University of Iowa); Melvin Fuller (Navy); Gladys Virginia Giles (Atlantic City, NJ, Teaching); Samule Wash Giles (Atlantic City NJ); Robert Leonard Graves; William Haywood Ingram; John James (Army); James Johnson; Robert James Lewis; Margie Mabin; Thomas Mabin (New York); Charlie Henry Mason; Wilson Lee Maden (Army); James Thomas Moore (Army);Marilyn Morton (Washington); Hildreth Glennell McGhee; Archie Lee Petty, Harvey Louis Poteat; Herman Prichett (in jail); Luvinia Prichett; Avon Wiliams Rollins (Washington); William Howard Scott; Percy Walters; Ralph Frank Walters; Melvin Warner; George Albert Watkins; James Edward Whipple; Jimmy Ray Hurston (penitentiary, life sentence); Michael Smith; Bertie Smith; Sylvester Burrell (jail); Harvey Davis Jr.; Mabel Graves (sick); Ennis Hairston;  Ola Mae Cunningham Harris; Leonard Winston Holt; Joe Wesley Lewis; Stuart Mingo; Robert Morton; Marcelluos Reeves; Willie Ulysses Thomas; John Robert Zellner (New York); Eugene Bennett; Ernest Howard Smith; Sylvester Graves; Jesse Hairston; Otha Frank Lumpkin Annie Mae Johnson; Harvey Smith; Robert Hemphill Jr. (Army); Daniel McCain; Paul Price; Alberta Via Tathatter [?]; Shirely Terry; Averett Wade Thompson; Ivanhoe Gaylord Thompson (Atlanta, college)"," Contents  Defendants roll call  arguments in Judge's chambers in re: consolidating cases"," Contents  Attorneys' arguments in Judge's chambers in re: consolidating cases (continued) Reading of Judge's injunction issued 6 June 1963 Defendants' pleas "," Contents  Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony"," Contents  Charles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony T. Neil Morris (police officer) testimony"," Contents  L. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony Curtis H. Royster (police officer) testimony W. L. Buettner (police officer) testimony Curtis H. Royster recall testimony Adjournment Reconvene T. C. Tatterhorn (police officer) testimony R. W. Brumfield (police officer) testimony"," Contents  W. L. Sheffield (police officer) testimony C. L. Fuller (police officer) testimony R. A. Walker (police officer) testimony D. E. Nostrand (police officer) testimony B. C. Enyard (police officer) testimony John M. Bailey (police officer) testimony"," Contents  John M. Bailey testimony (continued) Unidentified (police officer) testimony T. W. Evans (police officer) testimony Sutaliff (police officer) testimony Unidentified (police officer) testimony L. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony"," Contents  Ernest Howard Smith (demonstrator) testimony Defense attorneys' motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Adjournment and weather report"," Contents  Convene and roll call Approach bench - discussion Charles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony Juby E. Towler (chief of police detectives) testimony"," Contents  Juby E. Towler testimony (continued) City attorney argument against defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Defense attorney re-argues motion to strike evidence"," Contents  Defense attorney re-argues motion to strike evidence (continued) Judge's ruling on motion (denied) Adjournment Reconvene Defense motion to remove some defendant's names from case docket"," Contents  Defense attorney motion to strike evidence and witness testimony (continued) Judge's ruling on motion (denied) James Edward Whipple (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  James Edward Whipple testimony (continued) W. L. Buettner recall testimony Unidentified (police officer) recall testimony Prosecution rests Defense closing"," Contents  Defense closing (continued) Prosecution closing Judge's ruling and sentences"," Contents  Attorneys' arguments in Judge's chambers in re: bond hearing for absentee defendants Adjournment"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Sylvester Burrell, et. als.    through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order ","Defendants Named:  Sylvester Burrell; Harvey Davis Jr.; Mabel Graves; Ennis Hairston; Ola Mae Cunningham Harris; Leonard Winston Holt (removed, heard at later date); Joe Wesley Lewis (Army); Stuart Mingo; Robert Morton; Marcellos Reeves; Willie Ulysses Thomas; Sylvester Graves; Jesse Hairston; Harvey Smith; Robert Hemphill Jr. (Army); Annie Mae Johnson; Otha Frank Lumpkin; Daniel McCain; Paul Price; Alberta Viatanian [?]; Shirley Terry; Averett Wade Thompson; Ivanhoe Gaylord Donaldson (college)"," Contents  Convene Recorder sworn Defendants roll call Cases consolidated Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued)"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued) Recess Reconvene Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued)"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued)"," Contents  T. Neil Morris (police officer) testimony Lunch recess Reconvene T. Neil Morris testimony (continued) harles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony"," Contents  Charles Wade Graff testimony (continued) Attorneys' arguments in Judge's chambers in re: photographs and time of their development Charles Wade Graff testimony (continued) Juby E. Towler (chief of police detectives) testimony"," Contents  Juby E. Towler testimony (continued) Re-direct Re-cross Re-re-direct Re-re-cross Ralph Wilkerson (police officer) testimony Re-direct Re-cross Charles Wade Graff recall testimony Recess Reconvene B. C. Elliott Jr. (police officer) testimony\n Attorneys' arguments in Judge's chambers in re: photographs and time of their development Charles Wade Graff testimony (continued) Juby E. Towler (chief of police detectives) testimony"," Contents  B. C. Elliott Jr. testimony (continued) testimony Prosecution and Defense rests Defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Judge's ruling on motion (denied) Defense motion to strike because arrest did not occur at time of violation Judge's ruling on motion (denied) Recess Reconvene Wade Thompson (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  Wade Thompson testimony (continued) Harvey Smith (demonstrator) testimony Paul Price (demonstrator) testimony Stuart Walter Mayo (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  Otha Frank Lumpkin (demonstrator) testimony Adjournment"," Contents  Reconvene Defense renews motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Defense motion to dismiss against 5 defendants because prosecution has not proven a case Commonwealth argument against motion Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Prosecution opening argument Defense closing argument Judge questions Defense attorneys Prosecution closing argument Judge's ruling and sentences"," Contents  Judge's ruling and sentences (continued) [unclear, distorted sound] Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: James Edward Whipple   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Perjury ","Defendants Named:   James Edward Whipple"," Contents  Prosecution motion for a bench warrant to be issued for the arrest of James Edward Whipple on a charge of perjury Judge's ruling on motion (granted)"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Joseph Bowe, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order\n ","Defendants Named:   Joseph Bowe; Cynthia Ann Carter; L.W. Chase, Gineva Rogers Davis, Lizzie Spivey Davis, Jimmie Hamlett; Thomas Cleveland Holt; General Redd; William Edward Richardson; Isiah Hall; James Dixon jr.; Eddie Mae Womack; Estelle Womack; Doyle J. Thomas; Alice Lee Strader; Celester Lindsey; Percy Randolph Williams; Walter Link\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Cases consolidated Defendants roll call Defendants' pleas"," Contents  Walter Link (demonstrator) guilty plea Judge's sentence Adjournment Reconvene Stipulate injunction become part of the record Defendants' pleas T. Neil Morris (police officer) testimony"," Contents  T. Neil Morris testimony (continued) Charles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony B. C. Elliott Jr. (police officer) testimony William G. Doss (police officer) testimony"," Contents  William G. Doss testimony (continued) Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued) Recess and adjournment until Monday, 19 December"," Contents  Reconvene W. L. Sheffield (police officer) testimony"," Contents  P. L. Rowland (police officer) testimony T. C. Talley (police officer) testimony Recess Reconvene Eugene G. McCain recall testimony"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain recall testimony (continued) Prosecution rests City motion to dismiss cases against Joseph Bowe, Reverend Doyle J. Thomas, and Paul Wade Jr. Judge grants and dismisses cases Defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Judge's ruling on motion (denied) B. C. Elliott recall testimony Recess Reconvene Percy Randolph Williams (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  Percy Randolph Williams testimony (continued) Thomas F. Tucker (Danville Clerk of Court) testimony Defense rests Defense motion to show cause Defense motion to quash capias"," Contents  Defense motion to quash capias (continued) City argument and rebuttal against motion Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Defense renews motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Defense motions (various) Judge's ruling on motions (overruled) Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Ruth L. Harvey    through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Contempt of court\n\n ","Defendants Named:   Ruth L. Harvey \n"," Contents  Ruth L. Harvey held in contempt of court for misleading court on location of Leonard Winston Holt (demonstrator/defendant) Judge fines Harvey $25"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Everett Bruce Jr., et. Als    through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order\n\n ","Defendants Named:   L. W. Chase; Everett Bruce Jr; Barbara Cardwell (June 10th; college); Charlie Henry Echols; Daniel Aaron Foss (june 10th offense); Gladys Virginia Giles; Samuel Wash Giles; Thomas Madin; Charlie Henry Mason (hospital in DC); Marilyn Morton; Avon Williams Rollins; Mabel Graves; Leonard Winston Holt; Robert Morton Jr. ; John Robert Zellner; Bruce Baines; Hazel Phyllis Carter; James Edward Coleman; Daniel Aaron Foss (additional charge on June 15th); Abraham Glass; Joseph Benjamin Hairston;  Leatrice Ann Hairston; Lavern Higgins; Violet Howard (doctoral school); Lillie Echols Hubbard; Annie Mae Johnson (jail); Dorothy Elizabeth Moore; Harry Wilson Jr.; Margie Ann Wilson; Milton A. Reid; Ivanhoe Gaylord Donaldson\n\n"," Contents  Convene Recorder sworn Docket set Reverend L. W. Chase statement (found guilty in absence on 19 December 1966) Judge's ruling and sentence for Chase Defense motion to suspend pending appeal Recess Reconvene"," Contents  Defendants roll call Bonds forfeited for those defendants who are absent Leonard Winston Holt (demonstrator) case in absentia"," Contents  Hector Womack (bondsman for Leonard Winston Holt) testimony as to location of Holt Adjournment"," Contents  Leonard Winston Holt bond forfeited Judge's ruling and sentence of Holt Defense motion to suspend sentence pending appeal Recess Thomas Mabin (demonstrator) testimony Betty H. Dallas (juvenile probation officer) testimony Thomas Mabin case dismissed Judge's ruling and sentences remaining defendants"," Contents  Judge's ruling and sentences (continued)"," Audio files available here: Series XIII:  Foss, Zelner and Donaldson   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:Contempt of Court (being absent)\n","Defendants Named:   Daniel Aaron Foss; Robert Zellner; Ivanhoe Gaylord Donaldson\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Defendants roll call Witnesses sworn John Robert Zelner (demonstrator) testimony Defense argument"," Contents  Prosecution argument Judge's ruling and sentence Motion to suspend sentence pending appeal Daniel Aaron Foss (demonstrator) testimony Defense argument Judge's ruling and sentence"," Contents  Ivanhoe Gaylord Donaldson (demonstrator) testimony Defense argument Prosecution argument Judge's ruling and sentence Motion to suspend sentence pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII:  Setting the court docket   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery "," Contents  Recorder sworn Defense and Prosecution argument and discussion in re: injunction 1967 February 9 Docket set and announced"," Contents  1967 February 10 docket set (24 demonstrators arrested behind Police Department on 1963 July 11) 1967 February 10 docket set (continued: 12 demonstrators arrested at Belk-Leggett Department Store on 1963 July 11) 1967 February 10 docket set (continued: 3 demonstrators arrested at Municipal Building on 1963 July 11) 1967 February 13 docket set (15 demonstrators arrested at Municipal Building on 1963 July 11) 1967 February 13 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Patton and Union Streets on 1963 July 12) 1967 February 14 docket set (demonstrators arrested at Belk-Leggett Department Store on 1963 July 12) 1967 February 14 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Patton and Union Streets on 1963 July 12)"," Contents  1967 February 14 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Belk-Leggett Department Store and Raylass Department Store on 1963 July 13) 1967 February 14 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Country Club Drive on 1963 July 14) 1967 February 15 docket set (demonstrators arrested at Main and Crawford Streets on 1963 July 15) 1967 February 16 docket set (81 demonstrators arrested at Main and Union Streets on 1963 July 28) 1967 February 16 docket set (continued: 4 demonstrators arrested at Main Street Bridge on 1963 August 6) 1967 February 20 docket set (9 demonstrators arrested at Union Street on 1963 August 8) 1967 February 20 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Main and Union Streets on 1963 August 27)"," Contents  1967 February 20 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Main and Union Streets on 29 August 1963) 1967 February 14 docket omissions added Adjournment until Thursday"," Contents  Discussion in Judge's chambers [unclear, difficult to hear]"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Clarence Lewis Bowe, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order\n","Defendants Named:   Clarence Lewis Bowe; William Burrell Canada, Jr.; Claudia Anne Chaney; Connie Lavonne Chaney; Elnora Elizabeth Chase; Patricia Glendora Chase; Lelia Virginia Clark; Edith Mary Coleman; Elizabeth Davis; Cynthia Anne Dawson; Thelma Farmer Echols; Claudia Jean Edwards;  Ernest David Ferguson; Joylette Glass; Lorraine Glass; Kenneth Lisberg Lewis; Howard Lee Logan; Sally Logan; Myrtle Mason; Julia Ferguson Moore; Rosetta Powell; Lonnie McKinley Saunders; Blondine Odessa Scales; Don Marie Scales; Dorothy James Scales; Earnestine Scott; Geraldine Lee Scott; Rebecca Grasty Wilson (hospital in DC); Pasadena Woods\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Defendants roll call (3 defendants tried in absentia) Witnesses sworn Defense motion to quash capias Defense motion for bill of particulars Judge's ruling on motions (overruled) Commonwealth's attorney's notes exception to bill of particulars Norman H. Boswell (captain of police) testimony"," Contents  Norman H. Boswell testimony (continued) Judge questions witness Re-direct Re-cross Leon Townsend (Danville Register-Bee photographer) testimony Re-direct"," Contents  Leon Townsend testimony (continued) Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony B. C. Elliott Jr. (police officer) testimony"," Contents  B. C. Elliott Jr. testimony (continued) Recess Reconven B. C. Elliott Jr. testimony (continued) William G. Doss (police officer) testimony Re-direct Re-cross"," Contents  C. L. Fuller (police officer) testimony P. L. Rowland (police officer) testimony Ralph Wilkinson (police officer) testimony"," Contents  Ralph Wilkinson testimony (continued) Prosecution rests Defense motion Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Prosecution argument against motion Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Defense rests Closing arguments Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Contents  [No intelligible content]"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: James Vondell Bruce, et. als.    through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order ","Defendants Named:  James Vondell Bruce; Herman Canada; Sylvester Canada; Connie Lavonne Chaney; James Edward Coleman (potentially in jail); Lawrence Coleman; John Thomas Cunningham; Clifton Henry Davis (in the service);  Nelly Denson; Bobby Lee Ferguson; Samuel Wash Giles; Archie Glass (was in an accident; in DC); Hubert Graves; Roberta Hughes; William Haywood Ingram; Harry Michael Lewis; Robert James Lewis; Dollie J. Lumkpin; Conrad Price; James Malcom Scales; Sir Walter Scott; Ralph Frank Walters; Larry White (in the service); Basse Wilson Jr.\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Docket called Witnesses sworn Defense motion to quash capias Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued) Judge questions witness Re-direct Re-cross T. G. Faulkner (police officer) testimony E. L. Holley (police officer) testimony"," Contents  E. L. Holley testimony (continued) Recess Reconvene E. L. Holley testimony (continued) Norman H. Boswell (captain of police) testimony L. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony Re-direct Re-cross C. B. Scearce (police officer) testimony"," Contents  C. B. Scearce testimony (continued) J. B. Martin Jr. (police officer) testimony W. L. Buettner (police officer) testimony Re-direct/ John M. Bailey (police officer) testimony Norman H. Boswell recall testimony"," Contents  Norman H. Boswell recall testimony (continued) H. R. Chaney (police officer) testimony J. C. Lewis (police officer) testimony Prosecution rests Defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Defense motions renewed Judge's ruling on renewed motions (overruled) Charles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony Juby E. Towler (captain of police) testimony Defense rests Prosecution waives opening remarks Defense closing argument"," Contents  Defense closing argument (continued) Prosecution closing remarks Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Contents  Recorder sworn Witnesses sworn T. G. Faulkner (police officer) testimony Defense motion in re: double jeopardy Judge's ruling on motion (denied) Re-direct Re-cross Re-re-direct James L. Miller (police officer) testimony"," Contents  James L. Miller testimony (continued) Walter Riddle testimony Prosecution rests Defense renews motion in re: double jeopardy Defense rests Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII:William Burrell Canada, et. als.    through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \n","Defendants Named:  William Burrell Canada;  Cynthia Ann Carter; John Lewis Davis; Cynthia Anne Dawson; Joylette Camila Glass; Lorraine Glass (sick); Sallie Mae Harper; Ronda Holloway; Mary Laverne Price; Mary Etta White (recently had a child)\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Witnesses sworn Defense motions renewed Judge's ruling on motions (overruled) Lonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony Re-direct Re-cross J. W. Martin (police officer) testimony"," Contents  J. W. Martin testimony (continued) L. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony W. L. Buettner (police officer) testimony C. B. Scearce (police officer) testimony Prosecution rests Defense motions renewed Prosecution arguments against defense motions"," Contents  Prosecution argument against defense motions (continued) Judge's ruling on motions (overruled) Defense rests Judge's ruling and sentences"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Herman Joseph Chappelle, et. als.  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \n ","Defendants Named:   Herman Joseph Chappelle; Lararia Marintez Hutchins; James J. Marsden; Virginia Banks; Charles Samuel Beard; Anita Glass (sick); Hazel Joanne Lindsey (sick); Howard Lee Logan; Cecil McIntire; Robert Lou Osborne[?]\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Cases consolidated Witnesses sworn Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony Nolle pros'd (all 10 defendants' cases dismissed)"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Elnora Elizabeth Chase, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \n ","Defendants Named:   Elnora Elizabeth Chase; Lindell Warren Chase;  Patricia Glendora Chase; Claudia Jean Edwards; Sylvia Ruth Lewis; Sally Ann Logan;  Lonnie McKinley Saunders; Larry James Wilson; Virgil Alexander Wood (sick- debated in court); Frank Harrison Gant; Thomas Cleveland Holt; Matthew A. Jones; William Thompson; Sylvester Walton Jr.\n"," Contents  Nolle pros'd (continued: from previous trial of Herman Joseph Chappelle, et. als.) Recorder sworn Docket called Cases consolidated Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony Recess"," Contents  Reconvene Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued) Re-direct Re-cross C. E. Earles (police officer) testimony T. C. Talley (police officer) testimony"," Contents  T. C. Talley testimony (continued) R. W. Brumfield (police officer) testimony Re-direct Re-cross Roy Larsen (police officer) testimony Curtis H. Royster (police officer) testimony Re-direct/ P. L. Barber (police officer) testimony E. L. Carter (police officer) testimony Re-direct"," Contents  D. L. Haley (police officer) testimony Re-direct Prosecution rests Defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Recess Reconvene Defense rests Judge's ruling and sentences"," Contents  Judge's ruling and sentences (continued) Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: David Adams, et. als   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order ","Defendants Named:   David Adams; Ennis Hariston (in the service); Ralph McDonald Hairston; James Bernard Hughes;  Hortense Jones; Willie Thomas Cornodel [?] (in the Army); James Thomas Moore (in the Army); Charles Henry Payne; Edgar Lee Via;  Andrew Lewis Wilson \n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Cases consolidated Defense motions P. L. Rowland (police officer) testimony C. L. Fuller (police officer) testimony"," Contents  C. L. Fuller testimony (continued) Jackson H. Brown (police officer) testimony Re-direct Curtis H. Royster (police officer) testimony Thomas W. Evans (police officer) testimony Prosecution rests Defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony"," Contents  Defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony (continued) Edgar Lee Via (demonstrator) testimony Ralph McDonald Hairston (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  Ralph McDonald Hairston testimony (continued)"," Contents  Ralph McDonald Hairston testimony (continued) Defense rests James A. H. Ferguson (Danville City Attorney) testimony Re-direct Prosecution motion for a bench warrant to be issued for the arrest of Edgar Lee Via on a charge of perjury Prosecution and Defense rests Defense motion to dismiss Judge's ruling and sentences"," Contents  Judge's ruling and sentences (continued)"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Mabel Elizabeth Bethel, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \n\n\n ","Defendants Named:   Mabel Elizabeth Bethel; Hazel Phyllis Carter (sick); Violet Howard (incarcerated); Kenneth Lisberg Lewis \n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Cases consolidated Defense motions Lonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony Defense motion in re: double jeopardy Lonnie Riddle testimony (continued) Re-direct Re-cross Re-re-direct, etc. (5x)"," Contents  Prosecution rests Defense closing argument Prosecution closing argument Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Mary MacAglean Davis, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order\n ","Defendants Named:   Julius Adams (separate case); Mary MacAglean Davis; Laverne Hankins; Cheryl Elaine Hodnett; Evelyn Gray McGhee\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Prosecution requests postponement Judge grants postponement Remaining cases consolidated Defense motions stipulated Lonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony Re-direct Defense motions to strike evidence and witness testimony and in re: double jeopardy Defense rests Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal Recess"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Gloria Jane Barton, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge: Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order [Offense Date: July 13, 1963 Belk- Legett]\n\n\n ","Defendants Named:   Gloria Jane Barton; Irvin Chris Bethel; Ronald Eugene Horton; Frederick Douglas Wilson (in the service); George Thomas Gales; John James (in service); John Thomas Lumpkin; Margaret Read Terry (sick)\n\n\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Cases consolidated Defense motions stipulated Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony G. W. Platt (general merchandise manager at Belk-Leggett Company) testimony L. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony Re-direct W. L. Buettner (police officer) testimony Re-direct Re-cross"," Contents  L. A. Howerton (police officer) testimony H. R. Chaney (police officer) testimony Prosecution rests Defense motions renewed Defense rests Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Evelyn Holt Beavers, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \n\n ","Defendants Named:   Evelyn Holt Beavers; Mildred Luck Ferguson; Penny Jean Hairston; Buford Glendale Holt (in the service, AWOL); Cordelia Ferguson Saunders; Ann Gvonne Wilson\n\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Cases consolidated Lonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony Re-direct Re-cross Prosecution rests Defense motions renewed Defense motion to dismiss"," Contents  Defense motion to dismiss (continued) Prosecution argument against motions Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Maggie Lou Jennings, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order [offense date: 7/15/1963]\n ","Defendants Named:   Maggie Lou Jennings (High School , NJ); Penny Kennedy; Sarah Mildred Kennedy;  Delores Ellen Robertson; Barbara Ann Terry\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Cases consolidated Norman H. Boswell (police officer) testimony Juby E. Towler (captain of police) testimony"," Contents  Prosecution rests Defense motions renewed Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Randy Adams, et. als.    through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order [offense date: July 28th 1963]\n ","Defendants Named:   Randy Adams; Annie Pearl Avery; Clyde Langston Banks; Emmett Lee Banks; Carolyn Sue Barton; Valerie Bonner (industiral school for girls); Percy Bradford Boone; John Allen Bowels Jr (in the service); Luther Alfred Brown; Rosa Marie Cain; Owen Calvin Caldwell Jr.; Samuel Caldwell; Irvin Wendell Chase; Elnora Elizabeth Chase; Lelia Virginia Clark; Margaret Lee Coleman; Marion Johnson Coleman; Silas Coleman; Gilda Patricia Crews; Mary Helen Crews; Othia Davis; John Roosevelt Dodson (possibly deceased); Lena Emmerson Ferrel; Ardelia Freeman; Dorothy Gales; Thomas Lee Glass Jr.; Richard Drummond Goodwin (sick; discussion of criminal record; continued); Mabel Graves; Annie Mae Lewis Hairston; Alfred William Harper Jr.; Glayds Marie Harper; Gertie Williams Harris; Joe Harvest; Joseph Kenneth Hatechett; Ronald Leon Hoffman; Ruby Spraggins Wyllie Holloway; Grover Cleveland Holt; Iradell Graves Jefferies; Leslie Wisner Lancaster; Willie Terry Lanier; Willie Terry Lanier, Jr. (in the service); Joyce Ann Lewis Deshazo; Edna Rose Irby Lynn; Melvin Mason; Adell Morrison; Melba Graves Murrell; Maxine Luck Muse; Robert Lee Morton;  Lawrence Hance McKissick; Robert Earl Overbick (in the service); Delores Jeanette Page;  Brian Lee Peterson; Arthur Pinchback Jr.; Barbara Ann Townes (sick); Luvinia Prichett; Robert Lewis Waterman (in the service); Steve Jerome Reid; Odaris Robinson; Lorraine Coatland Bowe Schroeter; Lazaria Benton Slade; Dorothy Lee Smith; Claude Stevenson (in the service); Elizabeth Phillips Still; Maggie Julian Summers; William Thomas Sutherlin; Marie Thomas;  Robert Lee Trapp; Virginia Carol Via; Maggie Maxine Williams; Undra Ann Williams (in hospital);  Jacqueline Miller Wilson; Melvin Wilson; Garland Witherspoon; Hester William Womack; William Dexter Womack; L. Wilson York; John Robert Zellner\n\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Announcement of Charles Luther Morgan (attorney from Lynchburg for the Defense)  Cases consolidated Defense motions Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued)\n"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued)\n"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued) Recess for lunch Reconvene Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued) Re-direct"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued) Re-cross Re-re-direct, etc. (4x) Lonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony"," Contents  Lonnie Riddle testimony (continued) Thomas W. Evans (police officer) testimony [Recorder took belt off to check machine]"," Contents  Thomas W. Evans testimony (continued) Re-direct Re-cross Recess Reconvene Willard Osborne (police officer) testimony Re-direct Jackson Brown (police officer) testimony"," Contents  Jackson Brown testimony (continued) John W. Martin Jr. (police officer) testimony Re-direct  T. Neal Morris (police officer) testimony"," Contents  T. Neal Morris testimony (continued)  Re-direct Re-cross Re-re-direct  B. G. Buchanan (police officer) testimony  Coley Boone (records officer, police officer and photographer) testimony  Adjournment"," Contents  Reconvene Walter Brown (police officer and photographer) testimony Juby E. Towler (police captain) testimony"," Contents  Juby E. Towler testimony (continued) Re-direct John M. Bailey (police officer) testimony C. W. Howerton (police officer) testimony Defense motions renewed Defense motions to strike evidence and witness testimony Prosecution argument against Defense motions Defense argument Judge's ruling on motions (overruled) Emmett Lee Banks (demonstrator from Chatham) testimony"," Contents  Emmett Lee Banks testimony (continued) Defense motion Clyde L. Banks (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  Clyde L. Banks testimony (continued) Emmett Banks Case dismissed Recess Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony Re-direct Lonnie Riddle (police officer) recall testimony L. Wilson York (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  L. Wilson York testimony (continued) Re-direct Re-cross Othea Davis (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  Othea Davis testimony (continued) Joseph Hatchett (demonstrator) testimony Re-direct Re-cross Reverend Lawrence Wendell Chase (pastor at High Street Baptist Church) testimony"," Contents  Reverend Lawrence Wendell Chase testimony (continued) Elaine Elizabeth Chase (demonstrator) Case dismissed Robert L. Trent (demonstrator) testimony Robert L. Trent Case dismissed Defense rests Defense motions Judge's ruling on motions (overruled) Prosecution waives opening argument Defense argument"," Contents  Defense argument (continued) Prosecution argument Judge's ruling and sentences Adjournment until Monday"," Contents  Reconvened Docket called Judge's ruling and sentences (continued)"," Contents  Judge's ruling and sentences (continued)"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Bruce Baines, et. als.    through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Not specified\n\n ","Defendants Named:   [names not given just case numbers]\n\n\n"," Contents  Prosecution motion to Nolle Pros'd cases numbered 327-335 Judge grants motion Adjournment"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: James Coleman, et. als.     through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:   Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order [offense date:  August 27, 1963]\n ","Defendants Named:   James Coleman (on parole); Carol Delores Graves; Orlando Logan; Louie Martin Nasper (Berkley, CA); Samuel Wash Giles (injured leg); Harold Middlebrook (sick, in hospital, Tennessee); Lawrence Campbell; Betty Woods Dixon; Hubert Graves; Samuel Lawrence General; Geraldine Hairston\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Cases consolidated Defense motions Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony C. W. Howerton (police officer) testimony"," Contents  C. W. Howerton testimony (continued) Re-direct Charles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony Coley Boone (records officer, police officer and photographer) testimony Defense motions Prosecution argument against motion Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Defense rests Defense argument"," Contents  Defense argument (continued) Judge's ruling and sentences"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Sallie Mae Harper, et. als.     through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order  [Offense date: August , 1963]\n ","Defendants Named:   Sallie Mae Harper; Sally N. Heitt; Margaret Ann Pinchback; Larry Wilson\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Docket called Defense motions stipulated T. Neal Morris (police officer) testimony Norman H. Boswell (police officer) testimony Charles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony"," Contents  Charles Wade Graff testimony (continued) Prosecution rests Defense motions Recess Reconvene Defense argument Defense rests Defense argument Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Julius Emanuel Adams, et. als.     through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Date of Offense: July 12, 1963\n\n ","Defendants Named:   Julius Emanuel Adams\n\n\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Defense motions Lonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony Re-direct L. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony Reverend Frances F. McFarland testimony Re-direct Evelyn Gray McGhee (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  Mary Davis testimony (continued) Prosecution rests Defense motions Judge's ruling and sentences"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Barbara Caldwell, et. als.      through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  [Civil Cases docket]\n ","Defendants Named:   Barbara Caldwell;  Daniel Aaron Foss; L. W. Holt; John Robert Zellner; James E. Coleman; Abraham Glass; Joseph B. Hairston; Harry Wilson; Margie Ann Wilson; Ivanhoe Gaylord Donaldson; Harold Middlebrook\n\n\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Defense argument Prosecution argument Defense argument"," Contents  Defense argument (continued) Prosecution argument Judge's ruling and sentences"," Contents  Judge's ruling and sentences (continued)"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Connie Lavonne Chaney, et. als.      through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Unspecified\n\n ","Defendants Named:   Connie Lavonne Chaney; David Lea Davis; Ruth Anita Ferrll; Annette Ada Glass; Charles Junior Hairston; Wilmar Ann Holland; Willie Lewis Madison; Ernestine Scott; Geraldine Lee Scott (Hood); Vernice Smith; Elouise Stamps; Dewey Wayne Via; Jon Norman Westling; Peggy Wiles;\n\n\n"," Contents  Judge's ruling and sentences (continued: from previous case) Prosecution motion to Nolle Pros'd cases numbered 354-363 Judge grants motion"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Lawrence George Campbell, A. I. Dunlap, Julius E. Adams, and Arthur Pinchback    through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  suspension of sentence hearing\n\n ","Defendants Named:   Lawrence George Campbell;  Alexander Isaiah Dunlap; Julius Emanuel Adams;  and Arthur Pinchback, Jr.\n\n\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Defense motion Judge's ruling on motion (denied) T. Neal Morris (police officer) testimony Re-direct Re-cross Howard Lee (minister) testimony Everette L. Motley (Danville Public Schools) testimony Charles H. Harris (bank cashier) testimony"," Contents  Reverend Samuel Griffith testimony M. C. Martin (banker) testimony Wesley H. Motley Jr. testimony Roger Edwards testimony Julian R. Stinson testimony Doyle J. Thomas testimony Defense rests"," Contents  Defense argument Judge's ruling and sentences","There are no restrictions.","Library of Virginia","English"],"unitid_tesim":["38099"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Danville (Va.) Civil Rights Case\n         Files, \n         \n         1963-1973"],"collection_title_tesim":["Danville (Va.) Civil Rights Case\n         Files, \n         \n         1963-1973"],"collection_ssim":["Danville (Va.) Civil Rights Case\n         Files, \n         \n         1963-1973"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"acqinfo_ssim":["Records lent for microfilming and digital duplication by\n            Danville, Virginia Circuit Court, 17 August 1999 under accession 38099."," Digital images made by Backstage in 2021 from the 1999 microfilm. CDs of the original Dictabelt audio recordings of the trials were also converted in 2021."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["Digital images and audio files"],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eDanville (Va.) Civil Rights Case\n         Files, 1963-1973 physical materials and audio recordings have been digitized and are available through \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"https://lva.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/collectionDiscovery?vid=01LVA_INST:01LVA\"\u003eLibrary of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/extref\u003e page on the Library of Virginia website. Please use digital collection. Links to each section are included in the section description under the Content List.\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["Danville (Va.) Civil Rights Case\n         Files, 1963-1973 physical materials and audio recordings have been digitized and are available through  Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery   page on the Library of Virginia website. Please use digital collection. Links to each section are included in the section description under the Content List."],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThis collection is arranged into the following series:\n\n\u003clist type=\"simple\"\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eSeries I: Individual Case Files, A-Z\u003c/emph\u003e individual files of persons arrested during the civil rights demonstrations of 1963. \u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eSeries II: Howard Johnson Trespassing Case, 1963,\u003c/emph\u003e concerning the trial for those arrested for trespassing on January 1, 1963 at the Howard Johnson restaurant on Route 29 south of Danville. \u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eSeries III:Correspondence, 1963-1967 \u003c/emph\u003e of clerk of the Danville Corporation Court and clerk of the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. \u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eSeries IV: Corporation Court Dockets,1963-1967 \u003c/emph\u003e related to the demonstration cases. \u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eSeries V: Court Orders, 1963-1973 \u003c/emph\u003e  issued by the Danville Corporation Court and U.S. District Court, Western District of Virginia. \u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eSeries VI: Evidence, 1963 \u003c/emph\u003e used in various cases. \u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eSeries VII: Notes, undated \u003c/emph\u003e concerning cases and sentencing. \u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eSeries VIII: Petitions, 1963 \u003c/emph\u003e Petition for Removal filed with the court. \u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eSeries IX: Receipts \u003c/emph\u003e bonds and court costs related to various charges. \u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eSeries X: Special Grand Jury, 1963 \u003c/emph\u003e indictments and subpoenas concerning \"John Brown's Law.\" \u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eSeries XI: Transcripts, 1963 \u003c/emph\u003e transcripts of testimony in various cases.\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eSeries XII: Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, 1965-1972.\n \u003c/emph\u003e decisions handed down by the court of appeals.\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eSeries XIII: Dictabelt Records, 1966-1973\u003c/emph\u003e audio records of various cases heard in the Danville Corporation Court.\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e Contents arranged alphabetically by last name\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e Contents arranged chronologically\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e Contents arranged chronologically\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e Contents arranged chronologically\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e Contents arranged chronologically\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e Contents arranged alphabetically by material type\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e Contents arranged loosely by the charge \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e Contents arranged chronologically\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e Contents arranged by case\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e Contents arranged chronologically\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["This collection is arranged into the following series:\n\n Series I: Individual Case Files, A-Z  individual files of persons arrested during the civil rights demonstrations of 1963.  Series II: Howard Johnson Trespassing Case, 1963,  concerning the trial for those arrested for trespassing on January 1, 1963 at the Howard Johnson restaurant on Route 29 south of Danville.  Series III:Correspondence, 1963-1967   of clerk of the Danville Corporation Court and clerk of the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals.  Series IV: Corporation Court Dockets,1963-1967   related to the demonstration cases.  Series V: Court Orders, 1963-1973    issued by the Danville Corporation Court and U.S. District Court, Western District of Virginia.  Series VI: Evidence, 1963   used in various cases.  Series VII: Notes, undated   concerning cases and sentencing.  Series VIII: Petitions, 1963   Petition for Removal filed with the court.  Series IX: Receipts   bonds and court costs related to various charges.  Series X: Special Grand Jury, 1963   indictments and subpoenas concerning \"John Brown's Law.\"  Series XI: Transcripts, 1963   transcripts of testimony in various cases. Series XII: Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, 1965-1972.\n   decisions handed down by the court of appeals. Series XIII: Dictabelt Records, 1966-1973  audio records of various cases heard in the Danville Corporation Court."," Contents arranged alphabetically by last name\n"," Contents arranged chronologically\n"," Contents arranged chronologically\n"," Contents arranged chronologically\n"," Contents arranged chronologically\n"," Contents arranged alphabetically by material type\n"," Contents arranged loosely by the charge \n"," Contents arranged chronologically\n"," Contents arranged by case\n"," Contents arranged chronologically\n"],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eContext for Records:\u003c/emph\u003e The summer of 1963 witnessed a wave of civil rights\n         demonstrations throughout the nation. In Danville, Virginia,\n         the leaders of the Danville Christian Progressive Association (DCPA), an affiliate of the Southern Christian Leadership\n         Conference (SCLC), organized a series of protests. Rev. Lawrence G.\n         Campbell, Rev. Alexander I. Dunlap, Julius E. Adams, and\n         Arthur Pinchback, Jr., believing that the Danville NAACP under the\n         leadership of Doyle Thomas was too conservative, had founded\n         the DCPA in 1960. These men, along with Rev. Lendall\n         W. Chase, president of the Danville SCLC, took the lead in\n         promoting civil rights in Danville, a city deep in Virginia's\n         Black Belt with decades of systemic racism shaped by Jim Crow era polcies and therefore strong in segregationist sentiment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThroughout 1962, the leaders repeatedly appeared before the\n         Danville City Council to demand Black representation on the\n         boards of city agencies and the end of segregation. In August\n         1962, with the help of Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) lawyer Len W. Holt, Campbell, Dunlap, Adams, and Chase filed the Danville\n         Omnibus Integration Suit in federal court. The suit called\n         for the integration of Danville's hospitals, schools,\n         cemeteries, public buildings, public housing projects,\n         teaching assignments, and city employment opportunities. On\n         January 1, 1963, Dunlap, Chase, Campbell, Adams, and Pinchback\n         were arrested at a segregated Howard Johnson's restaurant for\n         trespassing after refusing to leave when the manager asked\n         them to do so. In March, Martin Luther King, Jr., spoke at a\n         meeting of the Danville SCLC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eOn May 31, the Danville civil rights demonstrations began\n         peacefully and ended without incident. Police did not make any\n         arrests and the local press ignored the demonstration. The\n         majority of the demonstrators were teenagers led by Thurman\n         Echols and Ezell Barksdale. On June 5, the demonstrators\n         changed tactics as the participants marched into City Hall and occupied the city manger's office, and the next day jointly impeded traffic by sitting down in the middle of a busy city street. Judge Archibald M. Aiken, Jr., judge\n         of the Danville Corporation Court, was summoned by police to\n         the scene and commanded the demonstrators to disperse. The\n         demonstrators, however, refused, prompting Aiken to issue a\n         temporary injunction that ordered the\n         demonstrators to desist from, among other things, assembling\n         in an unlawful manner, interfering with traffic and business,\n         obstructing entrances to businesses and public buildings,\n         participating and inciting \"mob violence,\" and using loud\n         language that disrupts the peace. The injunction, made\n         permanent a few weeks later, formed the basis for many of the\n         arrests made that summer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn addition to the injunction, Danville officials used other methods\n         to quell the demonstrations. A special grand jury, convened by\n         Aiken, indicted the demonstration leaders on June 7 under the 1859 statute called the \"John Brown's Law,\" that made inciting\n         \"the colored population to acts of violence or war against the\n         white population\" illegal. This set the bond for the leaders at $5,000 each. In mid-June and early July, the\n         Danville city council, under the leadership of councilman John\n         W. Carter, an attorney and staunch segregationist, adopted two\n         ordinances designed to limit the demonstrations. One limited\n         the size, place, and time of demonstrations and the other\n         required a permit to parade.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDespite Aiken's and the city council's attempts, the\n         demonstrations continued. Civil rights activists from the\n         SNCC and the\n         Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), including field\n         secretaries Bob Zellner, Ivanhoe Donaldson, Avon Rollins, and\n         Daniel Foss (SNCC), and Bruce Baines and Claudia Edwards (CORE) arrived in Danville to participate in the demonstrations.\n         Civil rights lawyers affiliated with the National Lawyer's\n         Guild and the NAACP, including William M. Kunstler, Dean Robb,\n         Nathan Conyers, and Samuel W. Tuckers, also arrived in\n         Danville to help represent the demonstrators. On June 10,\n         after a full day of protests, the police and deputized city workers, with nightsticks and\n         fire hoses, attacked a group of Black community members holding a vigil for individuals detained in the city jail. Forty-seven of the fifty or so people in attendance required medical\n         attention. The next day, July 11, Martin Luther King, Jr., visited Danville in a show of support for the demonstrators, although he decided to not hold a march during the appearance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe demonstrations continued, however, and by mid-July over\n         250 people had been arrested on charges of contempt,\n         trespassing, disorderly conduct, assault, parading without a\n         permit, and resisting arrest. When parents\n         went to the jail to post bail for their children, some of them were arrested and charged with\n         contributing to the delinquency of a minor by not providing\n         adequate supervision.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe defense lawyers, including Len W. Holt, Ruth L. Harvey,\n         Jerry Williams, and Harry I. Wood, in addition to those from\n         the National Lawyer's Guild and the NAACP, attempted to remove\n         the cases from the corporation court to federal court, but to\n         no avail. Each defendant demanded an individual trial causing\n         the corporation court's dockets to be filled to such an extent\n         that no cases other than the demonstrator's could not be\n         heard. The prosecutor requested a change of venue to alleviate\n         the crowded docket and Aiken transferred about 124 cases to\n         other courts throughout Virginia. This posed signigicant financial stress on many of the defendants who were then required to travel to a different court. In some cases, more than a hundred miles distant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe defense lawyers again sought an order from the federal\n         courts to stay all arrests, trials, and other proceedings for\n         violation of the injunction and city ordinance. On August 8,\n         the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals halted these trials\n         pending the outcome of the appeal. Judge Aiken, however,\n         continued hearing the cases for disorderly conduct, parading\n         without a permit, resisting arrest, and trespassing. He\n         generally sentenced the guilty parties to two to five days in\n         jail and a fine, suspending execution of the sentences pending\n         an appeal. In September, defense counsel agreed to consolidate\n         the cases and Aiken rescinded his orders for change of\n         venue.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eBy mid-August, the demonstrations had largely waned due to\n         Danville's unwillingness to yield to the protests. A year\n         later, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal dissolved the\n         injunction, but, by a 3-2 margin and with a strong dissent,\n         declared Aiken's injunction constitutional. Moreover, the\n         cases were remanded to the corporation court where the\n         Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals could hear the necessary\n         appeals. The United States Supreme Court upheld the decision\n         by a five-four margin.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn December 1966, Judge Aiken resumed the trials of those\n         who violated his injunction. The trials proceeded quickly.\n         Aiken did not find all the defendants guilty and dismissed\n         some cases for lack of evidence. The usual sentence was eight\n         days in jail and a fine of twenty dollars. The demonstration\n         leaders received the stiffest penalties with Rev. Lawrence G.\n         Campbell receiving the worst, being sentenced 250 days in jail\n         and a $2,500 fine.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn early 1967, the Virginia Supreme Court began deciding\n         the first of the appeals from the Danville Corporation Court.\n         In Thomas v. City of Danville, the Court ruled Judge Aiken's\n         injunction constitutional. In York v. City of Danville, they\n         ruled that a parade can be subject to \"reasonable and\n         nondiscriminatory regulation,\" but that the city's time\n         requirement for applying for a permit was too harsh. In 1970,\n         the Court ruled in Rollins v. Commonwealth that the state must\n         prove that a defendant not named in the injunction had\n         knowledge of the injunction before violating its orders. In\n         January 1973, the Supreme Court of Appeals heard the last of\n         the cases associated with the demonstrations and requested\n         that the Commonwealth's Attorney for Danville review the cases\n         under appeal in light of the court's previous rulings. As a\n         result, the Court overturned the convictions of almost 270\n         people. However, the Court upheld the convictions of those\n         named in the injunction and for trespassing, obstructing\n         traffic, and illegal picketing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eOn February 9, 1973, the court proceedings involving the\n         Danville demonstrations of 1963 came to end. Judge Glynn R.\n         Phillips, Jr., of Clintwood was assigned to hear the defense\n         motion to suspend the jail sentences and fines of those whose\n         convictions had been upheld. Judge Aiken died in 1971, and\n         the new Danville Corporation Court judge had recused\n         himself. Against the prosecutor's objections, Judge Phillips\n         suspended the jail sentences on condition of good behavior for\n         two years, but ordered payment of fines that totaled more than\n         $5,000.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLocality History:\u003c/emph\u003e Danville (Va.), in Pittsylvania County, was named for the Dan River on which the city is located. Danville was established in 1793, was incorporated as a town in 1830, and became a city in 1890. The town of North Danville, incorporated in 1877 and renamed Neopolis in 1894, was added in 1896. \u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Historical Information"],"bioghist_tesim":["Context for Records:  The summer of 1963 witnessed a wave of civil rights\n         demonstrations throughout the nation. In Danville, Virginia,\n         the leaders of the Danville Christian Progressive Association (DCPA), an affiliate of the Southern Christian Leadership\n         Conference (SCLC), organized a series of protests. Rev. Lawrence G.\n         Campbell, Rev. Alexander I. Dunlap, Julius E. Adams, and\n         Arthur Pinchback, Jr., believing that the Danville NAACP under the\n         leadership of Doyle Thomas was too conservative, had founded\n         the DCPA in 1960. These men, along with Rev. Lendall\n         W. Chase, president of the Danville SCLC, took the lead in\n         promoting civil rights in Danville, a city deep in Virginia's\n         Black Belt with decades of systemic racism shaped by Jim Crow era polcies and therefore strong in segregationist sentiment.","Throughout 1962, the leaders repeatedly appeared before the\n         Danville City Council to demand Black representation on the\n         boards of city agencies and the end of segregation. In August\n         1962, with the help of Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) lawyer Len W. Holt, Campbell, Dunlap, Adams, and Chase filed the Danville\n         Omnibus Integration Suit in federal court. The suit called\n         for the integration of Danville's hospitals, schools,\n         cemeteries, public buildings, public housing projects,\n         teaching assignments, and city employment opportunities. On\n         January 1, 1963, Dunlap, Chase, Campbell, Adams, and Pinchback\n         were arrested at a segregated Howard Johnson's restaurant for\n         trespassing after refusing to leave when the manager asked\n         them to do so. In March, Martin Luther King, Jr., spoke at a\n         meeting of the Danville SCLC.","On May 31, the Danville civil rights demonstrations began\n         peacefully and ended without incident. Police did not make any\n         arrests and the local press ignored the demonstration. The\n         majority of the demonstrators were teenagers led by Thurman\n         Echols and Ezell Barksdale. On June 5, the demonstrators\n         changed tactics as the participants marched into City Hall and occupied the city manger's office, and the next day jointly impeded traffic by sitting down in the middle of a busy city street. Judge Archibald M. Aiken, Jr., judge\n         of the Danville Corporation Court, was summoned by police to\n         the scene and commanded the demonstrators to disperse. The\n         demonstrators, however, refused, prompting Aiken to issue a\n         temporary injunction that ordered the\n         demonstrators to desist from, among other things, assembling\n         in an unlawful manner, interfering with traffic and business,\n         obstructing entrances to businesses and public buildings,\n         participating and inciting \"mob violence,\" and using loud\n         language that disrupts the peace. The injunction, made\n         permanent a few weeks later, formed the basis for many of the\n         arrests made that summer.","In addition to the injunction, Danville officials used other methods\n         to quell the demonstrations. A special grand jury, convened by\n         Aiken, indicted the demonstration leaders on June 7 under the 1859 statute called the \"John Brown's Law,\" that made inciting\n         \"the colored population to acts of violence or war against the\n         white population\" illegal. This set the bond for the leaders at $5,000 each. In mid-June and early July, the\n         Danville city council, under the leadership of councilman John\n         W. Carter, an attorney and staunch segregationist, adopted two\n         ordinances designed to limit the demonstrations. One limited\n         the size, place, and time of demonstrations and the other\n         required a permit to parade.","Despite Aiken's and the city council's attempts, the\n         demonstrations continued. Civil rights activists from the\n         SNCC and the\n         Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), including field\n         secretaries Bob Zellner, Ivanhoe Donaldson, Avon Rollins, and\n         Daniel Foss (SNCC), and Bruce Baines and Claudia Edwards (CORE) arrived in Danville to participate in the demonstrations.\n         Civil rights lawyers affiliated with the National Lawyer's\n         Guild and the NAACP, including William M. Kunstler, Dean Robb,\n         Nathan Conyers, and Samuel W. Tuckers, also arrived in\n         Danville to help represent the demonstrators. On June 10,\n         after a full day of protests, the police and deputized city workers, with nightsticks and\n         fire hoses, attacked a group of Black community members holding a vigil for individuals detained in the city jail. Forty-seven of the fifty or so people in attendance required medical\n         attention. The next day, July 11, Martin Luther King, Jr., visited Danville in a show of support for the demonstrators, although he decided to not hold a march during the appearance.","The demonstrations continued, however, and by mid-July over\n         250 people had been arrested on charges of contempt,\n         trespassing, disorderly conduct, assault, parading without a\n         permit, and resisting arrest. When parents\n         went to the jail to post bail for their children, some of them were arrested and charged with\n         contributing to the delinquency of a minor by not providing\n         adequate supervision.","The defense lawyers, including Len W. Holt, Ruth L. Harvey,\n         Jerry Williams, and Harry I. Wood, in addition to those from\n         the National Lawyer's Guild and the NAACP, attempted to remove\n         the cases from the corporation court to federal court, but to\n         no avail. Each defendant demanded an individual trial causing\n         the corporation court's dockets to be filled to such an extent\n         that no cases other than the demonstrator's could not be\n         heard. The prosecutor requested a change of venue to alleviate\n         the crowded docket and Aiken transferred about 124 cases to\n         other courts throughout Virginia. This posed signigicant financial stress on many of the defendants who were then required to travel to a different court. In some cases, more than a hundred miles distant.","The defense lawyers again sought an order from the federal\n         courts to stay all arrests, trials, and other proceedings for\n         violation of the injunction and city ordinance. On August 8,\n         the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals halted these trials\n         pending the outcome of the appeal. Judge Aiken, however,\n         continued hearing the cases for disorderly conduct, parading\n         without a permit, resisting arrest, and trespassing. He\n         generally sentenced the guilty parties to two to five days in\n         jail and a fine, suspending execution of the sentences pending\n         an appeal. In September, defense counsel agreed to consolidate\n         the cases and Aiken rescinded his orders for change of\n         venue.","By mid-August, the demonstrations had largely waned due to\n         Danville's unwillingness to yield to the protests. A year\n         later, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal dissolved the\n         injunction, but, by a 3-2 margin and with a strong dissent,\n         declared Aiken's injunction constitutional. Moreover, the\n         cases were remanded to the corporation court where the\n         Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals could hear the necessary\n         appeals. The United States Supreme Court upheld the decision\n         by a five-four margin.","In December 1966, Judge Aiken resumed the trials of those\n         who violated his injunction. The trials proceeded quickly.\n         Aiken did not find all the defendants guilty and dismissed\n         some cases for lack of evidence. The usual sentence was eight\n         days in jail and a fine of twenty dollars. The demonstration\n         leaders received the stiffest penalties with Rev. Lawrence G.\n         Campbell receiving the worst, being sentenced 250 days in jail\n         and a $2,500 fine.","In early 1967, the Virginia Supreme Court began deciding\n         the first of the appeals from the Danville Corporation Court.\n         In Thomas v. City of Danville, the Court ruled Judge Aiken's\n         injunction constitutional. In York v. City of Danville, they\n         ruled that a parade can be subject to \"reasonable and\n         nondiscriminatory regulation,\" but that the city's time\n         requirement for applying for a permit was too harsh. In 1970,\n         the Court ruled in Rollins v. Commonwealth that the state must\n         prove that a defendant not named in the injunction had\n         knowledge of the injunction before violating its orders. In\n         January 1973, the Supreme Court of Appeals heard the last of\n         the cases associated with the demonstrations and requested\n         that the Commonwealth's Attorney for Danville review the cases\n         under appeal in light of the court's previous rulings. As a\n         result, the Court overturned the convictions of almost 270\n         people. However, the Court upheld the convictions of those\n         named in the injunction and for trespassing, obstructing\n         traffic, and illegal picketing.","On February 9, 1973, the court proceedings involving the\n         Danville demonstrations of 1963 came to end. Judge Glynn R.\n         Phillips, Jr., of Clintwood was assigned to hear the defense\n         motion to suspend the jail sentences and fines of those whose\n         convictions had been upheld. Judge Aiken died in 1971, and\n         the new Danville Corporation Court judge had recused\n         himself. Against the prosecutor's objections, Judge Phillips\n         suspended the jail sentences on condition of good behavior for\n         two years, but ordered payment of fines that totaled more than\n         $5,000.","Locality History:  Danville (Va.), in Pittsylvania County, was named for the Dan River on which the city is located. Danville was established in 1793, was incorporated as a town in 1830, and became a city in 1890. The town of North Danville, incorporated in 1877 and renamed Neopolis in 1894, was added in 1896. "],"originalsloc_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eOriginal court records(6 boxes of records and 130 Dictabelt recordings)retained by the Danville (Va.) Circuit Court. \n\u003c/p\u003e"],"originalsloc_heading_ssm":["Location of Originals\n"],"originalsloc_tesim":["Original court records(6 boxes of records and 130 Dictabelt recordings)retained by the Danville (Va.) Circuit Court. \n"],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eDanville (Va.) Civil Rights Case Files, 1963-1973.\n            Accession 38099, Local Government Records Collection, The\n            Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Danville (Va.) Civil Rights Case Files, 1963-1973.\n            Accession 38099, Local Government Records Collection, The\n            Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia."],"processinfo_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e The Danville (Va.) Circuit Court Clerk lent the Library of Virginia the original case files and Dictabelts for microfilming and digitial conversion in 1999. The microfiliming was performed by Henry Micrographics in 1999 and produced Miscellaneous Microfilm reels 2325-2329 and preservation microfilm reels 1-5; however, it was determined Miscellaneous Microfilm reels 2327-2329 (or Reels 3-5) did not meet microfilm quality standards, and the records were refilmed in 2000-2001, creating new Reels 3-5 which were stored at the State Records Center. Service copies of the new reels were never created. The Library of Virginia used the security microfilm, Reels 1-5, to scan and create digitial images of the documents and at this time it was detemined that the service copy film (Miscellaneous Microfilm reels 2325-2329) were different from the preservation microfilm (Reels 1-5), as more material was include on Reels 1-5. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e A project was completed around 2000 by Dictaphone Corporation to record and transfer the audio contents and the inserts of these Dictabelts onto compact disks. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e As of 2024, upon conversion of the microfilmed material to digital images and the conversion of the CD audio to audio files 2021-2022, the Local Records manager deteremined the service copies of the microfilm and audio CDs to be redudent records in LVA holdings. These copies were removed from the collections.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn 2023 M. Mason and V. Brooks went through the approximately 4,300 digital images to arrange them so they would pair with the finding aid. At this time duplicate, blank, and microflim imaging targets were removed from the digital files. Corrections were made to alphabetical and chronological orders and misidentified or newly discovered material was identified.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e Encoded by Jay Gaidmore, 1999; updated by Alex Lorch, 2003; updated by M. Mason; May 2024 \u003c/p\u003e"],"processinfo_heading_ssm":["Processing Information\n"],"processinfo_tesim":[" The Danville (Va.) Circuit Court Clerk lent the Library of Virginia the original case files and Dictabelts for microfilming and digitial conversion in 1999. The microfiliming was performed by Henry Micrographics in 1999 and produced Miscellaneous Microfilm reels 2325-2329 and preservation microfilm reels 1-5; however, it was determined Miscellaneous Microfilm reels 2327-2329 (or Reels 3-5) did not meet microfilm quality standards, and the records were refilmed in 2000-2001, creating new Reels 3-5 which were stored at the State Records Center. Service copies of the new reels were never created. The Library of Virginia used the security microfilm, Reels 1-5, to scan and create digitial images of the documents and at this time it was detemined that the service copy film (Miscellaneous Microfilm reels 2325-2329) were different from the preservation microfilm (Reels 1-5), as more material was include on Reels 1-5. \n"," A project was completed around 2000 by Dictaphone Corporation to record and transfer the audio contents and the inserts of these Dictabelts onto compact disks. "," As of 2024, upon conversion of the microfilmed material to digital images and the conversion of the CD audio to audio files 2021-2022, the Local Records manager deteremined the service copies of the microfilm and audio CDs to be redudent records in LVA holdings. These copies were removed from the collections.","In 2023 M. Mason and V. Brooks went through the approximately 4,300 digital images to arrange them so they would pair with the finding aid. At this time duplicate, blank, and microflim imaging targets were removed from the digital files. Corrections were made to alphabetical and chronological orders and misidentified or newly discovered material was identified."," Encoded by Jay Gaidmore, 1999; updated by Alex Lorch, 2003; updated by M. Mason; May 2024 "],"relatedmaterial_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e See also: Virginia.  \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"https://lva.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01LVA_INST/altrmk/alma990015214620205756%20\"\u003e Virginia.Governor (1962-1966 : Harrison) Executive Papers, 1962-1966. \u003c/extref\u003e at the Library of Virginia \n\u003c/p\u003e"],"relatedmaterial_heading_ssm":["Related Material\n"],"relatedmaterial_tesim":[" See also: Virginia.    Virginia.Governor (1962-1966 : Harrison) Executive Papers, 1962-1966.   at the Library of Virginia \n"],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eDanville (Va.) Civil Rights Case Files, 1963-1973, consists of\n         court papers and legal files relating to the 1963 Civil Rights\n         demonstrations in Danville. These files include bills of\n         particulars, bond records, correspondence, court dockets,\n         court orders, Dictabelts, evidence, judgments, petitions,\n         photographs, receipts, subpoenas, and transcripts of testimony\n         that document the legal aspects of the demonstrations from the\n         Danville Corporation Court to the Virginia Supreme Court of\n         Appeals.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConsists of the individual files of persons arrested\n               during the civil rights demonstrations of 1963. Files\n               include bills of particulars, bond records, judgments,\n               receipts and subpoenas. The files of juveniles arrested\n               include biographical information, including age,\n               education, prior arrests, and family history. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3617403%20\"\u003e Digital files available Here: Series I: Individual Case Files, A-Z\u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery\u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIncludes transcript of testimony and a notice of\n               appeal and assignment of errors relating to the trial of\n               Julius E. Adams, Lawrence G. Campbell, Lendall W. Chase,\n               Alexander I. Dunlap, and Arthur Pinchback, Jr., arrested for\n               trespassing on January 1, 1963 at the Howard Johnson\n               restaurant on Route 29 south of Danville.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3619740%20\"\u003e Digital files available Here: Series II: Howard Johnson Trespassing Case, 1963 \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery\u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePrimarily consists of correspondence between the\n               clerk of the Danville Corporation Court and defense\n               attorney, Ruth L. Harvey, regarding notices of appeal\n               and assignments of errors, and designation of parts of\n               the record. The latter of which she requests the clerk\n               to forward to the clerk of the Virginia Supreme Court of\n               Appeals. Also, includes correspondence from the clerk of\n               the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals indicating receipt\n               of specified materials, and a telegram from the Seattle,\n               Washington, branch of the NAACP requesting information on\n               the arrest of Lawrence G. Campbell and Richard D.\n               Goodwin.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3619838%20\"\u003e Digital files available Here: Series III: Correspondence, 1963-1967 \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIncludes the Corporation Court's dockets for the\n               demonstration cases from June 1963-April 1967. Lists\n               name of defendant, alleged offense, date of offense,\n               date of trial and disposition of case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3619922%20\"\u003e Digital files available Here: Series IV: Corporation Court Dockets \u003c/extref\u003ethrough the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConsists of continuances, court orders, judgments,\n               and sentences, issued by the Danville Corporation Court\n               from June 1963-February 1973. Judge Aiken, from June\n               1963-May 1967, ordered the arrest of demonstrators for\n               violating his injunction and inciting the colored\n               populace, the appearance of demonstrators before the\n               court to answer these violations, the investigation of\n               the juvenile defendants, the serving of jail time and\n               payment of fines, the acquittals of defendants, the\n               consolidation of cases, and the changes of venue. The\n               court orders issued January-February 1973 involved the\n               disqualifying and recusing of the Danville Corporation\n               Judge Stuart L. Craig, the selection of Judge Phillips\n               to replace Craig, the subpoenaing of defense witnesses,\n               and the suspension of jail sentences for the remaining\n               defendants. Also, includes judgements issued by Judge\n               Ted Dalton of the United States District Court for the\n               Western District of Virginia in May 1967.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3620083%20\"\u003e Digital files available Here: Series V: Court Orders \u003c/extref\u003ethrough the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIncludes the June 7, 1963 issue of the Danville Bee\n               and a note from the paper's general manager indicating\n               the writer and photographer of the June 10, 1963 article\n               entitled. \"Thirty Demonstrators Jailed.\" Also includes\n               excerpts from the July 10, 1963 meeting of the Danville\n               City Council during which it passed an ordinance\n               governing parades, a photocopy of the temporary\n               injunction and restraining order issued by Judge Aiken,\n               and photographs. The photographs show the demonstrators\n               on the steps of city hall, and the arrest of Rev.\n               Lawrence G. Campbell and Thurman Echols.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3620288%20\"\u003e Digital files available Here: Series VI: Evidence\u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIncludes pieces of paper and lists indicating court\n               cases, dates and places of offenses, trial dates,\n               disposition of cases, and sentences.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3620402%20\"\u003e Digital files available Here: Series VII: Notes\u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConsists of the Petition for Removal filed with the\n               clerk of the United States District Court for the\n               Western District of Virginia on June 17, 1963, by defense\n               lawyers Len W. Holt and William M. Kunstler. The\n               petition tried to remove the demonstration cases to\n               federal court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3620450%20\"\u003e Digital files available Here: Series VIII: Petitions\u003c/extref\u003ethrough the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIncludes receipts for bond refunds and payment of\n               fines.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3620459%20\"\u003e Digital files available Here: Series IX: Receipts\u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIncludes indictments and subpoenas from the Special\n               Grand Jury responsible for indicting the demonstration\n               leaders under \"John Brown's Law.\" Contains names of the\n               members of the grand jury.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3620606%20\"\u003e Digital files available Here: Series X: Special Grand Jury\u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContains transcripts of testimony from: \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCommonwealth of Virginia v. Lawrence G. Campbell, Alexander I. Dunlap, Arthur Pinchback, Jr., and Julius Adams, September 19, 1963\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCommonwealth of Virginia v. Lawrence G. Campbell and Alexander I. Dunlap, Violation of Sections 18.1-14 and 18.1-254, October 22, 1963\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCommonwealth of Virginia v. Avon Williams Rollins, August 6, 1963\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCity of Danville v. Lawrence G.Campbell, et als, October 1963 \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3620634%20\"\u003e Digital files available Here: Series XI: Transcripts\u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConsists of decisions handed down from October\n               1965-December 1972. Primarily includes writs of error\n               and supersedeas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3621535%20\"\u003eDigital files vailable Here: Series XII: Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals\u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series consists of full case recordings from many of the Civil Rights demonstrations cases heard in the Danville Corporation Court from December 1966 through April 1967. The recordings include witnesses' testimony, defense attorney's motions and arguments, Commonwealth and Danville City attorney's arguments, rulings and sentences of Judge Archibald M. Aiken, Jr., witness and recorder oaths, and the calling of the court docket.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e This series is organized into 27 subseries (subseries A-AA), with each subseries representing one case. A majority of the cases documented in these audio recordings consist of dozens of individual cases consolidated and heard together on the charges of Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order. See the \"defendants named\" section in each subseries for the full list of individuals included in these consolidated cases. Names are listed in the order they occur in the audio, generally through the courts roll call. If abesent, the reason for the defendant's absence in placed in ( ) following the name. Additionally each subseries contains the belt list with information on the runtime and contents for each belt.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAlso contained herein is the recording of the 1973 February 9 Corporation Court hearing concerning the defense motion to suspend the sentences for those defendants whose sentences had been upheld on appeal by the Supreme Court of Appeals. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe original Dictabelts included wrapper containing written summaries of their audio contents, noting the approximate time the content appears in the recording.  In some cases, copies of the original court docket also accompany the original Dictabelt. \u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eThese wrappers and docket records are now digitized and available with the audio files available through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery\u003c/emph\u003e \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623200%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Irvin Christopher Bethel, et. als. \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003eIrvin Christopher Bethel; Lendbury Bradshaw; Donald Jerome Brandon (indicate as in Vietnam); Harrison Brown Jr.; Everett Bruce Jr. (college); Victor Hugo Burton; Barbara Cardwell (in Washington); James Cobb Jr.; John Roland Coleman; Lawrence Coleman; Clifton Henry Davis (armed forces); David Lea Davis (college); Wayne Rochelle Davis; Ellis Newton Dodson; Charlie Henry Echols (in New York); Daniel Aaron Foss (University of Iowa); Melvin Fuller (Navy); Gladys Virginia Giles (Atlantic City, NJ, Teaching); Samule Wash Giles (Atlantic City NJ); Robert Leonard Graves; William Haywood Ingram; John James (Army); James Johnson; Robert James Lewis; Margie Mabin; Thomas Mabin (New York); Charlie Henry Mason; Wilson Lee Maden (Army); James Thomas Moore (Army);Marilyn Morton (Washington); Hildreth Glennell McGhee; Archie Lee Petty, Harvey Louis Poteat; Herman Prichett (in jail); Luvinia Prichett; Avon Wiliams Rollins (Washington); William Howard Scott; Percy Walters; Ralph Frank Walters; Melvin Warner; George Albert Watkins; James Edward Whipple; Jimmy Ray Hurston (penitentiary, life sentence); Michael Smith; Bertie Smith; Sylvester Burrell (jail); Harvey Davis Jr.; Mabel Graves (sick); Ennis Hairston;  Ola Mae Cunningham Harris; Leonard Winston Holt; Joe Wesley Lewis; Stuart Mingo; Robert Morton; Marcelluos Reeves; Willie Ulysses Thomas; John Robert Zellner (New York); Eugene Bennett; Ernest Howard Smith; Sylvester Graves; Jesse Hairston; Otha Frank Lumpkin Annie Mae Johnson; Harvey Smith; Robert Hemphill Jr. (Army); Daniel McCain; Paul Price; Alberta Via Tathatter [?]; Shirely Terry; Averett Wade Thompson; Ivanhoe Gaylord Thompson (Atlanta, college)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefendants roll call\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e arguments in Judge's chambers in re: consolidating cases\u003c/item\u003e\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eAttorneys' arguments in Judge's chambers in re: consolidating cases (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReading of Judge's injunction issued 6 June 1963\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefendants' pleas \u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCharles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eT. Neil Morris (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eL. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCurtis H. Royster (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eW. L. Buettner (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCurtis H. Royster recall testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eAdjournment\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eT. C. Tatterhorn (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eR. W. Brumfield (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eW. L. Sheffield (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eC. L. Fuller (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eR. A. Walker (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eD. E. Nostrand (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eB. C. Enyard (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJohn M. Bailey (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJohn M. Bailey testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eUnidentified (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eT. W. Evans (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eSutaliff (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eUnidentified (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eL. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eErnest Howard Smith (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense attorneys' motion to strike evidence and witness testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eAdjournment and weather report\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eConvene and roll call\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eApproach bench - discussion\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCharles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJuby E. Towler (chief of police detectives) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJuby E. Towler testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCity attorney argument against defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense attorney re-argues motion to strike evidence\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense attorney re-argues motion to strike evidence (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (denied)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eAdjournment\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to remove some defendant's names from case docket\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense attorney motion to strike evidence and witness testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (denied)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJames Edward Whipple (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJames Edward Whipple testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eW. L. Buettner recall testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eUnidentified (police officer) recall testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense closing\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense closing (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution closing\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eAttorneys' arguments in Judge's chambers in re: bond hearing for absentee defendants\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eAdjournment\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623280%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Sylvester Burrell, et. als.  \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003eSylvester Burrell; Harvey Davis Jr.; Mabel Graves; Ennis Hairston; Ola Mae Cunningham Harris; Leonard Winston Holt (removed, heard at later date); Joe Wesley Lewis (Army); Stuart Mingo; Robert Morton; Marcellos Reeves; Willie Ulysses Thomas; Sylvester Graves; Jesse Hairston; Harvey Smith; Robert Hemphill Jr. (Army); Annie Mae Johnson; Otha Frank Lumpkin; Daniel McCain; Paul Price; Alberta Viatanian [?]; Shirley Terry; Averett Wade Thompson; Ivanhoe Gaylord Donaldson (college)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eConvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefendants roll call\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCases consolidated\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecess\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eT. Neil Morris (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eLunch recess\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eT. Neil Morris testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eharles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCharles Wade Graff testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eAttorneys' arguments in Judge's chambers in re: photographs and time of their development\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCharles Wade Graff testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJuby E. Towler (chief of police detectives) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJuby E. Towler testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-re-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-re-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRalph Wilkerson (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCharles Wade Graff recall testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecess\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eB. C. Elliott Jr. (police officer) testimony\n\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eAttorneys' arguments in Judge's chambers in re: photographs and time of their development\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCharles Wade Graff testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJuby E. Towler (chief of police detectives) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eB. C. Elliott Jr. testimony (continued) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution and Defense rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (denied)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to strike because arrest did not occur at time of violation\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (denied)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecess\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eWade Thompson (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eWade Thompson testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eHarvey Smith (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003ePaul Price (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eStuart Walter Mayo (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eOtha Frank Lumpkin (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eAdjournment\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense renews motion to strike evidence and witness testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to dismiss against 5 defendants because prosecution has not proven a case\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCommonwealth argument against motion\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution opening argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense closing argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge questions Defense attorneys\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution closing argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences (continued) [unclear, distorted sound]\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623500%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: James Edward Whipple \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Perjury \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e James Edward Whipple\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution motion for a bench warrant to be issued for the arrest of James Edward Whipple on a charge of perjury\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (granted)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623508%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Joseph Bowe, et. als. \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order\n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Joseph Bowe; Cynthia Ann Carter; L.W. Chase, Gineva Rogers Davis, Lizzie Spivey Davis, Jimmie Hamlett; Thomas Cleveland Holt; General Redd; William Edward Richardson; Isiah Hall; James Dixon jr.; Eddie Mae Womack; Estelle Womack; Doyle J. Thomas; Alice Lee Strader; Celester Lindsey; Percy Randolph Williams; Walter Link\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCases consolidated\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefendants roll call\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefendants' pleas\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eWalter Link (demonstrator) guilty plea\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's sentence\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eAdjournment\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eStipulate injunction become part of the record\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefendants' pleas\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eT. Neil Morris (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eT. Neil Morris testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCharles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eB. C. Elliott Jr. (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eWilliam G. Doss (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eWilliam G. Doss testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecess and adjournment until Monday, 19 December\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eW. L. Sheffield (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eP. L. Rowland (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eT. C. Talley (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecess\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain recall testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain recall testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCity motion to dismiss cases against Joseph Bowe, Reverend Doyle J. Thomas, and Paul Wade Jr.\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge grants and dismisses cases\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (denied)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eB. C. Elliott recall testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecess\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003ePercy Randolph Williams (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003ePercy Randolph Williams testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eThomas F. Tucker (Danville Clerk of Court) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to show cause\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to quash capias\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to quash capias (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCity argument and rebuttal against motion\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense renews motion to strike evidence and witness testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions (various)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motions (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623554%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Ruth L. Harvey  \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Contempt of court\n\n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Ruth L. Harvey \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRuth L. Harvey held in contempt of court for misleading court on location of Leonard Winston Holt (demonstrator/defendant)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge fines Harvey $25\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623562%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Everett Bruce Jr., et. Als  \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order\n\n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e L. W. Chase; Everett Bruce Jr; Barbara Cardwell (June 10th; college); Charlie Henry Echols; Daniel Aaron Foss (june 10th offense); Gladys Virginia Giles; Samuel Wash Giles; Thomas Madin; Charlie Henry Mason (hospital in DC); Marilyn Morton; Avon Williams Rollins; Mabel Graves; Leonard Winston Holt; Robert Morton Jr. ; John Robert Zellner; Bruce Baines; Hazel Phyllis Carter; James Edward Coleman; Daniel Aaron Foss (additional charge on June 15th); Abraham Glass; Joseph Benjamin Hairston;  Leatrice Ann Hairston; Lavern Higgins; Violet Howard (doctoral school); Lillie Echols Hubbard; Annie Mae Johnson (jail); Dorothy Elizabeth Moore; Harry Wilson Jr.; Margie Ann Wilson; Milton A. Reid; Ivanhoe Gaylord Donaldson\n\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eConvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDocket set\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReverend L. W. Chase statement (found guilty in absence on 19 December 1966)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentence for Chase\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to suspend pending appeal\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecess\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefendants roll call\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eBonds forfeited for those defendants who are absent\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eLeonard Winston Holt (demonstrator) case in absentia\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eHector Womack (bondsman for Leonard Winston Holt) testimony as to location of Holt Adjournment\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eLeonard Winston Holt bond forfeited\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentence of Holt\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to suspend sentence pending appeal\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecess\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eThomas Mabin (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eBetty H. Dallas (juvenile probation officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eThomas Mabin case dismissed\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences remaining defendants\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623620\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII:  Foss, Zelner and Donaldson \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:Contempt of Court (being absent)\n\u003c/emph\u003e \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Daniel Aaron Foss; Robert Zellner; Ivanhoe Gaylord Donaldson\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefendants roll call\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eWitnesses sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJohn Robert Zelner (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentence\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eMotion to suspend sentence pending appeal\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDaniel Aaron Foss (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentence\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eIvanhoe Gaylord Donaldson (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentence\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eMotion to suspend sentence pending appeal\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623636%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII:  Setting the court docket \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense and Prosecution argument and discussion in re: injunction\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 9 Docket set and announced\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 10 docket set (24 demonstrators arrested behind Police Department on 1963 July 11)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 10 docket set (continued: 12 demonstrators arrested at Belk-Leggett Department Store on 1963 July 11)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 10 docket set (continued: 3 demonstrators arrested at Municipal Building on 1963 July 11)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 13 docket set (15 demonstrators arrested at Municipal Building on 1963 July 11)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 13 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Patton and Union Streets on 1963 July 12)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 14 docket set (demonstrators arrested at Belk-Leggett Department Store on 1963 July 12)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 14 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Patton and Union Streets on 1963 July 12)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 14 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Belk-Leggett Department Store and Raylass Department Store on 1963 July 13)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 14 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Country Club Drive on 1963 July 14)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 15 docket set (demonstrators arrested at Main and Crawford Streets on 1963 July 15)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 16 docket set (81 demonstrators arrested at Main and Union Streets on 1963 July 28)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 16 docket set (continued: 4 demonstrators arrested at Main Street Bridge on 1963 August 6)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 20 docket set (9 demonstrators arrested at Union Street on 1963 August 8)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 20 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Main and Union Streets on 1963 August 27)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 20 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Main and Union Streets on 29 August 1963)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e1967 February 14 docket omissions added\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eAdjournment until Thursday\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDiscussion in Judge's chambers [unclear, difficult to hear]\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623658%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Clarence Lewis Bowe, et. als. \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Clarence Lewis Bowe; William Burrell Canada, Jr.; Claudia Anne Chaney; Connie Lavonne Chaney; Elnora Elizabeth Chase; Patricia Glendora Chase; Lelia Virginia Clark; Edith Mary Coleman; Elizabeth Davis; Cynthia Anne Dawson; Thelma Farmer Echols; Claudia Jean Edwards;  Ernest David Ferguson; Joylette Glass; Lorraine Glass; Kenneth Lisberg Lewis; Howard Lee Logan; Sally Logan; Myrtle Mason; Julia Ferguson Moore; Rosetta Powell; Lonnie McKinley Saunders; Blondine Odessa Scales; Don Marie Scales; Dorothy James Scales; Earnestine Scott; Geraldine Lee Scott; Rebecca Grasty Wilson (hospital in DC); Pasadena Woods\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefendants roll call (3 defendants tried in absentia)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eWitnesses sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to quash capias\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion for bill of particulars\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motions (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCommonwealth's attorney's notes exception to bill of particulars\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eNorman H. Boswell (captain of police) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eNorman H. Boswell testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge questions witness\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eLeon Townsend (Danville Register-Bee photographer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eLeon Townsend testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eB. C. Elliott Jr. (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eB. C. Elliott Jr. testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecess\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconven\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eB. C. Elliott Jr. testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eWilliam G. Doss (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eC. L. Fuller (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eP. L. Rowland (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRalph Wilkinson (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRalph Wilkinson testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution argument against motion\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eClosing arguments\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e[No intelligible content]\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623693%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: James Vondell Bruce, et. als.  \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named:\u003c/emph\u003e James Vondell Bruce; Herman Canada; Sylvester Canada; Connie Lavonne Chaney; James Edward Coleman (potentially in jail); Lawrence Coleman; John Thomas Cunningham; Clifton Henry Davis (in the service);  Nelly Denson; Bobby Lee Ferguson; Samuel Wash Giles; Archie Glass (was in an accident; in DC); Hubert Graves; Roberta Hughes; William Haywood Ingram; Harry Michael Lewis; Robert James Lewis; Dollie J. Lumkpin; Conrad Price; James Malcom Scales; Sir Walter Scott; Ralph Frank Walters; Larry White (in the service); Basse Wilson Jr.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDocket called\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eWitnesses sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to quash capias\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge questions witness\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eT. G. Faulkner (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eE. L. Holley (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eE. L. Holley testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecess\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eE. L. Holley testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eNorman H. Boswell (captain of police) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eL. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eC. B. Scearce (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eC. B. Scearce testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJ. B. Martin Jr. (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eW. L. Buettner (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct/ John M. Bailey (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eNorman H. Boswell recall testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eNorman H. Boswell recall testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eH. R. Chaney (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJ. C. Lewis (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions renewed\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on renewed motions (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCharles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJuby E. Towler (captain of police) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution waives opening remarks\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense closing argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense closing argument (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution closing remarks\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eWitnesses sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eT. G. Faulkner (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion in re: double jeopardy\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (denied)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-re-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJames L. Miller (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJames L. Miller testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eWalter Riddle testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense renews motion in re: double jeopardy\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623735%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII:William Burrell Canada, et. als.  \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named:\u003c/emph\u003e William Burrell Canada;  Cynthia Ann Carter; John Lewis Davis; Cynthia Anne Dawson; Joylette Camila Glass; Lorraine Glass (sick); Sallie Mae Harper; Ronda Holloway; Mary Laverne Price; Mary Etta White (recently had a child)\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eWitnesses sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions renewed\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motions (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eLonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJ. W. Martin (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJ. W. Martin testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eL. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eW. L. Buettner (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eC. B. Scearce (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions renewed\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution arguments against defense motions\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution argument against defense motions (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motions (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623755%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Herman Joseph Chappelle, et. als.\u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Herman Joseph Chappelle; Lararia Marintez Hutchins; James J. Marsden; Virginia Banks; Charles Samuel Beard; Anita Glass (sick); Hazel Joanne Lindsey (sick); Howard Lee Logan; Cecil McIntire; Robert Lou Osborne[?]\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCases consolidated\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eWitnesses sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eNolle pros'd (all 10 defendants' cases dismissed)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623765%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Elnora Elizabeth Chase, et. als. \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Elnora Elizabeth Chase; Lindell Warren Chase;  Patricia Glendora Chase; Claudia Jean Edwards; Sylvia Ruth Lewis; Sally Ann Logan;  Lonnie McKinley Saunders; Larry James Wilson; Virgil Alexander Wood (sick- debated in court); Frank Harrison Gant; Thomas Cleveland Holt; Matthew A. Jones; William Thompson; Sylvester Walton Jr.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eNolle pros'd (continued: from previous trial of Herman Joseph Chappelle, et. als.)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDocket called\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCases consolidated\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecess\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eC. E. Earles (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eT. C. Talley (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eT. C. Talley testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eR. W. Brumfield (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRoy Larsen (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCurtis H. Royster (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct/ P. L. Barber (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eE. L. Carter (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eD. L. Haley (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecess\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623791%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: David Adams, et. als \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e David Adams; Ennis Hariston (in the service); Ralph McDonald Hairston; James Bernard Hughes;  Hortense Jones; Willie Thomas Cornodel [?] (in the Army); James Thomas Moore (in the Army); Charles Henry Payne; Edgar Lee Via;  Andrew Lewis Wilson \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCases consolidated\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eP. L. Rowland (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eC. L. Fuller (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eC. L. Fuller testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJackson H. Brown (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCurtis H. Royster (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eThomas W. Evans (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEdgar Lee Via (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRalph McDonald Hairston (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRalph McDonald Hairston testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRalph McDonald Hairston testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJames A. H. Ferguson (Danville City Attorney) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution motion for a bench warrant to be issued for the arrest of Edgar Lee\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eVia on a charge of perjury\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution and Defense rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to dismiss\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623822%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Mabel Elizabeth Bethel, et. als. \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \n\n\n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Mabel Elizabeth Bethel; Hazel Phyllis Carter (sick); Violet Howard (incarcerated); Kenneth Lisberg Lewis \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCases consolidated\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eLonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion in re: double jeopardy\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eLonnie Riddle testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-re-direct, etc. (5x)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense closing argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution closing argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623836%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Mary MacAglean Davis, et. als. \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order\n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Julius Adams (separate case); Mary MacAglean Davis; Laverne Hankins; Cheryl Elaine Hodnett; Evelyn Gray McGhee\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution requests postponement\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge grants postponement\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRemaining cases consolidated\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions stipulated\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eLonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions to strike evidence and witness testimony and in re: double jeopardy\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecess\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3623846%20%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Gloria Jane Barton, et. als. \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003eViolation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order [Offense Date: July 13, 1963 Belk- Legett]\n\n\n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Gloria Jane Barton; Irvin Chris Bethel; Ronald Eugene Horton; Frederick Douglas Wilson (in the service); George Thomas Gales; John James (in service); John Thomas Lumpkin; Margaret Read Terry (sick)\n\n\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCases consolidated\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions stipulated\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eG. W. Platt (general merchandise manager at Belk-Leggett Company) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eL. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eW. L. Buettner (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\n\u003citem\u003eL. A. Howerton (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eH. R. Chaney (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eProsecution rests\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eDefense motions renewed\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eDefense rests\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eDefense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3624160%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Evelyn Holt Beavers, et. als. \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \n\n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Evelyn Holt Beavers; Mildred Luck Ferguson; Penny Jean Hairston; Buford Glendale Holt (in the service, AWOL); Cordelia Ferguson Saunders; Ann Gvonne Wilson\n\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCases consolidated\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eLonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions renewed\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to dismiss\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to dismiss (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution argument against motions\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3624172%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Maggie Lou Jennings, et. als. \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order [offense date: 7/15/1963]\n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Maggie Lou Jennings (High School , NJ); Penny Kennedy; Sarah Mildred Kennedy;  Delores Ellen Robertson; Barbara Ann Terry\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCases consolidated\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eNorman H. Boswell (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJuby E. Towler (captain of police) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions renewed\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3624186%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Randy Adams, et. als.  \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order [offense date: July 28th 1963]\n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Randy Adams; Annie Pearl Avery; Clyde Langston Banks; Emmett Lee Banks; Carolyn Sue Barton; Valerie Bonner (industiral school for girls); Percy Bradford Boone; John Allen Bowels Jr (in the service); Luther Alfred Brown; Rosa Marie Cain; Owen Calvin Caldwell Jr.; Samuel Caldwell; Irvin Wendell Chase; Elnora Elizabeth Chase; Lelia Virginia Clark; Margaret Lee Coleman; Marion Johnson Coleman; Silas Coleman; Gilda Patricia Crews; Mary Helen Crews; Othia Davis; John Roosevelt Dodson (possibly deceased); Lena Emmerson Ferrel; Ardelia Freeman; Dorothy Gales; Thomas Lee Glass Jr.; Richard Drummond Goodwin (sick; discussion of criminal record; continued); Mabel Graves; Annie Mae Lewis Hairston; Alfred William Harper Jr.; Glayds Marie Harper; Gertie Williams Harris; Joe Harvest; Joseph Kenneth Hatechett; Ronald Leon Hoffman; Ruby Spraggins Wyllie Holloway; Grover Cleveland Holt; Iradell Graves Jefferies; Leslie Wisner Lancaster; Willie Terry Lanier; Willie Terry Lanier, Jr. (in the service); Joyce Ann Lewis Deshazo; Edna Rose Irby Lynn; Melvin Mason; Adell Morrison; Melba Graves Murrell; Maxine Luck Muse; Robert Lee Morton;  Lawrence Hance McKissick; Robert Earl Overbick (in the service); Delores Jeanette Page;  Brian Lee Peterson; Arthur Pinchback Jr.; Barbara Ann Townes (sick); Luvinia Prichett; Robert Lewis Waterman (in the service); Steve Jerome Reid; Odaris Robinson; Lorraine Coatland Bowe Schroeter; Lazaria Benton Slade; Dorothy Lee Smith; Claude Stevenson (in the service); Elizabeth Phillips Still; Maggie Julian Summers; William Thomas Sutherlin; Marie Thomas;  Robert Lee Trapp; Virginia Carol Via; Maggie Maxine Williams; Undra Ann Williams (in hospital);  Jacqueline Miller Wilson; Melvin Wilson; Garland Witherspoon; Hester William Womack; William Dexter Womack; L. Wilson York; John Robert Zellner\n\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eAnnouncement of Charles Luther Morgan (attorney from Lynchburg for the Defense) \u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCases consolidated\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain testimony (continued)\n\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain testimony (continued)\n\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecess for lunch\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-re-direct, etc. (4x)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eLonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eLonnie Riddle testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eThomas W. Evans (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e[Recorder took belt off to check machine]\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eThomas W. Evans testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecess\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eWillard Osborne (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJackson Brown (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJackson Brown testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eJohn W. Martin Jr. (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e T. Neal Morris (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eT. Neal Morris testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e Re-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eRe-re-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e B. G. Buchanan (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e Coley Boone (records officer, police officer and photographer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003e Adjournment\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eWalter Brown (police officer and photographer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJuby E. Towler (police captain) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJuby E. Towler testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJohn M. Bailey (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eC. W. Howerton (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions renewed\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions to strike evidence and witness testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution argument against Defense motions\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motions (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEmmett Lee Banks (demonstrator from Chatham) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEmmett Lee Banks testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eClyde L. Banks (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eClyde L. Banks testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEmmett Banks Case dismissed\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecess\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eLonnie Riddle (police officer) recall testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eL. Wilson York (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eL. Wilson York testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eOthea Davis (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eOthea Davis testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJoseph Hatchett (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReverend Lawrence Wendell Chase (pastor at High Street Baptist Church) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReverend Lawrence Wendell Chase testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eElaine Elizabeth Chase (demonstrator) Case dismissed\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRobert L. Trent (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRobert L. Trent Case dismissed\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motions (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution waives opening argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense argument (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eAdjournment until Monday\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReconvened\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDocket called Judge's ruling and sentences (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3624284%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Bruce Baines, et. als.  \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Not specified\n\n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e [names not given just case numbers]\n\n\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution motion to Nolle Pros'd cases numbered 327-335\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge grants motion\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eAdjournment\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3624294%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: James Coleman, et. als.   \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order [offense date:  August 27, 1963]\n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e James Coleman (on parole); Carol Delores Graves; Orlando Logan; Louie Martin Nasper (Berkley, CA); Samuel Wash Giles (injured leg); Harold Middlebrook (sick, in hospital, Tennessee); Lawrence Campbell; Betty Woods Dixon; Hubert Graves; Samuel Lawrence General; Geraldine Hairston\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCases consolidated\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eC. W. Howerton (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eC. W. Howerton testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCharles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eColey Boone (records officer, police officer and photographer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution argument against motion\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (overruled)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense argument (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3624312%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Sallie Mae Harper, et. als.   \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order  [Offense date: August , 1963]\n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Sallie Mae Harper; Sally N. Heitt; Margaret Ann Pinchback; Larry Wilson\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDocket called\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions stipulated\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eT. Neal Morris (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eNorman H. Boswell (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCharles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCharles Wade Graff testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eRecess\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eReconvene\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eDefense argument\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eDefense rests\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eDefense argument\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eDefense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3624326%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Julius Emanuel Adams, et. als.   \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Date of Offense: July 12, 1963\n\n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Julius Emanuel Adams\n\n\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eLonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eL. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReverend Frances F. McFarland testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEvelyn Gray McGhee (demonstrator) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eMary Davis testimony (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motions\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3624338%20%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Barbara Caldwell, et. als.    \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e [Civil Cases docket]\n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Barbara Caldwell;  Daniel Aaron Foss; L. W. Holt; John Robert Zellner; James E. Coleman; Abraham Glass; Joseph B. Hairston; Harry Wilson; Margie Ann Wilson; Ivanhoe Gaylord Donaldson; Harold Middlebrook\n\n\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense argument (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences (continued)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3624358%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Connie Lavonne Chaney, et. als.    \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e Unspecified\n\n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Connie Lavonne Chaney; David Lea Davis; Ruth Anita Ferrll; Annette Ada Glass; Charles Junior Hairston; Wilmar Ann Holland; Willie Lewis Madison; Ernestine Scott; Geraldine Lee Scott (Hood); Vernice Smith; Elouise Stamps; Dewey Wayne Via; Jon Norman Westling; Peggy Wiles;\n\n\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences (continued: from previous case)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eProsecution motion to Nolle Pros'd cases numbered 354-363\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge grants motion\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003e\u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://rosetta.virginiamemory.com/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3624370%20\"\u003e Audio files available here: Series XIII: Lawrence George Campbell, A. I. Dunlap, Julius E. Adams, and Arthur Pinchback  \u003c/extref\u003e through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery \u003c/emph\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eCharge:\u003c/emph\u003e suspension of sentence hearing\n\n \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eDefendants Named: \u003c/emph\u003e Lawrence George Campbell;  Alexander Isaiah Dunlap; Julius Emanuel Adams;  and Arthur Pinchback, Jr.\n\n\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRecorder sworn\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense motion\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling on motion (denied)\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eT. Neal Morris (police officer) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-direct\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eRe-cross\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eHoward Lee (minister) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eEverette L. Motley (Danville Public Schools) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eCharles H. Harris (bank cashier) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eReverend Samuel Griffith testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eM. C. Martin (banker) testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eWesley H. Motley Jr. testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eRoger Edwards testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eJulian R. Stinson testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eDoyle J. Thomas testimony\u003c/item\u003e\n \u003citem\u003eDefense rests\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e \u003clist type=\"marked\"\u003e\n\t\u003chead\u003e Contents \u003c/head\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eDefense argument\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003citem\u003eJudge's ruling and sentences\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/list\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content Information"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Danville (Va.) Civil Rights Case Files, 1963-1973, consists of\n         court papers and legal files relating to the 1963 Civil Rights\n         demonstrations in Danville. These files include bills of\n         particulars, bond records, correspondence, court dockets,\n         court orders, Dictabelts, evidence, judgments, petitions,\n         photographs, receipts, subpoenas, and transcripts of testimony\n         that document the legal aspects of the demonstrations from the\n         Danville Corporation Court to the Virginia Supreme Court of\n         Appeals.","Consists of the individual files of persons arrested\n               during the civil rights demonstrations of 1963. Files\n               include bills of particulars, bond records, judgments,\n               receipts and subpoenas. The files of juveniles arrested\n               include biographical information, including age,\n               education, prior arrests, and family history. "," Digital files available Here: Series I: Individual Case Files, A-Z  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery","Includes transcript of testimony and a notice of\n               appeal and assignment of errors relating to the trial of\n               Julius E. Adams, Lawrence G. Campbell, Lendall W. Chase,\n               Alexander I. Dunlap, and Arthur Pinchback, Jr., arrested for\n               trespassing on January 1, 1963 at the Howard Johnson\n               restaurant on Route 29 south of Danville."," Digital files available Here: Series II: Howard Johnson Trespassing Case, 1963   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery","Primarily consists of correspondence between the\n               clerk of the Danville Corporation Court and defense\n               attorney, Ruth L. Harvey, regarding notices of appeal\n               and assignments of errors, and designation of parts of\n               the record. The latter of which she requests the clerk\n               to forward to the clerk of the Virginia Supreme Court of\n               Appeals. Also, includes correspondence from the clerk of\n               the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals indicating receipt\n               of specified materials, and a telegram from the Seattle,\n               Washington, branch of the NAACP requesting information on\n               the arrest of Lawrence G. Campbell and Richard D.\n               Goodwin."," Digital files available Here: Series III: Correspondence, 1963-1967   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Includes the Corporation Court's dockets for the\n               demonstration cases from June 1963-April 1967. Lists\n               name of defendant, alleged offense, date of offense,\n               date of trial and disposition of case."," Digital files available Here: Series IV: Corporation Court Dockets  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Consists of continuances, court orders, judgments,\n               and sentences, issued by the Danville Corporation Court\n               from June 1963-February 1973. Judge Aiken, from June\n               1963-May 1967, ordered the arrest of demonstrators for\n               violating his injunction and inciting the colored\n               populace, the appearance of demonstrators before the\n               court to answer these violations, the investigation of\n               the juvenile defendants, the serving of jail time and\n               payment of fines, the acquittals of defendants, the\n               consolidation of cases, and the changes of venue. The\n               court orders issued January-February 1973 involved the\n               disqualifying and recusing of the Danville Corporation\n               Judge Stuart L. Craig, the selection of Judge Phillips\n               to replace Craig, the subpoenaing of defense witnesses,\n               and the suspension of jail sentences for the remaining\n               defendants. Also, includes judgements issued by Judge\n               Ted Dalton of the United States District Court for the\n               Western District of Virginia in May 1967."," Digital files available Here: Series V: Court Orders  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Includes the June 7, 1963 issue of the Danville Bee\n               and a note from the paper's general manager indicating\n               the writer and photographer of the June 10, 1963 article\n               entitled. \"Thirty Demonstrators Jailed.\" Also includes\n               excerpts from the July 10, 1963 meeting of the Danville\n               City Council during which it passed an ordinance\n               governing parades, a photocopy of the temporary\n               injunction and restraining order issued by Judge Aiken,\n               and photographs. The photographs show the demonstrators\n               on the steps of city hall, and the arrest of Rev.\n               Lawrence G. Campbell and Thurman Echols."," Digital files available Here: Series VI: Evidence  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Includes pieces of paper and lists indicating court\n               cases, dates and places of offenses, trial dates,\n               disposition of cases, and sentences."," Digital files available Here: Series VII: Notes  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Consists of the Petition for Removal filed with the\n               clerk of the United States District Court for the\n               Western District of Virginia on June 17, 1963, by defense\n               lawyers Len W. Holt and William M. Kunstler. The\n               petition tried to remove the demonstration cases to\n               federal court."," Digital files available Here: Series VIII: Petitions through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Includes receipts for bond refunds and payment of\n               fines."," Digital files available Here: Series IX: Receipts  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Includes indictments and subpoenas from the Special\n               Grand Jury responsible for indicting the demonstration\n               leaders under \"John Brown's Law.\" Contains names of the\n               members of the grand jury."," Digital files available Here: Series X: Special Grand Jury  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Contains transcripts of testimony from: ","Commonwealth of Virginia v. Lawrence G. Campbell, Alexander I. Dunlap, Arthur Pinchback, Jr., and Julius Adams, September 19, 1963","Commonwealth of Virginia v. Lawrence G. Campbell and Alexander I. Dunlap, Violation of Sections 18.1-14 and 18.1-254, October 22, 1963","Commonwealth of Virginia v. Avon Williams Rollins, August 6, 1963","City of Danville v. Lawrence G.Campbell, et als, October 1963 "," Digital files available Here: Series XI: Transcripts  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Consists of decisions handed down from October\n               1965-December 1972. Primarily includes writs of error\n               and supersedeas.","Digital files vailable Here: Series XII: Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","This series consists of full case recordings from many of the Civil Rights demonstrations cases heard in the Danville Corporation Court from December 1966 through April 1967. The recordings include witnesses' testimony, defense attorney's motions and arguments, Commonwealth and Danville City attorney's arguments, rulings and sentences of Judge Archibald M. Aiken, Jr., witness and recorder oaths, and the calling of the court docket."," This series is organized into 27 subseries (subseries A-AA), with each subseries representing one case. A majority of the cases documented in these audio recordings consist of dozens of individual cases consolidated and heard together on the charges of Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order. See the \"defendants named\" section in each subseries for the full list of individuals included in these consolidated cases. Names are listed in the order they occur in the audio, generally through the courts roll call. If abesent, the reason for the defendant's absence in placed in ( ) following the name. Additionally each subseries contains the belt list with information on the runtime and contents for each belt.","Also contained herein is the recording of the 1973 February 9 Corporation Court hearing concerning the defense motion to suspend the sentences for those defendants whose sentences had been upheld on appeal by the Supreme Court of Appeals. ","The original Dictabelts included wrapper containing written summaries of their audio contents, noting the approximate time the content appears in the recording.  In some cases, copies of the original court docket also accompany the original Dictabelt.  These wrappers and docket records are now digitized and available with the audio files available through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery",""," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Irvin Christopher Bethel, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order ","Defendants Named:  Irvin Christopher Bethel; Lendbury Bradshaw; Donald Jerome Brandon (indicate as in Vietnam); Harrison Brown Jr.; Everett Bruce Jr. (college); Victor Hugo Burton; Barbara Cardwell (in Washington); James Cobb Jr.; John Roland Coleman; Lawrence Coleman; Clifton Henry Davis (armed forces); David Lea Davis (college); Wayne Rochelle Davis; Ellis Newton Dodson; Charlie Henry Echols (in New York); Daniel Aaron Foss (University of Iowa); Melvin Fuller (Navy); Gladys Virginia Giles (Atlantic City, NJ, Teaching); Samule Wash Giles (Atlantic City NJ); Robert Leonard Graves; William Haywood Ingram; John James (Army); James Johnson; Robert James Lewis; Margie Mabin; Thomas Mabin (New York); Charlie Henry Mason; Wilson Lee Maden (Army); James Thomas Moore (Army);Marilyn Morton (Washington); Hildreth Glennell McGhee; Archie Lee Petty, Harvey Louis Poteat; Herman Prichett (in jail); Luvinia Prichett; Avon Wiliams Rollins (Washington); William Howard Scott; Percy Walters; Ralph Frank Walters; Melvin Warner; George Albert Watkins; James Edward Whipple; Jimmy Ray Hurston (penitentiary, life sentence); Michael Smith; Bertie Smith; Sylvester Burrell (jail); Harvey Davis Jr.; Mabel Graves (sick); Ennis Hairston;  Ola Mae Cunningham Harris; Leonard Winston Holt; Joe Wesley Lewis; Stuart Mingo; Robert Morton; Marcelluos Reeves; Willie Ulysses Thomas; John Robert Zellner (New York); Eugene Bennett; Ernest Howard Smith; Sylvester Graves; Jesse Hairston; Otha Frank Lumpkin Annie Mae Johnson; Harvey Smith; Robert Hemphill Jr. (Army); Daniel McCain; Paul Price; Alberta Via Tathatter [?]; Shirely Terry; Averett Wade Thompson; Ivanhoe Gaylord Thompson (Atlanta, college)"," Contents  Defendants roll call  arguments in Judge's chambers in re: consolidating cases"," Contents  Attorneys' arguments in Judge's chambers in re: consolidating cases (continued) Reading of Judge's injunction issued 6 June 1963 Defendants' pleas "," Contents  Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony"," Contents  Charles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony T. Neil Morris (police officer) testimony"," Contents  L. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony Curtis H. Royster (police officer) testimony W. L. Buettner (police officer) testimony Curtis H. Royster recall testimony Adjournment Reconvene T. C. Tatterhorn (police officer) testimony R. W. Brumfield (police officer) testimony"," Contents  W. L. Sheffield (police officer) testimony C. L. Fuller (police officer) testimony R. A. Walker (police officer) testimony D. E. Nostrand (police officer) testimony B. C. Enyard (police officer) testimony John M. Bailey (police officer) testimony"," Contents  John M. Bailey testimony (continued) Unidentified (police officer) testimony T. W. Evans (police officer) testimony Sutaliff (police officer) testimony Unidentified (police officer) testimony L. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony"," Contents  Ernest Howard Smith (demonstrator) testimony Defense attorneys' motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Adjournment and weather report"," Contents  Convene and roll call Approach bench - discussion Charles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony Juby E. Towler (chief of police detectives) testimony"," Contents  Juby E. Towler testimony (continued) City attorney argument against defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Defense attorney re-argues motion to strike evidence"," Contents  Defense attorney re-argues motion to strike evidence (continued) Judge's ruling on motion (denied) Adjournment Reconvene Defense motion to remove some defendant's names from case docket"," Contents  Defense attorney motion to strike evidence and witness testimony (continued) Judge's ruling on motion (denied) James Edward Whipple (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  James Edward Whipple testimony (continued) W. L. Buettner recall testimony Unidentified (police officer) recall testimony Prosecution rests Defense closing"," Contents  Defense closing (continued) Prosecution closing Judge's ruling and sentences"," Contents  Attorneys' arguments in Judge's chambers in re: bond hearing for absentee defendants Adjournment"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Sylvester Burrell, et. als.    through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order ","Defendants Named:  Sylvester Burrell; Harvey Davis Jr.; Mabel Graves; Ennis Hairston; Ola Mae Cunningham Harris; Leonard Winston Holt (removed, heard at later date); Joe Wesley Lewis (Army); Stuart Mingo; Robert Morton; Marcellos Reeves; Willie Ulysses Thomas; Sylvester Graves; Jesse Hairston; Harvey Smith; Robert Hemphill Jr. (Army); Annie Mae Johnson; Otha Frank Lumpkin; Daniel McCain; Paul Price; Alberta Viatanian [?]; Shirley Terry; Averett Wade Thompson; Ivanhoe Gaylord Donaldson (college)"," Contents  Convene Recorder sworn Defendants roll call Cases consolidated Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued)"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued) Recess Reconvene Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued)"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued)"," Contents  T. Neil Morris (police officer) testimony Lunch recess Reconvene T. Neil Morris testimony (continued) harles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony"," Contents  Charles Wade Graff testimony (continued) Attorneys' arguments in Judge's chambers in re: photographs and time of their development Charles Wade Graff testimony (continued) Juby E. Towler (chief of police detectives) testimony"," Contents  Juby E. Towler testimony (continued) Re-direct Re-cross Re-re-direct Re-re-cross Ralph Wilkerson (police officer) testimony Re-direct Re-cross Charles Wade Graff recall testimony Recess Reconvene B. C. Elliott Jr. (police officer) testimony\n Attorneys' arguments in Judge's chambers in re: photographs and time of their development Charles Wade Graff testimony (continued) Juby E. Towler (chief of police detectives) testimony"," Contents  B. C. Elliott Jr. testimony (continued) testimony Prosecution and Defense rests Defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Judge's ruling on motion (denied) Defense motion to strike because arrest did not occur at time of violation Judge's ruling on motion (denied) Recess Reconvene Wade Thompson (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  Wade Thompson testimony (continued) Harvey Smith (demonstrator) testimony Paul Price (demonstrator) testimony Stuart Walter Mayo (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  Otha Frank Lumpkin (demonstrator) testimony Adjournment"," Contents  Reconvene Defense renews motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Defense motion to dismiss against 5 defendants because prosecution has not proven a case Commonwealth argument against motion Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Prosecution opening argument Defense closing argument Judge questions Defense attorneys Prosecution closing argument Judge's ruling and sentences"," Contents  Judge's ruling and sentences (continued) [unclear, distorted sound] Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: James Edward Whipple   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Perjury ","Defendants Named:   James Edward Whipple"," Contents  Prosecution motion for a bench warrant to be issued for the arrest of James Edward Whipple on a charge of perjury Judge's ruling on motion (granted)"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Joseph Bowe, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order\n ","Defendants Named:   Joseph Bowe; Cynthia Ann Carter; L.W. Chase, Gineva Rogers Davis, Lizzie Spivey Davis, Jimmie Hamlett; Thomas Cleveland Holt; General Redd; William Edward Richardson; Isiah Hall; James Dixon jr.; Eddie Mae Womack; Estelle Womack; Doyle J. Thomas; Alice Lee Strader; Celester Lindsey; Percy Randolph Williams; Walter Link\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Cases consolidated Defendants roll call Defendants' pleas"," Contents  Walter Link (demonstrator) guilty plea Judge's sentence Adjournment Reconvene Stipulate injunction become part of the record Defendants' pleas T. Neil Morris (police officer) testimony"," Contents  T. Neil Morris testimony (continued) Charles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony B. C. Elliott Jr. (police officer) testimony William G. Doss (police officer) testimony"," Contents  William G. Doss testimony (continued) Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued) Recess and adjournment until Monday, 19 December"," Contents  Reconvene W. L. Sheffield (police officer) testimony"," Contents  P. L. Rowland (police officer) testimony T. C. Talley (police officer) testimony Recess Reconvene Eugene G. McCain recall testimony"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain recall testimony (continued) Prosecution rests City motion to dismiss cases against Joseph Bowe, Reverend Doyle J. Thomas, and Paul Wade Jr. Judge grants and dismisses cases Defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Judge's ruling on motion (denied) B. C. Elliott recall testimony Recess Reconvene Percy Randolph Williams (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  Percy Randolph Williams testimony (continued) Thomas F. Tucker (Danville Clerk of Court) testimony Defense rests Defense motion to show cause Defense motion to quash capias"," Contents  Defense motion to quash capias (continued) City argument and rebuttal against motion Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Defense renews motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Defense motions (various) Judge's ruling on motions (overruled) Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Ruth L. Harvey    through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Contempt of court\n\n ","Defendants Named:   Ruth L. Harvey \n"," Contents  Ruth L. Harvey held in contempt of court for misleading court on location of Leonard Winston Holt (demonstrator/defendant) Judge fines Harvey $25"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Everett Bruce Jr., et. Als    through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order\n\n ","Defendants Named:   L. W. Chase; Everett Bruce Jr; Barbara Cardwell (June 10th; college); Charlie Henry Echols; Daniel Aaron Foss (june 10th offense); Gladys Virginia Giles; Samuel Wash Giles; Thomas Madin; Charlie Henry Mason (hospital in DC); Marilyn Morton; Avon Williams Rollins; Mabel Graves; Leonard Winston Holt; Robert Morton Jr. ; John Robert Zellner; Bruce Baines; Hazel Phyllis Carter; James Edward Coleman; Daniel Aaron Foss (additional charge on June 15th); Abraham Glass; Joseph Benjamin Hairston;  Leatrice Ann Hairston; Lavern Higgins; Violet Howard (doctoral school); Lillie Echols Hubbard; Annie Mae Johnson (jail); Dorothy Elizabeth Moore; Harry Wilson Jr.; Margie Ann Wilson; Milton A. Reid; Ivanhoe Gaylord Donaldson\n\n"," Contents  Convene Recorder sworn Docket set Reverend L. W. Chase statement (found guilty in absence on 19 December 1966) Judge's ruling and sentence for Chase Defense motion to suspend pending appeal Recess Reconvene"," Contents  Defendants roll call Bonds forfeited for those defendants who are absent Leonard Winston Holt (demonstrator) case in absentia"," Contents  Hector Womack (bondsman for Leonard Winston Holt) testimony as to location of Holt Adjournment"," Contents  Leonard Winston Holt bond forfeited Judge's ruling and sentence of Holt Defense motion to suspend sentence pending appeal Recess Thomas Mabin (demonstrator) testimony Betty H. Dallas (juvenile probation officer) testimony Thomas Mabin case dismissed Judge's ruling and sentences remaining defendants"," Contents  Judge's ruling and sentences (continued)"," Audio files available here: Series XIII:  Foss, Zelner and Donaldson   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:Contempt of Court (being absent)\n","Defendants Named:   Daniel Aaron Foss; Robert Zellner; Ivanhoe Gaylord Donaldson\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Defendants roll call Witnesses sworn John Robert Zelner (demonstrator) testimony Defense argument"," Contents  Prosecution argument Judge's ruling and sentence Motion to suspend sentence pending appeal Daniel Aaron Foss (demonstrator) testimony Defense argument Judge's ruling and sentence"," Contents  Ivanhoe Gaylord Donaldson (demonstrator) testimony Defense argument Prosecution argument Judge's ruling and sentence Motion to suspend sentence pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII:  Setting the court docket   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery "," Contents  Recorder sworn Defense and Prosecution argument and discussion in re: injunction 1967 February 9 Docket set and announced"," Contents  1967 February 10 docket set (24 demonstrators arrested behind Police Department on 1963 July 11) 1967 February 10 docket set (continued: 12 demonstrators arrested at Belk-Leggett Department Store on 1963 July 11) 1967 February 10 docket set (continued: 3 demonstrators arrested at Municipal Building on 1963 July 11) 1967 February 13 docket set (15 demonstrators arrested at Municipal Building on 1963 July 11) 1967 February 13 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Patton and Union Streets on 1963 July 12) 1967 February 14 docket set (demonstrators arrested at Belk-Leggett Department Store on 1963 July 12) 1967 February 14 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Patton and Union Streets on 1963 July 12)"," Contents  1967 February 14 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Belk-Leggett Department Store and Raylass Department Store on 1963 July 13) 1967 February 14 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Country Club Drive on 1963 July 14) 1967 February 15 docket set (demonstrators arrested at Main and Crawford Streets on 1963 July 15) 1967 February 16 docket set (81 demonstrators arrested at Main and Union Streets on 1963 July 28) 1967 February 16 docket set (continued: 4 demonstrators arrested at Main Street Bridge on 1963 August 6) 1967 February 20 docket set (9 demonstrators arrested at Union Street on 1963 August 8) 1967 February 20 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Main and Union Streets on 1963 August 27)"," Contents  1967 February 20 docket set (continued: demonstrators arrested at Main and Union Streets on 29 August 1963) 1967 February 14 docket omissions added Adjournment until Thursday"," Contents  Discussion in Judge's chambers [unclear, difficult to hear]"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Clarence Lewis Bowe, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order\n","Defendants Named:   Clarence Lewis Bowe; William Burrell Canada, Jr.; Claudia Anne Chaney; Connie Lavonne Chaney; Elnora Elizabeth Chase; Patricia Glendora Chase; Lelia Virginia Clark; Edith Mary Coleman; Elizabeth Davis; Cynthia Anne Dawson; Thelma Farmer Echols; Claudia Jean Edwards;  Ernest David Ferguson; Joylette Glass; Lorraine Glass; Kenneth Lisberg Lewis; Howard Lee Logan; Sally Logan; Myrtle Mason; Julia Ferguson Moore; Rosetta Powell; Lonnie McKinley Saunders; Blondine Odessa Scales; Don Marie Scales; Dorothy James Scales; Earnestine Scott; Geraldine Lee Scott; Rebecca Grasty Wilson (hospital in DC); Pasadena Woods\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Defendants roll call (3 defendants tried in absentia) Witnesses sworn Defense motion to quash capias Defense motion for bill of particulars Judge's ruling on motions (overruled) Commonwealth's attorney's notes exception to bill of particulars Norman H. Boswell (captain of police) testimony"," Contents  Norman H. Boswell testimony (continued) Judge questions witness Re-direct Re-cross Leon Townsend (Danville Register-Bee photographer) testimony Re-direct"," Contents  Leon Townsend testimony (continued) Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony B. C. Elliott Jr. (police officer) testimony"," Contents  B. C. Elliott Jr. testimony (continued) Recess Reconven B. C. Elliott Jr. testimony (continued) William G. Doss (police officer) testimony Re-direct Re-cross"," Contents  C. L. Fuller (police officer) testimony P. L. Rowland (police officer) testimony Ralph Wilkinson (police officer) testimony"," Contents  Ralph Wilkinson testimony (continued) Prosecution rests Defense motion Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Prosecution argument against motion Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Defense rests Closing arguments Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Contents  [No intelligible content]"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: James Vondell Bruce, et. als.    through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order ","Defendants Named:  James Vondell Bruce; Herman Canada; Sylvester Canada; Connie Lavonne Chaney; James Edward Coleman (potentially in jail); Lawrence Coleman; John Thomas Cunningham; Clifton Henry Davis (in the service);  Nelly Denson; Bobby Lee Ferguson; Samuel Wash Giles; Archie Glass (was in an accident; in DC); Hubert Graves; Roberta Hughes; William Haywood Ingram; Harry Michael Lewis; Robert James Lewis; Dollie J. Lumkpin; Conrad Price; James Malcom Scales; Sir Walter Scott; Ralph Frank Walters; Larry White (in the service); Basse Wilson Jr.\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Docket called Witnesses sworn Defense motion to quash capias Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued) Judge questions witness Re-direct Re-cross T. G. Faulkner (police officer) testimony E. L. Holley (police officer) testimony"," Contents  E. L. Holley testimony (continued) Recess Reconvene E. L. Holley testimony (continued) Norman H. Boswell (captain of police) testimony L. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony Re-direct Re-cross C. B. Scearce (police officer) testimony"," Contents  C. B. Scearce testimony (continued) J. B. Martin Jr. (police officer) testimony W. L. Buettner (police officer) testimony Re-direct/ John M. Bailey (police officer) testimony Norman H. Boswell recall testimony"," Contents  Norman H. Boswell recall testimony (continued) H. R. Chaney (police officer) testimony J. C. Lewis (police officer) testimony Prosecution rests Defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Defense motions renewed Judge's ruling on renewed motions (overruled) Charles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony Juby E. Towler (captain of police) testimony Defense rests Prosecution waives opening remarks Defense closing argument"," Contents  Defense closing argument (continued) Prosecution closing remarks Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Contents  Recorder sworn Witnesses sworn T. G. Faulkner (police officer) testimony Defense motion in re: double jeopardy Judge's ruling on motion (denied) Re-direct Re-cross Re-re-direct James L. Miller (police officer) testimony"," Contents  James L. Miller testimony (continued) Walter Riddle testimony Prosecution rests Defense renews motion in re: double jeopardy Defense rests Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII:William Burrell Canada, et. als.    through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \n","Defendants Named:  William Burrell Canada;  Cynthia Ann Carter; John Lewis Davis; Cynthia Anne Dawson; Joylette Camila Glass; Lorraine Glass (sick); Sallie Mae Harper; Ronda Holloway; Mary Laverne Price; Mary Etta White (recently had a child)\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Witnesses sworn Defense motions renewed Judge's ruling on motions (overruled) Lonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony Re-direct Re-cross J. W. Martin (police officer) testimony"," Contents  J. W. Martin testimony (continued) L. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony W. L. Buettner (police officer) testimony C. B. Scearce (police officer) testimony Prosecution rests Defense motions renewed Prosecution arguments against defense motions"," Contents  Prosecution argument against defense motions (continued) Judge's ruling on motions (overruled) Defense rests Judge's ruling and sentences"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Herman Joseph Chappelle, et. als.  through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \n ","Defendants Named:   Herman Joseph Chappelle; Lararia Marintez Hutchins; James J. Marsden; Virginia Banks; Charles Samuel Beard; Anita Glass (sick); Hazel Joanne Lindsey (sick); Howard Lee Logan; Cecil McIntire; Robert Lou Osborne[?]\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Cases consolidated Witnesses sworn Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony Nolle pros'd (all 10 defendants' cases dismissed)"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Elnora Elizabeth Chase, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \n ","Defendants Named:   Elnora Elizabeth Chase; Lindell Warren Chase;  Patricia Glendora Chase; Claudia Jean Edwards; Sylvia Ruth Lewis; Sally Ann Logan;  Lonnie McKinley Saunders; Larry James Wilson; Virgil Alexander Wood (sick- debated in court); Frank Harrison Gant; Thomas Cleveland Holt; Matthew A. Jones; William Thompson; Sylvester Walton Jr.\n"," Contents  Nolle pros'd (continued: from previous trial of Herman Joseph Chappelle, et. als.) Recorder sworn Docket called Cases consolidated Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony Recess"," Contents  Reconvene Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued) Re-direct Re-cross C. E. Earles (police officer) testimony T. C. Talley (police officer) testimony"," Contents  T. C. Talley testimony (continued) R. W. Brumfield (police officer) testimony Re-direct Re-cross Roy Larsen (police officer) testimony Curtis H. Royster (police officer) testimony Re-direct/ P. L. Barber (police officer) testimony E. L. Carter (police officer) testimony Re-direct"," Contents  D. L. Haley (police officer) testimony Re-direct Prosecution rests Defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Recess Reconvene Defense rests Judge's ruling and sentences"," Contents  Judge's ruling and sentences (continued) Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: David Adams, et. als   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order ","Defendants Named:   David Adams; Ennis Hariston (in the service); Ralph McDonald Hairston; James Bernard Hughes;  Hortense Jones; Willie Thomas Cornodel [?] (in the Army); James Thomas Moore (in the Army); Charles Henry Payne; Edgar Lee Via;  Andrew Lewis Wilson \n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Cases consolidated Defense motions P. L. Rowland (police officer) testimony C. L. Fuller (police officer) testimony"," Contents  C. L. Fuller testimony (continued) Jackson H. Brown (police officer) testimony Re-direct Curtis H. Royster (police officer) testimony Thomas W. Evans (police officer) testimony Prosecution rests Defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony"," Contents  Defense motion to strike evidence and witness testimony (continued) Edgar Lee Via (demonstrator) testimony Ralph McDonald Hairston (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  Ralph McDonald Hairston testimony (continued)"," Contents  Ralph McDonald Hairston testimony (continued) Defense rests James A. H. Ferguson (Danville City Attorney) testimony Re-direct Prosecution motion for a bench warrant to be issued for the arrest of Edgar Lee Via on a charge of perjury Prosecution and Defense rests Defense motion to dismiss Judge's ruling and sentences"," Contents  Judge's ruling and sentences (continued)"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Mabel Elizabeth Bethel, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \n\n\n ","Defendants Named:   Mabel Elizabeth Bethel; Hazel Phyllis Carter (sick); Violet Howard (incarcerated); Kenneth Lisberg Lewis \n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Cases consolidated Defense motions Lonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony Defense motion in re: double jeopardy Lonnie Riddle testimony (continued) Re-direct Re-cross Re-re-direct, etc. (5x)"," Contents  Prosecution rests Defense closing argument Prosecution closing argument Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Mary MacAglean Davis, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order\n ","Defendants Named:   Julius Adams (separate case); Mary MacAglean Davis; Laverne Hankins; Cheryl Elaine Hodnett; Evelyn Gray McGhee\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Prosecution requests postponement Judge grants postponement Remaining cases consolidated Defense motions stipulated Lonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony Re-direct Defense motions to strike evidence and witness testimony and in re: double jeopardy Defense rests Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal Recess"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Gloria Jane Barton, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge: Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order [Offense Date: July 13, 1963 Belk- Legett]\n\n\n ","Defendants Named:   Gloria Jane Barton; Irvin Chris Bethel; Ronald Eugene Horton; Frederick Douglas Wilson (in the service); George Thomas Gales; John James (in service); John Thomas Lumpkin; Margaret Read Terry (sick)\n\n\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Cases consolidated Defense motions stipulated Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony G. W. Platt (general merchandise manager at Belk-Leggett Company) testimony L. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony Re-direct W. L. Buettner (police officer) testimony Re-direct Re-cross"," Contents  L. A. Howerton (police officer) testimony H. R. Chaney (police officer) testimony Prosecution rests Defense motions renewed Defense rests Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Evelyn Holt Beavers, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order \n\n ","Defendants Named:   Evelyn Holt Beavers; Mildred Luck Ferguson; Penny Jean Hairston; Buford Glendale Holt (in the service, AWOL); Cordelia Ferguson Saunders; Ann Gvonne Wilson\n\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Cases consolidated Lonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony Re-direct Re-cross Prosecution rests Defense motions renewed Defense motion to dismiss"," Contents  Defense motion to dismiss (continued) Prosecution argument against motions Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Maggie Lou Jennings, et. als.   through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order [offense date: 7/15/1963]\n ","Defendants Named:   Maggie Lou Jennings (High School , NJ); Penny Kennedy; Sarah Mildred Kennedy;  Delores Ellen Robertson; Barbara Ann Terry\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Cases consolidated Norman H. Boswell (police officer) testimony Juby E. Towler (captain of police) testimony"," Contents  Prosecution rests Defense motions renewed Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Randy Adams, et. als.    through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order [offense date: July 28th 1963]\n ","Defendants Named:   Randy Adams; Annie Pearl Avery; Clyde Langston Banks; Emmett Lee Banks; Carolyn Sue Barton; Valerie Bonner (industiral school for girls); Percy Bradford Boone; John Allen Bowels Jr (in the service); Luther Alfred Brown; Rosa Marie Cain; Owen Calvin Caldwell Jr.; Samuel Caldwell; Irvin Wendell Chase; Elnora Elizabeth Chase; Lelia Virginia Clark; Margaret Lee Coleman; Marion Johnson Coleman; Silas Coleman; Gilda Patricia Crews; Mary Helen Crews; Othia Davis; John Roosevelt Dodson (possibly deceased); Lena Emmerson Ferrel; Ardelia Freeman; Dorothy Gales; Thomas Lee Glass Jr.; Richard Drummond Goodwin (sick; discussion of criminal record; continued); Mabel Graves; Annie Mae Lewis Hairston; Alfred William Harper Jr.; Glayds Marie Harper; Gertie Williams Harris; Joe Harvest; Joseph Kenneth Hatechett; Ronald Leon Hoffman; Ruby Spraggins Wyllie Holloway; Grover Cleveland Holt; Iradell Graves Jefferies; Leslie Wisner Lancaster; Willie Terry Lanier; Willie Terry Lanier, Jr. (in the service); Joyce Ann Lewis Deshazo; Edna Rose Irby Lynn; Melvin Mason; Adell Morrison; Melba Graves Murrell; Maxine Luck Muse; Robert Lee Morton;  Lawrence Hance McKissick; Robert Earl Overbick (in the service); Delores Jeanette Page;  Brian Lee Peterson; Arthur Pinchback Jr.; Barbara Ann Townes (sick); Luvinia Prichett; Robert Lewis Waterman (in the service); Steve Jerome Reid; Odaris Robinson; Lorraine Coatland Bowe Schroeter; Lazaria Benton Slade; Dorothy Lee Smith; Claude Stevenson (in the service); Elizabeth Phillips Still; Maggie Julian Summers; William Thomas Sutherlin; Marie Thomas;  Robert Lee Trapp; Virginia Carol Via; Maggie Maxine Williams; Undra Ann Williams (in hospital);  Jacqueline Miller Wilson; Melvin Wilson; Garland Witherspoon; Hester William Womack; William Dexter Womack; L. Wilson York; John Robert Zellner\n\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Announcement of Charles Luther Morgan (attorney from Lynchburg for the Defense)  Cases consolidated Defense motions Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued)\n"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued)\n"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued) Recess for lunch Reconvene Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued) Re-direct"," Contents  Eugene G. McCain testimony (continued) Re-cross Re-re-direct, etc. (4x) Lonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony"," Contents  Lonnie Riddle testimony (continued) Thomas W. Evans (police officer) testimony [Recorder took belt off to check machine]"," Contents  Thomas W. Evans testimony (continued) Re-direct Re-cross Recess Reconvene Willard Osborne (police officer) testimony Re-direct Jackson Brown (police officer) testimony"," Contents  Jackson Brown testimony (continued) John W. Martin Jr. (police officer) testimony Re-direct  T. Neal Morris (police officer) testimony"," Contents  T. Neal Morris testimony (continued)  Re-direct Re-cross Re-re-direct  B. G. Buchanan (police officer) testimony  Coley Boone (records officer, police officer and photographer) testimony  Adjournment"," Contents  Reconvene Walter Brown (police officer and photographer) testimony Juby E. Towler (police captain) testimony"," Contents  Juby E. Towler testimony (continued) Re-direct John M. Bailey (police officer) testimony C. W. Howerton (police officer) testimony Defense motions renewed Defense motions to strike evidence and witness testimony Prosecution argument against Defense motions Defense argument Judge's ruling on motions (overruled) Emmett Lee Banks (demonstrator from Chatham) testimony"," Contents  Emmett Lee Banks testimony (continued) Defense motion Clyde L. Banks (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  Clyde L. Banks testimony (continued) Emmett Banks Case dismissed Recess Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony Re-direct Lonnie Riddle (police officer) recall testimony L. Wilson York (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  L. Wilson York testimony (continued) Re-direct Re-cross Othea Davis (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  Othea Davis testimony (continued) Joseph Hatchett (demonstrator) testimony Re-direct Re-cross Reverend Lawrence Wendell Chase (pastor at High Street Baptist Church) testimony"," Contents  Reverend Lawrence Wendell Chase testimony (continued) Elaine Elizabeth Chase (demonstrator) Case dismissed Robert L. Trent (demonstrator) testimony Robert L. Trent Case dismissed Defense rests Defense motions Judge's ruling on motions (overruled) Prosecution waives opening argument Defense argument"," Contents  Defense argument (continued) Prosecution argument Judge's ruling and sentences Adjournment until Monday"," Contents  Reconvened Docket called Judge's ruling and sentences (continued)"," Contents  Judge's ruling and sentences (continued)"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Bruce Baines, et. als.    through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Not specified\n\n ","Defendants Named:   [names not given just case numbers]\n\n\n"," Contents  Prosecution motion to Nolle Pros'd cases numbered 327-335 Judge grants motion Adjournment"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: James Coleman, et. als.     through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:   Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order [offense date:  August 27, 1963]\n ","Defendants Named:   James Coleman (on parole); Carol Delores Graves; Orlando Logan; Louie Martin Nasper (Berkley, CA); Samuel Wash Giles (injured leg); Harold Middlebrook (sick, in hospital, Tennessee); Lawrence Campbell; Betty Woods Dixon; Hubert Graves; Samuel Lawrence General; Geraldine Hairston\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Cases consolidated Defense motions Eugene G. McCain (chief of police) testimony C. W. Howerton (police officer) testimony"," Contents  C. W. Howerton testimony (continued) Re-direct Charles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony Coley Boone (records officer, police officer and photographer) testimony Defense motions Prosecution argument against motion Judge's ruling on motion (overruled) Defense rests Defense argument"," Contents  Defense argument (continued) Judge's ruling and sentences"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Sallie Mae Harper, et. als.     through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Violation of Temporary Injunction and Restraining Order  [Offense date: August , 1963]\n ","Defendants Named:   Sallie Mae Harper; Sally N. Heitt; Margaret Ann Pinchback; Larry Wilson\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Docket called Defense motions stipulated T. Neal Morris (police officer) testimony Norman H. Boswell (police officer) testimony Charles Wade Graff (police officer and photographer) testimony"," Contents  Charles Wade Graff testimony (continued) Prosecution rests Defense motions Recess Reconvene Defense argument Defense rests Defense argument Judge's ruling and sentences Defense motion to suspend sentences pending appeal"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Julius Emanuel Adams, et. als.     through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Date of Offense: July 12, 1963\n\n ","Defendants Named:   Julius Emanuel Adams\n\n\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Defense motions Lonnie Riddle (police officer) testimony Re-direct L. P. Rigney (police officer) testimony Reverend Frances F. McFarland testimony Re-direct Evelyn Gray McGhee (demonstrator) testimony"," Contents  Mary Davis testimony (continued) Prosecution rests Defense motions Judge's ruling and sentences"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Barbara Caldwell, et. als.      through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  [Civil Cases docket]\n ","Defendants Named:   Barbara Caldwell;  Daniel Aaron Foss; L. W. Holt; John Robert Zellner; James E. Coleman; Abraham Glass; Joseph B. Hairston; Harry Wilson; Margie Ann Wilson; Ivanhoe Gaylord Donaldson; Harold Middlebrook\n\n\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Defense argument Prosecution argument Defense argument"," Contents  Defense argument (continued) Prosecution argument Judge's ruling and sentences"," Contents  Judge's ruling and sentences (continued)"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Connie Lavonne Chaney, et. als.      through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  Unspecified\n\n ","Defendants Named:   Connie Lavonne Chaney; David Lea Davis; Ruth Anita Ferrll; Annette Ada Glass; Charles Junior Hairston; Wilmar Ann Holland; Willie Lewis Madison; Ernestine Scott; Geraldine Lee Scott (Hood); Vernice Smith; Elouise Stamps; Dewey Wayne Via; Jon Norman Westling; Peggy Wiles;\n\n\n"," Contents  Judge's ruling and sentences (continued: from previous case) Prosecution motion to Nolle Pros'd cases numbered 354-363 Judge grants motion"," Audio files available here: Series XIII: Lawrence George Campbell, A. I. Dunlap, Julius E. Adams, and Arthur Pinchback    through the Library of Virginia's Digital Collections Discovery ","Charge:  suspension of sentence hearing\n\n ","Defendants Named:   Lawrence George Campbell;  Alexander Isaiah Dunlap; Julius Emanuel Adams;  and Arthur Pinchback, Jr.\n\n\n"," Contents  Recorder sworn Defense motion Judge's ruling on motion (denied) T. Neal Morris (police officer) testimony Re-direct Re-cross Howard Lee (minister) testimony Everette L. Motley (Danville Public Schools) testimony Charles H. Harris (bank cashier) testimony"," Contents  Reverend Samuel Griffith testimony M. C. Martin (banker) testimony Wesley H. Motley Jr. testimony Roger Edwards testimony Julian R. Stinson testimony Doyle J. Thomas testimony Defense rests"," Contents  Defense argument Judge's ruling and sentences"],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions"],"userestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions."],"physloc_html_tesm":["\u003cphysloc label=\"Physical Location\"\u003eLibrary of Virginia\u003c/physloc\u003e"],"physloc_tesim":["Library of Virginia"],"language_ssim":["English"],"total_component_count_is":486,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T08:50:16.294Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi00037_c01_c256"}},{"id":"vi_vi01055_c05_c01_c1455","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Zendig, E.L., Victoria, October 1919","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi01055_c05_c01_c1455#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi01055_c05_c01_c1455","ref_ssm":["vi_vi01055_c05_c01_c1455"],"id":"vi_vi01055_c05_c01_c1455","ead_ssi":"vi_vi01055","_root_":"vi_vi01055","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi01055_c05_c01","parent_ssi":"vi_vi01055_c05_c01","parent_ssim":["vi_vi01055","vi_vi01055_c05","vi_vi01055_c05_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi01055","vi_vi01055_c05","vi_vi01055_c05_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Records of the Virginia Prohibition Commission,\n1916-1934","Series V: Permits, 1918-1934. Boxes 99-180","Item"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Records of the Virginia Prohibition Commission,\n1916-1934","Series V: Permits, 1918-1934. Boxes 99-180","Item"],"text":["Records of the Virginia Prohibition Commission,\n1916-1934","Series V: Permits, 1918-1934. Boxes 99-180","Item","Zendig, E.L., Victoria, October 1919","box 105","folder 54"],"title_filing_ssi":"Zendig, E.L., Victoria, October 1919\n\t","title_ssm":["Zendig, E.L., Victoria, October 1919"],"title_tesim":["Zendig, E.L., Victoria, October 1919"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Zendig, E.L., Victoria, October 1919"],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Records of the Virginia Prohibition Commission,\n1916-1934"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":6804,"containers_ssim":["box 105","folder 54"],"_nest_path_":"/components#4/components#0/components#1454","timestamp":"2026-05-21T10:27:14.939Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi01055","ead_ssi":"vi_vi01055","_root_":"vi_vi01055","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi01055","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi01055.xml","title_ssm":["Records of the Virginia Prohibition Commission,\n1916-1934"],"title_tesim":["Records of the Virginia Prohibition Commission,\n1916-1934"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["42740\n"],"text":["42740\n","Records of the Virginia Prohibition Commission,\n1916-1934","179.93 cu. ft. (203 boxes, 2 volumes)","Collection is open to research.\n","This collection is arranged into the following series: Series I. Applications and Personnel Files, 1916-1934; Series I.A. Applications\nSeries I.B. Personnel Files; Series II. Correspondence, 1916-1934; Series II.A. General Correspondence; Series II.B. Correspondence re: Beer; Series III. Financial and Administrative Records, 1916-1934 [bulk 1926-1934]; Series III.A. Financial Records; Series III.B. Administrative Records; Series IV. Inspectors' Reports, 1918-1934; Series V. Permits, 1918-1934; Series VI. Licenses and Bonds, 1918-1934 [bulk 1926-1934]; Series VII. Index Card Files, undated.\n","\nArranged into two (2) subseries: Applications; and Personnel Files. Arranged alphabetically by last name of individual within the series. \n","\nContains correspondence, letters of applications, references.  This series is not complete. Please note: the content of the two (2) subseries overlap. Distinction between Applications series and the Personnel Files series is the presence or mention of then-current employment with the Prohibition Commission, a commission stating an individual is an inspector acting on behalf of the Prohibition Commission or other indication of then-current employment. There are files of previous and future employees/volunteers with the Commission who are represented in the Applications series. \n","\n\tArranged alphabetically by last name of individual. \n\t","\n\tArranged alphabetically by last name of individual. \n\t","\nArranged into two (2) subseries: General Correspondence and Subject Files, 1916-1934; and Correspondence re: Beer, 1932-1934. Arranged alphabetically by topic or last name of correspondent.  \n","\n\tArranged alphabetically by last name of correspondent or topic.\n\t","\n\tArranged alphabetically by topic.\n\t","Arranged into two subseries: Financial Records, 1919-1934 [bulk 1927-1934]; and Administrative Records, 1923-1934 [bulk 1926-1934]. \n","Arranged alphabetically by material type, and chronologically thereunder. \n\t","Arranged alphabetically by folder title.  \n\t","Arranged by date and then alphabetically by last name of inspector.  \n","","Arranged by date and then alphabetically by company name or last name of requestor.\n","","Arranged by type of applicant, and alphabetically by locality therein.\n","","Arranged by type of index and alphabetically by last name therein. \n","","Arranged by series type and chronologically therein. \n","","The Virginia Prohibition Commission was established by Act of Assembly on 10 March 1916 as \"an exercise of the police power of the State for the protection of the State, for the protection of the public health, peace and morals, and the prevention of the sale and use of ardent spirits\".  This act, also known as the \"Mapp Act\", made it \"unlawful to manufacture, transport, sell, keep or store for sale, offer, advertise, or expose for sale, give away, or dispense, or solicit in any way, or receive orders for or aid in procuring ardent spirits\" with some exceptions. Ardent spirits were defined as alcohol, brandy, whiskey, rum, gin, wine, porter, ale, beer, all malt liquors, all fruits preserved in ardent spirits, all liquids, mixtures or preparations which will produce intoxication, all beverages containing more than 1/2 of 1 percent of alcohol by volume. The legislation also regulated pharmacists and how prescriptions were dispensed, as well as the use of alcohol by hotels, restaurants, hospitals, and \"social places.\"  Personal use was also allowed, with limits of either one quart of distilled liquor, three gallons of beer, or one gallon of wine per 30-day period. Items for personal use were shipped by common carrier, with a label clearly identifying the contents of the package including quantity and type of alcohol contained. \n","\nThe Prohibition Commission was charged with enforcing this law, with the Commissioner, deputies and inspectors having powers of sheriffs of the Commonwealth. These same personnel were also authorized to administer oaths, take affidavits, examine records and enter buildings with a warrant.  The Commission was to make reports to the judges of the circuit, corporate and hustings courts where such violations occurred. Due to a lack of funding, the Commission relied heavily on volunteer inspectors and informants. In the first report of the Prohibition Commission, J. Sidney Peters lists the inspectors as the following: 4 paid inspectors, 516 unpaid correspondents, and an unknown number of volunteers and informants.  \n","\nIn 1918, the revised Prohibition law was passed on 19 March. The revision expanded the definition of ardent spirits to include absinth, all malt beverages, alcoholic bitters, and all compounds and mixtures containing any of the ardent spirits listed in the act. Also, the new act required the issuance of transportation permits for ardent spirits. Permits were issued to qualified applicants for one of four purposes: mechanical, medicinal, sacramental and scientific. The 1918 act also specifically mentions stills and that it was \"unlawful for any person except duly licensed druggists, hospitals and laboratories, in this State to own or have in his possession any still, still cap, worm, tub, fermenter or any of them or any other appliances connected with a still and used, or mash or other substances, capable of being used in the manufacture of ardent spirits.\" An exception to this was those people who were authorized by and registered with the Prohibition Commission, and who prominently displayed their permit to operate the still. The authority of the inspectors was also expanded to include the authority to \"enter freight yards, passenger depots, baggage and storage rooms of any common carrier and may enter any train, baggage express, Pullman, or freight car and any boat, automobile, or other conveyance, whether of like kind or not, where there is reason to believe that the law relating to ardent spirits is being violated.\" \n","\nOn 16 January 1920, the 18th amendment of the United States Constitution became effective, and the focus of the efforts of the Virginia Prohibition Commission shifted from the importation of ardent spirits from nearby localities to the illegal production of ardent spirits - specifically corn whiskey, commonly known as moonshine. The Commission was able to increase the number of salaried and commissioned inspectors, who often worked with federal authorities to seek out and destroy these operations, and prosecute the operators of these illegal stills. This was in addition to the other enforcement tasks of the Commission - the issuance of transportation permits, licensing of pharmacists and others utilizing alcohol in their profession, and the monitoring of the stock of ardent spirits in pharmacies. \n","\nIn 1920, the Virginia General Assembly further revised the Virginia Prohibition law with the most sweeping changes being to the office of the Prohibition Commissioner. The General Assembly was given power to elect a Commissioner of Prohibition, who was given a two-year term. This change to the office of the Prohibition Commissioner was partly due to the public outcry regarding the leadership of J. Sidney Peters, the first Prohibition Commissioner. A member of the clergy and an avid supporter of the temperance and prohibition movements, Peters' approach to the investigation and enforcement of the Prohibition laws was met with intense criticism. In 1920, Harry B. Smith was named the second Commissioner of Prohibition by the General Assembly, and Smith sought to repair the image of the Commission. The office of the Commissioner of Prohibition was abolished effective 30 August 1922, and responsibilities for the Commission fell to the Department of Prohibition within the Office of the Attorney General. The Attorney General, John R. Saunders, further sought to improve the image and morale of the Department and ensure fair, honest and respectable means to enforce the prohibition laws\n","\nOn 5 December 1933, the repeal of the 18th amendment was completed with the ratification of the 21st amendment to the United States Constitution. This presented a number of challenges for the Department of Prohibition, as there was no other organization within state government to regulate the transportation, production and sale of alcohol. The Department continued to issue transportation permits and seek out illegal stills until the establishment of the Virginia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control in 1934. The Office of the Dept. of Prohibition was abolished on 22 March 1934. \n","\nThe records of the Virginia Prohibition Commission are housed in 203 boxes totaling 179.93 cu. ft and 2 volumes. The records are divided into seven (7) series. I. Applications and Personnel Files, 1916-1934; II. Correspondence, 1916-1934; III. Financial and Administrative Records, 1916-1934 [bulk 1926-1934]; IV. Inspectors' Reports, 1918-1934; V. Permits, 1918-1934; VI. Licenses and Bonds, 1918-1934 [bulk 1926-1934]; and VII. Index Card Files, undated. These records document the enforcement of state and federal prohibition laws and include annual reports, bonds, checkbooks, correspondence, insurance policies, inventories, journals, ledgers, memos, payroll records, permits, receipts, reports and vouchers. \n","\nFollowing is a brief overview and some highlights of the collection. A more in-depth description of the collection can be found in the Series and Sub-series level description. It is recommended that the researcher read the Series level descriptions thoroughly before accessing the collection.\n","\nThe Inspectors' Reports (Series IV) provide varying levels of detail regarding the activities of this position. The more detailed reports include details regarding the investigation, property seizures including valuations, and daily expenses. These reports coupled with correspondence from citizens in various localities give an excellent picture of the investigation process from the initial \"tip\" from concerned citizens to the arrest of parties involved. \n","\nThe Application and Personnel Files (Series I) are restricted through 31 March 2009 due to the presence of privacy-protected information. While the Application and Personnel files were maintained separately, there is a great deal of overlap between the two sets of files, which led to the restriction on both series. Of interest in these files is correspondence related to complaints against the inspectors, the appointment process for inspectors, and details regarding incidents involving inspectors - sometimes involving injury or death. \n","\nIn the Correspondence series (Series II), items of interest include correspondence with the attorney general including the text of opinions, and correspondence with the governor including correspondence regarding pardons for prohibition offenses. Also, in the correspondence and administrative files are details regarding the daily operation of the office of the Prohibition Commission. \n","\nTransportation Permits (Series V) were issued following the passage of the 1918 Prohibition Act, which regulated the transport of alcohol within the boundaries of the Commonwealth. Following the repeal of the 18th Amendment of the United States Constitution  and the end of the national prohibition on alcohol, the Prohibition Commission continued to issue transportation permits (citing \"medicinal\" as the default purpose of use) until the establishment of the Virginia Alcohol Beverage Control Board in 1934.  Of particular interest in the permit series is correspondence regarding the 1918 influenza epidemic with requests for permits for medicinal alcohol. The permit series also yields information regarding the status of women in business and medicine, as well as the establishment of chains of drug stores. \n","\nThe original organization of the collection was maintained as best as possible. However, a tremendous amount of material was misfiled, some of which was discovered at the conclusion of processing, which accounts for the boxes which contain the letter 'A' in the box number. Please note, for example, that correspondence related to the federal legislation legalizing beer of no more than 3.2% alcohol is a separate subseries from the general correspondence. This is the result of attempting to maintain the physical separation of this correspondence as maintained in the office of the Prohibition Commission. Another example is that of box 6A, Applications. These records were located following the conclusion of processing, and were placed here rather than interfiling. This arrangement reflects the original order of the collection and is an indication of the original arrangement of these records.\n","\nThere are a great number of misspellings by the office staff - particularly in the permit series. While an attempt has been made to correct the spelling errors, not all of the errors were confirmed. Therefore some known errors were maintained as they appear in the original document. \n","\nPlease note that the collection is not complete. Groups of absent records include: In Series IV. Inspectors' Reports: A - O, April - September 1931; In Series V, Permits:  A - U, May 1923 - April 1924, Q-V January - June 1929, the majority of W, January - June 1929, and X-Z, January - June 1929. The financial series is comprised mainly of records from 1926 to 1934, with some earlier records being present as well. \n","\nContains letters of application, references, and correspondence with applicants for positions within the Prohibition Commission. Positions applied for include Prohibition Inspector, Attorney, and clerical staff. Please note: this series contains application files for individuals who may have been in the service of the department either before or following the dates covered by these folders. Inclusion in this series does not imply that the individual was never in the employ or service of the Prohibition Commission.\n\t"," Contains personnel files and related information such as letter of commission to office, and correspondence with the Attorney General, in addition to applications, and references for positions within the Prohibition Commission. \n\t","\nContains correspondence, memoranda, and other materials related to the daily operations of the Prohibition Commission.\n","\nContains general correspondence and subject files related to the operations of the department including reports from court clerks and local sheriffs, correspondence and opinions from the Attorney General's office, correspondence from the Governor's office regarding pardons and other matters, as well as correspondence with federal authorities, and local commonwealth's attorneys. Topics addressed include the handling of ardent spirits, automobiles, permits and complaints received by the department. Includes correspondence, reports, invoices, form letters, and inventories.\n\t","\nContains correspondence and opinions regarding the possession, transport, and consumption of beer. The correspondence is the result of the passage of the Blaine Law, which legalized beer containing 3.2% alcohol (3.2% by weight/4% by volume). The Blaine law went into effect in February 1933.  \n\t","Contains administrative and financial records related to the daily operations of the Virginia Prohibition Commission. \n","This sub-series contains vouchers, receipts, expense reports, and ledgers documenting the financial affairs of the Prohibition Commission.  Of particular interest are the travel expense reports of the Prohibition Inspectors, providing an overview of the inspector's travels and activities.  The reports vary in detail from only naming the locale they were in on a particular day, to a one or two sentence description of activities during that day.  Also of interest are receipts for the purchase of the automobiles used by the inspectors, and documentation concerning the wages of each employee of the Prohibition Commission. \n\t","The vouchers from July 1927 to September 1929 (Boxes 42 and 43), as received, were arranged differently from the other receipts in the series.  As there was no apparent organization in this set of records, an alphabetical arrangement by vendor name was constructed, as no voucher numbers were present.  \n\t","\nPlease note that this series is incomplete and that there are several gaps in coverage of material in this series. \n\t","Contains personnel, budget, insurance and equipment information of the Prohibition Commission. Includes annual reports, correspondence, reports, insurance documents, and forms. \n\t","Contains daily reports of inspectors documenting persons arrested, items seized, and expense information.  On many of the reports, the Commission secretary made notes on the reports, especially concerning the date.  It appears that the \"correction\" of date information was made for statistical purposes, as some inspectors would send a group of reports spanning several months at one time.  Early reports were written accounts in narrative form while later accounts were on a standardized form supplied by the Commission.  The original order of the collection was maintained, with the reports being kept by time period (usually six months, sometimes longer) with an alphabetical organization within the dates specified.  Please note that the following reports are missing: all reports from October 1929 to March 1930, with the exception of one report; and reports from inspectors with last names from A to P, during the period from April to October 1931, again with one exception.   \n","","Contains correspondence and requests for transportation permits for \"ardent spirits\" and other types of alcohol, which were dispensed for medicinal, mechanical, sacramental or scientific purposes. Of particular interest are references to the 1918 influenza epidemic, the entrance of corporate chain stores, and women physicians and entrepreneurs.\n","Transportation permits were issued following the passage of the 1918 Prohibition Act, which regulated the transport of alcohol within the boundaries of the Commonwealth. Following the repeal of the 18th Amendment of the United States Constitution ending the national prohibition on alcohol, the Prohibition Commission continued to issue transportation permits (citing \"medicinal\" as the purpose of use for the majority of cases) until the establishment of the Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board in 1934.\n","","Contains application materials for licenses and bonds for the manufacture, use, and sale of alcohol. Applicants include colleges, druggists, hospitals, manufacturers, wholesalers and various retail establishments. Later correspondence includes the return of bonds to the applicants following the repeal of the 18th amendment.\n","","Contains reference card files on the topics of qualified medical and dental personnel, the status of requests for pardons, and a general correspondence index. Note that some materials may overlap with those found in the Series III.B: Administrative Records.\n","","Two boxes found in 2022. Records correspond with material found in three original series: Series I: Applications and Personnel Files, Series II: Correspondence, and Series III: Financial and Administrative Records. Records kept together in a new seperate series to respect provenance of the collection's process.\n","","Materials in the Applications and Personnel File series are restricted until 31 March 2009 due to the presence of privacy-protected materials.\n","English\n"],"unitid_tesim":["42740\n"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Records of the Virginia Prohibition Commission,\n1916-1934"],"collection_title_tesim":["Records of the Virginia Prohibition Commission,\n1916-1934"],"collection_ssim":["Records of the Virginia Prohibition Commission,\n1916-1934"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"acqinfo_ssim":["Transferred 1938.\n"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["179.93 cu. ft. (203 boxes, 2 volumes)"],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eCollection is open to research.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions\n"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["Collection is open to research.\n"],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThis collection is arranged into the following series: Series I. Applications and Personnel Files, 1916-1934; Series I.A. Applications\nSeries I.B. Personnel Files; Series II. Correspondence, 1916-1934; Series II.A. General Correspondence; Series II.B. Correspondence re: Beer; Series III. Financial and Administrative Records, 1916-1934 [bulk 1926-1934]; Series III.A. Financial Records; Series III.B. Administrative Records; Series IV. Inspectors' Reports, 1918-1934; Series V. Permits, 1918-1934; Series VI. Licenses and Bonds, 1918-1934 [bulk 1926-1934]; Series VII. Index Card Files, undated.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nArranged into two (2) subseries: Applications; and Personnel Files. Arranged alphabetically by last name of individual within the series. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nContains correspondence, letters of applications, references.  This series is not complete. Please note: the content of the two (2) subseries overlap. Distinction between Applications series and the Personnel Files series is the presence or mention of then-current employment with the Prohibition Commission, a commission stating an individual is an inspector acting on behalf of the Prohibition Commission or other indication of then-current employment. There are files of previous and future employees/volunteers with the Commission who are represented in the Applications series. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\n\tArranged alphabetically by last name of individual. \n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\n\tArranged alphabetically by last name of individual. \n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nArranged into two (2) subseries: General Correspondence and Subject Files, 1916-1934; and Correspondence re: Beer, 1932-1934. Arranged alphabetically by topic or last name of correspondent.  \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\n\tArranged alphabetically by last name of correspondent or topic.\n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\n\tArranged alphabetically by topic.\n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged into two subseries: Financial Records, 1919-1934 [bulk 1927-1934]; and Administrative Records, 1923-1934 [bulk 1926-1934]. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged alphabetically by material type, and chronologically thereunder. \n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged alphabetically by folder title.  \n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged by date and then alphabetically by last name of inspector.  \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged by date and then alphabetically by company name or last name of requestor.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged by type of applicant, and alphabetically by locality therein.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged by type of index and alphabetically by last name therein. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged by series type and chronologically therein. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["This collection is arranged into the following series: Series I. Applications and Personnel Files, 1916-1934; Series I.A. Applications\nSeries I.B. Personnel Files; Series II. Correspondence, 1916-1934; Series II.A. General Correspondence; Series II.B. Correspondence re: Beer; Series III. Financial and Administrative Records, 1916-1934 [bulk 1926-1934]; Series III.A. Financial Records; Series III.B. Administrative Records; Series IV. Inspectors' Reports, 1918-1934; Series V. Permits, 1918-1934; Series VI. Licenses and Bonds, 1918-1934 [bulk 1926-1934]; Series VII. Index Card Files, undated.\n","\nArranged into two (2) subseries: Applications; and Personnel Files. Arranged alphabetically by last name of individual within the series. \n","\nContains correspondence, letters of applications, references.  This series is not complete. Please note: the content of the two (2) subseries overlap. Distinction between Applications series and the Personnel Files series is the presence or mention of then-current employment with the Prohibition Commission, a commission stating an individual is an inspector acting on behalf of the Prohibition Commission or other indication of then-current employment. There are files of previous and future employees/volunteers with the Commission who are represented in the Applications series. \n","\n\tArranged alphabetically by last name of individual. \n\t","\n\tArranged alphabetically by last name of individual. \n\t","\nArranged into two (2) subseries: General Correspondence and Subject Files, 1916-1934; and Correspondence re: Beer, 1932-1934. Arranged alphabetically by topic or last name of correspondent.  \n","\n\tArranged alphabetically by last name of correspondent or topic.\n\t","\n\tArranged alphabetically by topic.\n\t","Arranged into two subseries: Financial Records, 1919-1934 [bulk 1927-1934]; and Administrative Records, 1923-1934 [bulk 1926-1934]. \n","Arranged alphabetically by material type, and chronologically thereunder. \n\t","Arranged alphabetically by folder title.  \n\t","Arranged by date and then alphabetically by last name of inspector.  \n","","Arranged by date and then alphabetically by company name or last name of requestor.\n","","Arranged by type of applicant, and alphabetically by locality therein.\n","","Arranged by type of index and alphabetically by last name therein. \n","","Arranged by series type and chronologically therein. \n",""],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe Virginia Prohibition Commission was established by Act of Assembly on 10 March 1916 as \"an exercise of the police power of the State for the protection of the State, for the protection of the public health, peace and morals, and the prevention of the sale and use of ardent spirits\".  This act, also known as the \"Mapp Act\", made it \"unlawful to manufacture, transport, sell, keep or store for sale, offer, advertise, or expose for sale, give away, or dispense, or solicit in any way, or receive orders for or aid in procuring ardent spirits\" with some exceptions. Ardent spirits were defined as alcohol, brandy, whiskey, rum, gin, wine, porter, ale, beer, all malt liquors, all fruits preserved in ardent spirits, all liquids, mixtures or preparations which will produce intoxication, all beverages containing more than 1/2 of 1 percent of alcohol by volume. The legislation also regulated pharmacists and how prescriptions were dispensed, as well as the use of alcohol by hotels, restaurants, hospitals, and \"social places.\"  Personal use was also allowed, with limits of either one quart of distilled liquor, three gallons of beer, or one gallon of wine per 30-day period. Items for personal use were shipped by common carrier, with a label clearly identifying the contents of the package including quantity and type of alcohol contained. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nThe Prohibition Commission was charged with enforcing this law, with the Commissioner, deputies and inspectors having powers of sheriffs of the Commonwealth. These same personnel were also authorized to administer oaths, take affidavits, examine records and enter buildings with a warrant.  The Commission was to make reports to the judges of the circuit, corporate and hustings courts where such violations occurred. Due to a lack of funding, the Commission relied heavily on volunteer inspectors and informants. In the first report of the Prohibition Commission, J. Sidney Peters lists the inspectors as the following: 4 paid inspectors, 516 unpaid correspondents, and an unknown number of volunteers and informants.  \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nIn 1918, the revised Prohibition law was passed on 19 March. The revision expanded the definition of ardent spirits to include absinth, all malt beverages, alcoholic bitters, and all compounds and mixtures containing any of the ardent spirits listed in the act. Also, the new act required the issuance of transportation permits for ardent spirits. Permits were issued to qualified applicants for one of four purposes: mechanical, medicinal, sacramental and scientific. The 1918 act also specifically mentions stills and that it was \"unlawful for any person except duly licensed druggists, hospitals and laboratories, in this State to own or have in his possession any still, still cap, worm, tub, fermenter or any of them or any other appliances connected with a still and used, or mash or other substances, capable of being used in the manufacture of ardent spirits.\" An exception to this was those people who were authorized by and registered with the Prohibition Commission, and who prominently displayed their permit to operate the still. The authority of the inspectors was also expanded to include the authority to \"enter freight yards, passenger depots, baggage and storage rooms of any common carrier and may enter any train, baggage express, Pullman, or freight car and any boat, automobile, or other conveyance, whether of like kind or not, where there is reason to believe that the law relating to ardent spirits is being violated.\" \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nOn 16 January 1920, the 18th amendment of the United States Constitution became effective, and the focus of the efforts of the Virginia Prohibition Commission shifted from the importation of ardent spirits from nearby localities to the illegal production of ardent spirits - specifically corn whiskey, commonly known as moonshine. The Commission was able to increase the number of salaried and commissioned inspectors, who often worked with federal authorities to seek out and destroy these operations, and prosecute the operators of these illegal stills. This was in addition to the other enforcement tasks of the Commission - the issuance of transportation permits, licensing of pharmacists and others utilizing alcohol in their profession, and the monitoring of the stock of ardent spirits in pharmacies. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nIn 1920, the Virginia General Assembly further revised the Virginia Prohibition law with the most sweeping changes being to the office of the Prohibition Commissioner. The General Assembly was given power to elect a Commissioner of Prohibition, who was given a two-year term. This change to the office of the Prohibition Commissioner was partly due to the public outcry regarding the leadership of J. Sidney Peters, the first Prohibition Commissioner. A member of the clergy and an avid supporter of the temperance and prohibition movements, Peters' approach to the investigation and enforcement of the Prohibition laws was met with intense criticism. In 1920, Harry B. Smith was named the second Commissioner of Prohibition by the General Assembly, and Smith sought to repair the image of the Commission. The office of the Commissioner of Prohibition was abolished effective 30 August 1922, and responsibilities for the Commission fell to the Department of Prohibition within the Office of the Attorney General. The Attorney General, John R. Saunders, further sought to improve the image and morale of the Department and ensure fair, honest and respectable means to enforce the prohibition laws\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nOn 5 December 1933, the repeal of the 18th amendment was completed with the ratification of the 21st amendment to the United States Constitution. This presented a number of challenges for the Department of Prohibition, as there was no other organization within state government to regulate the transportation, production and sale of alcohol. The Department continued to issue transportation permits and seek out illegal stills until the establishment of the Virginia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control in 1934. The Office of the Dept. of Prohibition was abolished on 22 March 1934. \n\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Biographical Information\n"],"bioghist_tesim":["The Virginia Prohibition Commission was established by Act of Assembly on 10 March 1916 as \"an exercise of the police power of the State for the protection of the State, for the protection of the public health, peace and morals, and the prevention of the sale and use of ardent spirits\".  This act, also known as the \"Mapp Act\", made it \"unlawful to manufacture, transport, sell, keep or store for sale, offer, advertise, or expose for sale, give away, or dispense, or solicit in any way, or receive orders for or aid in procuring ardent spirits\" with some exceptions. Ardent spirits were defined as alcohol, brandy, whiskey, rum, gin, wine, porter, ale, beer, all malt liquors, all fruits preserved in ardent spirits, all liquids, mixtures or preparations which will produce intoxication, all beverages containing more than 1/2 of 1 percent of alcohol by volume. The legislation also regulated pharmacists and how prescriptions were dispensed, as well as the use of alcohol by hotels, restaurants, hospitals, and \"social places.\"  Personal use was also allowed, with limits of either one quart of distilled liquor, three gallons of beer, or one gallon of wine per 30-day period. Items for personal use were shipped by common carrier, with a label clearly identifying the contents of the package including quantity and type of alcohol contained. \n","\nThe Prohibition Commission was charged with enforcing this law, with the Commissioner, deputies and inspectors having powers of sheriffs of the Commonwealth. These same personnel were also authorized to administer oaths, take affidavits, examine records and enter buildings with a warrant.  The Commission was to make reports to the judges of the circuit, corporate and hustings courts where such violations occurred. Due to a lack of funding, the Commission relied heavily on volunteer inspectors and informants. In the first report of the Prohibition Commission, J. Sidney Peters lists the inspectors as the following: 4 paid inspectors, 516 unpaid correspondents, and an unknown number of volunteers and informants.  \n","\nIn 1918, the revised Prohibition law was passed on 19 March. The revision expanded the definition of ardent spirits to include absinth, all malt beverages, alcoholic bitters, and all compounds and mixtures containing any of the ardent spirits listed in the act. Also, the new act required the issuance of transportation permits for ardent spirits. Permits were issued to qualified applicants for one of four purposes: mechanical, medicinal, sacramental and scientific. The 1918 act also specifically mentions stills and that it was \"unlawful for any person except duly licensed druggists, hospitals and laboratories, in this State to own or have in his possession any still, still cap, worm, tub, fermenter or any of them or any other appliances connected with a still and used, or mash or other substances, capable of being used in the manufacture of ardent spirits.\" An exception to this was those people who were authorized by and registered with the Prohibition Commission, and who prominently displayed their permit to operate the still. The authority of the inspectors was also expanded to include the authority to \"enter freight yards, passenger depots, baggage and storage rooms of any common carrier and may enter any train, baggage express, Pullman, or freight car and any boat, automobile, or other conveyance, whether of like kind or not, where there is reason to believe that the law relating to ardent spirits is being violated.\" \n","\nOn 16 January 1920, the 18th amendment of the United States Constitution became effective, and the focus of the efforts of the Virginia Prohibition Commission shifted from the importation of ardent spirits from nearby localities to the illegal production of ardent spirits - specifically corn whiskey, commonly known as moonshine. The Commission was able to increase the number of salaried and commissioned inspectors, who often worked with federal authorities to seek out and destroy these operations, and prosecute the operators of these illegal stills. This was in addition to the other enforcement tasks of the Commission - the issuance of transportation permits, licensing of pharmacists and others utilizing alcohol in their profession, and the monitoring of the stock of ardent spirits in pharmacies. \n","\nIn 1920, the Virginia General Assembly further revised the Virginia Prohibition law with the most sweeping changes being to the office of the Prohibition Commissioner. The General Assembly was given power to elect a Commissioner of Prohibition, who was given a two-year term. This change to the office of the Prohibition Commissioner was partly due to the public outcry regarding the leadership of J. Sidney Peters, the first Prohibition Commissioner. A member of the clergy and an avid supporter of the temperance and prohibition movements, Peters' approach to the investigation and enforcement of the Prohibition laws was met with intense criticism. In 1920, Harry B. Smith was named the second Commissioner of Prohibition by the General Assembly, and Smith sought to repair the image of the Commission. The office of the Commissioner of Prohibition was abolished effective 30 August 1922, and responsibilities for the Commission fell to the Department of Prohibition within the Office of the Attorney General. The Attorney General, John R. Saunders, further sought to improve the image and morale of the Department and ensure fair, honest and respectable means to enforce the prohibition laws\n","\nOn 5 December 1933, the repeal of the 18th amendment was completed with the ratification of the 21st amendment to the United States Constitution. This presented a number of challenges for the Department of Prohibition, as there was no other organization within state government to regulate the transportation, production and sale of alcohol. The Department continued to issue transportation permits and seek out illegal stills until the establishment of the Virginia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control in 1934. The Office of the Dept. of Prohibition was abolished on 22 March 1934. \n"],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eVirginia Prohibition Commission. Records, 1916-1934. Accession 42740. State Government Records Collection. The Library of Virginia. Richmond, Va. \n\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Virginia Prohibition Commission. Records, 1916-1934. Accession 42740. State Government Records Collection. The Library of Virginia. Richmond, Va. \n"],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e\nThe records of the Virginia Prohibition Commission are housed in 203 boxes totaling 179.93 cu. ft and 2 volumes. The records are divided into seven (7) series. I. Applications and Personnel Files, 1916-1934; II. Correspondence, 1916-1934; III. Financial and Administrative Records, 1916-1934 [bulk 1926-1934]; IV. Inspectors' Reports, 1918-1934; V. Permits, 1918-1934; VI. Licenses and Bonds, 1918-1934 [bulk 1926-1934]; and VII. Index Card Files, undated. These records document the enforcement of state and federal prohibition laws and include annual reports, bonds, checkbooks, correspondence, insurance policies, inventories, journals, ledgers, memos, payroll records, permits, receipts, reports and vouchers. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nFollowing is a brief overview and some highlights of the collection. A more in-depth description of the collection can be found in the Series and Sub-series level description. It is recommended that the researcher read the Series level descriptions thoroughly before accessing the collection.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nThe Inspectors' Reports (Series IV) provide varying levels of detail regarding the activities of this position. The more detailed reports include details regarding the investigation, property seizures including valuations, and daily expenses. These reports coupled with correspondence from citizens in various localities give an excellent picture of the investigation process from the initial \"tip\" from concerned citizens to the arrest of parties involved. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nThe Application and Personnel Files (Series I) are restricted through 31 March 2009 due to the presence of privacy-protected information. While the Application and Personnel files were maintained separately, there is a great deal of overlap between the two sets of files, which led to the restriction on both series. Of interest in these files is correspondence related to complaints against the inspectors, the appointment process for inspectors, and details regarding incidents involving inspectors - sometimes involving injury or death. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nIn the Correspondence series (Series II), items of interest include correspondence with the attorney general including the text of opinions, and correspondence with the governor including correspondence regarding pardons for prohibition offenses. Also, in the correspondence and administrative files are details regarding the daily operation of the office of the Prohibition Commission. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nTransportation Permits (Series V) were issued following the passage of the 1918 Prohibition Act, which regulated the transport of alcohol within the boundaries of the Commonwealth. Following the repeal of the 18th Amendment of the United States Constitution  and the end of the national prohibition on alcohol, the Prohibition Commission continued to issue transportation permits (citing \"medicinal\" as the default purpose of use) until the establishment of the Virginia Alcohol Beverage Control Board in 1934.  Of particular interest in the permit series is correspondence regarding the 1918 influenza epidemic with requests for permits for medicinal alcohol. The permit series also yields information regarding the status of women in business and medicine, as well as the establishment of chains of drug stores. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nThe original organization of the collection was maintained as best as possible. However, a tremendous amount of material was misfiled, some of which was discovered at the conclusion of processing, which accounts for the boxes which contain the letter 'A' in the box number. Please note, for example, that correspondence related to the federal legislation legalizing beer of no more than 3.2% alcohol is a separate subseries from the general correspondence. This is the result of attempting to maintain the physical separation of this correspondence as maintained in the office of the Prohibition Commission. Another example is that of box 6A, Applications. These records were located following the conclusion of processing, and were placed here rather than interfiling. This arrangement reflects the original order of the collection and is an indication of the original arrangement of these records.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nThere are a great number of misspellings by the office staff - particularly in the permit series. While an attempt has been made to correct the spelling errors, not all of the errors were confirmed. Therefore some known errors were maintained as they appear in the original document. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nPlease note that the collection is not complete. Groups of absent records include: In Series IV. Inspectors' Reports: A - O, April - September 1931; In Series V, Permits:  A - U, May 1923 - April 1924, Q-V January - June 1929, the majority of W, January - June 1929, and X-Z, January - June 1929. The financial series is comprised mainly of records from 1926 to 1934, with some earlier records being present as well. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nContains letters of application, references, and correspondence with applicants for positions within the Prohibition Commission. Positions applied for include Prohibition Inspector, Attorney, and clerical staff. Please note: this series contains application files for individuals who may have been in the service of the department either before or following the dates covered by these folders. Inclusion in this series does not imply that the individual was never in the employ or service of the Prohibition Commission.\n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e Contains personnel files and related information such as letter of commission to office, and correspondence with the Attorney General, in addition to applications, and references for positions within the Prohibition Commission. \n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nContains correspondence, memoranda, and other materials related to the daily operations of the Prohibition Commission.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nContains general correspondence and subject files related to the operations of the department including reports from court clerks and local sheriffs, correspondence and opinions from the Attorney General's office, correspondence from the Governor's office regarding pardons and other matters, as well as correspondence with federal authorities, and local commonwealth's attorneys. Topics addressed include the handling of ardent spirits, automobiles, permits and complaints received by the department. Includes correspondence, reports, invoices, form letters, and inventories.\n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nContains correspondence and opinions regarding the possession, transport, and consumption of beer. The correspondence is the result of the passage of the Blaine Law, which legalized beer containing 3.2% alcohol (3.2% by weight/4% by volume). The Blaine law went into effect in February 1933.  \n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContains administrative and financial records related to the daily operations of the Virginia Prohibition Commission. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis sub-series contains vouchers, receipts, expense reports, and ledgers documenting the financial affairs of the Prohibition Commission.  Of particular interest are the travel expense reports of the Prohibition Inspectors, providing an overview of the inspector's travels and activities.  The reports vary in detail from only naming the locale they were in on a particular day, to a one or two sentence description of activities during that day.  Also of interest are receipts for the purchase of the automobiles used by the inspectors, and documentation concerning the wages of each employee of the Prohibition Commission. \n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe vouchers from July 1927 to September 1929 (Boxes 42 and 43), as received, were arranged differently from the other receipts in the series.  As there was no apparent organization in this set of records, an alphabetical arrangement by vendor name was constructed, as no voucher numbers were present.  \n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nPlease note that this series is incomplete and that there are several gaps in coverage of material in this series. \n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContains personnel, budget, insurance and equipment information of the Prohibition Commission. Includes annual reports, correspondence, reports, insurance documents, and forms. \n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContains daily reports of inspectors documenting persons arrested, items seized, and expense information.  On many of the reports, the Commission secretary made notes on the reports, especially concerning the date.  It appears that the \"correction\" of date information was made for statistical purposes, as some inspectors would send a group of reports spanning several months at one time.  Early reports were written accounts in narrative form while later accounts were on a standardized form supplied by the Commission.  The original order of the collection was maintained, with the reports being kept by time period (usually six months, sometimes longer) with an alphabetical organization within the dates specified.  Please note that the following reports are missing: all reports from October 1929 to March 1930, with the exception of one report; and reports from inspectors with last names from A to P, during the period from April to October 1931, again with one exception.   \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContains correspondence and requests for transportation permits for \"ardent spirits\" and other types of alcohol, which were dispensed for medicinal, mechanical, sacramental or scientific purposes. Of particular interest are references to the 1918 influenza epidemic, the entrance of corporate chain stores, and women physicians and entrepreneurs.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTransportation permits were issued following the passage of the 1918 Prohibition Act, which regulated the transport of alcohol within the boundaries of the Commonwealth. Following the repeal of the 18th Amendment of the United States Constitution ending the national prohibition on alcohol, the Prohibition Commission continued to issue transportation permits (citing \"medicinal\" as the purpose of use for the majority of cases) until the establishment of the Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board in 1934.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContains application materials for licenses and bonds for the manufacture, use, and sale of alcohol. Applicants include colleges, druggists, hospitals, manufacturers, wholesalers and various retail establishments. Later correspondence includes the return of bonds to the applicants following the repeal of the 18th amendment.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContains reference card files on the topics of qualified medical and dental personnel, the status of requests for pardons, and a general correspondence index. Note that some materials may overlap with those found in the Series III.B: Administrative Records.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTwo boxes found in 2022. Records correspond with material found in three original series: Series I: Applications and Personnel Files, Series II: Correspondence, and Series III: Financial and Administrative Records. Records kept together in a new seperate series to respect provenance of the collection's process.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["\nThe records of the Virginia Prohibition Commission are housed in 203 boxes totaling 179.93 cu. ft and 2 volumes. The records are divided into seven (7) series. I. Applications and Personnel Files, 1916-1934; II. Correspondence, 1916-1934; III. Financial and Administrative Records, 1916-1934 [bulk 1926-1934]; IV. Inspectors' Reports, 1918-1934; V. Permits, 1918-1934; VI. Licenses and Bonds, 1918-1934 [bulk 1926-1934]; and VII. Index Card Files, undated. These records document the enforcement of state and federal prohibition laws and include annual reports, bonds, checkbooks, correspondence, insurance policies, inventories, journals, ledgers, memos, payroll records, permits, receipts, reports and vouchers. \n","\nFollowing is a brief overview and some highlights of the collection. A more in-depth description of the collection can be found in the Series and Sub-series level description. It is recommended that the researcher read the Series level descriptions thoroughly before accessing the collection.\n","\nThe Inspectors' Reports (Series IV) provide varying levels of detail regarding the activities of this position. The more detailed reports include details regarding the investigation, property seizures including valuations, and daily expenses. These reports coupled with correspondence from citizens in various localities give an excellent picture of the investigation process from the initial \"tip\" from concerned citizens to the arrest of parties involved. \n","\nThe Application and Personnel Files (Series I) are restricted through 31 March 2009 due to the presence of privacy-protected information. While the Application and Personnel files were maintained separately, there is a great deal of overlap between the two sets of files, which led to the restriction on both series. Of interest in these files is correspondence related to complaints against the inspectors, the appointment process for inspectors, and details regarding incidents involving inspectors - sometimes involving injury or death. \n","\nIn the Correspondence series (Series II), items of interest include correspondence with the attorney general including the text of opinions, and correspondence with the governor including correspondence regarding pardons for prohibition offenses. Also, in the correspondence and administrative files are details regarding the daily operation of the office of the Prohibition Commission. \n","\nTransportation Permits (Series V) were issued following the passage of the 1918 Prohibition Act, which regulated the transport of alcohol within the boundaries of the Commonwealth. Following the repeal of the 18th Amendment of the United States Constitution  and the end of the national prohibition on alcohol, the Prohibition Commission continued to issue transportation permits (citing \"medicinal\" as the default purpose of use) until the establishment of the Virginia Alcohol Beverage Control Board in 1934.  Of particular interest in the permit series is correspondence regarding the 1918 influenza epidemic with requests for permits for medicinal alcohol. The permit series also yields information regarding the status of women in business and medicine, as well as the establishment of chains of drug stores. \n","\nThe original organization of the collection was maintained as best as possible. However, a tremendous amount of material was misfiled, some of which was discovered at the conclusion of processing, which accounts for the boxes which contain the letter 'A' in the box number. Please note, for example, that correspondence related to the federal legislation legalizing beer of no more than 3.2% alcohol is a separate subseries from the general correspondence. This is the result of attempting to maintain the physical separation of this correspondence as maintained in the office of the Prohibition Commission. Another example is that of box 6A, Applications. These records were located following the conclusion of processing, and were placed here rather than interfiling. This arrangement reflects the original order of the collection and is an indication of the original arrangement of these records.\n","\nThere are a great number of misspellings by the office staff - particularly in the permit series. While an attempt has been made to correct the spelling errors, not all of the errors were confirmed. Therefore some known errors were maintained as they appear in the original document. \n","\nPlease note that the collection is not complete. Groups of absent records include: In Series IV. Inspectors' Reports: A - O, April - September 1931; In Series V, Permits:  A - U, May 1923 - April 1924, Q-V January - June 1929, the majority of W, January - June 1929, and X-Z, January - June 1929. The financial series is comprised mainly of records from 1926 to 1934, with some earlier records being present as well. \n","\nContains letters of application, references, and correspondence with applicants for positions within the Prohibition Commission. Positions applied for include Prohibition Inspector, Attorney, and clerical staff. Please note: this series contains application files for individuals who may have been in the service of the department either before or following the dates covered by these folders. Inclusion in this series does not imply that the individual was never in the employ or service of the Prohibition Commission.\n\t"," Contains personnel files and related information such as letter of commission to office, and correspondence with the Attorney General, in addition to applications, and references for positions within the Prohibition Commission. \n\t","\nContains correspondence, memoranda, and other materials related to the daily operations of the Prohibition Commission.\n","\nContains general correspondence and subject files related to the operations of the department including reports from court clerks and local sheriffs, correspondence and opinions from the Attorney General's office, correspondence from the Governor's office regarding pardons and other matters, as well as correspondence with federal authorities, and local commonwealth's attorneys. Topics addressed include the handling of ardent spirits, automobiles, permits and complaints received by the department. Includes correspondence, reports, invoices, form letters, and inventories.\n\t","\nContains correspondence and opinions regarding the possession, transport, and consumption of beer. The correspondence is the result of the passage of the Blaine Law, which legalized beer containing 3.2% alcohol (3.2% by weight/4% by volume). The Blaine law went into effect in February 1933.  \n\t","Contains administrative and financial records related to the daily operations of the Virginia Prohibition Commission. \n","This sub-series contains vouchers, receipts, expense reports, and ledgers documenting the financial affairs of the Prohibition Commission.  Of particular interest are the travel expense reports of the Prohibition Inspectors, providing an overview of the inspector's travels and activities.  The reports vary in detail from only naming the locale they were in on a particular day, to a one or two sentence description of activities during that day.  Also of interest are receipts for the purchase of the automobiles used by the inspectors, and documentation concerning the wages of each employee of the Prohibition Commission. \n\t","The vouchers from July 1927 to September 1929 (Boxes 42 and 43), as received, were arranged differently from the other receipts in the series.  As there was no apparent organization in this set of records, an alphabetical arrangement by vendor name was constructed, as no voucher numbers were present.  \n\t","\nPlease note that this series is incomplete and that there are several gaps in coverage of material in this series. \n\t","Contains personnel, budget, insurance and equipment information of the Prohibition Commission. Includes annual reports, correspondence, reports, insurance documents, and forms. \n\t","Contains daily reports of inspectors documenting persons arrested, items seized, and expense information.  On many of the reports, the Commission secretary made notes on the reports, especially concerning the date.  It appears that the \"correction\" of date information was made for statistical purposes, as some inspectors would send a group of reports spanning several months at one time.  Early reports were written accounts in narrative form while later accounts were on a standardized form supplied by the Commission.  The original order of the collection was maintained, with the reports being kept by time period (usually six months, sometimes longer) with an alphabetical organization within the dates specified.  Please note that the following reports are missing: all reports from October 1929 to March 1930, with the exception of one report; and reports from inspectors with last names from A to P, during the period from April to October 1931, again with one exception.   \n","","Contains correspondence and requests for transportation permits for \"ardent spirits\" and other types of alcohol, which were dispensed for medicinal, mechanical, sacramental or scientific purposes. Of particular interest are references to the 1918 influenza epidemic, the entrance of corporate chain stores, and women physicians and entrepreneurs.\n","Transportation permits were issued following the passage of the 1918 Prohibition Act, which regulated the transport of alcohol within the boundaries of the Commonwealth. Following the repeal of the 18th Amendment of the United States Constitution ending the national prohibition on alcohol, the Prohibition Commission continued to issue transportation permits (citing \"medicinal\" as the purpose of use for the majority of cases) until the establishment of the Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board in 1934.\n","","Contains application materials for licenses and bonds for the manufacture, use, and sale of alcohol. Applicants include colleges, druggists, hospitals, manufacturers, wholesalers and various retail establishments. Later correspondence includes the return of bonds to the applicants following the repeal of the 18th amendment.\n","","Contains reference card files on the topics of qualified medical and dental personnel, the status of requests for pardons, and a general correspondence index. Note that some materials may overlap with those found in the Series III.B: Administrative Records.\n","","Two boxes found in 2022. Records correspond with material found in three original series: Series I: Applications and Personnel Files, Series II: Correspondence, and Series III: Financial and Administrative Records. Records kept together in a new seperate series to respect provenance of the collection's process.\n",""],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eMaterials in the Applications and Personnel File series are restricted until 31 March 2009 due to the presence of privacy-protected materials.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions\n"],"userestrict_tesim":["Materials in the Applications and Personnel File series are restricted until 31 March 2009 due to the presence of privacy-protected materials.\n"],"language_ssim":["English\n"],"total_component_count_is":15865,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T10:27:14.939Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi01055_c05_c01_c1455"}},{"id":"vi_vi00968_c09_c02_c03_c1178","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Zeno, Michael L., granted 23 February 2004","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi00968_c09_c02_c03_c1178#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi00968_c09_c02_c03_c1178","ref_ssm":["vi_vi00968_c09_c02_c03_c1178"],"id":"vi_vi00968_c09_c02_c03_c1178","ead_ssi":"vi_vi00968","_root_":"vi_vi00968","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi00968_c09_c02_c03","parent_ssi":"vi_vi00968_c09_c02_c03","parent_ssim":["vi_vi00968","vi_vi00968_c09","vi_vi00968_c09_c02","vi_vi00968_c09_c02_c03"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi00968","vi_vi00968_c09","vi_vi00968_c09_c02","vi_vi00968_c09_c02_c03"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Records of the Secretary of the Commonwealth, \n1996-2006","Series IX. Restoration of Rights Files, \n1996-2006 (accessions 42418 and 42513) RESTRICTED FOR 75 YEARS.","Subseries B:  Governor Mark R. Warner,\n\t2002-2006.","15 January 2004 to 14 January 2005 (Accession 42418)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Records of the Secretary of the Commonwealth, \n1996-2006","Series IX. Restoration of Rights Files, \n1996-2006 (accessions 42418 and 42513) RESTRICTED FOR 75 YEARS.","Subseries B:  Governor Mark R. Warner,\n\t2002-2006.","15 January 2004 to 14 January 2005 (Accession 42418)"],"text":["Records of the Secretary of the Commonwealth, \n1996-2006","Series IX. Restoration of Rights Files, \n1996-2006 (accessions 42418 and 42513) RESTRICTED FOR 75 YEARS.","Subseries B:  Governor Mark R. Warner,\n\t2002-2006.","15 January 2004 to 14 January 2005 (Accession 42418)","Zeno, Michael L., granted 23 February 2004","box 222","folder 3"],"title_filing_ssi":"Zeno, Michael L., granted 23 February 2004  \n \t\t","title_ssm":["Zeno, Michael L., granted 23 February 2004"],"title_tesim":["Zeno, Michael L., granted 23 February 2004"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Zeno, Michael L., granted 23 February 2004"],"component_level_isim":[4],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Records of the Secretary of the Commonwealth, \n1996-2006"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":3283,"containers_ssim":["box 222","folder 3"],"_nest_path_":"/components#8/components#1/components#2/components#1177","timestamp":"2026-05-21T10:38:47.577Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi00968","ead_ssi":"vi_vi00968","_root_":"vi_vi00968","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi00968","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi00968.xml","title_ssm":["Records of the Secretary of the Commonwealth, \n1996-2006"],"title_tesim":["Records of the Secretary of the Commonwealth, \n1996-2006"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["42418, 42513 and 42630\n"],"text":["42418, 42513 and 42630\n","Records of the Secretary of the Commonwealth, \n1996-2006","100 cu. ft (290 boxes)","Clemency Files (pardon files, pardon files-denied) and Restoration of Rights Files (restoration of rights files, and restoration of rights files-denied) contain confidential and privacy-protected information.  Access is restricted for 75 years after date of creation per Code of Virginia 42.1-78. \n","This collection is arranged into the following series:","Series I. Appointment Calendars: Secretary, 2002-2005 Series II. Correspondence and Supporting Documentation: Office of the Secretary, 2001-2005 Series III. Executive Papers, 2002-2006 Series IV. Registration of State Agency Logos, Devices and Slogans, 2000-2005 Series V. Clemency: Pardon Files, 2002-2005 Series VI. Clemency: Pardon Files-Denied, 1996-2006 Series VII. Extradition Requisitions and Renditions, 2002-2005 Series VIII. Notary Public Register, 2002-2005 Series IX. Restoration of Rights Files, 1996-2006 Series X. Restoration of Rights Files-Denied, 1997, 2003-2006","The Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth has evolved from early colonial times when there existed a Secretary of the Colony.  Thomas Nelson held the position of the first Secretary of Virginia in 1776.  Early Secretaries were elected by the public.  An Act of the General Assembly in 1920 changed the election to a joint vote of the General Assembly.  In a 1930 Act the duties of the Secretary were redefined with the Secretary of the Commonwealth serving as the ex officio secretary of the Governor, as custodian of many official State records, and as keeper of the Greater and Lesser Seals of the Commonwealth.  The office of the Secretary has gradually acquired other functions, such as:  service of out-of-state civil process; appointment and regulation of notaries public; and registration and oversight of lobbyists.  The Office became a gubernatorial appointment subsequent to a 1958 Act of the Assembly.  The Secretary of the Commonwealth is under the jurisdiction of the Governor's Office.  The Secretary is appointed by the Governor for a term of four years.  Currently the Secretary of the Commonwealth is responsible for gubernatorial appointments, clemency and restoration of civil rights requests and extraditions.  Additional activities include:  serving as ex officio Secretary to the Governor; serving as keeper of the seals of the Commonwealth; compiling and publishing the annual Blue Book; commissioning and regulating notary publics, including the publication of a Notary Handbook and conduct of disciplinary hearings; promulgating the lobbying disclosure requirements, registration of lobbyists, and recording of lobbying reports; servicing the civil process of out-of-state defendants and other parties; and authenticating and certifying the records of the courts and of any state agency.\n","The Secretary of the Commonwealth, Records, are housed in 290 boxes.  The collection is arranged into ten (10) series.  Series have been designated for:  I Appointment Calendars; II. Correspondence and Supporting Documentation; III. Executive Papers; IV. Registration of State Agency Logos, Devices and Slogans; V. Clemency:  Pardon Files; VI. Clemency:  Pardon Files-Denied; VII. Extradition Requisitions and Renditions; VIII. Notary Public Register; IX. Restoration of Rights Files; and X. Restoration of Rights Files-Denied.  These records include affidavits, agendas, appointment calendars, certificates, executive orders, invitations, judicial records, legal files, letters (correspondence), medical records, memorandums, notes, oaths, petitions, transcripts, warrants and writs.  These records primarily document the clemency activities of the Warner Administration (2002-2006).\n","Series contains invitations to Secretary Rimler and related materials pertaining to various events, speaking engagements, meetings and conferences.  Secretary Rimler or one of her assistants, Marilyn Mandell or Jo Ann Pulliam, noted on the invitation if she planned to attend.  Events attended by Secretary Rimler often include additional registration and contact information.  The files are generally arranged chronologically by the date of the engagement, though some invitations/conference material appear to have been filed separately.\n","Series consists of incoming and outgoing correspondence and supporting documentation from the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth.  The files are arranged alphabetically by topic.  The majority of the correspondence consist of constituent correspondence and thank you notes and letters.  Notable documents include:  memorandum dated 21 July 2002 from Robert M. Blue, Counselor, to Governor Mark R. Warner, summarizing current Virginia law and processes for restoring the right to vote, process for restoring the right to vote in other states, and the policy change recommendations of Blue, Anita Rimler and Secretary of Public Safety, John Marshall; correspondence between Rimler and Delegate Brad Marrs pertaining to his Freedom of Information Act requests concerning the Warner Administration's policies on the restoration of rights (fall 2004); and meeting agendas, notes and documents for HJR 159 (2002), the Joint Subcommittee to Study the Operations, Practices, Duties and Funding of the Commonwealth's Agencies, Boards, Commissions, Councils, and other Governmental Entities.\n","Series documents certain official actions of Governor Mark R. Warner during his administration.  The files are arranged alphabetically by type of record.  Records include gubernatorial appointment announcement letters, lists of appointments submitted to the General Assembly for confirmation, Executive Orders, gubernatorial and judicial appointment oaths, board resignation letters and writs of election.  The announcement letters are from the Governor to Secretary of the Commonwealth Rimler requesting that she prepare a commission of appointment.  They are arranged chronologically.  The lists of appointments were compiled five times a year (during General Assembly session, June, August, October and December) and were submitted to the General Assembly for confirmation. The gubernatorial and judicial appointment oaths and board resignations are arranged by date and then by first letter of surname.\n","Series documents the registration of logos, state mottos or slogans of state agencies through a form signed by the Secretary of the Commonwealth.  This series includes records from the final two years of the administration of Governor James S. Gilmore (2000-2001) and the Warner Administration (2002-2005).  The files are arranged chronologically by date filed and registered.  Nearly all of the records concern the registration of Virginia Lottery scratch-off tickets and each application form contains an example of the ticket. \n","Series documents the pardons granted by Governor Mark R. Warner during his term (2002-2006).  Each pardon file usually includes a copy of pardon letter, parole board investigation, Virginia Criminal Information Network reports, Executive Clemency Review Form, recommendation letters or other supporting documentation, and in the case of medical furloughs or pardons, medical records.  The files are arranged alphabetically by name.  This series contains confidential and privacy-protected information.  Access is restricted for 75 years after date of creation per Code of Virginia 42.1-78. \n","Series documents the pardons denied by Governor's George F. Allen (1996-1998), James S. Gilmore (1998-2002) and Mark R. Warner (2002-2006).  The files are arranged into four subseries:  Allen and Gilmore and Warner, 1996-2002, Medical Denials, 1996-1998, 2001, Warner, 2003-2006 and Capital Punishment files, 2002-2006.  The files are arranged alphabetically (1996-2002 and 2005-2006) and chronological by date of last action taken such as a denial letter or request to pardon board for an investigation (2003-2004).  In some instances there are two files - one filed by date of last action and a second file by date of denial. Capital Punishment clemency files are arranged chronologically by date of execution or action taken by Governor.  This series contains confidential and privacy-protected information.  Access is restricted for 75 years after date of creation per Code of Virginia 42.1-78.\n","Each pardon filed usually includes a copy of the pardon denial letter from the Secretary of the Commonwealth, parole board investigation, Virginia Criminal Information Network reports, Executive Clemency Review Form, and recommendation letters or other supporting documentation.  A small number of applicants included photographs of themselves and/or family.\n","Most, but not all, capital punishment files contain a clemency petition (either a letter or a formal document), legal files (trial transcripts, court rulings, execution orders, etc.) and correspondence from interested parties.  Some also include memorandum about the petition by the Counselor to the Governor, Robert M. Blue (2002-2005) to Governor Warner, handwritten by Blue concerning the case and police and prison files.\n","Notable denied pardon files include:  Elizabeth Renee Otte (denied 10 October 2002), Davey James Reedy (denied 14 January 1998 and 9 September 2004), Dustin Turner (denied 28 November 2005) and a request to amend Earl Washington's 2000 absolute pardon (denied 2 December 2005).\n","Notable denied capital punishment clemency files include: Percy Levar Walton (execution stayed by U.S. Supreme Court, 27 May 2003) and Bobby Wayne Swisher (executed 22 July 2003).\n","Series consists of extradition and requisitions issued during the final days of Governor James S. Gilmore's term and Governor Mark R. Warner's administration (2002-2006).  The files are arranged into two series:  requisitions and renditions.  A requisition documents Virginia's request of another state to return a fugitive to Virginia's jurisdiction.  A rendition documents another state's request of Virginia to return a fugitive to the requesting state's jurisdiction.  The files are arranged by year and alphabetical therein. This series contains confidential and privacy-protected information and some information may be redacted.\n","A typical requisition file contains an application from the Commonwealth's Attorney, a formal request by the Governor for extradition, and the Governor's request of one or more law enforcement officers to retrieve the fugitive.  The Commonwealth's Attorney's application usually includes:  copies of the indictment or arrest warrant with supporting affidavits and a statement of facts in support of a Governor's Warrant.  Some files include a photograph of the subject of the requisition.\n","A typical rendition file contains a formal request for extradition from another state's governor, correspondence from the Office of the Attorney General to the Office of the Governor concerning the extradition request, and a copy of the notice of extradition sent by the Secretary of the Commonwealth to the wanted individual.  The request for extradition usually includes:  copies of the indictment or arrest warrant with supporting affidavits and an appointment of agent by the Governor.  Some applications may include a photograph of the fugitive.  Also included in each files is a Rendition Fact Sheet completed by the Secretary of the Commonwealth.  The Rendition Fact Sheet lists date received, jurisdiction, fugitive's name and address, attorney's name and address, date charged as a fugitive, disposition of fugitive warrant, next scheduled court appearance on fugitive warrant, fugitive status (in custody or out on bond), list of pending Virginia charges and disposition and contact information for requestor.\n","This series consists of an annual printout that documents the registration of persons appointed to be notaries public by the Secretary of the Commonwealth between 2002 and 2005 and the date they were appointed.\n","Series documents the restoration of rights that were granted by Governor Mark R. Warner (2002-2006).  Also included are files for a few restoration of rights granted by Governors George F. Allen (1996) and James S. Gilmore (1998-2002) that were not previously transferred to the Library of Virginia.  The files are arranged into two subseries:  Allen and Gilmore, 1996-2002 and Warner, 2002-2006.  Each file includes a copy of the restoration of rights certificate, original application, recommendation letters, parole information, and police record checks.  The files are arranged by year and alphabetically by name therein.  This series contains confidential and privacy-protected information.  Access is restricted for 75 years after date of creation per Code of Virginia 42.1-78. \n","Series documents the restoration of rights applications that were denied by Governor Mark R. Warner (2002-2006).  Also included are a handful of applications denied by Governor George F. Allen (1994-1998).  Each file includes a copy of the original application, rejection letter, recommendation letters, parole information, and police record checks.  The files are arranged by year and alphabetically by name therein.  This series contains confidential and privacy-protected information.  Access is restricted for 75 years after date of creation per Code of Virginia 42.1-78. \n","Extradition Requisition and Rendition files may contain confidential and privacy-protected information.\n","English\n"],"unitid_tesim":["42418, 42513 and 42630\n"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Records of the Secretary of the Commonwealth, \n1996-2006"],"collection_title_tesim":["Records of the Secretary of the Commonwealth, \n1996-2006"],"collection_ssim":["Records of the Secretary of the Commonwealth, \n1996-2006"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"creator_ssm":["Virginia Secretary of the Commonwealth\n"],"creator_ssim":["Virginia Secretary of the Commonwealth\n"],"acqinfo_ssim":["Jonathan Young, Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth, Patrick Henry Building, 1111 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23219, transferred 18 January 2006 (accession 42418), 27 February 2006 (accession 42513), and 12 April 2006 (accession 42630).\n"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["100 cu. ft (290 boxes)"],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eClemency Files (pardon files, pardon files-denied) and Restoration of Rights Files (restoration of rights files, and restoration of rights files-denied) contain confidential and privacy-protected information.  Access is restricted for 75 years after date of creation per Code of Virginia 42.1-78. \n\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions\n"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["Clemency Files (pardon files, pardon files-denied) and Restoration of Rights Files (restoration of rights files, and restoration of rights files-denied) contain confidential and privacy-protected information.  Access is restricted for 75 years after date of creation per Code of Virginia 42.1-78. \n"],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThis collection is arranged into the following series:\u003c/p\u003e","\u003clist type=\"simple\"\u003e\n        \u003citem\u003eSeries I. Appointment Calendars: Secretary, 2002-2005\u003c/item\u003e\n        \u003citem\u003eSeries II. Correspondence and Supporting Documentation: Office of the Secretary, 2001-2005\u003c/item\u003e\n        \u003citem\u003eSeries III. Executive Papers, 2002-2006\u003c/item\u003e\n        \u003citem\u003eSeries IV. Registration of State Agency Logos, Devices and Slogans, 2000-2005\u003c/item\u003e\n        \u003citem\u003eSeries V. Clemency: Pardon Files, 2002-2005\u003c/item\u003e\n        \u003citem\u003eSeries VI. Clemency: Pardon Files-Denied, 1996-2006\u003c/item\u003e\n        \u003citem\u003eSeries VII. Extradition Requisitions and Renditions, 2002-2005\u003c/item\u003e\n        \u003citem\u003eSeries VIII. Notary Public Register, 2002-2005\u003c/item\u003e\n        \u003citem\u003eSeries IX. Restoration of Rights Files, 1996-2006\u003c/item\u003e\n        \u003citem\u003eSeries X. Restoration of Rights Files-Denied, 1997, 2003-2006\u003c/item\u003e\n      \u003c/list\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["This collection is arranged into the following series:","Series I. Appointment Calendars: Secretary, 2002-2005 Series II. Correspondence and Supporting Documentation: Office of the Secretary, 2001-2005 Series III. Executive Papers, 2002-2006 Series IV. Registration of State Agency Logos, Devices and Slogans, 2000-2005 Series V. Clemency: Pardon Files, 2002-2005 Series VI. Clemency: Pardon Files-Denied, 1996-2006 Series VII. Extradition Requisitions and Renditions, 2002-2005 Series VIII. Notary Public Register, 2002-2005 Series IX. Restoration of Rights Files, 1996-2006 Series X. Restoration of Rights Files-Denied, 1997, 2003-2006"],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth has evolved from early colonial times when there existed a Secretary of the Colony.  Thomas Nelson held the position of the first Secretary of Virginia in 1776.  Early Secretaries were elected by the public.  An Act of the General Assembly in 1920 changed the election to a joint vote of the General Assembly.  In a 1930 Act the duties of the Secretary were redefined with the Secretary of the Commonwealth serving as the ex officio secretary of the Governor, as custodian of many official State records, and as keeper of the Greater and Lesser Seals of the Commonwealth.  The office of the Secretary has gradually acquired other functions, such as:  service of out-of-state civil process; appointment and regulation of notaries public; and registration and oversight of lobbyists.  The Office became a gubernatorial appointment subsequent to a 1958 Act of the Assembly.  The Secretary of the Commonwealth is under the jurisdiction of the Governor's Office.  The Secretary is appointed by the Governor for a term of four years.  Currently the Secretary of the Commonwealth is responsible for gubernatorial appointments, clemency and restoration of civil rights requests and extraditions.  Additional activities include:  serving as ex officio Secretary to the Governor; serving as keeper of the seals of the Commonwealth; compiling and publishing the annual Blue Book; commissioning and regulating notary publics, including the publication of a Notary Handbook and conduct of disciplinary hearings; promulgating the lobbying disclosure requirements, registration of lobbyists, and recording of lobbying reports; servicing the civil process of out-of-state defendants and other parties; and authenticating and certifying the records of the courts and of any state agency.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Biographical/Historical Information \n"],"bioghist_tesim":["The Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth has evolved from early colonial times when there existed a Secretary of the Colony.  Thomas Nelson held the position of the first Secretary of Virginia in 1776.  Early Secretaries were elected by the public.  An Act of the General Assembly in 1920 changed the election to a joint vote of the General Assembly.  In a 1930 Act the duties of the Secretary were redefined with the Secretary of the Commonwealth serving as the ex officio secretary of the Governor, as custodian of many official State records, and as keeper of the Greater and Lesser Seals of the Commonwealth.  The office of the Secretary has gradually acquired other functions, such as:  service of out-of-state civil process; appointment and regulation of notaries public; and registration and oversight of lobbyists.  The Office became a gubernatorial appointment subsequent to a 1958 Act of the Assembly.  The Secretary of the Commonwealth is under the jurisdiction of the Governor's Office.  The Secretary is appointed by the Governor for a term of four years.  Currently the Secretary of the Commonwealth is responsible for gubernatorial appointments, clemency and restoration of civil rights requests and extraditions.  Additional activities include:  serving as ex officio Secretary to the Governor; serving as keeper of the seals of the Commonwealth; compiling and publishing the annual Blue Book; commissioning and regulating notary publics, including the publication of a Notary Handbook and conduct of disciplinary hearings; promulgating the lobbying disclosure requirements, registration of lobbyists, and recording of lobbying reports; servicing the civil process of out-of-state defendants and other parties; and authenticating and certifying the records of the courts and of any state agency.\n"],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eRecords of the Virginia Secretary of the Commonwealth, [cite specific date and accession used].  State Records Collection, The Library of Virginia.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Records of the Virginia Secretary of the Commonwealth, [cite specific date and accession used].  State Records Collection, The Library of Virginia.\n"],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe Secretary of the Commonwealth, Records, are housed in 290 boxes.  The collection is arranged into ten (10) series.  Series have been designated for:  I Appointment Calendars; II. Correspondence and Supporting Documentation; III. Executive Papers; IV. Registration of State Agency Logos, Devices and Slogans; V. Clemency:  Pardon Files; VI. Clemency:  Pardon Files-Denied; VII. Extradition Requisitions and Renditions; VIII. Notary Public Register; IX. Restoration of Rights Files; and X. Restoration of Rights Files-Denied.  These records include affidavits, agendas, appointment calendars, certificates, executive orders, invitations, judicial records, legal files, letters (correspondence), medical records, memorandums, notes, oaths, petitions, transcripts, warrants and writs.  These records primarily document the clemency activities of the Warner Administration (2002-2006).\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries contains invitations to Secretary Rimler and related materials pertaining to various events, speaking engagements, meetings and conferences.  Secretary Rimler or one of her assistants, Marilyn Mandell or Jo Ann Pulliam, noted on the invitation if she planned to attend.  Events attended by Secretary Rimler often include additional registration and contact information.  The files are generally arranged chronologically by the date of the engagement, though some invitations/conference material appear to have been filed separately.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries consists of incoming and outgoing correspondence and supporting documentation from the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth.  The files are arranged alphabetically by topic.  The majority of the correspondence consist of constituent correspondence and thank you notes and letters.  Notable documents include:  memorandum dated 21 July 2002 from Robert M. Blue, Counselor, to Governor Mark R. Warner, summarizing current Virginia law and processes for restoring the right to vote, process for restoring the right to vote in other states, and the policy change recommendations of Blue, Anita Rimler and Secretary of Public Safety, John Marshall; correspondence between Rimler and Delegate Brad Marrs pertaining to his Freedom of Information Act requests concerning the Warner Administration's policies on the restoration of rights (fall 2004); and meeting agendas, notes and documents for HJR 159 (2002), the Joint Subcommittee to Study the Operations, Practices, Duties and Funding of the Commonwealth's Agencies, Boards, Commissions, Councils, and other Governmental Entities.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries documents certain official actions of Governor Mark R. Warner during his administration.  The files are arranged alphabetically by type of record.  Records include gubernatorial appointment announcement letters, lists of appointments submitted to the General Assembly for confirmation, Executive Orders, gubernatorial and judicial appointment oaths, board resignation letters and writs of election.  The announcement letters are from the Governor to Secretary of the Commonwealth Rimler requesting that she prepare a commission of appointment.  They are arranged chronologically.  The lists of appointments were compiled five times a year (during General Assembly session, June, August, October and December) and were submitted to the General Assembly for confirmation. The gubernatorial and judicial appointment oaths and board resignations are arranged by date and then by first letter of surname.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries documents the registration of logos, state mottos or slogans of state agencies through a form signed by the Secretary of the Commonwealth.  This series includes records from the final two years of the administration of Governor James S. Gilmore (2000-2001) and the Warner Administration (2002-2005).  The files are arranged chronologically by date filed and registered.  Nearly all of the records concern the registration of Virginia Lottery scratch-off tickets and each application form contains an example of the ticket. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries documents the pardons granted by Governor Mark R. Warner during his term (2002-2006).  Each pardon file usually includes a copy of pardon letter, parole board investigation, Virginia Criminal Information Network reports, Executive Clemency Review Form, recommendation letters or other supporting documentation, and in the case of medical furloughs or pardons, medical records.  The files are arranged alphabetically by name.  This series contains confidential and privacy-protected information.  Access is restricted for 75 years after date of creation per Code of Virginia 42.1-78. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries documents the pardons denied by Governor's George F. Allen (1996-1998), James S. Gilmore (1998-2002) and Mark R. Warner (2002-2006).  The files are arranged into four subseries:  Allen and Gilmore and Warner, 1996-2002, Medical Denials, 1996-1998, 2001, Warner, 2003-2006 and Capital Punishment files, 2002-2006.  The files are arranged alphabetically (1996-2002 and 2005-2006) and chronological by date of last action taken such as a denial letter or request to pardon board for an investigation (2003-2004).  In some instances there are two files - one filed by date of last action and a second file by date of denial. Capital Punishment clemency files are arranged chronologically by date of execution or action taken by Governor.  This series contains confidential and privacy-protected information.  Access is restricted for 75 years after date of creation per Code of Virginia 42.1-78.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEach pardon filed usually includes a copy of the pardon denial letter from the Secretary of the Commonwealth, parole board investigation, Virginia Criminal Information Network reports, Executive Clemency Review Form, and recommendation letters or other supporting documentation.  A small number of applicants included photographs of themselves and/or family.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMost, but not all, capital punishment files contain a clemency petition (either a letter or a formal document), legal files (trial transcripts, court rulings, execution orders, etc.) and correspondence from interested parties.  Some also include memorandum about the petition by the Counselor to the Governor, Robert M. Blue (2002-2005) to Governor Warner, handwritten by Blue concerning the case and police and prison files.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eNotable denied pardon files include:  Elizabeth Renee Otte (denied 10 October 2002), Davey James Reedy (denied 14 January 1998 and 9 September 2004), Dustin Turner (denied 28 November 2005) and a request to amend Earl Washington's 2000 absolute pardon (denied 2 December 2005).\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eNotable denied capital punishment clemency files include: Percy Levar Walton (execution stayed by U.S. Supreme Court, 27 May 2003) and Bobby Wayne Swisher (executed 22 July 2003).\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries consists of extradition and requisitions issued during the final days of Governor James S. Gilmore's term and Governor Mark R. Warner's administration (2002-2006).  The files are arranged into two series:  requisitions and renditions.  A requisition documents Virginia's request of another state to return a fugitive to Virginia's jurisdiction.  A rendition documents another state's request of Virginia to return a fugitive to the requesting state's jurisdiction.  The files are arranged by year and alphabetical therein. This series contains confidential and privacy-protected information and some information may be redacted.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA typical requisition file contains an application from the Commonwealth's Attorney, a formal request by the Governor for extradition, and the Governor's request of one or more law enforcement officers to retrieve the fugitive.  The Commonwealth's Attorney's application usually includes:  copies of the indictment or arrest warrant with supporting affidavits and a statement of facts in support of a Governor's Warrant.  Some files include a photograph of the subject of the requisition.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA typical rendition file contains a formal request for extradition from another state's governor, correspondence from the Office of the Attorney General to the Office of the Governor concerning the extradition request, and a copy of the notice of extradition sent by the Secretary of the Commonwealth to the wanted individual.  The request for extradition usually includes:  copies of the indictment or arrest warrant with supporting affidavits and an appointment of agent by the Governor.  Some applications may include a photograph of the fugitive.  Also included in each files is a Rendition Fact Sheet completed by the Secretary of the Commonwealth.  The Rendition Fact Sheet lists date received, jurisdiction, fugitive's name and address, attorney's name and address, date charged as a fugitive, disposition of fugitive warrant, next scheduled court appearance on fugitive warrant, fugitive status (in custody or out on bond), list of pending Virginia charges and disposition and contact information for requestor.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series consists of an annual printout that documents the registration of persons appointed to be notaries public by the Secretary of the Commonwealth between 2002 and 2005 and the date they were appointed.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries documents the restoration of rights that were granted by Governor Mark R. Warner (2002-2006).  Also included are files for a few restoration of rights granted by Governors George F. Allen (1996) and James S. Gilmore (1998-2002) that were not previously transferred to the Library of Virginia.  The files are arranged into two subseries:  Allen and Gilmore, 1996-2002 and Warner, 2002-2006.  Each file includes a copy of the restoration of rights certificate, original application, recommendation letters, parole information, and police record checks.  The files are arranged by year and alphabetically by name therein.  This series contains confidential and privacy-protected information.  Access is restricted for 75 years after date of creation per Code of Virginia 42.1-78. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries documents the restoration of rights applications that were denied by Governor Mark R. Warner (2002-2006).  Also included are a handful of applications denied by Governor George F. Allen (1994-1998).  Each file includes a copy of the original application, rejection letter, recommendation letters, parole information, and police record checks.  The files are arranged by year and alphabetically by name therein.  This series contains confidential and privacy-protected information.  Access is restricted for 75 years after date of creation per Code of Virginia 42.1-78. \n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The Secretary of the Commonwealth, Records, are housed in 290 boxes.  The collection is arranged into ten (10) series.  Series have been designated for:  I Appointment Calendars; II. Correspondence and Supporting Documentation; III. Executive Papers; IV. Registration of State Agency Logos, Devices and Slogans; V. Clemency:  Pardon Files; VI. Clemency:  Pardon Files-Denied; VII. Extradition Requisitions and Renditions; VIII. Notary Public Register; IX. Restoration of Rights Files; and X. Restoration of Rights Files-Denied.  These records include affidavits, agendas, appointment calendars, certificates, executive orders, invitations, judicial records, legal files, letters (correspondence), medical records, memorandums, notes, oaths, petitions, transcripts, warrants and writs.  These records primarily document the clemency activities of the Warner Administration (2002-2006).\n","Series contains invitations to Secretary Rimler and related materials pertaining to various events, speaking engagements, meetings and conferences.  Secretary Rimler or one of her assistants, Marilyn Mandell or Jo Ann Pulliam, noted on the invitation if she planned to attend.  Events attended by Secretary Rimler often include additional registration and contact information.  The files are generally arranged chronologically by the date of the engagement, though some invitations/conference material appear to have been filed separately.\n","Series consists of incoming and outgoing correspondence and supporting documentation from the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth.  The files are arranged alphabetically by topic.  The majority of the correspondence consist of constituent correspondence and thank you notes and letters.  Notable documents include:  memorandum dated 21 July 2002 from Robert M. Blue, Counselor, to Governor Mark R. Warner, summarizing current Virginia law and processes for restoring the right to vote, process for restoring the right to vote in other states, and the policy change recommendations of Blue, Anita Rimler and Secretary of Public Safety, John Marshall; correspondence between Rimler and Delegate Brad Marrs pertaining to his Freedom of Information Act requests concerning the Warner Administration's policies on the restoration of rights (fall 2004); and meeting agendas, notes and documents for HJR 159 (2002), the Joint Subcommittee to Study the Operations, Practices, Duties and Funding of the Commonwealth's Agencies, Boards, Commissions, Councils, and other Governmental Entities.\n","Series documents certain official actions of Governor Mark R. Warner during his administration.  The files are arranged alphabetically by type of record.  Records include gubernatorial appointment announcement letters, lists of appointments submitted to the General Assembly for confirmation, Executive Orders, gubernatorial and judicial appointment oaths, board resignation letters and writs of election.  The announcement letters are from the Governor to Secretary of the Commonwealth Rimler requesting that she prepare a commission of appointment.  They are arranged chronologically.  The lists of appointments were compiled five times a year (during General Assembly session, June, August, October and December) and were submitted to the General Assembly for confirmation. The gubernatorial and judicial appointment oaths and board resignations are arranged by date and then by first letter of surname.\n","Series documents the registration of logos, state mottos or slogans of state agencies through a form signed by the Secretary of the Commonwealth.  This series includes records from the final two years of the administration of Governor James S. Gilmore (2000-2001) and the Warner Administration (2002-2005).  The files are arranged chronologically by date filed and registered.  Nearly all of the records concern the registration of Virginia Lottery scratch-off tickets and each application form contains an example of the ticket. \n","Series documents the pardons granted by Governor Mark R. Warner during his term (2002-2006).  Each pardon file usually includes a copy of pardon letter, parole board investigation, Virginia Criminal Information Network reports, Executive Clemency Review Form, recommendation letters or other supporting documentation, and in the case of medical furloughs or pardons, medical records.  The files are arranged alphabetically by name.  This series contains confidential and privacy-protected information.  Access is restricted for 75 years after date of creation per Code of Virginia 42.1-78. \n","Series documents the pardons denied by Governor's George F. Allen (1996-1998), James S. Gilmore (1998-2002) and Mark R. Warner (2002-2006).  The files are arranged into four subseries:  Allen and Gilmore and Warner, 1996-2002, Medical Denials, 1996-1998, 2001, Warner, 2003-2006 and Capital Punishment files, 2002-2006.  The files are arranged alphabetically (1996-2002 and 2005-2006) and chronological by date of last action taken such as a denial letter or request to pardon board for an investigation (2003-2004).  In some instances there are two files - one filed by date of last action and a second file by date of denial. Capital Punishment clemency files are arranged chronologically by date of execution or action taken by Governor.  This series contains confidential and privacy-protected information.  Access is restricted for 75 years after date of creation per Code of Virginia 42.1-78.\n","Each pardon filed usually includes a copy of the pardon denial letter from the Secretary of the Commonwealth, parole board investigation, Virginia Criminal Information Network reports, Executive Clemency Review Form, and recommendation letters or other supporting documentation.  A small number of applicants included photographs of themselves and/or family.\n","Most, but not all, capital punishment files contain a clemency petition (either a letter or a formal document), legal files (trial transcripts, court rulings, execution orders, etc.) and correspondence from interested parties.  Some also include memorandum about the petition by the Counselor to the Governor, Robert M. Blue (2002-2005) to Governor Warner, handwritten by Blue concerning the case and police and prison files.\n","Notable denied pardon files include:  Elizabeth Renee Otte (denied 10 October 2002), Davey James Reedy (denied 14 January 1998 and 9 September 2004), Dustin Turner (denied 28 November 2005) and a request to amend Earl Washington's 2000 absolute pardon (denied 2 December 2005).\n","Notable denied capital punishment clemency files include: Percy Levar Walton (execution stayed by U.S. Supreme Court, 27 May 2003) and Bobby Wayne Swisher (executed 22 July 2003).\n","Series consists of extradition and requisitions issued during the final days of Governor James S. Gilmore's term and Governor Mark R. Warner's administration (2002-2006).  The files are arranged into two series:  requisitions and renditions.  A requisition documents Virginia's request of another state to return a fugitive to Virginia's jurisdiction.  A rendition documents another state's request of Virginia to return a fugitive to the requesting state's jurisdiction.  The files are arranged by year and alphabetical therein. This series contains confidential and privacy-protected information and some information may be redacted.\n","A typical requisition file contains an application from the Commonwealth's Attorney, a formal request by the Governor for extradition, and the Governor's request of one or more law enforcement officers to retrieve the fugitive.  The Commonwealth's Attorney's application usually includes:  copies of the indictment or arrest warrant with supporting affidavits and a statement of facts in support of a Governor's Warrant.  Some files include a photograph of the subject of the requisition.\n","A typical rendition file contains a formal request for extradition from another state's governor, correspondence from the Office of the Attorney General to the Office of the Governor concerning the extradition request, and a copy of the notice of extradition sent by the Secretary of the Commonwealth to the wanted individual.  The request for extradition usually includes:  copies of the indictment or arrest warrant with supporting affidavits and an appointment of agent by the Governor.  Some applications may include a photograph of the fugitive.  Also included in each files is a Rendition Fact Sheet completed by the Secretary of the Commonwealth.  The Rendition Fact Sheet lists date received, jurisdiction, fugitive's name and address, attorney's name and address, date charged as a fugitive, disposition of fugitive warrant, next scheduled court appearance on fugitive warrant, fugitive status (in custody or out on bond), list of pending Virginia charges and disposition and contact information for requestor.\n","This series consists of an annual printout that documents the registration of persons appointed to be notaries public by the Secretary of the Commonwealth between 2002 and 2005 and the date they were appointed.\n","Series documents the restoration of rights that were granted by Governor Mark R. Warner (2002-2006).  Also included are files for a few restoration of rights granted by Governors George F. Allen (1996) and James S. Gilmore (1998-2002) that were not previously transferred to the Library of Virginia.  The files are arranged into two subseries:  Allen and Gilmore, 1996-2002 and Warner, 2002-2006.  Each file includes a copy of the restoration of rights certificate, original application, recommendation letters, parole information, and police record checks.  The files are arranged by year and alphabetically by name therein.  This series contains confidential and privacy-protected information.  Access is restricted for 75 years after date of creation per Code of Virginia 42.1-78. \n","Series documents the restoration of rights applications that were denied by Governor Mark R. Warner (2002-2006).  Also included are a handful of applications denied by Governor George F. Allen (1994-1998).  Each file includes a copy of the original application, rejection letter, recommendation letters, parole information, and police record checks.  The files are arranged by year and alphabetically by name therein.  This series contains confidential and privacy-protected information.  Access is restricted for 75 years after date of creation per Code of Virginia 42.1-78. \n"],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eExtradition Requisition and Rendition files may contain confidential and privacy-protected information.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions\n"],"userestrict_tesim":["Extradition Requisition and Rendition files may contain confidential and privacy-protected information.\n"],"language_ssim":["English\n"],"total_component_count_is":5013,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T10:38:47.577Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi00968_c09_c02_c03_c1178"}},{"id":"vi_vi00090_c13_c281","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Zephyr - Abingdon, Va., \n                  \n                  1960-1965","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi00090_c13_c281#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi00090_c13_c281","ref_ssm":["vi_vi00090_c13_c281"],"id":"vi_vi00090_c13_c281","ead_ssi":"vi_vi00090","_root_":"vi_vi00090","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi00090_c13","parent_ssi":"vi_vi00090_c13","parent_ssim":["vi_vi00090","vi_vi00090_c13"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi00090","vi_vi00090_c13"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Records of the Division of Motion\n         Picture Censorship, \n         \n         1926-1968","Series XIII:: Correspondence (Active\n               Theaters and Drive-ins), \n               \n               1957-1965"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Records of the Division of Motion\n         Picture Censorship, \n         \n         1926-1968","Series XIII:: Correspondence (Active\n               Theaters and Drive-ins), \n               \n               1957-1965"],"text":["Records of the Division of Motion\n         Picture Censorship, \n         \n         1926-1968","Series XIII:: Correspondence (Active\n               Theaters and Drive-ins), \n               \n               1957-1965","Zephyr - Abingdon, Va., \n                  \n                  1960-1965","Box 52","Folder 6"],"title_filing_ssi":"Zephyr - Abingdon, Va., \n                   \n                  1960-1965","title_ssm":["Zephyr - Abingdon, Va., \n                  \n                  1960-1965"],"title_tesim":["Zephyr - Abingdon, Va., \n                  \n                  1960-1965"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Zephyr - Abingdon, Va., \n                  \n                  1960-1965"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Records of the Division of Motion\n         Picture Censorship, \n         \n         1926-1968"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":1170,"containers_ssim":["Box 52","Folder 6"],"_nest_path_":"/components#12/components#280","timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:16:53.688Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi00090","ead_ssi":"vi_vi00090","_root_":"vi_vi00090","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi00090","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi00090.xml","title_ssm":["Records of the Division of Motion\n         Picture Censorship, \n         \n         1926-1968"],"title_tesim":["Records of the Division of Motion\n         Picture Censorship, \n         \n         1926-1968"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["26515"],"text":["26515","Records of the Division of Motion\n         Picture Censorship, \n         \n         1926-1968","57 cubic feet (62\n         boxes)","There are no restrictions.","Arranged alphabetically by film title.","Arranged chronologically by serial number.","Arranged alphabetically by film title.","Arranged alphabetically by employee.","Arranged alphabetically by location.","Arranged chronologically.","Arranged chronologically.","Arranged alphabetically by subject.","Arranged chronologically.","Arranged chronologically.","Arranged chronologically.","Arranged alphabetically by subject.","Arranged alphabetically by name of theater.","Arranged alphabetically by name of theater.","Arranged alphabetically.","Arranged chronologically by date of report.","The Board of Censors (forerunner to the Division) was\n         established by H.B. 346 Chapter 257 of the Acts of Assembly\n         approved March 15, 1922. The purpose of the act was to\n         regulate motion picture films, provide a system of\n         examination, approval and regulation of banners and posters\n         and advertising material related to films and providing\n         penalties for violation of the act. The law made it in effect\n         illegal to sell or exhibit any commercial film that had not\n         been officially approved and licensed by the Board.","The Board had the following requirements; (1) Movies\n            could not be shown without a valid licenses or permit; (2)\n            The Board was composed of three resident citizens of\n            Virginia, appointed by the governor to 4- year terms\n            subject to confirmation by the senate; (3) Criteria used to\n            review films was based on if the film was \"obscene,\n            indecent, immoral, inhuman or is of such character that its\n            exhibition would ten to corrupt morals or incite crime. A\n            written explanation was required to explain why a license\n            was not issued and a detailed description of rejected\n            portions of a film; (4) The establishment of a fee\n            structure (in order to receive a license to show movies in\n            the state) of one dollar (1.00) per 1000 feet of film and\n            fifty cents (.50) for each duplicate or copy of the\n            original print; (5) On the 15th day of year an annual\n            detailed report was to be submitted to the governor\n            providing details such as receipts and disbursements and\n            summaries of films examined.","The Board had the following requirements; (1) Movies\n            could not be shown without a valid licenses or permit; (2)\n            The Board was composed of three resident citizens of\n            Virginia, appointed by the governor to 4- year terms\n            subject to confirmation by the senate; (3) Criteria used to\n            review films was based on if the film was \"obscene,\n            indecent, immoral, inhuman or is of such character that its\n            exhibition would ten to corrupt morals or incite crime. A\n            written explanation was required to explain why a license\n            was not issued and a detailed description of rejected\n            portions of a film; (4) The establishment of a fee\n            structure (in order to receive a license to show movies in\n            the state) of one dollar (1.00) per 1000 feet of film and\n            fifty cents (.50) for each duplicate or copy of the\n            original print; (5) On the 15th day of year an annual\n            detailed report was to be submitted to the governor\n            providing details such as receipts and disbursements and\n            summaries of films examined.","On February 25, 1930 Chapter 49 of the Acts of Assembly\n            Section 378A officially abolished the Board of Censors and\n            established within the Department of Law the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship. The Divisions' three censors had\n            equal authority and were appointed and served at the\n            pleasure of the Attorney General. The censors had to be\n            \"educated and experienced residents of Virginia\". The three\n            members of the division had the responsibility of voting a\n            director from among their group. The function of the\n            division was similar to that of the Board of Censors but\n            with changes to accommodate the medium of \"talkies\" in\n            film. The fee structure was increased at this time.","On February 25, 1930 Chapter 49 of the Acts of Assembly\n            Section 378A officially abolished the Board of Censors and\n            established within the Department of Law the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship. The Divisions' three censors had\n            equal authority and were appointed and served at the\n            pleasure of the Attorney General. The censors had to be\n            \"educated and experienced residents of Virginia\". The three\n            members of the division had the responsibility of voting a\n            director from among their group. The function of the\n            division was similar to that of the Board of Censors but\n            with changes to accommodate the medium of \"talkies\" in\n            film. The fee structure was increased at this time.","The Division of Motion Picture Censorship carried out\n            its duties effectively until the decade of the 1960's when\n            court decisions raised questions about the necessity of\n            government to censor movies. Coupled with changing mores\n            and liberal first amendment interpretations by the federal\n            courts, the General Assembly passed legislation (HB 176) to\n            repeal and stop funding the Division of Motion Picture\n            Censorship effective June 30, 1966.","The Division of Motion Picture Censorship carried out\n            its duties effectively until the decade of the 1960's when\n            court decisions raised questions about the necessity of\n            government to censor movies. Coupled with changing mores\n            and liberal first amendment interpretations by the federal\n            courts, the General Assembly passed legislation (HB 176) to\n            repeal and stop funding the Division of Motion Picture\n            Censorship effective June 30, 1966.","Series I: LICENSE APPLICATIONS, 1926-1965 (14.5 cu. ft.)\n         This series contains the actual applications for licenses to\n         show and distribute films in the state of Virginia. The form\n         includes the following information: date of license, title of\n         movie or serial, names of lead characters, print number,\n         duplicate number, reel footage, name of studio and address,\n         notarized signature of designated representative for the\n         studio and the date and signature of the notary public. The\n         reverse side of the form may contain comments or remarks\n         regarding the elimination of offensive parts of a film or the\n         total rejection of a film due to its immoral content. Arranged\n         alphabetically by film title.","Series II: LICENSES (REGULAR AND NON-REGULAR), 1954-1965\n            (10. 5 cu. ft.) This series contains two types of\n            certificates, organized as Regular and Non-Regular\n            Licenses. Both Regular and Non-Regular license certificates\n            consists of two types of numbered forms. The license\n            certificate entitled Licenses For Duplicates (Form 4)\n            certifies that a motion picture studio is permitted to\n            exhibit and display a film within the State of Virginia.\n            The form contains the title of the movie, the date the\n            certificate was issued, the amount of fee paid by the\n            studio, serial number, print number and the signature of\n            the Director of the Division of Motion Picture Censorship.\n            The second form is entitled Copy of Application For\n            Substitute Seal Original Receipted and Returned to\n            Applicant (Form 8). This form gives the studio name, the\n            title of the film, date issued and name of the Director.\n            The form states that the movie studio is applying for a\n            substitute seal to be attached to a print of the film\n            previously censored and approved by the Division. The major\n            difference between Regular and Non-Regular Licenses appears\n            to be the arrangement order and time period. Regular\n            Licenses are arranged by the prefix CS and cover the early\n            1950's to 1965 while the Non-Regular Licenses are arranged\n            chronologically by serial number and cover the early\n            1960's. Arranged chronologically by serial number.","Series II: LICENSES (REGULAR AND NON-REGULAR), 1954-1965\n            (10. 5 cu. ft.) This series contains two types of\n            certificates, organized as Regular and Non-Regular\n            Licenses. Both Regular and Non-Regular license certificates\n            consists of two types of numbered forms. The license\n            certificate entitled Licenses For Duplicates (Form 4)\n            certifies that a motion picture studio is permitted to\n            exhibit and display a film within the State of Virginia.\n            The form contains the title of the movie, the date the\n            certificate was issued, the amount of fee paid by the\n            studio, serial number, print number and the signature of\n            the Director of the Division of Motion Picture Censorship.\n            The second form is entitled Copy of Application For\n            Substitute Seal Original Receipted and Returned to\n            Applicant (Form 8). This form gives the studio name, the\n            title of the film, date issued and name of the Director.\n            The form states that the movie studio is applying for a\n            substitute seal to be attached to a print of the film\n            previously censored and approved by the Division. The major\n            difference between Regular and Non-Regular Licenses appears\n            to be the arrangement order and time period. Regular\n            Licenses are arranged by the prefix CS and cover the early\n            1950's to 1965 while the Non-Regular Licenses are arranged\n            chronologically by serial number and cover the early\n            1960's. Arranged chronologically by serial number.","Series III: INDEX TO LICENSES AND APPLICATIONS,\n            1947-1965 (3.15 cu. ft.) This series contains 4x6 index\n            cards that serve as an index to the non-Regular Licenses\n            and the License Applications. The index includes the motion\n            picture title, date license or application issued, studio\n            releasing film and serial number. The pink index cards\n            provide notations about the status of the film such as,\n            whether a seal has been issued for a film, whether the film\n            was eliminated or \"rejected in toto\" meaning it could not\n            be shown in the state, and the conditional approval of a\n            film with the seal of Virginia, issued at a later date. The\n            index does not appear to apply to the Regular Licenses.\n            Arranged alphabetically by film title.","Series III: INDEX TO LICENSES AND APPLICATIONS,\n            1947-1965 (3.15 cu. ft.) This series contains 4x6 index\n            cards that serve as an index to the non-Regular Licenses\n            and the License Applications. The index includes the motion\n            picture title, date license or application issued, studio\n            releasing film and serial number. The pink index cards\n            provide notations about the status of the film such as,\n            whether a seal has been issued for a film, whether the film\n            was eliminated or \"rejected in toto\" meaning it could not\n            be shown in the state, and the conditional approval of a\n            film with the seal of Virginia, issued at a later date. The\n            index does not appear to apply to the Regular Licenses.\n            Arranged alphabetically by film title.","Series IV: ATTENDANCE REPORT FOR EMPLOYEES, 1958-1965\n            (2.1 cu. ft.) This series contains 4x6 index cards that\n            served as attendance forms for employees of the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship. Each card has the name of the\n            employee, day of the week, check mark for when the employee\n            was present, or on sick/vacation leave and the signature of\n            employees. Arranged alphabetically by board member.","Series IV: ATTENDANCE REPORT FOR EMPLOYEES, 1958-1965\n            (2.1 cu. ft.) This series contains 4x6 index cards that\n            served as attendance forms for employees of the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship. Each card has the name of the\n            employee, day of the week, check mark for when the employee\n            was present, or on sick/vacation leave and the signature of\n            employees. Arranged alphabetically by board member.","Series V: THEATRE AND INSPECTOR LISTINGS, 1959-1965 (.35\n            cu. ft.) This series provides 4x6 index cards giving an\n            alphabetical listing of movie theatres and separate listing\n            for the name and address of inspectors along with the\n            theatres they were responsible for monitoring. The movie\n            theatres are organized by location of county, city and\n            town. The index cards have notations for \"Negro\" inspectors\n            and/or \"Negro\" owned theatres. The cards are divided into\n            active (white color) and inactive (pink color) cards. There\n            is a separate listing of index cards for inspectors of\n            drive-ins. Arranged alphabetically by location.","Series V: THEATRE AND INSPECTOR LISTINGS, 1959-1965 (.35\n            cu. ft.) This series provides 4x6 index cards giving an\n            alphabetical listing of movie theatres and separate listing\n            for the name and address of inspectors along with the\n            theatres they were responsible for monitoring. The movie\n            theatres are organized by location of county, city and\n            town. The index cards have notations for \"Negro\" inspectors\n            and/or \"Negro\" owned theatres. The cards are divided into\n            active (white color) and inactive (pink color) cards. There\n            is a separate listing of index cards for inspectors of\n            drive-ins. Arranged alphabetically by location.","Series VI: LISTING OF FILM TITLES, 1928-1957 (1 cu.\n            ft.)This series offers a typed listing of movie titles,\n            seal numbers, and notations of films eliminated and\n            approved for viewing within the state. Some of the listings\n            give only the date, movie title, serial number and the\n            studio releasing the film. Arranged chronologically.","Series VI: LISTING OF FILM TITLES, 1928-1957 (1 cu.\n            ft.)This series offers a typed listing of movie titles,\n            seal numbers, and notations of films eliminated and\n            approved for viewing within the state. Some of the listings\n            give only the date, movie title, serial number and the\n            studio releasing the film. Arranged chronologically.","Series VII: FINANCIAL RECORDS, 1949-1960 (3.2 cu. ft.)\n            This series consists of five volumes, one tablet, and a\n            selection of financial reports that are Daily Billings (the\n            form is entitled Film Record), which provide an overview of\n            the financial housekeeping of the agency. There are three\n            volumes entitled Cash Receipts dated 1950-1966 that\n            provides an accounting ledger format with columns for the\n            dates of transaction, studio names and assigned license\n            number, fees for original and duplicate licenses, news\n            reels charges and substitute seal fee along with totals for\n            all columns. There are two volumes entitled Disbursements\n            dated 1949-1950, an are organized in similar format as the\n            Cash Receipts. The columns in these two volumes are\n            identified as follows; Salaries, Wages, Repairs,\n            Maintenance Service Contract, Travel, Transportation,\n            Communications, Printing, Other Expenses, Office Supplies,\n            Photographic, Supplies, Other Supplies, Office Equipment,\n            Fire Insurance, Workmen's Compensation, Surety Insurance,\n            Technical Subscriptions and Capitol Outlay. The one tablet\n            entitled Office Cash Vouchers dated 1962, is an accounting\n            booklet for the office petty cash fund. The columns\n            headings in this tablet are for the Date of Transaction,\n            Nature of Disbursement, Amount Paid, Totals, the Signatures\n            for those authorized to approve payment, certification for\n            the correct reimbursement and the checker of the\n            transaction. The Daily Billings or Film Record dated\n            1960-1965, offers an insightful account of the amount of\n            fees generated by charges applied to studios for original\n            and duplicate prints and the seal issuance. The form\n            contains the title of the movie, studio releasing film\n            number of reels, total footage amount, print number,\n            original seal number, duplicate seal number, substitute\n            seal number and total amount of fees collected. Some\n            reports have adding machine ticker tabulations attached to\n            them. Arranged chronologically.","Series VII: FINANCIAL RECORDS, 1949-1960 (3.2 cu. ft.)\n            This series consists of five volumes, one tablet, and a\n            selection of financial reports that are Daily Billings (the\n            form is entitled Film Record), which provide an overview of\n            the financial housekeeping of the agency. There are three\n            volumes entitled Cash Receipts dated 1950-1966 that\n            provides an accounting ledger format with columns for the\n            dates of transaction, studio names and assigned license\n            number, fees for original and duplicate licenses, news\n            reels charges and substitute seal fee along with totals for\n            all columns. There are two volumes entitled Disbursements\n            dated 1949-1950, an are organized in similar format as the\n            Cash Receipts. The columns in these two volumes are\n            identified as follows; Salaries, Wages, Repairs,\n            Maintenance Service Contract, Travel, Transportation,\n            Communications, Printing, Other Expenses, Office Supplies,\n            Photographic, Supplies, Other Supplies, Office Equipment,\n            Fire Insurance, Workmen's Compensation, Surety Insurance,\n            Technical Subscriptions and Capitol Outlay. The one tablet\n            entitled Office Cash Vouchers dated 1962, is an accounting\n            booklet for the office petty cash fund. The columns\n            headings in this tablet are for the Date of Transaction,\n            Nature of Disbursement, Amount Paid, Totals, the Signatures\n            for those authorized to approve payment, certification for\n            the correct reimbursement and the checker of the\n            transaction. The Daily Billings or Film Record dated\n            1960-1965, offers an insightful account of the amount of\n            fees generated by charges applied to studios for original\n            and duplicate prints and the seal issuance. The form\n            contains the title of the movie, studio releasing film\n            number of reels, total footage amount, print number,\n            original seal number, duplicate seal number, substitute\n            seal number and total amount of fees collected. Some\n            reports have adding machine ticker tabulations attached to\n            them. Arranged chronologically.","Series VIII: OFFICE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS, 1924-1966\n            (1.5 cu. ft) This series contains the office voucher files\n            for the Division of Motion Picture Censorship. The files\n            provide information on financial management as well as\n            procedures included in the operation and administration of\n            the Division. There also are attendance reports for the\n            Censors. Some of the topics include information on the\n            Commonwealth's personnel act, procurement procedures and\n            monthly report of monies collected by the Division. These\n            records include a sampling of blank forms used by the\n            Division during its' operation. Arranged alphabetically by\n            subject.","Series VIII: OFFICE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS, 1924-1966\n            (1.5 cu. ft) This series contains the office voucher files\n            for the Division of Motion Picture Censorship. The files\n            provide information on financial management as well as\n            procedures included in the operation and administration of\n            the Division. There also are attendance reports for the\n            Censors. Some of the topics include information on the\n            Commonwealth's personnel act, procurement procedures and\n            monthly report of monies collected by the Division. These\n            records include a sampling of blank forms used by the\n            Division during its' operation. Arranged alphabetically by\n            subject.","Series IX: REPORT OF FILM CLERKS, 1960-1965 (1.2 cu. ft.\n            )This series gives a form entitled Film Clerk's Report. The\n            form consists of multiple pages with the following\n            categories and headings: Title (movie title), Exchange\n            (studio name) Number of Reel, Footage, Print Number,\n            Original Seal Number, Duplicate Print Number, Duplicate\n            Seal Number, and Substitute Seal. Not all categories on the\n            form contain information. Arranged chronologically by\n            date.","Series IX: REPORT OF FILM CLERKS, 1960-1965 (1.2 cu. ft.\n            )This series gives a form entitled Film Clerk's Report. The\n            form consists of multiple pages with the following\n            categories and headings: Title (movie title), Exchange\n            (studio name) Number of Reel, Footage, Print Number,\n            Original Seal Number, Duplicate Print Number, Duplicate\n            Seal Number, and Substitute Seal. Not all categories on the\n            form contain information. Arranged chronologically by\n            date.","Series X: ANNUAL REPORTS, 1924-1965 (.2 cu. ft.) This\n            series contains the yearly reports for the Censorship\n            Division as submitted to the Governor. The reports provide\n            a detailed narrative and statistical breakdown of the\n            activities for the fiscal year. The first report reflects\n            in detail the standard used in the elimination and /or\n            rejections of certain films. The main purpose for\n            censorship was to prevent the display of \"obscene,\n            indecent, immoral or inhuman films of such character that\n            their exhibition would tend to corrupt moral(s) or incite\n            crime\". The earlier reports (roughly 1924-1935) offer a\n            descriptive narrative account of the activities of the\n            Board. The reports of the 1920's document the improprieties\n            of certain comic films of the day. One report states that\n            \"directors seem willing to violate all the refinements and\n            all conventions in order to get a laugh!\" There are\n            descriptions of total scenes cut from films along with\n            examples given of specific movies and the reasons for the\n            \"slicing\". The report of 1927- 1928 highlights the advent\n            of the new technology in motion pictures, \"the talkies\".\n            Among the concerns of the Board about the new technology\n            was the cost of purchasing new projectors that would allow\n            viewing and editing of synchronized films. In the Annual\n            Report of 1931, comments are made about the \"great\n            onslaught of gang pictures\". This \"problem\" was not seen as\n            vital for Virginia as for the \"northern states where the\n            foreign population is greater\". None the less the Censors'\n            considered gangster movies fostered a \"disagreeable\n            situation\" that members of the Censors' hoped producers of\n            this genre of film would \"tone down in the future\". In the\n            1941 report, advances in technology are highlighted with\n            the introduction of a new projector known as the \"Juke Box\"\n            that used (16) sixteen-millimeter film. Once again, the\n            report documents concerns about getting state\n            appropriations for the purchase of new equipment. The\n            reports of 1943-1944 make note of the surprise in the\n            increase in the number of films due to the fact of\n            restrictions placed on raw materials (including film)\n            during World War II. The reports of later years (roughly\n            1947-1965) are more statistical and less narrative in\n            composition. The statistical tables give a numerical\n            breakdown of films. The headings on the report are Totals\n            for the Years, Elimination, Rejections, Receipts,\n            Disbursements and Revenue Refunds. The financial statements\n            provide the amount of fees collected and turned over to the\n            state treasurer. Often, they will include disbursement of\n            operating expenses and capital outlay. Arranged\n            chronologically.","Series X: ANNUAL REPORTS, 1924-1965 (.2 cu. ft.) This\n            series contains the yearly reports for the Censorship\n            Division as submitted to the Governor. The reports provide\n            a detailed narrative and statistical breakdown of the\n            activities for the fiscal year. The first report reflects\n            in detail the standard used in the elimination and /or\n            rejections of certain films. The main purpose for\n            censorship was to prevent the display of \"obscene,\n            indecent, immoral or inhuman films of such character that\n            their exhibition would tend to corrupt moral(s) or incite\n            crime\". The earlier reports (roughly 1924-1935) offer a\n            descriptive narrative account of the activities of the\n            Board. The reports of the 1920's document the improprieties\n            of certain comic films of the day. One report states that\n            \"directors seem willing to violate all the refinements and\n            all conventions in order to get a laugh!\" There are\n            descriptions of total scenes cut from films along with\n            examples given of specific movies and the reasons for the\n            \"slicing\". The report of 1927- 1928 highlights the advent\n            of the new technology in motion pictures, \"the talkies\".\n            Among the concerns of the Board about the new technology\n            was the cost of purchasing new projectors that would allow\n            viewing and editing of synchronized films. In the Annual\n            Report of 1931, comments are made about the \"great\n            onslaught of gang pictures\". This \"problem\" was not seen as\n            vital for Virginia as for the \"northern states where the\n            foreign population is greater\". None the less the Censors'\n            considered gangster movies fostered a \"disagreeable\n            situation\" that members of the Censors' hoped producers of\n            this genre of film would \"tone down in the future\". In the\n            1941 report, advances in technology are highlighted with\n            the introduction of a new projector known as the \"Juke Box\"\n            that used (16) sixteen-millimeter film. Once again, the\n            report documents concerns about getting state\n            appropriations for the purchase of new equipment. The\n            reports of 1943-1944 make note of the surprise in the\n            increase in the number of films due to the fact of\n            restrictions placed on raw materials (including film)\n            during World War II. The reports of later years (roughly\n            1947-1965) are more statistical and less narrative in\n            composition. The statistical tables give a numerical\n            breakdown of films. The headings on the report are Totals\n            for the Years, Elimination, Rejections, Receipts,\n            Disbursements and Revenue Refunds. The financial statements\n            provide the amount of fees collected and turned over to the\n            state treasurer. Often, they will include disbursement of\n            operating expenses and capital outlay. Arranged\n            chronologically.","Series XI: ELIMINATION RECORDS, 1945-1965 (.4 cu. ft.)\n            This series gives the form sent to the studios documenting\n            in writing the eliminated scenes or cuts from feature\n            films. The form contains the name and address of the\n            studio, title of movie, a brief and graphic description of\n            the scene cut from the original movie and the signatures of\n            the Director of the Division of Motion Picture Censorship\n            and the authorized agent for the studio. The form usually\n            has triplicate copies and sometimes includes an attachment\n            of correspondence between Censors and studio executives.\n            Arranged chronologically.","Series XI: ELIMINATION RECORDS, 1945-1965 (.4 cu. ft.)\n            This series gives the form sent to the studios documenting\n            in writing the eliminated scenes or cuts from feature\n            films. The form contains the name and address of the\n            studio, title of movie, a brief and graphic description of\n            the scene cut from the original movie and the signatures of\n            the Director of the Division of Motion Picture Censorship\n            and the authorized agent for the studio. The form usually\n            has triplicate copies and sometimes includes an attachment\n            of correspondence between Censors and studio executives.\n            Arranged chronologically.","Series XII: CORRESPONDENCE (OUTGOING AND INCOMING),\n            1958-1966 (.8 cu. ft.) This series consists of carbon\n            copies of letters mailed from the various Directors' of the\n            Division of Motion Picture Censorship and the other\n            Censors. The letters cover a wide range of topics including\n            the discussion with studio executives regarding censorship\n            decisions made by the Division. The files include\n            information on the daily operations of the division along\n            with the records from two prominent former directors, Mrs.\n            Lollie C. Whitehead and Mrs. Russell F. Wagers. Arranged\n            alphabetically by subject.","Series XII: CORRESPONDENCE (OUTGOING AND INCOMING),\n            1958-1966 (.8 cu. ft.) This series consists of carbon\n            copies of letters mailed from the various Directors' of the\n            Division of Motion Picture Censorship and the other\n            Censors. The letters cover a wide range of topics including\n            the discussion with studio executives regarding censorship\n            decisions made by the Division. The files include\n            information on the daily operations of the division along\n            with the records from two prominent former directors, Mrs.\n            Lollie C. Whitehead and Mrs. Russell F. Wagers. Arranged\n            alphabetically by subject.","Series XIII: CORRESPONDENCE (ACTIVE THEATRES/DRIVE-INS),\n            1957-1965 (2.3 cu. ft.) This series gives copies of\n            outgoing and incoming letters between the Director of the\n            Division and theater and drive-in owners of viable theaters\n            within the state from 1957 to 1965. The correspondence\n            mainly consists of the Director looking for recommendations\n            for the names of individuals to work as inspectors, to view\n            films and verify that the state seal had been appropriately\n            applied to the print. The files are organized by the name\n            of the theater and include the theaters' location. The\n            files have special notations for \"Negro\"only theaters and\n            inspectors. There are also report forms that list the\n            number of admission card issued to an inspector. Arranged\n            alphabetically by name of theater.","Series XIII: CORRESPONDENCE (ACTIVE THEATRES/DRIVE-INS),\n            1957-1965 (2.3 cu. ft.) This series gives copies of\n            outgoing and incoming letters between the Director of the\n            Division and theater and drive-in owners of viable theaters\n            within the state from 1957 to 1965. The correspondence\n            mainly consists of the Director looking for recommendations\n            for the names of individuals to work as inspectors, to view\n            films and verify that the state seal had been appropriately\n            applied to the print. The files are organized by the name\n            of the theater and include the theaters' location. The\n            files have special notations for \"Negro\"only theaters and\n            inspectors. There are also report forms that list the\n            number of admission card issued to an inspector. Arranged\n            alphabetically by name of theater.","Series XIV: CORRESPONDENCE (INACTIVE-CLOSED THEATRES),\n            1957-1965 (2.3 cu. ft.) This series offers the outgoing and\n            incoming letters between the Director of the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship and the owners of theaters and\n            drive-ins that were no longer in existence. The\n            correspondence mainly consists of inquiries by the Director\n            for the name of inspectors for the theaters and\n            notification to the Director that the theater or drive-in\n            is no longer in operation. Some files may contain returned\n            admission cards issued to inspectors for their free\n            admittance into the theaters. These files may include an\n            index card with the name and address of the inspector\n            assigned to a specific theater. Arranged alphabetically by\n            name of theater.","Series XIV: CORRESPONDENCE (INACTIVE-CLOSED THEATRES),\n            1957-1965 (2.3 cu. ft.) This series offers the outgoing and\n            incoming letters between the Director of the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship and the owners of theaters and\n            drive-ins that were no longer in existence. The\n            correspondence mainly consists of inquiries by the Director\n            for the name of inspectors for the theaters and\n            notification to the Director that the theater or drive-in\n            is no longer in operation. Some files may contain returned\n            admission cards issued to inspectors for their free\n            admittance into the theaters. These files may include an\n            index card with the name and address of the inspector\n            assigned to a specific theater. Arranged alphabetically by\n            name of theater.","Series XV: GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE AND CONTROVERSIAL\n            FILMS, 1922-1966 (2.7 cu. ft.) This series combines general\n            correspondence of the agency director and correspondence\n            regarding films that were eliminated for viewing within the\n            state of Virginia. The correspondences consist of letters\n            mailed to movie distributors, court documents as well as\n            correspondence from the state's Attorney General. The\n            series includes selected promotional movie posters,\n            examples of advertisements in movie industry trade\n            magazines and scripts of some of the movies listed. There\n            are recurring issues that caused grave concern for the\n            Censors. Among those issues of concern are films that\n            depict \"miscegenation\". It is noted in the records that\n            sexual relations between Black and white people were\n            against the law and transgresses \"rules of propriety\". In\n            general, films that displayed sexual content were strictly\n            censored or rejected in toto. In one report the suggested\n            that \"some of the bedroom scenes are particularly\n            disgusting and are calculated to shock even the most\n            vulgar.\" Violent films and movies emphasizing racial\n            situations were rejected due to concerns that these movies\n            might incite people to riot. The Censors rejected a 1947\n            movie entitled \"The Burning Cross,\" (a film portraying the\n            Ku Klux Klan in a negative light) because of the films'\n            tendencies to \"excite prejudices and intense emotions\n            thereby reviving controversies and disputes that the\n            Censors' believes presently to be quiet, and not now\n            occupying the public attention\". The Censors' insisted that\n            the film be banned despite objections from religious\n            leaders and civil rights organizations such as the N.A.A.C.\n            P., which wanted the film shown to help counter the \"more\n            than a score of years of propaganda\" in support of the\n            K.K.K. in the movie industry. The civil rights organization\n            was perplexed by the Board's action since they had\n            supposedly allowed the showing of \"The Birth of a Nation\",\n            a film that portrayed the Klan in a most favorable light.\n            In, 1924 a movie entitled \"A Son of Satan\" \"released by a\n            colored concern\" was banned in toto because it portrayed \"a\n            mulatto whose villainies were inherited by his white\n            forefathers\". Arranged alphabetically.","Series XV: GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE AND CONTROVERSIAL\n            FILMS, 1922-1966 (2.7 cu. ft.) This series combines general\n            correspondence of the agency director and correspondence\n            regarding films that were eliminated for viewing within the\n            state of Virginia. The correspondences consist of letters\n            mailed to movie distributors, court documents as well as\n            correspondence from the state's Attorney General. The\n            series includes selected promotional movie posters,\n            examples of advertisements in movie industry trade\n            magazines and scripts of some of the movies listed. There\n            are recurring issues that caused grave concern for the\n            Censors. Among those issues of concern are films that\n            depict \"miscegenation\". It is noted in the records that\n            sexual relations between Black and white people were\n            against the law and transgresses \"rules of propriety\". In\n            general, films that displayed sexual content were strictly\n            censored or rejected in toto. In one report the suggested\n            that \"some of the bedroom scenes are particularly\n            disgusting and are calculated to shock even the most\n            vulgar.\" Violent films and movies emphasizing racial\n            situations were rejected due to concerns that these movies\n            might incite people to riot. The Censors rejected a 1947\n            movie entitled \"The Burning Cross,\" (a film portraying the\n            Ku Klux Klan in a negative light) because of the films'\n            tendencies to \"excite prejudices and intense emotions\n            thereby reviving controversies and disputes that the\n            Censors' believes presently to be quiet, and not now\n            occupying the public attention\". The Censors' insisted that\n            the film be banned despite objections from religious\n            leaders and civil rights organizations such as the N.A.A.C.\n            P., which wanted the film shown to help counter the \"more\n            than a score of years of propaganda\" in support of the\n            K.K.K. in the movie industry. The civil rights organization\n            was perplexed by the Board's action since they had\n            supposedly allowed the showing of \"The Birth of a Nation\",\n            a film that portrayed the Klan in a most favorable light.\n            In, 1924 a movie entitled \"A Son of Satan\" \"released by a\n            colored concern\" was banned in toto because it portrayed \"a\n            mulatto whose villainies were inherited by his white\n            forefathers\". Arranged alphabetically.","Series VI: CENSORSHIP REPORTS, 1960-1965 (.8 cu. ft.)\n            This series documents the work of censorship boards in\n            other states and Canada. The format of the reports vary\n            however, all the reports provide movie titles, scenes\n            deleted from movies, total number of prints and the studio\n            responsible for producing the film. Arranged\n            chronologically by date of report.","Series VI: CENSORSHIP REPORTS, 1960-1965 (.8 cu. ft.)\n            This series documents the work of censorship boards in\n            other states and Canada. The format of the reports vary\n            however, all the reports provide movie titles, scenes\n            deleted from movies, total number of prints and the studio\n            responsible for producing the film. Arranged\n            chronologically by date of report.","This series offers the actual application for license\n               to show and distribute films in the state of Virginia.\n               The form contains the following information: date of\n               license, title of movie or serial, names of lead\n               characters, print number, duplicate number, reel\n               footage, name of studio and address, notarized signature\n               of designated representative for the studio and the date\n               and signature of the notary public. The reverse side of\n               the form may contain comments or remarks regarding the\n               elimination of offensive parts of a film or the total\n               rejection of a film due to its immoral content.","This series contains two types of certificates,\n               organized as Regular and Non-Regular Licenses. Both\n               Regular and Non-Regular license certificates consists of\n               two types of numbered forms. The license certificate\n               entitled Licenses For Duplicates (Form 4) certifies that\n               a motion picture studio is permitted to exhibit and\n               display a film within the State of Virginia. The form\n               contains the title of the movie, the date the\n               certificate was issued, the amount of fee paid by the\n               studio, serial number, print number and the signature of\n               the Director of the Division of Motion Picture\n               Censorship. The second form is entitled Copy of\n               Application For Substitute Seal Original Receipted and\n               Returned to Applicant (Form 8). This form gives the\n               studio name, the title of the film, date issued and name\n               of the Director. The form states that the movie studio\n               is applying for a substitute seal to be attached to a\n               print of the film previously censored and approved by\n               the Division.","The major difference between Regular and Non-Regular\n               Licenses appears to be the arrangement order and time\n               period. Regular Licenses are arranged by the prefix CS\n               and cover the early 1950's to 1965 while the Non-Regular\n               Licenses are arranged chronologically by serial number\n               and cover the early 1960's.","This series contains 4x6 index cards that serve as an\n               index to the non-regular licenses and the license\n               applications. The index provides the motion picture\n               title, dat of license or application, studio releasing\n               the film and serial number. The pink index cards provide\n               notations about the status of the film, such as, whether\n               a seal has been issued for a film, whether the film was\n               eliminated or \"rejected in toto\", meaning it could not\n               be shown in the state, and the conditional approval of a\n               film with the seal of Virginia issued at a later date.\n               The index does not apply to the regular licenses.","This series contains 4x6 index cards that served as\n               attendance forms for imployees of the Division of Motion\n               Picture Censorship. Each card has the name of the\n               employee, day of the week, check mark for when the\n               employee was present or on sick/vacation leave, and the\n               signature of employees.","This series consists of 4x6 index cards giving an\n               alphabetical listing of movie theaters and a separate\n               listing for the name and address of inspectors along\n               with the names of the theaters they were responsible for\n               monitoring. The movie theaters are organized by location\n               of county, city or town. The index cards have notations\n               for \"Negro\" inspectores and/or \"Negro\" owned theaters.\n               The cards are divided into active (white color cards)\n               and inactive (pink color cards) cards. There is a\n               separate listing of index cards for inspectors of\n               drive-in theaters.","This series provides a typed listing of movie titles,\n               seal numbers, and notations of films eliminated or\n               approved for viewing within the state. Some of the\n               listings supply only the date, movie title, serial\n               number and name of the studio releasing the film.","This series consists of five volumes, one tablet, and\n               a selection of financial reports that are Daily Billings\n               (the form is entitled Film Record), which provide an\n               overview of the financial housekeeping of the agency.\n               There are three volumes entitled Cash Receipts dated\n               1950-1966 that provide an accounting ledger format with\n               columns for dates of transactions, studio names and\n               assigned license number, fees for original and duplicate\n               licenses, news reels charges and substitute seal fee,\n               along with totals for all columns.","There are two volumes entitles Disbursements dated\n               1949-1950 that are organized in similar format to the\n               Cash Receipts. The columns in these two volumes are\n               identified follows: salaries, wages, repairs,\n               maintenance service contract, travel, transportation,\n               communications, printing, other expenses, office\n               supplies, photographic, supplies, other supplies, office\n               equipment, fire insurance, workmen's compensation,\n               surety insurance, technical subscriptions, and capital\n               outlay.","The one tablet entitled Office Cash Vouchers is dated\n               1962 and is an accounting booklet for the office petty\n               cash fund. The column headings in this tablet are for\n               date of transaction, nature of disbursement, amount\n               paid, totals and signatures for those authorized to\n               approve payment, certification for the correct\n               reimbursement and the checker of the transaction.","The Daily Billings or Film Record are dated 1960-1965\n               and provide and insightful account of the amount of fees\n               generated by charges applied to studios for original and\n               duplicate prints and the seal of issuance. The contains\n               the title of the movie, studio releasing film, number of\n               reels, total footage amount, print number, original seal\n               number, duplicate seal number, substitute seal number\n               and total of fees collected. Some reports have adding\n               machine tabulations attached to them.","This series contains the office voucher files for the\n               Division of Motion Picture Censorship. The files provide\n               information on financial management as well as\n               procedures for the operation and administration of the\n               Division. There are also annual reports and attendance\n               reports for the censors. Some topical files include\n               information on the Commonwealth's personnel act,\n               procurement procedures and monthly reports of monies\n               collected by the Division. These records include a\n               sampling of blank forms used by the Division during it's\n               operation.","This series consists of forms entitled Film Clerk's\n               Report. This form consists of multiple pages with the\n               following categories and headings: Title (movie title),\n               Exchange (studio name), Number of Reel, Footage, Print\n               Number, Original Seal Number, Duplicate Print Number,\n               Duplicate Seal Number, and Substitute Seal. Not all\n               categories on the form contain information.","This series contains the yearly reports for the\n               Censorship Division as submitted to the Governor. The\n               reports provide a detailed narrative and statistical\n               breakdown of the activities for the fiscal year. The\n               first report reflects in detail the standard used in the\n               elimination and/or rejection of certain films. The main\n               purpose for censorship was to prevent the display of\n               \"obscene, indecent, immoral or inhuman films of such\n               character that their exhibition would tend to corrupt\n               morals or incite crime.\"","The earlier reports (roughly 1924-1935) offer a\n               descriptive narrative acount of the activities of the\n               Board. The reports of the 1920's document the\n               improprieties of certain comic films of the day. One\n               report states that \"directors seem willing to violate\n               all the refinements and all conventions in order to get\n               a laugh.\" There are descriptions of total scenes cut\n               from films along with examples given of specific movies\n               and the reasons for the \"slicing\". The report for\n               1927-1928 highlights the advent of the new technology in\n               motion pictures, \"the talkies\". Among the concerns of\n               the Board about the new technology was the cost of\n               purchasing new projectors that would allow viewing and\n               editing of synchronized films. In the annual report of\n               1931 comments are made about the \"great onslaught of\n               gang pictures\". This \"problem\" was not seen as vital for\n               Virginia as for the \"northern states where foreign\n               population is greater\". Nonetheless, the censors\n               considered gangster movies fostered a \"disagreeable\n               situation\" that members of the Division hoped producers\n               of this genre of film would \"tone down in the\n               future\".","In the 1941 report advances in technology are\n               highlighted with the introduction of a new projector\n               known as the \"Juke Box\" that used sixteen millimeter\n               film. Once again, the report documents concerns about\n               getting state appropriations for the purchase of new\n               equipment. The reports for 1943-1944 make note of the\n               surprise in the increase in the number of films due to\n               the fact of restrictions placed on raw materials\n               (including film) during World War II.","The reports for later years (roughly 1947-1965) are\n               more statistical and less narrative in composition. The\n               statistical tables give a numerical breakdown of films.\n               The headings in the report include Totals for the Years,\n               Elimination, Rejections, Receipts, Disbursements, and\n               Revenue Refunds. The financial statements provide the\n               amount of fees collected and turned over to the state\n               treasurer. Often the statements will include\n               disbursements of operating expenses and capital\n               outlays.","This series consists of forms sent to the studios\n               documenting in writing the eliminated scenes or cuts\n               from feature films. The form contains the name and\n               address of the studio, title of the movie, a brief and\n               graphice description of the scene cut from the original\n               movie, and the signatures of the Director of the\n               Division of Motion Picture Censorship an the authorized\n               agent for the studio. The form usually has triplicate\n               copies and sometimes includes an attachment of\n               correspondence between censors and studio\n               executives.","This series consists of carbon copies of letters\n               mailed from the various director's of the Division of\n               Motion Picture Censorship and the other censors. The\n               letters cover a wide range of topics including the\n               discussion with studio executives regarding censorship\n               decisions made by the division. The files include\n               information on the daily operations of the division\n               along with the records from two prominent former\n               directors, Mrs. Lollie C. Whitehead and Mrs. russell F.\n               Wagers.","This series consists of copies of outgoing and\n               incoming letters between the Director of the Division of\n               Motion Picture Censorship and theater and drive-in\n               owners of viable theater within the state. The\n               correspondence mainly conists of letters from the\n               director seeking recommendations for the names of\n               individuals to work as inspectors, to view films, and\n               verify that the state seal had been appropriately\n               applied to the print. The files are organized by the\n               name of the theater and include the theater location.\n               The files have special notations for \"Negro\" only\n               theaters and inspectors. There are also report forms\n               that list the number of admission cards issued to an\n               inspector.","This series offers the outgoing and incoming letters\n               between the Director of the Division of Motion Picture\n               Censorship and the owners of theaters and drive-ins that\n               were no longer in existence. The correspondence mainly\n               consists of inquiries by the Director for the name of\n               inspectors for the theaters and notification to the\n               Director that the theater or drive-in is no longer in\n               operation. Some files may contain returned admission\n               cards issued to inspectors for their free admittance\n               into the theaters. These files include index cards with\n               the name and address of the inspector assigned to a\n               specific theater.","This series combines general correspondence of the\n               agency director and correspondence regarding films that\n               were eliminated for viewing within the state of\n               Virginia. The correspondence consists of letters mailed\n               to movie distributors and court documents, as well as\n               correspondence from the state's Attorney General. The\n               series also includes selected promotional movie posters,\n               examples of advertisements in movie industry trade\n               magazines, and scripts of some of the movies listed.","This series documents the work of censorship boards\n               in other states and Canada. The format of the reports\n               vary, however all reports provide movie titles, scenes\n               deleted from movies, total number of prints, and the\n               studio responsible for producing the film.","There are no restrictions.","State Records Collection,\n         Acc. 26515","English"],"unitid_tesim":["26515"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Records of the Division of Motion\n         Picture Censorship, \n         \n         1926-1968"],"collection_title_tesim":["Records of the Division of Motion\n         Picture Censorship, \n         \n         1926-1968"],"collection_ssim":["Records of the Division of Motion\n         Picture Censorship, \n         \n         1926-1968"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"acqinfo_ssim":["Transferred from the Office of the Attorney General, 29\n            June 1966."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["57 cubic feet (62\n         boxes)"],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions."],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eArranged alphabetically by film title.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged chronologically by serial number.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged alphabetically by film title.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged alphabetically by employee.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged alphabetically by location.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged chronologically.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged chronologically.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged alphabetically by subject.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged chronologically.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged chronologically.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged chronologically.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged alphabetically by subject.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged alphabetically by name of theater.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged alphabetically by name of theater.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged alphabetically.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged chronologically by date of report.\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_tesim":["Arranged alphabetically by film title.","Arranged chronologically by serial number.","Arranged alphabetically by film title.","Arranged alphabetically by employee.","Arranged alphabetically by location.","Arranged chronologically.","Arranged chronologically.","Arranged alphabetically by subject.","Arranged chronologically.","Arranged chronologically.","Arranged chronologically.","Arranged alphabetically by subject.","Arranged alphabetically by name of theater.","Arranged alphabetically by name of theater.","Arranged alphabetically.","Arranged chronologically by date of report."],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe Board of Censors (forerunner to the Division) was\n         established by H.B. 346 Chapter 257 of the Acts of Assembly\n         approved March 15, 1922. The purpose of the act was to\n         regulate motion picture films, provide a system of\n         examination, approval and regulation of banners and posters\n         and advertising material related to films and providing\n         penalties for violation of the act. The law made it in effect\n         illegal to sell or exhibit any commercial film that had not\n         been officially approved and licensed by the Board.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cbioghist\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eThe Board had the following requirements; (1) Movies\n            could not be shown without a valid licenses or permit; (2)\n            The Board was composed of three resident citizens of\n            Virginia, appointed by the governor to 4- year terms\n            subject to confirmation by the senate; (3) Criteria used to\n            review films was based on if the film was \"obscene,\n            indecent, immoral, inhuman or is of such character that its\n            exhibition would ten to corrupt morals or incite crime. A\n            written explanation was required to explain why a license\n            was not issued and a detailed description of rejected\n            portions of a film; (4) The establishment of a fee\n            structure (in order to receive a license to show movies in\n            the state) of one dollar (1.00) per 1000 feet of film and\n            fifty cents (.50) for each duplicate or copy of the\n            original print; (5) On the 15th day of year an annual\n            detailed report was to be submitted to the governor\n            providing details such as receipts and disbursements and\n            summaries of films examined.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/bioghist\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe Board had the following requirements; (1) Movies\n            could not be shown without a valid licenses or permit; (2)\n            The Board was composed of three resident citizens of\n            Virginia, appointed by the governor to 4- year terms\n            subject to confirmation by the senate; (3) Criteria used to\n            review films was based on if the film was \"obscene,\n            indecent, immoral, inhuman or is of such character that its\n            exhibition would ten to corrupt morals or incite crime. A\n            written explanation was required to explain why a license\n            was not issued and a detailed description of rejected\n            portions of a film; (4) The establishment of a fee\n            structure (in order to receive a license to show movies in\n            the state) of one dollar (1.00) per 1000 feet of film and\n            fifty cents (.50) for each duplicate or copy of the\n            original print; (5) On the 15th day of year an annual\n            detailed report was to be submitted to the governor\n            providing details such as receipts and disbursements and\n            summaries of films examined.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cbioghist\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eOn February 25, 1930 Chapter 49 of the Acts of Assembly\n            Section 378A officially abolished the Board of Censors and\n            established within the Department of Law the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship. The Divisions' three censors had\n            equal authority and were appointed and served at the\n            pleasure of the Attorney General. The censors had to be\n            \"educated and experienced residents of Virginia\". The three\n            members of the division had the responsibility of voting a\n            director from among their group. The function of the\n            division was similar to that of the Board of Censors but\n            with changes to accommodate the medium of \"talkies\" in\n            film. The fee structure was increased at this time.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/bioghist\u003e","\u003cp\u003eOn February 25, 1930 Chapter 49 of the Acts of Assembly\n            Section 378A officially abolished the Board of Censors and\n            established within the Department of Law the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship. The Divisions' three censors had\n            equal authority and were appointed and served at the\n            pleasure of the Attorney General. The censors had to be\n            \"educated and experienced residents of Virginia\". The three\n            members of the division had the responsibility of voting a\n            director from among their group. The function of the\n            division was similar to that of the Board of Censors but\n            with changes to accommodate the medium of \"talkies\" in\n            film. The fee structure was increased at this time.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cbioghist\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eThe Division of Motion Picture Censorship carried out\n            its duties effectively until the decade of the 1960's when\n            court decisions raised questions about the necessity of\n            government to censor movies. Coupled with changing mores\n            and liberal first amendment interpretations by the federal\n            courts, the General Assembly passed legislation (HB 176) to\n            repeal and stop funding the Division of Motion Picture\n            Censorship effective June 30, 1966.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/bioghist\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe Division of Motion Picture Censorship carried out\n            its duties effectively until the decade of the 1960's when\n            court decisions raised questions about the necessity of\n            government to censor movies. Coupled with changing mores\n            and liberal first amendment interpretations by the federal\n            courts, the General Assembly passed legislation (HB 176) to\n            repeal and stop funding the Division of Motion Picture\n            Censorship effective June 30, 1966.\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Biographical/Historical Information"],"bioghist_tesim":["The Board of Censors (forerunner to the Division) was\n         established by H.B. 346 Chapter 257 of the Acts of Assembly\n         approved March 15, 1922. The purpose of the act was to\n         regulate motion picture films, provide a system of\n         examination, approval and regulation of banners and posters\n         and advertising material related to films and providing\n         penalties for violation of the act. The law made it in effect\n         illegal to sell or exhibit any commercial film that had not\n         been officially approved and licensed by the Board.","The Board had the following requirements; (1) Movies\n            could not be shown without a valid licenses or permit; (2)\n            The Board was composed of three resident citizens of\n            Virginia, appointed by the governor to 4- year terms\n            subject to confirmation by the senate; (3) Criteria used to\n            review films was based on if the film was \"obscene,\n            indecent, immoral, inhuman or is of such character that its\n            exhibition would ten to corrupt morals or incite crime. A\n            written explanation was required to explain why a license\n            was not issued and a detailed description of rejected\n            portions of a film; (4) The establishment of a fee\n            structure (in order to receive a license to show movies in\n            the state) of one dollar (1.00) per 1000 feet of film and\n            fifty cents (.50) for each duplicate or copy of the\n            original print; (5) On the 15th day of year an annual\n            detailed report was to be submitted to the governor\n            providing details such as receipts and disbursements and\n            summaries of films examined.","The Board had the following requirements; (1) Movies\n            could not be shown without a valid licenses or permit; (2)\n            The Board was composed of three resident citizens of\n            Virginia, appointed by the governor to 4- year terms\n            subject to confirmation by the senate; (3) Criteria used to\n            review films was based on if the film was \"obscene,\n            indecent, immoral, inhuman or is of such character that its\n            exhibition would ten to corrupt morals or incite crime. A\n            written explanation was required to explain why a license\n            was not issued and a detailed description of rejected\n            portions of a film; (4) The establishment of a fee\n            structure (in order to receive a license to show movies in\n            the state) of one dollar (1.00) per 1000 feet of film and\n            fifty cents (.50) for each duplicate or copy of the\n            original print; (5) On the 15th day of year an annual\n            detailed report was to be submitted to the governor\n            providing details such as receipts and disbursements and\n            summaries of films examined.","On February 25, 1930 Chapter 49 of the Acts of Assembly\n            Section 378A officially abolished the Board of Censors and\n            established within the Department of Law the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship. The Divisions' three censors had\n            equal authority and were appointed and served at the\n            pleasure of the Attorney General. The censors had to be\n            \"educated and experienced residents of Virginia\". The three\n            members of the division had the responsibility of voting a\n            director from among their group. The function of the\n            division was similar to that of the Board of Censors but\n            with changes to accommodate the medium of \"talkies\" in\n            film. The fee structure was increased at this time.","On February 25, 1930 Chapter 49 of the Acts of Assembly\n            Section 378A officially abolished the Board of Censors and\n            established within the Department of Law the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship. The Divisions' three censors had\n            equal authority and were appointed and served at the\n            pleasure of the Attorney General. The censors had to be\n            \"educated and experienced residents of Virginia\". The three\n            members of the division had the responsibility of voting a\n            director from among their group. The function of the\n            division was similar to that of the Board of Censors but\n            with changes to accommodate the medium of \"talkies\" in\n            film. The fee structure was increased at this time.","The Division of Motion Picture Censorship carried out\n            its duties effectively until the decade of the 1960's when\n            court decisions raised questions about the necessity of\n            government to censor movies. Coupled with changing mores\n            and liberal first amendment interpretations by the federal\n            courts, the General Assembly passed legislation (HB 176) to\n            repeal and stop funding the Division of Motion Picture\n            Censorship effective June 30, 1966.","The Division of Motion Picture Censorship carried out\n            its duties effectively until the decade of the 1960's when\n            court decisions raised questions about the necessity of\n            government to censor movies. Coupled with changing mores\n            and liberal first amendment interpretations by the federal\n            courts, the General Assembly passed legislation (HB 176) to\n            repeal and stop funding the Division of Motion Picture\n            Censorship effective June 30, 1966."],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eDivision of Motion Picture Censorship Records,\n            1926-1968. Accession 26515, State Records Collection, The\n            Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Division of Motion Picture Censorship Records,\n            1926-1968. Accession 26515, State Records Collection, The\n            Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia."],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eSeries I: LICENSE APPLICATIONS, 1926-1965 (14.5 cu. ft.)\n         This series contains the actual applications for licenses to\n         show and distribute films in the state of Virginia. The form\n         includes the following information: date of license, title of\n         movie or serial, names of lead characters, print number,\n         duplicate number, reel footage, name of studio and address,\n         notarized signature of designated representative for the\n         studio and the date and signature of the notary public. The\n         reverse side of the form may contain comments or remarks\n         regarding the elimination of offensive parts of a film or the\n         total rejection of a film due to its immoral content. Arranged\n         alphabetically by film title.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cscopecontent\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eSeries II: LICENSES (REGULAR AND NON-REGULAR), 1954-1965\n            (10. 5 cu. ft.) This series contains two types of\n            certificates, organized as Regular and Non-Regular\n            Licenses. Both Regular and Non-Regular license certificates\n            consists of two types of numbered forms. The license\n            certificate entitled Licenses For Duplicates (Form 4)\n            certifies that a motion picture studio is permitted to\n            exhibit and display a film within the State of Virginia.\n            The form contains the title of the movie, the date the\n            certificate was issued, the amount of fee paid by the\n            studio, serial number, print number and the signature of\n            the Director of the Division of Motion Picture Censorship.\n            The second form is entitled Copy of Application For\n            Substitute Seal Original Receipted and Returned to\n            Applicant (Form 8). This form gives the studio name, the\n            title of the film, date issued and name of the Director.\n            The form states that the movie studio is applying for a\n            substitute seal to be attached to a print of the film\n            previously censored and approved by the Division. The major\n            difference between Regular and Non-Regular Licenses appears\n            to be the arrangement order and time period. Regular\n            Licenses are arranged by the prefix CS and cover the early\n            1950's to 1965 while the Non-Regular Licenses are arranged\n            chronologically by serial number and cover the early\n            1960's. Arranged chronologically by serial number.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/scopecontent\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries II: LICENSES (REGULAR AND NON-REGULAR), 1954-1965\n            (10. 5 cu. ft.) This series contains two types of\n            certificates, organized as Regular and Non-Regular\n            Licenses. Both Regular and Non-Regular license certificates\n            consists of two types of numbered forms. The license\n            certificate entitled Licenses For Duplicates (Form 4)\n            certifies that a motion picture studio is permitted to\n            exhibit and display a film within the State of Virginia.\n            The form contains the title of the movie, the date the\n            certificate was issued, the amount of fee paid by the\n            studio, serial number, print number and the signature of\n            the Director of the Division of Motion Picture Censorship.\n            The second form is entitled Copy of Application For\n            Substitute Seal Original Receipted and Returned to\n            Applicant (Form 8). This form gives the studio name, the\n            title of the film, date issued and name of the Director.\n            The form states that the movie studio is applying for a\n            substitute seal to be attached to a print of the film\n            previously censored and approved by the Division. The major\n            difference between Regular and Non-Regular Licenses appears\n            to be the arrangement order and time period. Regular\n            Licenses are arranged by the prefix CS and cover the early\n            1950's to 1965 while the Non-Regular Licenses are arranged\n            chronologically by serial number and cover the early\n            1960's. Arranged chronologically by serial number.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cscopecontent\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eSeries III: INDEX TO LICENSES AND APPLICATIONS,\n            1947-1965 (3.15 cu. ft.) This series contains 4x6 index\n            cards that serve as an index to the non-Regular Licenses\n            and the License Applications. The index includes the motion\n            picture title, date license or application issued, studio\n            releasing film and serial number. The pink index cards\n            provide notations about the status of the film such as,\n            whether a seal has been issued for a film, whether the film\n            was eliminated or \"rejected in toto\" meaning it could not\n            be shown in the state, and the conditional approval of a\n            film with the seal of Virginia, issued at a later date. The\n            index does not appear to apply to the Regular Licenses.\n            Arranged alphabetically by film title.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/scopecontent\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries III: INDEX TO LICENSES AND APPLICATIONS,\n            1947-1965 (3.15 cu. ft.) This series contains 4x6 index\n            cards that serve as an index to the non-Regular Licenses\n            and the License Applications. The index includes the motion\n            picture title, date license or application issued, studio\n            releasing film and serial number. The pink index cards\n            provide notations about the status of the film such as,\n            whether a seal has been issued for a film, whether the film\n            was eliminated or \"rejected in toto\" meaning it could not\n            be shown in the state, and the conditional approval of a\n            film with the seal of Virginia, issued at a later date. The\n            index does not appear to apply to the Regular Licenses.\n            Arranged alphabetically by film title.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cscopecontent\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eSeries IV: ATTENDANCE REPORT FOR EMPLOYEES, 1958-1965\n            (2.1 cu. ft.) This series contains 4x6 index cards that\n            served as attendance forms for employees of the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship. Each card has the name of the\n            employee, day of the week, check mark for when the employee\n            was present, or on sick/vacation leave and the signature of\n            employees. Arranged alphabetically by board member.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/scopecontent\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries IV: ATTENDANCE REPORT FOR EMPLOYEES, 1958-1965\n            (2.1 cu. ft.) This series contains 4x6 index cards that\n            served as attendance forms for employees of the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship. Each card has the name of the\n            employee, day of the week, check mark for when the employee\n            was present, or on sick/vacation leave and the signature of\n            employees. Arranged alphabetically by board member.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cscopecontent\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eSeries V: THEATRE AND INSPECTOR LISTINGS, 1959-1965 (.35\n            cu. ft.) This series provides 4x6 index cards giving an\n            alphabetical listing of movie theatres and separate listing\n            for the name and address of inspectors along with the\n            theatres they were responsible for monitoring. The movie\n            theatres are organized by location of county, city and\n            town. The index cards have notations for \"Negro\" inspectors\n            and/or \"Negro\" owned theatres. The cards are divided into\n            active (white color) and inactive (pink color) cards. There\n            is a separate listing of index cards for inspectors of\n            drive-ins. Arranged alphabetically by location.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/scopecontent\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries V: THEATRE AND INSPECTOR LISTINGS, 1959-1965 (.35\n            cu. ft.) This series provides 4x6 index cards giving an\n            alphabetical listing of movie theatres and separate listing\n            for the name and address of inspectors along with the\n            theatres they were responsible for monitoring. The movie\n            theatres are organized by location of county, city and\n            town. The index cards have notations for \"Negro\" inspectors\n            and/or \"Negro\" owned theatres. The cards are divided into\n            active (white color) and inactive (pink color) cards. There\n            is a separate listing of index cards for inspectors of\n            drive-ins. Arranged alphabetically by location.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cscopecontent\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eSeries VI: LISTING OF FILM TITLES, 1928-1957 (1 cu.\n            ft.)This series offers a typed listing of movie titles,\n            seal numbers, and notations of films eliminated and\n            approved for viewing within the state. Some of the listings\n            give only the date, movie title, serial number and the\n            studio releasing the film. Arranged chronologically.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/scopecontent\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries VI: LISTING OF FILM TITLES, 1928-1957 (1 cu.\n            ft.)This series offers a typed listing of movie titles,\n            seal numbers, and notations of films eliminated and\n            approved for viewing within the state. Some of the listings\n            give only the date, movie title, serial number and the\n            studio releasing the film. Arranged chronologically.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cscopecontent\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eSeries VII: FINANCIAL RECORDS, 1949-1960 (3.2 cu. ft.)\n            This series consists of five volumes, one tablet, and a\n            selection of financial reports that are Daily Billings (the\n            form is entitled Film Record), which provide an overview of\n            the financial housekeeping of the agency. There are three\n            volumes entitled Cash Receipts dated 1950-1966 that\n            provides an accounting ledger format with columns for the\n            dates of transaction, studio names and assigned license\n            number, fees for original and duplicate licenses, news\n            reels charges and substitute seal fee along with totals for\n            all columns. There are two volumes entitled Disbursements\n            dated 1949-1950, an are organized in similar format as the\n            Cash Receipts. The columns in these two volumes are\n            identified as follows; Salaries, Wages, Repairs,\n            Maintenance Service Contract, Travel, Transportation,\n            Communications, Printing, Other Expenses, Office Supplies,\n            Photographic, Supplies, Other Supplies, Office Equipment,\n            Fire Insurance, Workmen's Compensation, Surety Insurance,\n            Technical Subscriptions and Capitol Outlay. The one tablet\n            entitled Office Cash Vouchers dated 1962, is an accounting\n            booklet for the office petty cash fund. The columns\n            headings in this tablet are for the Date of Transaction,\n            Nature of Disbursement, Amount Paid, Totals, the Signatures\n            for those authorized to approve payment, certification for\n            the correct reimbursement and the checker of the\n            transaction. The Daily Billings or Film Record dated\n            1960-1965, offers an insightful account of the amount of\n            fees generated by charges applied to studios for original\n            and duplicate prints and the seal issuance. The form\n            contains the title of the movie, studio releasing film\n            number of reels, total footage amount, print number,\n            original seal number, duplicate seal number, substitute\n            seal number and total amount of fees collected. Some\n            reports have adding machine ticker tabulations attached to\n            them. Arranged chronologically.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/scopecontent\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries VII: FINANCIAL RECORDS, 1949-1960 (3.2 cu. ft.)\n            This series consists of five volumes, one tablet, and a\n            selection of financial reports that are Daily Billings (the\n            form is entitled Film Record), which provide an overview of\n            the financial housekeeping of the agency. There are three\n            volumes entitled Cash Receipts dated 1950-1966 that\n            provides an accounting ledger format with columns for the\n            dates of transaction, studio names and assigned license\n            number, fees for original and duplicate licenses, news\n            reels charges and substitute seal fee along with totals for\n            all columns. There are two volumes entitled Disbursements\n            dated 1949-1950, an are organized in similar format as the\n            Cash Receipts. The columns in these two volumes are\n            identified as follows; Salaries, Wages, Repairs,\n            Maintenance Service Contract, Travel, Transportation,\n            Communications, Printing, Other Expenses, Office Supplies,\n            Photographic, Supplies, Other Supplies, Office Equipment,\n            Fire Insurance, Workmen's Compensation, Surety Insurance,\n            Technical Subscriptions and Capitol Outlay. The one tablet\n            entitled Office Cash Vouchers dated 1962, is an accounting\n            booklet for the office petty cash fund. The columns\n            headings in this tablet are for the Date of Transaction,\n            Nature of Disbursement, Amount Paid, Totals, the Signatures\n            for those authorized to approve payment, certification for\n            the correct reimbursement and the checker of the\n            transaction. The Daily Billings or Film Record dated\n            1960-1965, offers an insightful account of the amount of\n            fees generated by charges applied to studios for original\n            and duplicate prints and the seal issuance. The form\n            contains the title of the movie, studio releasing film\n            number of reels, total footage amount, print number,\n            original seal number, duplicate seal number, substitute\n            seal number and total amount of fees collected. Some\n            reports have adding machine ticker tabulations attached to\n            them. Arranged chronologically.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cscopecontent\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eSeries VIII: OFFICE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS, 1924-1966\n            (1.5 cu. ft) This series contains the office voucher files\n            for the Division of Motion Picture Censorship. The files\n            provide information on financial management as well as\n            procedures included in the operation and administration of\n            the Division. There also are attendance reports for the\n            Censors. Some of the topics include information on the\n            Commonwealth's personnel act, procurement procedures and\n            monthly report of monies collected by the Division. These\n            records include a sampling of blank forms used by the\n            Division during its' operation. Arranged alphabetically by\n            subject.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/scopecontent\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries VIII: OFFICE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS, 1924-1966\n            (1.5 cu. ft) This series contains the office voucher files\n            for the Division of Motion Picture Censorship. The files\n            provide information on financial management as well as\n            procedures included in the operation and administration of\n            the Division. There also are attendance reports for the\n            Censors. Some of the topics include information on the\n            Commonwealth's personnel act, procurement procedures and\n            monthly report of monies collected by the Division. These\n            records include a sampling of blank forms used by the\n            Division during its' operation. Arranged alphabetically by\n            subject.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cscopecontent\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eSeries IX: REPORT OF FILM CLERKS, 1960-1965 (1.2 cu. ft.\n            )This series gives a form entitled Film Clerk's Report. The\n            form consists of multiple pages with the following\n            categories and headings: Title (movie title), Exchange\n            (studio name) Number of Reel, Footage, Print Number,\n            Original Seal Number, Duplicate Print Number, Duplicate\n            Seal Number, and Substitute Seal. Not all categories on the\n            form contain information. Arranged chronologically by\n            date.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/scopecontent\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries IX: REPORT OF FILM CLERKS, 1960-1965 (1.2 cu. ft.\n            )This series gives a form entitled Film Clerk's Report. The\n            form consists of multiple pages with the following\n            categories and headings: Title (movie title), Exchange\n            (studio name) Number of Reel, Footage, Print Number,\n            Original Seal Number, Duplicate Print Number, Duplicate\n            Seal Number, and Substitute Seal. Not all categories on the\n            form contain information. Arranged chronologically by\n            date.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cscopecontent\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eSeries X: ANNUAL REPORTS, 1924-1965 (.2 cu. ft.) This\n            series contains the yearly reports for the Censorship\n            Division as submitted to the Governor. The reports provide\n            a detailed narrative and statistical breakdown of the\n            activities for the fiscal year. The first report reflects\n            in detail the standard used in the elimination and /or\n            rejections of certain films. The main purpose for\n            censorship was to prevent the display of \"obscene,\n            indecent, immoral or inhuman films of such character that\n            their exhibition would tend to corrupt moral(s) or incite\n            crime\". The earlier reports (roughly 1924-1935) offer a\n            descriptive narrative account of the activities of the\n            Board. The reports of the 1920's document the improprieties\n            of certain comic films of the day. One report states that\n            \"directors seem willing to violate all the refinements and\n            all conventions in order to get a laugh!\" There are\n            descriptions of total scenes cut from films along with\n            examples given of specific movies and the reasons for the\n            \"slicing\". The report of 1927- 1928 highlights the advent\n            of the new technology in motion pictures, \"the talkies\".\n            Among the concerns of the Board about the new technology\n            was the cost of purchasing new projectors that would allow\n            viewing and editing of synchronized films. In the Annual\n            Report of 1931, comments are made about the \"great\n            onslaught of gang pictures\". This \"problem\" was not seen as\n            vital for Virginia as for the \"northern states where the\n            foreign population is greater\". None the less the Censors'\n            considered gangster movies fostered a \"disagreeable\n            situation\" that members of the Censors' hoped producers of\n            this genre of film would \"tone down in the future\". In the\n            1941 report, advances in technology are highlighted with\n            the introduction of a new projector known as the \"Juke Box\"\n            that used (16) sixteen-millimeter film. Once again, the\n            report documents concerns about getting state\n            appropriations for the purchase of new equipment. The\n            reports of 1943-1944 make note of the surprise in the\n            increase in the number of films due to the fact of\n            restrictions placed on raw materials (including film)\n            during World War II. The reports of later years (roughly\n            1947-1965) are more statistical and less narrative in\n            composition. The statistical tables give a numerical\n            breakdown of films. The headings on the report are Totals\n            for the Years, Elimination, Rejections, Receipts,\n            Disbursements and Revenue Refunds. The financial statements\n            provide the amount of fees collected and turned over to the\n            state treasurer. Often, they will include disbursement of\n            operating expenses and capital outlay. Arranged\n            chronologically.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/scopecontent\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries X: ANNUAL REPORTS, 1924-1965 (.2 cu. ft.) This\n            series contains the yearly reports for the Censorship\n            Division as submitted to the Governor. The reports provide\n            a detailed narrative and statistical breakdown of the\n            activities for the fiscal year. The first report reflects\n            in detail the standard used in the elimination and /or\n            rejections of certain films. The main purpose for\n            censorship was to prevent the display of \"obscene,\n            indecent, immoral or inhuman films of such character that\n            their exhibition would tend to corrupt moral(s) or incite\n            crime\". The earlier reports (roughly 1924-1935) offer a\n            descriptive narrative account of the activities of the\n            Board. The reports of the 1920's document the improprieties\n            of certain comic films of the day. One report states that\n            \"directors seem willing to violate all the refinements and\n            all conventions in order to get a laugh!\" There are\n            descriptions of total scenes cut from films along with\n            examples given of specific movies and the reasons for the\n            \"slicing\". The report of 1927- 1928 highlights the advent\n            of the new technology in motion pictures, \"the talkies\".\n            Among the concerns of the Board about the new technology\n            was the cost of purchasing new projectors that would allow\n            viewing and editing of synchronized films. In the Annual\n            Report of 1931, comments are made about the \"great\n            onslaught of gang pictures\". This \"problem\" was not seen as\n            vital for Virginia as for the \"northern states where the\n            foreign population is greater\". None the less the Censors'\n            considered gangster movies fostered a \"disagreeable\n            situation\" that members of the Censors' hoped producers of\n            this genre of film would \"tone down in the future\". In the\n            1941 report, advances in technology are highlighted with\n            the introduction of a new projector known as the \"Juke Box\"\n            that used (16) sixteen-millimeter film. Once again, the\n            report documents concerns about getting state\n            appropriations for the purchase of new equipment. The\n            reports of 1943-1944 make note of the surprise in the\n            increase in the number of films due to the fact of\n            restrictions placed on raw materials (including film)\n            during World War II. The reports of later years (roughly\n            1947-1965) are more statistical and less narrative in\n            composition. The statistical tables give a numerical\n            breakdown of films. The headings on the report are Totals\n            for the Years, Elimination, Rejections, Receipts,\n            Disbursements and Revenue Refunds. The financial statements\n            provide the amount of fees collected and turned over to the\n            state treasurer. Often, they will include disbursement of\n            operating expenses and capital outlay. Arranged\n            chronologically.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cscopecontent\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eSeries XI: ELIMINATION RECORDS, 1945-1965 (.4 cu. ft.)\n            This series gives the form sent to the studios documenting\n            in writing the eliminated scenes or cuts from feature\n            films. The form contains the name and address of the\n            studio, title of movie, a brief and graphic description of\n            the scene cut from the original movie and the signatures of\n            the Director of the Division of Motion Picture Censorship\n            and the authorized agent for the studio. The form usually\n            has triplicate copies and sometimes includes an attachment\n            of correspondence between Censors and studio executives.\n            Arranged chronologically.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/scopecontent\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries XI: ELIMINATION RECORDS, 1945-1965 (.4 cu. ft.)\n            This series gives the form sent to the studios documenting\n            in writing the eliminated scenes or cuts from feature\n            films. The form contains the name and address of the\n            studio, title of movie, a brief and graphic description of\n            the scene cut from the original movie and the signatures of\n            the Director of the Division of Motion Picture Censorship\n            and the authorized agent for the studio. The form usually\n            has triplicate copies and sometimes includes an attachment\n            of correspondence between Censors and studio executives.\n            Arranged chronologically.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cscopecontent\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eSeries XII: CORRESPONDENCE (OUTGOING AND INCOMING),\n            1958-1966 (.8 cu. ft.) This series consists of carbon\n            copies of letters mailed from the various Directors' of the\n            Division of Motion Picture Censorship and the other\n            Censors. The letters cover a wide range of topics including\n            the discussion with studio executives regarding censorship\n            decisions made by the Division. The files include\n            information on the daily operations of the division along\n            with the records from two prominent former directors, Mrs.\n            Lollie C. Whitehead and Mrs. Russell F. Wagers. Arranged\n            alphabetically by subject.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/scopecontent\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries XII: CORRESPONDENCE (OUTGOING AND INCOMING),\n            1958-1966 (.8 cu. ft.) This series consists of carbon\n            copies of letters mailed from the various Directors' of the\n            Division of Motion Picture Censorship and the other\n            Censors. The letters cover a wide range of topics including\n            the discussion with studio executives regarding censorship\n            decisions made by the Division. The files include\n            information on the daily operations of the division along\n            with the records from two prominent former directors, Mrs.\n            Lollie C. Whitehead and Mrs. Russell F. Wagers. Arranged\n            alphabetically by subject.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cscopecontent\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eSeries XIII: CORRESPONDENCE (ACTIVE THEATRES/DRIVE-INS),\n            1957-1965 (2.3 cu. ft.) This series gives copies of\n            outgoing and incoming letters between the Director of the\n            Division and theater and drive-in owners of viable theaters\n            within the state from 1957 to 1965. The correspondence\n            mainly consists of the Director looking for recommendations\n            for the names of individuals to work as inspectors, to view\n            films and verify that the state seal had been appropriately\n            applied to the print. The files are organized by the name\n            of the theater and include the theaters' location. The\n            files have special notations for \"Negro\"only theaters and\n            inspectors. There are also report forms that list the\n            number of admission card issued to an inspector. Arranged\n            alphabetically by name of theater.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/scopecontent\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries XIII: CORRESPONDENCE (ACTIVE THEATRES/DRIVE-INS),\n            1957-1965 (2.3 cu. ft.) This series gives copies of\n            outgoing and incoming letters between the Director of the\n            Division and theater and drive-in owners of viable theaters\n            within the state from 1957 to 1965. The correspondence\n            mainly consists of the Director looking for recommendations\n            for the names of individuals to work as inspectors, to view\n            films and verify that the state seal had been appropriately\n            applied to the print. The files are organized by the name\n            of the theater and include the theaters' location. The\n            files have special notations for \"Negro\"only theaters and\n            inspectors. There are also report forms that list the\n            number of admission card issued to an inspector. Arranged\n            alphabetically by name of theater.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cscopecontent\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eSeries XIV: CORRESPONDENCE (INACTIVE-CLOSED THEATRES),\n            1957-1965 (2.3 cu. ft.) This series offers the outgoing and\n            incoming letters between the Director of the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship and the owners of theaters and\n            drive-ins that were no longer in existence. The\n            correspondence mainly consists of inquiries by the Director\n            for the name of inspectors for the theaters and\n            notification to the Director that the theater or drive-in\n            is no longer in operation. Some files may contain returned\n            admission cards issued to inspectors for their free\n            admittance into the theaters. These files may include an\n            index card with the name and address of the inspector\n            assigned to a specific theater. Arranged alphabetically by\n            name of theater.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/scopecontent\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries XIV: CORRESPONDENCE (INACTIVE-CLOSED THEATRES),\n            1957-1965 (2.3 cu. ft.) This series offers the outgoing and\n            incoming letters between the Director of the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship and the owners of theaters and\n            drive-ins that were no longer in existence. The\n            correspondence mainly consists of inquiries by the Director\n            for the name of inspectors for the theaters and\n            notification to the Director that the theater or drive-in\n            is no longer in operation. Some files may contain returned\n            admission cards issued to inspectors for their free\n            admittance into the theaters. These files may include an\n            index card with the name and address of the inspector\n            assigned to a specific theater. Arranged alphabetically by\n            name of theater.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cscopecontent\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eSeries XV: GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE AND CONTROVERSIAL\n            FILMS, 1922-1966 (2.7 cu. ft.) This series combines general\n            correspondence of the agency director and correspondence\n            regarding films that were eliminated for viewing within the\n            state of Virginia. The correspondences consist of letters\n            mailed to movie distributors, court documents as well as\n            correspondence from the state's Attorney General. The\n            series includes selected promotional movie posters,\n            examples of advertisements in movie industry trade\n            magazines and scripts of some of the movies listed. There\n            are recurring issues that caused grave concern for the\n            Censors. Among those issues of concern are films that\n            depict \"miscegenation\". It is noted in the records that\n            sexual relations between Black and white people were\n            against the law and transgresses \"rules of propriety\". In\n            general, films that displayed sexual content were strictly\n            censored or rejected in toto. In one report the suggested\n            that \"some of the bedroom scenes are particularly\n            disgusting and are calculated to shock even the most\n            vulgar.\" Violent films and movies emphasizing racial\n            situations were rejected due to concerns that these movies\n            might incite people to riot. The Censors rejected a 1947\n            movie entitled \"The Burning Cross,\" (a film portraying the\n            Ku Klux Klan in a negative light) because of the films'\n            tendencies to \"excite prejudices and intense emotions\n            thereby reviving controversies and disputes that the\n            Censors' believes presently to be quiet, and not now\n            occupying the public attention\". The Censors' insisted that\n            the film be banned despite objections from religious\n            leaders and civil rights organizations such as the N.A.A.C.\n            P., which wanted the film shown to help counter the \"more\n            than a score of years of propaganda\" in support of the\n            K.K.K. in the movie industry. The civil rights organization\n            was perplexed by the Board's action since they had\n            supposedly allowed the showing of \"The Birth of a Nation\",\n            a film that portrayed the Klan in a most favorable light.\n            In, 1924 a movie entitled \"A Son of Satan\" \"released by a\n            colored concern\" was banned in toto because it portrayed \"a\n            mulatto whose villainies were inherited by his white\n            forefathers\". Arranged alphabetically.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/scopecontent\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries XV: GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE AND CONTROVERSIAL\n            FILMS, 1922-1966 (2.7 cu. ft.) This series combines general\n            correspondence of the agency director and correspondence\n            regarding films that were eliminated for viewing within the\n            state of Virginia. The correspondences consist of letters\n            mailed to movie distributors, court documents as well as\n            correspondence from the state's Attorney General. The\n            series includes selected promotional movie posters,\n            examples of advertisements in movie industry trade\n            magazines and scripts of some of the movies listed. There\n            are recurring issues that caused grave concern for the\n            Censors. Among those issues of concern are films that\n            depict \"miscegenation\". It is noted in the records that\n            sexual relations between Black and white people were\n            against the law and transgresses \"rules of propriety\". In\n            general, films that displayed sexual content were strictly\n            censored or rejected in toto. In one report the suggested\n            that \"some of the bedroom scenes are particularly\n            disgusting and are calculated to shock even the most\n            vulgar.\" Violent films and movies emphasizing racial\n            situations were rejected due to concerns that these movies\n            might incite people to riot. The Censors rejected a 1947\n            movie entitled \"The Burning Cross,\" (a film portraying the\n            Ku Klux Klan in a negative light) because of the films'\n            tendencies to \"excite prejudices and intense emotions\n            thereby reviving controversies and disputes that the\n            Censors' believes presently to be quiet, and not now\n            occupying the public attention\". The Censors' insisted that\n            the film be banned despite objections from religious\n            leaders and civil rights organizations such as the N.A.A.C.\n            P., which wanted the film shown to help counter the \"more\n            than a score of years of propaganda\" in support of the\n            K.K.K. in the movie industry. The civil rights organization\n            was perplexed by the Board's action since they had\n            supposedly allowed the showing of \"The Birth of a Nation\",\n            a film that portrayed the Klan in a most favorable light.\n            In, 1924 a movie entitled \"A Son of Satan\" \"released by a\n            colored concern\" was banned in toto because it portrayed \"a\n            mulatto whose villainies were inherited by his white\n            forefathers\". Arranged alphabetically.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cscopecontent\u003e\n        \u003cp\u003eSeries VI: CENSORSHIP REPORTS, 1960-1965 (.8 cu. ft.)\n            This series documents the work of censorship boards in\n            other states and Canada. The format of the reports vary\n            however, all the reports provide movie titles, scenes\n            deleted from movies, total number of prints and the studio\n            responsible for producing the film. Arranged\n            chronologically by date of report.\u003c/p\u003e\n      \u003c/scopecontent\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries VI: CENSORSHIP REPORTS, 1960-1965 (.8 cu. ft.)\n            This series documents the work of censorship boards in\n            other states and Canada. The format of the reports vary\n            however, all the reports provide movie titles, scenes\n            deleted from movies, total number of prints and the studio\n            responsible for producing the film. Arranged\n            chronologically by date of report.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series offers the actual application for license\n               to show and distribute films in the state of Virginia.\n               The form contains the following information: date of\n               license, title of movie or serial, names of lead\n               characters, print number, duplicate number, reel\n               footage, name of studio and address, notarized signature\n               of designated representative for the studio and the date\n               and signature of the notary public. The reverse side of\n               the form may contain comments or remarks regarding the\n               elimination of offensive parts of a film or the total\n               rejection of a film due to its immoral content.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series contains two types of certificates,\n               organized as Regular and Non-Regular Licenses. Both\n               Regular and Non-Regular license certificates consists of\n               two types of numbered forms. The license certificate\n               entitled Licenses For Duplicates (Form 4) certifies that\n               a motion picture studio is permitted to exhibit and\n               display a film within the State of Virginia. The form\n               contains the title of the movie, the date the\n               certificate was issued, the amount of fee paid by the\n               studio, serial number, print number and the signature of\n               the Director of the Division of Motion Picture\n               Censorship. The second form is entitled Copy of\n               Application For Substitute Seal Original Receipted and\n               Returned to Applicant (Form 8). This form gives the\n               studio name, the title of the film, date issued and name\n               of the Director. The form states that the movie studio\n               is applying for a substitute seal to be attached to a\n               print of the film previously censored and approved by\n               the Division.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe major difference between Regular and Non-Regular\n               Licenses appears to be the arrangement order and time\n               period. Regular Licenses are arranged by the prefix CS\n               and cover the early 1950's to 1965 while the Non-Regular\n               Licenses are arranged chronologically by serial number\n               and cover the early 1960's.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series contains 4x6 index cards that serve as an\n               index to the non-regular licenses and the license\n               applications. The index provides the motion picture\n               title, dat of license or application, studio releasing\n               the film and serial number. The pink index cards provide\n               notations about the status of the film, such as, whether\n               a seal has been issued for a film, whether the film was\n               eliminated or \"rejected in toto\", meaning it could not\n               be shown in the state, and the conditional approval of a\n               film with the seal of Virginia issued at a later date.\n               The index does not apply to the regular licenses.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series contains 4x6 index cards that served as\n               attendance forms for imployees of the Division of Motion\n               Picture Censorship. Each card has the name of the\n               employee, day of the week, check mark for when the\n               employee was present or on sick/vacation leave, and the\n               signature of employees.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series consists of 4x6 index cards giving an\n               alphabetical listing of movie theaters and a separate\n               listing for the name and address of inspectors along\n               with the names of the theaters they were responsible for\n               monitoring. The movie theaters are organized by location\n               of county, city or town. The index cards have notations\n               for \"Negro\" inspectores and/or \"Negro\" owned theaters.\n               The cards are divided into active (white color cards)\n               and inactive (pink color cards) cards. There is a\n               separate listing of index cards for inspectors of\n               drive-in theaters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series provides a typed listing of movie titles,\n               seal numbers, and notations of films eliminated or\n               approved for viewing within the state. Some of the\n               listings supply only the date, movie title, serial\n               number and name of the studio releasing the film.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series consists of five volumes, one tablet, and\n               a selection of financial reports that are Daily Billings\n               (the form is entitled Film Record), which provide an\n               overview of the financial housekeeping of the agency.\n               There are three volumes entitled Cash Receipts dated\n               1950-1966 that provide an accounting ledger format with\n               columns for dates of transactions, studio names and\n               assigned license number, fees for original and duplicate\n               licenses, news reels charges and substitute seal fee,\n               along with totals for all columns.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThere are two volumes entitles Disbursements dated\n               1949-1950 that are organized in similar format to the\n               Cash Receipts. The columns in these two volumes are\n               identified follows: salaries, wages, repairs,\n               maintenance service contract, travel, transportation,\n               communications, printing, other expenses, office\n               supplies, photographic, supplies, other supplies, office\n               equipment, fire insurance, workmen's compensation,\n               surety insurance, technical subscriptions, and capital\n               outlay.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe one tablet entitled Office Cash Vouchers is dated\n               1962 and is an accounting booklet for the office petty\n               cash fund. The column headings in this tablet are for\n               date of transaction, nature of disbursement, amount\n               paid, totals and signatures for those authorized to\n               approve payment, certification for the correct\n               reimbursement and the checker of the transaction.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe Daily Billings or Film Record are dated 1960-1965\n               and provide and insightful account of the amount of fees\n               generated by charges applied to studios for original and\n               duplicate prints and the seal of issuance. The contains\n               the title of the movie, studio releasing film, number of\n               reels, total footage amount, print number, original seal\n               number, duplicate seal number, substitute seal number\n               and total of fees collected. Some reports have adding\n               machine tabulations attached to them.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series contains the office voucher files for the\n               Division of Motion Picture Censorship. The files provide\n               information on financial management as well as\n               procedures for the operation and administration of the\n               Division. There are also annual reports and attendance\n               reports for the censors. Some topical files include\n               information on the Commonwealth's personnel act,\n               procurement procedures and monthly reports of monies\n               collected by the Division. These records include a\n               sampling of blank forms used by the Division during it's\n               operation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series consists of forms entitled Film Clerk's\n               Report. This form consists of multiple pages with the\n               following categories and headings: Title (movie title),\n               Exchange (studio name), Number of Reel, Footage, Print\n               Number, Original Seal Number, Duplicate Print Number,\n               Duplicate Seal Number, and Substitute Seal. Not all\n               categories on the form contain information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series contains the yearly reports for the\n               Censorship Division as submitted to the Governor. The\n               reports provide a detailed narrative and statistical\n               breakdown of the activities for the fiscal year. The\n               first report reflects in detail the standard used in the\n               elimination and/or rejection of certain films. The main\n               purpose for censorship was to prevent the display of\n               \"obscene, indecent, immoral or inhuman films of such\n               character that their exhibition would tend to corrupt\n               morals or incite crime.\"\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe earlier reports (roughly 1924-1935) offer a\n               descriptive narrative acount of the activities of the\n               Board. The reports of the 1920's document the\n               improprieties of certain comic films of the day. One\n               report states that \"directors seem willing to violate\n               all the refinements and all conventions in order to get\n               a laugh.\" There are descriptions of total scenes cut\n               from films along with examples given of specific movies\n               and the reasons for the \"slicing\". The report for\n               1927-1928 highlights the advent of the new technology in\n               motion pictures, \"the talkies\". Among the concerns of\n               the Board about the new technology was the cost of\n               purchasing new projectors that would allow viewing and\n               editing of synchronized films. In the annual report of\n               1931 comments are made about the \"great onslaught of\n               gang pictures\". This \"problem\" was not seen as vital for\n               Virginia as for the \"northern states where foreign\n               population is greater\". Nonetheless, the censors\n               considered gangster movies fostered a \"disagreeable\n               situation\" that members of the Division hoped producers\n               of this genre of film would \"tone down in the\n               future\".\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn the 1941 report advances in technology are\n               highlighted with the introduction of a new projector\n               known as the \"Juke Box\" that used sixteen millimeter\n               film. Once again, the report documents concerns about\n               getting state appropriations for the purchase of new\n               equipment. The reports for 1943-1944 make note of the\n               surprise in the increase in the number of films due to\n               the fact of restrictions placed on raw materials\n               (including film) during World War II.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe reports for later years (roughly 1947-1965) are\n               more statistical and less narrative in composition. The\n               statistical tables give a numerical breakdown of films.\n               The headings in the report include Totals for the Years,\n               Elimination, Rejections, Receipts, Disbursements, and\n               Revenue Refunds. The financial statements provide the\n               amount of fees collected and turned over to the state\n               treasurer. Often the statements will include\n               disbursements of operating expenses and capital\n               outlays.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series consists of forms sent to the studios\n               documenting in writing the eliminated scenes or cuts\n               from feature films. The form contains the name and\n               address of the studio, title of the movie, a brief and\n               graphice description of the scene cut from the original\n               movie, and the signatures of the Director of the\n               Division of Motion Picture Censorship an the authorized\n               agent for the studio. The form usually has triplicate\n               copies and sometimes includes an attachment of\n               correspondence between censors and studio\n               executives.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series consists of carbon copies of letters\n               mailed from the various director's of the Division of\n               Motion Picture Censorship and the other censors. The\n               letters cover a wide range of topics including the\n               discussion with studio executives regarding censorship\n               decisions made by the division. The files include\n               information on the daily operations of the division\n               along with the records from two prominent former\n               directors, Mrs. Lollie C. Whitehead and Mrs. russell F.\n               Wagers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series consists of copies of outgoing and\n               incoming letters between the Director of the Division of\n               Motion Picture Censorship and theater and drive-in\n               owners of viable theater within the state. The\n               correspondence mainly conists of letters from the\n               director seeking recommendations for the names of\n               individuals to work as inspectors, to view films, and\n               verify that the state seal had been appropriately\n               applied to the print. The files are organized by the\n               name of the theater and include the theater location.\n               The files have special notations for \"Negro\" only\n               theaters and inspectors. There are also report forms\n               that list the number of admission cards issued to an\n               inspector.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series offers the outgoing and incoming letters\n               between the Director of the Division of Motion Picture\n               Censorship and the owners of theaters and drive-ins that\n               were no longer in existence. The correspondence mainly\n               consists of inquiries by the Director for the name of\n               inspectors for the theaters and notification to the\n               Director that the theater or drive-in is no longer in\n               operation. Some files may contain returned admission\n               cards issued to inspectors for their free admittance\n               into the theaters. These files include index cards with\n               the name and address of the inspector assigned to a\n               specific theater.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series combines general correspondence of the\n               agency director and correspondence regarding films that\n               were eliminated for viewing within the state of\n               Virginia. The correspondence consists of letters mailed\n               to movie distributors and court documents, as well as\n               correspondence from the state's Attorney General. The\n               series also includes selected promotional movie posters,\n               examples of advertisements in movie industry trade\n               magazines, and scripts of some of the movies listed.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series documents the work of censorship boards\n               in other states and Canada. The format of the reports\n               vary, however all reports provide movie titles, scenes\n               deleted from movies, total number of prints, and the\n               studio responsible for producing the film.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content Information"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Series I: LICENSE APPLICATIONS, 1926-1965 (14.5 cu. ft.)\n         This series contains the actual applications for licenses to\n         show and distribute films in the state of Virginia. The form\n         includes the following information: date of license, title of\n         movie or serial, names of lead characters, print number,\n         duplicate number, reel footage, name of studio and address,\n         notarized signature of designated representative for the\n         studio and the date and signature of the notary public. The\n         reverse side of the form may contain comments or remarks\n         regarding the elimination of offensive parts of a film or the\n         total rejection of a film due to its immoral content. Arranged\n         alphabetically by film title.","Series II: LICENSES (REGULAR AND NON-REGULAR), 1954-1965\n            (10. 5 cu. ft.) This series contains two types of\n            certificates, organized as Regular and Non-Regular\n            Licenses. Both Regular and Non-Regular license certificates\n            consists of two types of numbered forms. The license\n            certificate entitled Licenses For Duplicates (Form 4)\n            certifies that a motion picture studio is permitted to\n            exhibit and display a film within the State of Virginia.\n            The form contains the title of the movie, the date the\n            certificate was issued, the amount of fee paid by the\n            studio, serial number, print number and the signature of\n            the Director of the Division of Motion Picture Censorship.\n            The second form is entitled Copy of Application For\n            Substitute Seal Original Receipted and Returned to\n            Applicant (Form 8). This form gives the studio name, the\n            title of the film, date issued and name of the Director.\n            The form states that the movie studio is applying for a\n            substitute seal to be attached to a print of the film\n            previously censored and approved by the Division. The major\n            difference between Regular and Non-Regular Licenses appears\n            to be the arrangement order and time period. Regular\n            Licenses are arranged by the prefix CS and cover the early\n            1950's to 1965 while the Non-Regular Licenses are arranged\n            chronologically by serial number and cover the early\n            1960's. Arranged chronologically by serial number.","Series II: LICENSES (REGULAR AND NON-REGULAR), 1954-1965\n            (10. 5 cu. ft.) This series contains two types of\n            certificates, organized as Regular and Non-Regular\n            Licenses. Both Regular and Non-Regular license certificates\n            consists of two types of numbered forms. The license\n            certificate entitled Licenses For Duplicates (Form 4)\n            certifies that a motion picture studio is permitted to\n            exhibit and display a film within the State of Virginia.\n            The form contains the title of the movie, the date the\n            certificate was issued, the amount of fee paid by the\n            studio, serial number, print number and the signature of\n            the Director of the Division of Motion Picture Censorship.\n            The second form is entitled Copy of Application For\n            Substitute Seal Original Receipted and Returned to\n            Applicant (Form 8). This form gives the studio name, the\n            title of the film, date issued and name of the Director.\n            The form states that the movie studio is applying for a\n            substitute seal to be attached to a print of the film\n            previously censored and approved by the Division. The major\n            difference between Regular and Non-Regular Licenses appears\n            to be the arrangement order and time period. Regular\n            Licenses are arranged by the prefix CS and cover the early\n            1950's to 1965 while the Non-Regular Licenses are arranged\n            chronologically by serial number and cover the early\n            1960's. Arranged chronologically by serial number.","Series III: INDEX TO LICENSES AND APPLICATIONS,\n            1947-1965 (3.15 cu. ft.) This series contains 4x6 index\n            cards that serve as an index to the non-Regular Licenses\n            and the License Applications. The index includes the motion\n            picture title, date license or application issued, studio\n            releasing film and serial number. The pink index cards\n            provide notations about the status of the film such as,\n            whether a seal has been issued for a film, whether the film\n            was eliminated or \"rejected in toto\" meaning it could not\n            be shown in the state, and the conditional approval of a\n            film with the seal of Virginia, issued at a later date. The\n            index does not appear to apply to the Regular Licenses.\n            Arranged alphabetically by film title.","Series III: INDEX TO LICENSES AND APPLICATIONS,\n            1947-1965 (3.15 cu. ft.) This series contains 4x6 index\n            cards that serve as an index to the non-Regular Licenses\n            and the License Applications. The index includes the motion\n            picture title, date license or application issued, studio\n            releasing film and serial number. The pink index cards\n            provide notations about the status of the film such as,\n            whether a seal has been issued for a film, whether the film\n            was eliminated or \"rejected in toto\" meaning it could not\n            be shown in the state, and the conditional approval of a\n            film with the seal of Virginia, issued at a later date. The\n            index does not appear to apply to the Regular Licenses.\n            Arranged alphabetically by film title.","Series IV: ATTENDANCE REPORT FOR EMPLOYEES, 1958-1965\n            (2.1 cu. ft.) This series contains 4x6 index cards that\n            served as attendance forms for employees of the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship. Each card has the name of the\n            employee, day of the week, check mark for when the employee\n            was present, or on sick/vacation leave and the signature of\n            employees. Arranged alphabetically by board member.","Series IV: ATTENDANCE REPORT FOR EMPLOYEES, 1958-1965\n            (2.1 cu. ft.) This series contains 4x6 index cards that\n            served as attendance forms for employees of the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship. Each card has the name of the\n            employee, day of the week, check mark for when the employee\n            was present, or on sick/vacation leave and the signature of\n            employees. Arranged alphabetically by board member.","Series V: THEATRE AND INSPECTOR LISTINGS, 1959-1965 (.35\n            cu. ft.) This series provides 4x6 index cards giving an\n            alphabetical listing of movie theatres and separate listing\n            for the name and address of inspectors along with the\n            theatres they were responsible for monitoring. The movie\n            theatres are organized by location of county, city and\n            town. The index cards have notations for \"Negro\" inspectors\n            and/or \"Negro\" owned theatres. The cards are divided into\n            active (white color) and inactive (pink color) cards. There\n            is a separate listing of index cards for inspectors of\n            drive-ins. Arranged alphabetically by location.","Series V: THEATRE AND INSPECTOR LISTINGS, 1959-1965 (.35\n            cu. ft.) This series provides 4x6 index cards giving an\n            alphabetical listing of movie theatres and separate listing\n            for the name and address of inspectors along with the\n            theatres they were responsible for monitoring. The movie\n            theatres are organized by location of county, city and\n            town. The index cards have notations for \"Negro\" inspectors\n            and/or \"Negro\" owned theatres. The cards are divided into\n            active (white color) and inactive (pink color) cards. There\n            is a separate listing of index cards for inspectors of\n            drive-ins. Arranged alphabetically by location.","Series VI: LISTING OF FILM TITLES, 1928-1957 (1 cu.\n            ft.)This series offers a typed listing of movie titles,\n            seal numbers, and notations of films eliminated and\n            approved for viewing within the state. Some of the listings\n            give only the date, movie title, serial number and the\n            studio releasing the film. Arranged chronologically.","Series VI: LISTING OF FILM TITLES, 1928-1957 (1 cu.\n            ft.)This series offers a typed listing of movie titles,\n            seal numbers, and notations of films eliminated and\n            approved for viewing within the state. Some of the listings\n            give only the date, movie title, serial number and the\n            studio releasing the film. Arranged chronologically.","Series VII: FINANCIAL RECORDS, 1949-1960 (3.2 cu. ft.)\n            This series consists of five volumes, one tablet, and a\n            selection of financial reports that are Daily Billings (the\n            form is entitled Film Record), which provide an overview of\n            the financial housekeeping of the agency. There are three\n            volumes entitled Cash Receipts dated 1950-1966 that\n            provides an accounting ledger format with columns for the\n            dates of transaction, studio names and assigned license\n            number, fees for original and duplicate licenses, news\n            reels charges and substitute seal fee along with totals for\n            all columns. There are two volumes entitled Disbursements\n            dated 1949-1950, an are organized in similar format as the\n            Cash Receipts. The columns in these two volumes are\n            identified as follows; Salaries, Wages, Repairs,\n            Maintenance Service Contract, Travel, Transportation,\n            Communications, Printing, Other Expenses, Office Supplies,\n            Photographic, Supplies, Other Supplies, Office Equipment,\n            Fire Insurance, Workmen's Compensation, Surety Insurance,\n            Technical Subscriptions and Capitol Outlay. The one tablet\n            entitled Office Cash Vouchers dated 1962, is an accounting\n            booklet for the office petty cash fund. The columns\n            headings in this tablet are for the Date of Transaction,\n            Nature of Disbursement, Amount Paid, Totals, the Signatures\n            for those authorized to approve payment, certification for\n            the correct reimbursement and the checker of the\n            transaction. The Daily Billings or Film Record dated\n            1960-1965, offers an insightful account of the amount of\n            fees generated by charges applied to studios for original\n            and duplicate prints and the seal issuance. The form\n            contains the title of the movie, studio releasing film\n            number of reels, total footage amount, print number,\n            original seal number, duplicate seal number, substitute\n            seal number and total amount of fees collected. Some\n            reports have adding machine ticker tabulations attached to\n            them. Arranged chronologically.","Series VII: FINANCIAL RECORDS, 1949-1960 (3.2 cu. ft.)\n            This series consists of five volumes, one tablet, and a\n            selection of financial reports that are Daily Billings (the\n            form is entitled Film Record), which provide an overview of\n            the financial housekeeping of the agency. There are three\n            volumes entitled Cash Receipts dated 1950-1966 that\n            provides an accounting ledger format with columns for the\n            dates of transaction, studio names and assigned license\n            number, fees for original and duplicate licenses, news\n            reels charges and substitute seal fee along with totals for\n            all columns. There are two volumes entitled Disbursements\n            dated 1949-1950, an are organized in similar format as the\n            Cash Receipts. The columns in these two volumes are\n            identified as follows; Salaries, Wages, Repairs,\n            Maintenance Service Contract, Travel, Transportation,\n            Communications, Printing, Other Expenses, Office Supplies,\n            Photographic, Supplies, Other Supplies, Office Equipment,\n            Fire Insurance, Workmen's Compensation, Surety Insurance,\n            Technical Subscriptions and Capitol Outlay. The one tablet\n            entitled Office Cash Vouchers dated 1962, is an accounting\n            booklet for the office petty cash fund. The columns\n            headings in this tablet are for the Date of Transaction,\n            Nature of Disbursement, Amount Paid, Totals, the Signatures\n            for those authorized to approve payment, certification for\n            the correct reimbursement and the checker of the\n            transaction. The Daily Billings or Film Record dated\n            1960-1965, offers an insightful account of the amount of\n            fees generated by charges applied to studios for original\n            and duplicate prints and the seal issuance. The form\n            contains the title of the movie, studio releasing film\n            number of reels, total footage amount, print number,\n            original seal number, duplicate seal number, substitute\n            seal number and total amount of fees collected. Some\n            reports have adding machine ticker tabulations attached to\n            them. Arranged chronologically.","Series VIII: OFFICE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS, 1924-1966\n            (1.5 cu. ft) This series contains the office voucher files\n            for the Division of Motion Picture Censorship. The files\n            provide information on financial management as well as\n            procedures included in the operation and administration of\n            the Division. There also are attendance reports for the\n            Censors. Some of the topics include information on the\n            Commonwealth's personnel act, procurement procedures and\n            monthly report of monies collected by the Division. These\n            records include a sampling of blank forms used by the\n            Division during its' operation. Arranged alphabetically by\n            subject.","Series VIII: OFFICE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS, 1924-1966\n            (1.5 cu. ft) This series contains the office voucher files\n            for the Division of Motion Picture Censorship. The files\n            provide information on financial management as well as\n            procedures included in the operation and administration of\n            the Division. There also are attendance reports for the\n            Censors. Some of the topics include information on the\n            Commonwealth's personnel act, procurement procedures and\n            monthly report of monies collected by the Division. These\n            records include a sampling of blank forms used by the\n            Division during its' operation. Arranged alphabetically by\n            subject.","Series IX: REPORT OF FILM CLERKS, 1960-1965 (1.2 cu. ft.\n            )This series gives a form entitled Film Clerk's Report. The\n            form consists of multiple pages with the following\n            categories and headings: Title (movie title), Exchange\n            (studio name) Number of Reel, Footage, Print Number,\n            Original Seal Number, Duplicate Print Number, Duplicate\n            Seal Number, and Substitute Seal. Not all categories on the\n            form contain information. Arranged chronologically by\n            date.","Series IX: REPORT OF FILM CLERKS, 1960-1965 (1.2 cu. ft.\n            )This series gives a form entitled Film Clerk's Report. The\n            form consists of multiple pages with the following\n            categories and headings: Title (movie title), Exchange\n            (studio name) Number of Reel, Footage, Print Number,\n            Original Seal Number, Duplicate Print Number, Duplicate\n            Seal Number, and Substitute Seal. Not all categories on the\n            form contain information. Arranged chronologically by\n            date.","Series X: ANNUAL REPORTS, 1924-1965 (.2 cu. ft.) This\n            series contains the yearly reports for the Censorship\n            Division as submitted to the Governor. The reports provide\n            a detailed narrative and statistical breakdown of the\n            activities for the fiscal year. The first report reflects\n            in detail the standard used in the elimination and /or\n            rejections of certain films. The main purpose for\n            censorship was to prevent the display of \"obscene,\n            indecent, immoral or inhuman films of such character that\n            their exhibition would tend to corrupt moral(s) or incite\n            crime\". The earlier reports (roughly 1924-1935) offer a\n            descriptive narrative account of the activities of the\n            Board. The reports of the 1920's document the improprieties\n            of certain comic films of the day. One report states that\n            \"directors seem willing to violate all the refinements and\n            all conventions in order to get a laugh!\" There are\n            descriptions of total scenes cut from films along with\n            examples given of specific movies and the reasons for the\n            \"slicing\". The report of 1927- 1928 highlights the advent\n            of the new technology in motion pictures, \"the talkies\".\n            Among the concerns of the Board about the new technology\n            was the cost of purchasing new projectors that would allow\n            viewing and editing of synchronized films. In the Annual\n            Report of 1931, comments are made about the \"great\n            onslaught of gang pictures\". This \"problem\" was not seen as\n            vital for Virginia as for the \"northern states where the\n            foreign population is greater\". None the less the Censors'\n            considered gangster movies fostered a \"disagreeable\n            situation\" that members of the Censors' hoped producers of\n            this genre of film would \"tone down in the future\". In the\n            1941 report, advances in technology are highlighted with\n            the introduction of a new projector known as the \"Juke Box\"\n            that used (16) sixteen-millimeter film. Once again, the\n            report documents concerns about getting state\n            appropriations for the purchase of new equipment. The\n            reports of 1943-1944 make note of the surprise in the\n            increase in the number of films due to the fact of\n            restrictions placed on raw materials (including film)\n            during World War II. The reports of later years (roughly\n            1947-1965) are more statistical and less narrative in\n            composition. The statistical tables give a numerical\n            breakdown of films. The headings on the report are Totals\n            for the Years, Elimination, Rejections, Receipts,\n            Disbursements and Revenue Refunds. The financial statements\n            provide the amount of fees collected and turned over to the\n            state treasurer. Often, they will include disbursement of\n            operating expenses and capital outlay. Arranged\n            chronologically.","Series X: ANNUAL REPORTS, 1924-1965 (.2 cu. ft.) This\n            series contains the yearly reports for the Censorship\n            Division as submitted to the Governor. The reports provide\n            a detailed narrative and statistical breakdown of the\n            activities for the fiscal year. The first report reflects\n            in detail the standard used in the elimination and /or\n            rejections of certain films. The main purpose for\n            censorship was to prevent the display of \"obscene,\n            indecent, immoral or inhuman films of such character that\n            their exhibition would tend to corrupt moral(s) or incite\n            crime\". The earlier reports (roughly 1924-1935) offer a\n            descriptive narrative account of the activities of the\n            Board. The reports of the 1920's document the improprieties\n            of certain comic films of the day. One report states that\n            \"directors seem willing to violate all the refinements and\n            all conventions in order to get a laugh!\" There are\n            descriptions of total scenes cut from films along with\n            examples given of specific movies and the reasons for the\n            \"slicing\". The report of 1927- 1928 highlights the advent\n            of the new technology in motion pictures, \"the talkies\".\n            Among the concerns of the Board about the new technology\n            was the cost of purchasing new projectors that would allow\n            viewing and editing of synchronized films. In the Annual\n            Report of 1931, comments are made about the \"great\n            onslaught of gang pictures\". This \"problem\" was not seen as\n            vital for Virginia as for the \"northern states where the\n            foreign population is greater\". None the less the Censors'\n            considered gangster movies fostered a \"disagreeable\n            situation\" that members of the Censors' hoped producers of\n            this genre of film would \"tone down in the future\". In the\n            1941 report, advances in technology are highlighted with\n            the introduction of a new projector known as the \"Juke Box\"\n            that used (16) sixteen-millimeter film. Once again, the\n            report documents concerns about getting state\n            appropriations for the purchase of new equipment. The\n            reports of 1943-1944 make note of the surprise in the\n            increase in the number of films due to the fact of\n            restrictions placed on raw materials (including film)\n            during World War II. The reports of later years (roughly\n            1947-1965) are more statistical and less narrative in\n            composition. The statistical tables give a numerical\n            breakdown of films. The headings on the report are Totals\n            for the Years, Elimination, Rejections, Receipts,\n            Disbursements and Revenue Refunds. The financial statements\n            provide the amount of fees collected and turned over to the\n            state treasurer. Often, they will include disbursement of\n            operating expenses and capital outlay. Arranged\n            chronologically.","Series XI: ELIMINATION RECORDS, 1945-1965 (.4 cu. ft.)\n            This series gives the form sent to the studios documenting\n            in writing the eliminated scenes or cuts from feature\n            films. The form contains the name and address of the\n            studio, title of movie, a brief and graphic description of\n            the scene cut from the original movie and the signatures of\n            the Director of the Division of Motion Picture Censorship\n            and the authorized agent for the studio. The form usually\n            has triplicate copies and sometimes includes an attachment\n            of correspondence between Censors and studio executives.\n            Arranged chronologically.","Series XI: ELIMINATION RECORDS, 1945-1965 (.4 cu. ft.)\n            This series gives the form sent to the studios documenting\n            in writing the eliminated scenes or cuts from feature\n            films. The form contains the name and address of the\n            studio, title of movie, a brief and graphic description of\n            the scene cut from the original movie and the signatures of\n            the Director of the Division of Motion Picture Censorship\n            and the authorized agent for the studio. The form usually\n            has triplicate copies and sometimes includes an attachment\n            of correspondence between Censors and studio executives.\n            Arranged chronologically.","Series XII: CORRESPONDENCE (OUTGOING AND INCOMING),\n            1958-1966 (.8 cu. ft.) This series consists of carbon\n            copies of letters mailed from the various Directors' of the\n            Division of Motion Picture Censorship and the other\n            Censors. The letters cover a wide range of topics including\n            the discussion with studio executives regarding censorship\n            decisions made by the Division. The files include\n            information on the daily operations of the division along\n            with the records from two prominent former directors, Mrs.\n            Lollie C. Whitehead and Mrs. Russell F. Wagers. Arranged\n            alphabetically by subject.","Series XII: CORRESPONDENCE (OUTGOING AND INCOMING),\n            1958-1966 (.8 cu. ft.) This series consists of carbon\n            copies of letters mailed from the various Directors' of the\n            Division of Motion Picture Censorship and the other\n            Censors. The letters cover a wide range of topics including\n            the discussion with studio executives regarding censorship\n            decisions made by the Division. The files include\n            information on the daily operations of the division along\n            with the records from two prominent former directors, Mrs.\n            Lollie C. Whitehead and Mrs. Russell F. Wagers. Arranged\n            alphabetically by subject.","Series XIII: CORRESPONDENCE (ACTIVE THEATRES/DRIVE-INS),\n            1957-1965 (2.3 cu. ft.) This series gives copies of\n            outgoing and incoming letters between the Director of the\n            Division and theater and drive-in owners of viable theaters\n            within the state from 1957 to 1965. The correspondence\n            mainly consists of the Director looking for recommendations\n            for the names of individuals to work as inspectors, to view\n            films and verify that the state seal had been appropriately\n            applied to the print. The files are organized by the name\n            of the theater and include the theaters' location. The\n            files have special notations for \"Negro\"only theaters and\n            inspectors. There are also report forms that list the\n            number of admission card issued to an inspector. Arranged\n            alphabetically by name of theater.","Series XIII: CORRESPONDENCE (ACTIVE THEATRES/DRIVE-INS),\n            1957-1965 (2.3 cu. ft.) This series gives copies of\n            outgoing and incoming letters between the Director of the\n            Division and theater and drive-in owners of viable theaters\n            within the state from 1957 to 1965. The correspondence\n            mainly consists of the Director looking for recommendations\n            for the names of individuals to work as inspectors, to view\n            films and verify that the state seal had been appropriately\n            applied to the print. The files are organized by the name\n            of the theater and include the theaters' location. The\n            files have special notations for \"Negro\"only theaters and\n            inspectors. There are also report forms that list the\n            number of admission card issued to an inspector. Arranged\n            alphabetically by name of theater.","Series XIV: CORRESPONDENCE (INACTIVE-CLOSED THEATRES),\n            1957-1965 (2.3 cu. ft.) This series offers the outgoing and\n            incoming letters between the Director of the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship and the owners of theaters and\n            drive-ins that were no longer in existence. The\n            correspondence mainly consists of inquiries by the Director\n            for the name of inspectors for the theaters and\n            notification to the Director that the theater or drive-in\n            is no longer in operation. Some files may contain returned\n            admission cards issued to inspectors for their free\n            admittance into the theaters. These files may include an\n            index card with the name and address of the inspector\n            assigned to a specific theater. Arranged alphabetically by\n            name of theater.","Series XIV: CORRESPONDENCE (INACTIVE-CLOSED THEATRES),\n            1957-1965 (2.3 cu. ft.) This series offers the outgoing and\n            incoming letters between the Director of the Division of\n            Motion Picture Censorship and the owners of theaters and\n            drive-ins that were no longer in existence. The\n            correspondence mainly consists of inquiries by the Director\n            for the name of inspectors for the theaters and\n            notification to the Director that the theater or drive-in\n            is no longer in operation. Some files may contain returned\n            admission cards issued to inspectors for their free\n            admittance into the theaters. These files may include an\n            index card with the name and address of the inspector\n            assigned to a specific theater. Arranged alphabetically by\n            name of theater.","Series XV: GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE AND CONTROVERSIAL\n            FILMS, 1922-1966 (2.7 cu. ft.) This series combines general\n            correspondence of the agency director and correspondence\n            regarding films that were eliminated for viewing within the\n            state of Virginia. The correspondences consist of letters\n            mailed to movie distributors, court documents as well as\n            correspondence from the state's Attorney General. The\n            series includes selected promotional movie posters,\n            examples of advertisements in movie industry trade\n            magazines and scripts of some of the movies listed. There\n            are recurring issues that caused grave concern for the\n            Censors. Among those issues of concern are films that\n            depict \"miscegenation\". It is noted in the records that\n            sexual relations between Black and white people were\n            against the law and transgresses \"rules of propriety\". In\n            general, films that displayed sexual content were strictly\n            censored or rejected in toto. In one report the suggested\n            that \"some of the bedroom scenes are particularly\n            disgusting and are calculated to shock even the most\n            vulgar.\" Violent films and movies emphasizing racial\n            situations were rejected due to concerns that these movies\n            might incite people to riot. The Censors rejected a 1947\n            movie entitled \"The Burning Cross,\" (a film portraying the\n            Ku Klux Klan in a negative light) because of the films'\n            tendencies to \"excite prejudices and intense emotions\n            thereby reviving controversies and disputes that the\n            Censors' believes presently to be quiet, and not now\n            occupying the public attention\". The Censors' insisted that\n            the film be banned despite objections from religious\n            leaders and civil rights organizations such as the N.A.A.C.\n            P., which wanted the film shown to help counter the \"more\n            than a score of years of propaganda\" in support of the\n            K.K.K. in the movie industry. The civil rights organization\n            was perplexed by the Board's action since they had\n            supposedly allowed the showing of \"The Birth of a Nation\",\n            a film that portrayed the Klan in a most favorable light.\n            In, 1924 a movie entitled \"A Son of Satan\" \"released by a\n            colored concern\" was banned in toto because it portrayed \"a\n            mulatto whose villainies were inherited by his white\n            forefathers\". Arranged alphabetically.","Series XV: GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE AND CONTROVERSIAL\n            FILMS, 1922-1966 (2.7 cu. ft.) This series combines general\n            correspondence of the agency director and correspondence\n            regarding films that were eliminated for viewing within the\n            state of Virginia. The correspondences consist of letters\n            mailed to movie distributors, court documents as well as\n            correspondence from the state's Attorney General. The\n            series includes selected promotional movie posters,\n            examples of advertisements in movie industry trade\n            magazines and scripts of some of the movies listed. There\n            are recurring issues that caused grave concern for the\n            Censors. Among those issues of concern are films that\n            depict \"miscegenation\". It is noted in the records that\n            sexual relations between Black and white people were\n            against the law and transgresses \"rules of propriety\". In\n            general, films that displayed sexual content were strictly\n            censored or rejected in toto. In one report the suggested\n            that \"some of the bedroom scenes are particularly\n            disgusting and are calculated to shock even the most\n            vulgar.\" Violent films and movies emphasizing racial\n            situations were rejected due to concerns that these movies\n            might incite people to riot. The Censors rejected a 1947\n            movie entitled \"The Burning Cross,\" (a film portraying the\n            Ku Klux Klan in a negative light) because of the films'\n            tendencies to \"excite prejudices and intense emotions\n            thereby reviving controversies and disputes that the\n            Censors' believes presently to be quiet, and not now\n            occupying the public attention\". The Censors' insisted that\n            the film be banned despite objections from religious\n            leaders and civil rights organizations such as the N.A.A.C.\n            P., which wanted the film shown to help counter the \"more\n            than a score of years of propaganda\" in support of the\n            K.K.K. in the movie industry. The civil rights organization\n            was perplexed by the Board's action since they had\n            supposedly allowed the showing of \"The Birth of a Nation\",\n            a film that portrayed the Klan in a most favorable light.\n            In, 1924 a movie entitled \"A Son of Satan\" \"released by a\n            colored concern\" was banned in toto because it portrayed \"a\n            mulatto whose villainies were inherited by his white\n            forefathers\". Arranged alphabetically.","Series VI: CENSORSHIP REPORTS, 1960-1965 (.8 cu. ft.)\n            This series documents the work of censorship boards in\n            other states and Canada. The format of the reports vary\n            however, all the reports provide movie titles, scenes\n            deleted from movies, total number of prints and the studio\n            responsible for producing the film. Arranged\n            chronologically by date of report.","Series VI: CENSORSHIP REPORTS, 1960-1965 (.8 cu. ft.)\n            This series documents the work of censorship boards in\n            other states and Canada. The format of the reports vary\n            however, all the reports provide movie titles, scenes\n            deleted from movies, total number of prints and the studio\n            responsible for producing the film. Arranged\n            chronologically by date of report.","This series offers the actual application for license\n               to show and distribute films in the state of Virginia.\n               The form contains the following information: date of\n               license, title of movie or serial, names of lead\n               characters, print number, duplicate number, reel\n               footage, name of studio and address, notarized signature\n               of designated representative for the studio and the date\n               and signature of the notary public. The reverse side of\n               the form may contain comments or remarks regarding the\n               elimination of offensive parts of a film or the total\n               rejection of a film due to its immoral content.","This series contains two types of certificates,\n               organized as Regular and Non-Regular Licenses. Both\n               Regular and Non-Regular license certificates consists of\n               two types of numbered forms. The license certificate\n               entitled Licenses For Duplicates (Form 4) certifies that\n               a motion picture studio is permitted to exhibit and\n               display a film within the State of Virginia. The form\n               contains the title of the movie, the date the\n               certificate was issued, the amount of fee paid by the\n               studio, serial number, print number and the signature of\n               the Director of the Division of Motion Picture\n               Censorship. The second form is entitled Copy of\n               Application For Substitute Seal Original Receipted and\n               Returned to Applicant (Form 8). This form gives the\n               studio name, the title of the film, date issued and name\n               of the Director. The form states that the movie studio\n               is applying for a substitute seal to be attached to a\n               print of the film previously censored and approved by\n               the Division.","The major difference between Regular and Non-Regular\n               Licenses appears to be the arrangement order and time\n               period. Regular Licenses are arranged by the prefix CS\n               and cover the early 1950's to 1965 while the Non-Regular\n               Licenses are arranged chronologically by serial number\n               and cover the early 1960's.","This series contains 4x6 index cards that serve as an\n               index to the non-regular licenses and the license\n               applications. The index provides the motion picture\n               title, dat of license or application, studio releasing\n               the film and serial number. The pink index cards provide\n               notations about the status of the film, such as, whether\n               a seal has been issued for a film, whether the film was\n               eliminated or \"rejected in toto\", meaning it could not\n               be shown in the state, and the conditional approval of a\n               film with the seal of Virginia issued at a later date.\n               The index does not apply to the regular licenses.","This series contains 4x6 index cards that served as\n               attendance forms for imployees of the Division of Motion\n               Picture Censorship. Each card has the name of the\n               employee, day of the week, check mark for when the\n               employee was present or on sick/vacation leave, and the\n               signature of employees.","This series consists of 4x6 index cards giving an\n               alphabetical listing of movie theaters and a separate\n               listing for the name and address of inspectors along\n               with the names of the theaters they were responsible for\n               monitoring. The movie theaters are organized by location\n               of county, city or town. The index cards have notations\n               for \"Negro\" inspectores and/or \"Negro\" owned theaters.\n               The cards are divided into active (white color cards)\n               and inactive (pink color cards) cards. There is a\n               separate listing of index cards for inspectors of\n               drive-in theaters.","This series provides a typed listing of movie titles,\n               seal numbers, and notations of films eliminated or\n               approved for viewing within the state. Some of the\n               listings supply only the date, movie title, serial\n               number and name of the studio releasing the film.","This series consists of five volumes, one tablet, and\n               a selection of financial reports that are Daily Billings\n               (the form is entitled Film Record), which provide an\n               overview of the financial housekeeping of the agency.\n               There are three volumes entitled Cash Receipts dated\n               1950-1966 that provide an accounting ledger format with\n               columns for dates of transactions, studio names and\n               assigned license number, fees for original and duplicate\n               licenses, news reels charges and substitute seal fee,\n               along with totals for all columns.","There are two volumes entitles Disbursements dated\n               1949-1950 that are organized in similar format to the\n               Cash Receipts. The columns in these two volumes are\n               identified follows: salaries, wages, repairs,\n               maintenance service contract, travel, transportation,\n               communications, printing, other expenses, office\n               supplies, photographic, supplies, other supplies, office\n               equipment, fire insurance, workmen's compensation,\n               surety insurance, technical subscriptions, and capital\n               outlay.","The one tablet entitled Office Cash Vouchers is dated\n               1962 and is an accounting booklet for the office petty\n               cash fund. The column headings in this tablet are for\n               date of transaction, nature of disbursement, amount\n               paid, totals and signatures for those authorized to\n               approve payment, certification for the correct\n               reimbursement and the checker of the transaction.","The Daily Billings or Film Record are dated 1960-1965\n               and provide and insightful account of the amount of fees\n               generated by charges applied to studios for original and\n               duplicate prints and the seal of issuance. The contains\n               the title of the movie, studio releasing film, number of\n               reels, total footage amount, print number, original seal\n               number, duplicate seal number, substitute seal number\n               and total of fees collected. Some reports have adding\n               machine tabulations attached to them.","This series contains the office voucher files for the\n               Division of Motion Picture Censorship. The files provide\n               information on financial management as well as\n               procedures for the operation and administration of the\n               Division. There are also annual reports and attendance\n               reports for the censors. Some topical files include\n               information on the Commonwealth's personnel act,\n               procurement procedures and monthly reports of monies\n               collected by the Division. These records include a\n               sampling of blank forms used by the Division during it's\n               operation.","This series consists of forms entitled Film Clerk's\n               Report. This form consists of multiple pages with the\n               following categories and headings: Title (movie title),\n               Exchange (studio name), Number of Reel, Footage, Print\n               Number, Original Seal Number, Duplicate Print Number,\n               Duplicate Seal Number, and Substitute Seal. Not all\n               categories on the form contain information.","This series contains the yearly reports for the\n               Censorship Division as submitted to the Governor. The\n               reports provide a detailed narrative and statistical\n               breakdown of the activities for the fiscal year. The\n               first report reflects in detail the standard used in the\n               elimination and/or rejection of certain films. The main\n               purpose for censorship was to prevent the display of\n               \"obscene, indecent, immoral or inhuman films of such\n               character that their exhibition would tend to corrupt\n               morals or incite crime.\"","The earlier reports (roughly 1924-1935) offer a\n               descriptive narrative acount of the activities of the\n               Board. The reports of the 1920's document the\n               improprieties of certain comic films of the day. One\n               report states that \"directors seem willing to violate\n               all the refinements and all conventions in order to get\n               a laugh.\" There are descriptions of total scenes cut\n               from films along with examples given of specific movies\n               and the reasons for the \"slicing\". The report for\n               1927-1928 highlights the advent of the new technology in\n               motion pictures, \"the talkies\". Among the concerns of\n               the Board about the new technology was the cost of\n               purchasing new projectors that would allow viewing and\n               editing of synchronized films. In the annual report of\n               1931 comments are made about the \"great onslaught of\n               gang pictures\". This \"problem\" was not seen as vital for\n               Virginia as for the \"northern states where foreign\n               population is greater\". Nonetheless, the censors\n               considered gangster movies fostered a \"disagreeable\n               situation\" that members of the Division hoped producers\n               of this genre of film would \"tone down in the\n               future\".","In the 1941 report advances in technology are\n               highlighted with the introduction of a new projector\n               known as the \"Juke Box\" that used sixteen millimeter\n               film. Once again, the report documents concerns about\n               getting state appropriations for the purchase of new\n               equipment. The reports for 1943-1944 make note of the\n               surprise in the increase in the number of films due to\n               the fact of restrictions placed on raw materials\n               (including film) during World War II.","The reports for later years (roughly 1947-1965) are\n               more statistical and less narrative in composition. The\n               statistical tables give a numerical breakdown of films.\n               The headings in the report include Totals for the Years,\n               Elimination, Rejections, Receipts, Disbursements, and\n               Revenue Refunds. The financial statements provide the\n               amount of fees collected and turned over to the state\n               treasurer. Often the statements will include\n               disbursements of operating expenses and capital\n               outlays.","This series consists of forms sent to the studios\n               documenting in writing the eliminated scenes or cuts\n               from feature films. The form contains the name and\n               address of the studio, title of the movie, a brief and\n               graphice description of the scene cut from the original\n               movie, and the signatures of the Director of the\n               Division of Motion Picture Censorship an the authorized\n               agent for the studio. The form usually has triplicate\n               copies and sometimes includes an attachment of\n               correspondence between censors and studio\n               executives.","This series consists of carbon copies of letters\n               mailed from the various director's of the Division of\n               Motion Picture Censorship and the other censors. The\n               letters cover a wide range of topics including the\n               discussion with studio executives regarding censorship\n               decisions made by the division. The files include\n               information on the daily operations of the division\n               along with the records from two prominent former\n               directors, Mrs. Lollie C. Whitehead and Mrs. russell F.\n               Wagers.","This series consists of copies of outgoing and\n               incoming letters between the Director of the Division of\n               Motion Picture Censorship and theater and drive-in\n               owners of viable theater within the state. The\n               correspondence mainly conists of letters from the\n               director seeking recommendations for the names of\n               individuals to work as inspectors, to view films, and\n               verify that the state seal had been appropriately\n               applied to the print. The files are organized by the\n               name of the theater and include the theater location.\n               The files have special notations for \"Negro\" only\n               theaters and inspectors. There are also report forms\n               that list the number of admission cards issued to an\n               inspector.","This series offers the outgoing and incoming letters\n               between the Director of the Division of Motion Picture\n               Censorship and the owners of theaters and drive-ins that\n               were no longer in existence. The correspondence mainly\n               consists of inquiries by the Director for the name of\n               inspectors for the theaters and notification to the\n               Director that the theater or drive-in is no longer in\n               operation. Some files may contain returned admission\n               cards issued to inspectors for their free admittance\n               into the theaters. These files include index cards with\n               the name and address of the inspector assigned to a\n               specific theater.","This series combines general correspondence of the\n               agency director and correspondence regarding films that\n               were eliminated for viewing within the state of\n               Virginia. The correspondence consists of letters mailed\n               to movie distributors and court documents, as well as\n               correspondence from the state's Attorney General. The\n               series also includes selected promotional movie posters,\n               examples of advertisements in movie industry trade\n               magazines, and scripts of some of the movies listed.","This series documents the work of censorship boards\n               in other states and Canada. The format of the reports\n               vary, however all reports provide movie titles, scenes\n               deleted from movies, total number of prints, and the\n               studio responsible for producing the film."],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions"],"userestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions."],"physloc_html_tesm":["\u003cphysloc label=\"Physical Location\"\u003eState Records Collection,\n         Acc. 26515\u003c/physloc\u003e"],"physloc_tesim":["State Records Collection,\n         Acc. 26515"],"language_ssim":["English"],"total_component_count_is":1647,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:16:53.688Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi00090_c13_c281"}},{"id":"vi_vi01266_c02_c273","type":"Subseries","attributes":{"title":"Zeppelin, Hindenburg,\n\t1937","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi01266_c02_c273#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi01266_c02_c273","ref_ssm":["vi_vi01266_c02_c273"],"id":"vi_vi01266_c02_c273","ead_ssi":"vi_vi01266","_root_":"vi_vi01266","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi01266_c02","parent_ssi":"vi_vi01266_c02","parent_ssim":["vi_vi01266","vi_vi01266_c02"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi01266","vi_vi01266_c02"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)","Series II: Subject files,\n1937-1983 (bulk 1970-1975)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)","Series II: Subject files,\n1937-1983 (bulk 1970-1975)"],"text":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)","Series II: Subject files,\n1937-1983 (bulk 1970-1975)","Zeppelin, Hindenburg,\n\t1937","box 20","folder 20"],"title_filing_ssi":"Zeppelin, Hindenburg,\n\t 1937\n\t","title_ssm":["Zeppelin, Hindenburg,\n\t1937"],"title_tesim":["Zeppelin, Hindenburg,\n\t1937"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Zeppelin, Hindenburg,\n\t1937"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Subseries"],"level_ssim":["Subseries"],"sort_isi":530,"containers_ssim":["box 20","folder 20"],"_nest_path_":"/components#1/components#272","timestamp":"2026-05-21T10:47:16.127Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi01266","ead_ssi":"vi_vi01266","_root_":"vi_vi01266","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi01266","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi01266.xml","title_ssm":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)"],"title_tesim":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["40235\n"],"text":["40235\n","Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)","7 cu. ft. (20 boxes)","Collection is open to research.\n","Arranged into two series: Series I: State/Country Files and Series II: Subject Files.\n","The Pioneer America Society was founded in July 1967 and officially incorporated in December 1968 in Virginia. The founder and executive director was Henry H. Douglas (1903-1987). The Society's mission was to record and document the evidence of America's cultural landscape, architecture, and artifacts and encourage educational programs, scholarly research, and preservation. The organization published the newsletters, \"Pioneer America\" and \"Echoes of History.\" In 1976 due to financial deficits the Society was disbanned and publication of \"Echoes of History\" was discontinued. At a later point the organization was re-established and is currently active (2006). \n","Records, 1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976) of the Pioneer America Society, based in Falls Church, Virginia. The files were collected by Henry H. Douglas, Executive Director of the Pioneer Society of America and were maintained in their original order. The records are arranged into two series: 1. State/Country Files and 2. Subject Files. \n","The records document the efforts of the organization to detail and record information on historical buildings, landscapes, people, and towns in America. The files include brochures, clippings, correspondence, data sheets, maps, photographs, and postcards. Also included are various newsletters from local and national organizations. The collection does not contain any of the organizations internal files such as financial records, membership lists, or minutes, although some correspondence is included. Rather the collection consists of files the organization gathered for information purposes on subjects they considered important for their mission of documenting America's historic treasures.  ","Series I: State/Country Files, 1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1978). This series consists of booklets, clippings, correspondence, newsletters, photographs, and postcards collected on various conservation topics. The files are arranged by state name and includes some foreign country files such as China, Japan, Russia, and Siberia. Topics include the documentation of the towns and villages in America; the history of canals, farms, forts, gold mines, mills, and railroads; how growth of cities threaten historical sites; and efforts and grants by individuals, societies, and the government to save historic sites. Also includes brochures from museums, historical sites, and local tourist bureaus across the country. Includes newsletters from the American Canal Society, Kansas Historical Society Mirror, The Long Island in History Series, Montana Post, Pennsylvania Heritage, and Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission. The files on Maryland and Virginia are the most complete, with files for cities and counties in the state.","\nOf note are the data sheets, prepared by the Pioneer America Society. These data sheets include information on various buildings and people noted for their historical significance. The sheets include the location and coordinates, photographs, and notes. The photographs are of various historic buildings such as churches, farms, homes, post offices, and schools, and of local people. Some of the data sheets also include notes and descriptions of the buildings, especially if a photograph is not attached. These data sheets are informative, but unfortunately very dispersed within the collection. Most can be found within the Pennsylvania and Virginia files. ","Also included are letters to Henry H. Douglas from other organizations asking for copies of books or newsletters published by the society, from members, and sharing information to be included in the society's newsletter. Also included are files on William E. Barrett (b. 1927), a photographer from Clifton, Virginia. He donated photographs to be used in the publications, Echoes of History and Pioneer America. Included are copies of photographs and images from a calendar of historic structures in Virginia.","Series II: Subject Files, 1937-1983 (bulk 1970-1975). This series also consists of booklets, clippings, magazine articles, minutes, newsletters, and postcards collected on various conservation topics, arranged by subject, rather than by location. Subject files include architecture, automobiles, bicentennial, blast furnaces, circuses, civil war, covered bridges, farming, Indians, Thomas Jefferson, lime kilns, living history, money raising, National Endowment for the Humanities, people, photography, pollution, preservation, railroads, rivers, roads, tobacco, trolleys, George Washington, wilderness, and Zeppelins, among others. ","Includes newsletters from the American Folklore Society, Bicentennial Newsletter, Council on Abandoned MIlitary Posts, Early Man, The Headway Recorder (National Capital Historical Museum of Transportation) Living Historical Fams Bulletin, Lynchburg Historical Society, Old Mills News, Pennsylvania Canal Society, Shenandoah Vallye Folklore Society, Society for Industrial Archeology, Society of Architectural Historians, and the Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission. ","There are no restrictions.\n","English\n"],"unitid_tesim":["40235\n"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)"],"collection_title_tesim":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)"],"collection_ssim":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"acqinfo_ssim":["Donor information unavailable.\n"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["7 cu. ft. (20 boxes)"],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eCollection is open to research.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions\n"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["Collection is open to research.\n"],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eArranged into two series: Series I: State/Country Files and Series II: Subject Files.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["Arranged into two series: Series I: State/Country Files and Series II: Subject Files.\n"],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe Pioneer America Society was founded in July 1967 and officially incorporated in December 1968 in Virginia. The founder and executive director was Henry H. Douglas (1903-1987). The Society's mission was to record and document the evidence of America's cultural landscape, architecture, and artifacts and encourage educational programs, scholarly research, and preservation. The organization published the newsletters, \"Pioneer America\" and \"Echoes of History.\" In 1976 due to financial deficits the Society was disbanned and publication of \"Echoes of History\" was discontinued. At a later point the organization was re-established and is currently active (2006). \n\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Biographical Information\n"],"bioghist_tesim":["The Pioneer America Society was founded in July 1967 and officially incorporated in December 1968 in Virginia. The founder and executive director was Henry H. Douglas (1903-1987). The Society's mission was to record and document the evidence of America's cultural landscape, architecture, and artifacts and encourage educational programs, scholarly research, and preservation. The organization published the newsletters, \"Pioneer America\" and \"Echoes of History.\" In 1976 due to financial deficits the Society was disbanned and publication of \"Echoes of History\" was discontinued. At a later point the organization was re-established and is currently active (2006). \n"],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003ePioneer America Society. Records, 1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976). Accession 40235. Organization Records Collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Va. 23219.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Pioneer America Society. Records, 1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976). Accession 40235. Organization Records Collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Va. 23219.\n"],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eRecords, 1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976) of the Pioneer America Society, based in Falls Church, Virginia. The files were collected by Henry H. Douglas, Executive Director of the Pioneer Society of America and were maintained in their original order. The records are arranged into two series: 1. State/Country Files and 2. Subject Files. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe records document the efforts of the organization to detail and record information on historical buildings, landscapes, people, and towns in America. The files include brochures, clippings, correspondence, data sheets, maps, photographs, and postcards. Also included are various newsletters from local and national organizations. The collection does not contain any of the organizations internal files such as financial records, membership lists, or minutes, although some correspondence is included. Rather the collection consists of files the organization gathered for information purposes on subjects they considered important for their mission of documenting America's historic treasures.  \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries I: State/Country Files, 1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1978). This series consists of booklets, clippings, correspondence, newsletters, photographs, and postcards collected on various conservation topics. The files are arranged by state name and includes some foreign country files such as China, Japan, Russia, and Siberia. Topics include the documentation of the towns and villages in America; the history of canals, farms, forts, gold mines, mills, and railroads; how growth of cities threaten historical sites; and efforts and grants by individuals, societies, and the government to save historic sites. Also includes brochures from museums, historical sites, and local tourist bureaus across the country. Includes newsletters from the American Canal Society, Kansas Historical Society Mirror, The Long Island in History Series, Montana Post, Pennsylvania Heritage, and Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission. The files on Maryland and Virginia are the most complete, with files for cities and counties in the state.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nOf note are the data sheets, prepared by the Pioneer America Society. These data sheets include information on various buildings and people noted for their historical significance. The sheets include the location and coordinates, photographs, and notes. The photographs are of various historic buildings such as churches, farms, homes, post offices, and schools, and of local people. Some of the data sheets also include notes and descriptions of the buildings, especially if a photograph is not attached. These data sheets are informative, but unfortunately very dispersed within the collection. Most can be found within the Pennsylvania and Virginia files. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAlso included are letters to Henry H. Douglas from other organizations asking for copies of books or newsletters published by the society, from members, and sharing information to be included in the society's newsletter. Also included are files on William E. Barrett (b. 1927), a photographer from Clifton, Virginia. He donated photographs to be used in the publications, Echoes of History and Pioneer America. Included are copies of photographs and images from a calendar of historic structures in Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries II: Subject Files, 1937-1983 (bulk 1970-1975). This series also consists of booklets, clippings, magazine articles, minutes, newsletters, and postcards collected on various conservation topics, arranged by subject, rather than by location. Subject files include architecture, automobiles, bicentennial, blast furnaces, circuses, civil war, covered bridges, farming, Indians, Thomas Jefferson, lime kilns, living history, money raising, National Endowment for the Humanities, people, photography, pollution, preservation, railroads, rivers, roads, tobacco, trolleys, George Washington, wilderness, and Zeppelins, among others. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIncludes newsletters from the American Folklore Society, Bicentennial Newsletter, Council on Abandoned MIlitary Posts, Early Man, The Headway Recorder (National Capital Historical Museum of Transportation) Living Historical Fams Bulletin, Lynchburg Historical Society, Old Mills News, Pennsylvania Canal Society, Shenandoah Vallye Folklore Society, Society for Industrial Archeology, Society of Architectural Historians, and the Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission. \u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Records, 1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976) of the Pioneer America Society, based in Falls Church, Virginia. The files were collected by Henry H. Douglas, Executive Director of the Pioneer Society of America and were maintained in their original order. The records are arranged into two series: 1. State/Country Files and 2. Subject Files. \n","The records document the efforts of the organization to detail and record information on historical buildings, landscapes, people, and towns in America. The files include brochures, clippings, correspondence, data sheets, maps, photographs, and postcards. Also included are various newsletters from local and national organizations. The collection does not contain any of the organizations internal files such as financial records, membership lists, or minutes, although some correspondence is included. Rather the collection consists of files the organization gathered for information purposes on subjects they considered important for their mission of documenting America's historic treasures.  ","Series I: State/Country Files, 1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1978). This series consists of booklets, clippings, correspondence, newsletters, photographs, and postcards collected on various conservation topics. The files are arranged by state name and includes some foreign country files such as China, Japan, Russia, and Siberia. Topics include the documentation of the towns and villages in America; the history of canals, farms, forts, gold mines, mills, and railroads; how growth of cities threaten historical sites; and efforts and grants by individuals, societies, and the government to save historic sites. Also includes brochures from museums, historical sites, and local tourist bureaus across the country. Includes newsletters from the American Canal Society, Kansas Historical Society Mirror, The Long Island in History Series, Montana Post, Pennsylvania Heritage, and Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission. The files on Maryland and Virginia are the most complete, with files for cities and counties in the state.","\nOf note are the data sheets, prepared by the Pioneer America Society. These data sheets include information on various buildings and people noted for their historical significance. The sheets include the location and coordinates, photographs, and notes. The photographs are of various historic buildings such as churches, farms, homes, post offices, and schools, and of local people. Some of the data sheets also include notes and descriptions of the buildings, especially if a photograph is not attached. These data sheets are informative, but unfortunately very dispersed within the collection. Most can be found within the Pennsylvania and Virginia files. ","Also included are letters to Henry H. Douglas from other organizations asking for copies of books or newsletters published by the society, from members, and sharing information to be included in the society's newsletter. Also included are files on William E. Barrett (b. 1927), a photographer from Clifton, Virginia. He donated photographs to be used in the publications, Echoes of History and Pioneer America. Included are copies of photographs and images from a calendar of historic structures in Virginia.","Series II: Subject Files, 1937-1983 (bulk 1970-1975). This series also consists of booklets, clippings, magazine articles, minutes, newsletters, and postcards collected on various conservation topics, arranged by subject, rather than by location. Subject files include architecture, automobiles, bicentennial, blast furnaces, circuses, civil war, covered bridges, farming, Indians, Thomas Jefferson, lime kilns, living history, money raising, National Endowment for the Humanities, people, photography, pollution, preservation, railroads, rivers, roads, tobacco, trolleys, George Washington, wilderness, and Zeppelins, among others. ","Includes newsletters from the American Folklore Society, Bicentennial Newsletter, Council on Abandoned MIlitary Posts, Early Man, The Headway Recorder (National Capital Historical Museum of Transportation) Living Historical Fams Bulletin, Lynchburg Historical Society, Old Mills News, Pennsylvania Canal Society, Shenandoah Vallye Folklore Society, Society for Industrial Archeology, Society of Architectural Historians, and the Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission. "],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions\n"],"userestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions.\n"],"language_ssim":["English\n"],"total_component_count_is":531,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T10:47:16.127Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi01266_c02_c273"}},{"id":"vi_vi01266_c02_c272","type":"Subseries","attributes":{"title":"Zeppelins,\n\t1973","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi01266_c02_c272#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi01266_c02_c272","ref_ssm":["vi_vi01266_c02_c272"],"id":"vi_vi01266_c02_c272","ead_ssi":"vi_vi01266","_root_":"vi_vi01266","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi01266_c02","parent_ssi":"vi_vi01266_c02","parent_ssim":["vi_vi01266","vi_vi01266_c02"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi01266","vi_vi01266_c02"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)","Series II: Subject files,\n1937-1983 (bulk 1970-1975)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)","Series II: Subject files,\n1937-1983 (bulk 1970-1975)"],"text":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)","Series II: Subject files,\n1937-1983 (bulk 1970-1975)","Zeppelins,\n\t1973","box 20","folder 19"],"title_filing_ssi":"Zeppelins,\n\t 1973\n\t","title_ssm":["Zeppelins,\n\t1973"],"title_tesim":["Zeppelins,\n\t1973"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Zeppelins,\n\t1973"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Subseries"],"level_ssim":["Subseries"],"sort_isi":529,"containers_ssim":["box 20","folder 19"],"_nest_path_":"/components#1/components#271","timestamp":"2026-05-21T10:47:16.127Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi01266","ead_ssi":"vi_vi01266","_root_":"vi_vi01266","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi01266","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi01266.xml","title_ssm":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)"],"title_tesim":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["40235\n"],"text":["40235\n","Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)","7 cu. ft. (20 boxes)","Collection is open to research.\n","Arranged into two series: Series I: State/Country Files and Series II: Subject Files.\n","The Pioneer America Society was founded in July 1967 and officially incorporated in December 1968 in Virginia. The founder and executive director was Henry H. Douglas (1903-1987). The Society's mission was to record and document the evidence of America's cultural landscape, architecture, and artifacts and encourage educational programs, scholarly research, and preservation. The organization published the newsletters, \"Pioneer America\" and \"Echoes of History.\" In 1976 due to financial deficits the Society was disbanned and publication of \"Echoes of History\" was discontinued. At a later point the organization was re-established and is currently active (2006). \n","Records, 1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976) of the Pioneer America Society, based in Falls Church, Virginia. The files were collected by Henry H. Douglas, Executive Director of the Pioneer Society of America and were maintained in their original order. The records are arranged into two series: 1. State/Country Files and 2. Subject Files. \n","The records document the efforts of the organization to detail and record information on historical buildings, landscapes, people, and towns in America. The files include brochures, clippings, correspondence, data sheets, maps, photographs, and postcards. Also included are various newsletters from local and national organizations. The collection does not contain any of the organizations internal files such as financial records, membership lists, or minutes, although some correspondence is included. Rather the collection consists of files the organization gathered for information purposes on subjects they considered important for their mission of documenting America's historic treasures.  ","Series I: State/Country Files, 1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1978). This series consists of booklets, clippings, correspondence, newsletters, photographs, and postcards collected on various conservation topics. The files are arranged by state name and includes some foreign country files such as China, Japan, Russia, and Siberia. Topics include the documentation of the towns and villages in America; the history of canals, farms, forts, gold mines, mills, and railroads; how growth of cities threaten historical sites; and efforts and grants by individuals, societies, and the government to save historic sites. Also includes brochures from museums, historical sites, and local tourist bureaus across the country. Includes newsletters from the American Canal Society, Kansas Historical Society Mirror, The Long Island in History Series, Montana Post, Pennsylvania Heritage, and Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission. The files on Maryland and Virginia are the most complete, with files for cities and counties in the state.","\nOf note are the data sheets, prepared by the Pioneer America Society. These data sheets include information on various buildings and people noted for their historical significance. The sheets include the location and coordinates, photographs, and notes. The photographs are of various historic buildings such as churches, farms, homes, post offices, and schools, and of local people. Some of the data sheets also include notes and descriptions of the buildings, especially if a photograph is not attached. These data sheets are informative, but unfortunately very dispersed within the collection. Most can be found within the Pennsylvania and Virginia files. ","Also included are letters to Henry H. Douglas from other organizations asking for copies of books or newsletters published by the society, from members, and sharing information to be included in the society's newsletter. Also included are files on William E. Barrett (b. 1927), a photographer from Clifton, Virginia. He donated photographs to be used in the publications, Echoes of History and Pioneer America. Included are copies of photographs and images from a calendar of historic structures in Virginia.","Series II: Subject Files, 1937-1983 (bulk 1970-1975). This series also consists of booklets, clippings, magazine articles, minutes, newsletters, and postcards collected on various conservation topics, arranged by subject, rather than by location. Subject files include architecture, automobiles, bicentennial, blast furnaces, circuses, civil war, covered bridges, farming, Indians, Thomas Jefferson, lime kilns, living history, money raising, National Endowment for the Humanities, people, photography, pollution, preservation, railroads, rivers, roads, tobacco, trolleys, George Washington, wilderness, and Zeppelins, among others. ","Includes newsletters from the American Folklore Society, Bicentennial Newsletter, Council on Abandoned MIlitary Posts, Early Man, The Headway Recorder (National Capital Historical Museum of Transportation) Living Historical Fams Bulletin, Lynchburg Historical Society, Old Mills News, Pennsylvania Canal Society, Shenandoah Vallye Folklore Society, Society for Industrial Archeology, Society of Architectural Historians, and the Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission. ","There are no restrictions.\n","English\n"],"unitid_tesim":["40235\n"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)"],"collection_title_tesim":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)"],"collection_ssim":["Pioneer America Society Records\n1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976)"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"acqinfo_ssim":["Donor information unavailable.\n"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["7 cu. ft. (20 boxes)"],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eCollection is open to research.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions\n"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["Collection is open to research.\n"],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eArranged into two series: Series I: State/Country Files and Series II: Subject Files.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["Arranged into two series: Series I: State/Country Files and Series II: Subject Files.\n"],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe Pioneer America Society was founded in July 1967 and officially incorporated in December 1968 in Virginia. The founder and executive director was Henry H. Douglas (1903-1987). The Society's mission was to record and document the evidence of America's cultural landscape, architecture, and artifacts and encourage educational programs, scholarly research, and preservation. The organization published the newsletters, \"Pioneer America\" and \"Echoes of History.\" In 1976 due to financial deficits the Society was disbanned and publication of \"Echoes of History\" was discontinued. At a later point the organization was re-established and is currently active (2006). \n\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Biographical Information\n"],"bioghist_tesim":["The Pioneer America Society was founded in July 1967 and officially incorporated in December 1968 in Virginia. The founder and executive director was Henry H. Douglas (1903-1987). The Society's mission was to record and document the evidence of America's cultural landscape, architecture, and artifacts and encourage educational programs, scholarly research, and preservation. The organization published the newsletters, \"Pioneer America\" and \"Echoes of History.\" In 1976 due to financial deficits the Society was disbanned and publication of \"Echoes of History\" was discontinued. At a later point the organization was re-established and is currently active (2006). \n"],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003ePioneer America Society. Records, 1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976). Accession 40235. Organization Records Collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Va. 23219.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Pioneer America Society. Records, 1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976). Accession 40235. Organization Records Collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Va. 23219.\n"],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eRecords, 1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976) of the Pioneer America Society, based in Falls Church, Virginia. The files were collected by Henry H. Douglas, Executive Director of the Pioneer Society of America and were maintained in their original order. The records are arranged into two series: 1. State/Country Files and 2. Subject Files. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe records document the efforts of the organization to detail and record information on historical buildings, landscapes, people, and towns in America. The files include brochures, clippings, correspondence, data sheets, maps, photographs, and postcards. Also included are various newsletters from local and national organizations. The collection does not contain any of the organizations internal files such as financial records, membership lists, or minutes, although some correspondence is included. Rather the collection consists of files the organization gathered for information purposes on subjects they considered important for their mission of documenting America's historic treasures.  \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries I: State/Country Files, 1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1978). This series consists of booklets, clippings, correspondence, newsletters, photographs, and postcards collected on various conservation topics. The files are arranged by state name and includes some foreign country files such as China, Japan, Russia, and Siberia. Topics include the documentation of the towns and villages in America; the history of canals, farms, forts, gold mines, mills, and railroads; how growth of cities threaten historical sites; and efforts and grants by individuals, societies, and the government to save historic sites. Also includes brochures from museums, historical sites, and local tourist bureaus across the country. Includes newsletters from the American Canal Society, Kansas Historical Society Mirror, The Long Island in History Series, Montana Post, Pennsylvania Heritage, and Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission. The files on Maryland and Virginia are the most complete, with files for cities and counties in the state.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\nOf note are the data sheets, prepared by the Pioneer America Society. These data sheets include information on various buildings and people noted for their historical significance. The sheets include the location and coordinates, photographs, and notes. The photographs are of various historic buildings such as churches, farms, homes, post offices, and schools, and of local people. Some of the data sheets also include notes and descriptions of the buildings, especially if a photograph is not attached. These data sheets are informative, but unfortunately very dispersed within the collection. Most can be found within the Pennsylvania and Virginia files. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAlso included are letters to Henry H. Douglas from other organizations asking for copies of books or newsletters published by the society, from members, and sharing information to be included in the society's newsletter. Also included are files on William E. Barrett (b. 1927), a photographer from Clifton, Virginia. He donated photographs to be used in the publications, Echoes of History and Pioneer America. Included are copies of photographs and images from a calendar of historic structures in Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeries II: Subject Files, 1937-1983 (bulk 1970-1975). This series also consists of booklets, clippings, magazine articles, minutes, newsletters, and postcards collected on various conservation topics, arranged by subject, rather than by location. Subject files include architecture, automobiles, bicentennial, blast furnaces, circuses, civil war, covered bridges, farming, Indians, Thomas Jefferson, lime kilns, living history, money raising, National Endowment for the Humanities, people, photography, pollution, preservation, railroads, rivers, roads, tobacco, trolleys, George Washington, wilderness, and Zeppelins, among others. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIncludes newsletters from the American Folklore Society, Bicentennial Newsletter, Council on Abandoned MIlitary Posts, Early Man, The Headway Recorder (National Capital Historical Museum of Transportation) Living Historical Fams Bulletin, Lynchburg Historical Society, Old Mills News, Pennsylvania Canal Society, Shenandoah Vallye Folklore Society, Society for Industrial Archeology, Society of Architectural Historians, and the Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission. \u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Records, 1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1976) of the Pioneer America Society, based in Falls Church, Virginia. The files were collected by Henry H. Douglas, Executive Director of the Pioneer Society of America and were maintained in their original order. The records are arranged into two series: 1. State/Country Files and 2. Subject Files. \n","The records document the efforts of the organization to detail and record information on historical buildings, landscapes, people, and towns in America. The files include brochures, clippings, correspondence, data sheets, maps, photographs, and postcards. Also included are various newsletters from local and national organizations. The collection does not contain any of the organizations internal files such as financial records, membership lists, or minutes, although some correspondence is included. Rather the collection consists of files the organization gathered for information purposes on subjects they considered important for their mission of documenting America's historic treasures.  ","Series I: State/Country Files, 1929-1984 (bulk 1968-1978). This series consists of booklets, clippings, correspondence, newsletters, photographs, and postcards collected on various conservation topics. The files are arranged by state name and includes some foreign country files such as China, Japan, Russia, and Siberia. Topics include the documentation of the towns and villages in America; the history of canals, farms, forts, gold mines, mills, and railroads; how growth of cities threaten historical sites; and efforts and grants by individuals, societies, and the government to save historic sites. Also includes brochures from museums, historical sites, and local tourist bureaus across the country. Includes newsletters from the American Canal Society, Kansas Historical Society Mirror, The Long Island in History Series, Montana Post, Pennsylvania Heritage, and Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission. The files on Maryland and Virginia are the most complete, with files for cities and counties in the state.","\nOf note are the data sheets, prepared by the Pioneer America Society. These data sheets include information on various buildings and people noted for their historical significance. The sheets include the location and coordinates, photographs, and notes. The photographs are of various historic buildings such as churches, farms, homes, post offices, and schools, and of local people. Some of the data sheets also include notes and descriptions of the buildings, especially if a photograph is not attached. These data sheets are informative, but unfortunately very dispersed within the collection. Most can be found within the Pennsylvania and Virginia files. ","Also included are letters to Henry H. Douglas from other organizations asking for copies of books or newsletters published by the society, from members, and sharing information to be included in the society's newsletter. Also included are files on William E. Barrett (b. 1927), a photographer from Clifton, Virginia. He donated photographs to be used in the publications, Echoes of History and Pioneer America. Included are copies of photographs and images from a calendar of historic structures in Virginia.","Series II: Subject Files, 1937-1983 (bulk 1970-1975). This series also consists of booklets, clippings, magazine articles, minutes, newsletters, and postcards collected on various conservation topics, arranged by subject, rather than by location. Subject files include architecture, automobiles, bicentennial, blast furnaces, circuses, civil war, covered bridges, farming, Indians, Thomas Jefferson, lime kilns, living history, money raising, National Endowment for the Humanities, people, photography, pollution, preservation, railroads, rivers, roads, tobacco, trolleys, George Washington, wilderness, and Zeppelins, among others. ","Includes newsletters from the American Folklore Society, Bicentennial Newsletter, Council on Abandoned MIlitary Posts, Early Man, The Headway Recorder (National Capital Historical Museum of Transportation) Living Historical Fams Bulletin, Lynchburg Historical Society, Old Mills News, Pennsylvania Canal Society, Shenandoah Vallye Folklore Society, Society for Industrial Archeology, Society of Architectural Historians, and the Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission. "],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions\n"],"userestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions.\n"],"language_ssim":["English\n"],"total_component_count_is":531,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T10:47:16.127Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi01266_c02_c272"}},{"id":"vi_vi00158_c03_c02_c17","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Zerkel, L. Ferdinand: \n                     1943, 1951, 1954","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi00158_c03_c02_c17#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi00158_c03_c02_c17","ref_ssm":["vi_vi00158_c03_c02_c17"],"id":"vi_vi00158_c03_c02_c17","ead_ssi":"vi_vi00158","_root_":"vi_vi00158","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi00158_c03_c02","parent_ssi":"vi_vi00158_c03_c02","parent_ssim":["vi_vi00158","vi_vi00158_c03","vi_vi00158_c03_c02"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi00158","vi_vi00158_c03","vi_vi00158_c03_c02"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["George Bernard Lorraine Records, \n         ca.\n         1925-1976","Series III: Miscellaneous business\n               correspondence and records","Broker and owner\n                  correspondence"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["George Bernard Lorraine Records, \n         ca.\n         1925-1976","Series III: Miscellaneous business\n               correspondence and records","Broker and owner\n                  correspondence"],"text":["George Bernard Lorraine Records, \n         ca.\n         1925-1976","Series III: Miscellaneous business\n               correspondence and records","Broker and owner\n                  correspondence","Zerkel, L. Ferdinand: \n                     1943, 1951, 1954","box 151","Folder \n                     17"],"title_filing_ssi":"Zerkel, L. Ferdinand: \n                      1943, 1951, 1954","title_ssm":["Zerkel, L. Ferdinand: \n                     1943, 1951, 1954"],"title_tesim":["Zerkel, L. Ferdinand: \n                     1943, 1951, 1954"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Zerkel, L. Ferdinand: \n                     1943, 1951, 1954"],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["George Bernard Lorraine Records, \n         ca.\n         1925-1976"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":3367,"containers_ssim":["box 151","Folder \n                     17"],"_nest_path_":"/components#2/components#1/components#16","timestamp":"2026-05-21T09:04:39.709Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi00158","ead_ssi":"vi_vi00158","_root_":"vi_vi00158","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi00158","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi00158.xml","title_ssm":["George Bernard Lorraine Records, \n         ca.\n         1925-1976"],"title_tesim":["George Bernard Lorraine Records, \n         ca.\n         1925-1976"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["31042"],"text":["31042","George Bernard Lorraine Records, \n         ca.\n         1925-1976","85.70 cubic feet; 161 Hollinger\n         boxes, 13 file card boxes, 9 map case drawers","There are no restrictions.","The collection is organized into the following series and\n         sub-series: Series I: Real estate records (Sub-series A:\n         Virginia real estate (bulk), Sub-series B: Out-of-state real\n         estate); Series II: Oversize (Sub- series A: Virginia real\n         estate maps and plats (bulk), Sub-series B: Out-of-state real\n         estate maps and plats, Sub-series C: Miscellaneous and\n         unidentified property maps and plats); Series III:\n         Miscellaneous business correspondence and records; Series IV:\n         Publications; Series V: File cards.","George Bernard Lorraine (12 January 1887- 7 January 1976),\n         son of Charles Lorraine (1853-1939) and Martha Bohannan\n         Lorraine (1852-1930), was a real estate broker and agent in\n         Richmond and later Heathsville, Northumberland County,\n         Virginia. He specialized in the sale of large private estates\n         in Tidewater and eastern Virginia; although, he also did\n         business in other Virginia locales and out-of-state. He was\n         married to Estelle LeGrand Lorraine (1896-1978), and the pair\n         had two children, John Knowles Lorraine and Margaret Lorraine\n         Bleser. He died in Tappahannock Hospital in Essex and was\n         interred in St. Stephens Episcopal Church Cemetery in\n         Heathsville.","The records, ca. 1925-1976, of George Bernard Lorraine,\n         real estate broker and agent in the City of Richmond and\n         Northumberland County, Virginia, consist of advertising, real\n         estate agreements, blueprints, checks, clippings,\n         correspondence (letters), house keys, maps, notes, obituaries,\n         pamphlets, periodicals, photographs, plats, postcards,\n         receipts, and surveys. They generally relate to Lorraine's\n         real estate business, an enterprise encompassing a broad array\n         of purchases and sales for land, businesses, houses, farms,\n         and private estates both in Virginia and out-of-state. A\n         significant number of these properties date their construction\n         to the 19th, 18th and even 17th centuries. Notable properties\n         Lorraine brokered include: Christ's Cross (Criss Cross),\n         Dewberry, Edgewood, Keswick, Kingsmill Plantation, Locksley\n         Hall, Mitchie Tavern, Powhite, Scotchtown, Wilton, and many\n         Virginia Landmarks Register, National Register of Historic\n         Properties, Historic American Building Survey, and Historic\n         Virginia Building Survey properties.","Arranged into Virginia and out-of-state sub-series,\n               this series contains advertising, clippings,\n               correspondence, deeds, maps, notes, obituaries,\n               photographs, plats, postcards, property descriptions,\n               surveys, and real estate agreements pertaining to\n               properties George B. Lorraine brokered, purchased,\n               advertised, or sold. The Virginia sub-series consists of\n               real estate listings arranged alphabetically by county\n               or township. The out-of-state sub-series is arranged\n               alphabetically by state. Within both the Virginia and\n               out-of-state sub-series, properties are arranged\n               alphabetically first according to name. Properties\n               without names follow second and are arranged\n               alphabetically by property owner's surname. For most\n               counties and states, there also exists miscellaneous\n               letter and miscellaneous real estate listings files. The\n               file arrangement for Series I remains consistent with\n               the order established by the brokerage.","Material within this series highlights the buying and\n               selling process undertaken by Lorraine and his real\n               estate brokerage for each property. The correspondence\n               principally consists of letters exchanged between\n               Lorraine's brokerage and other brokers and realtors,\n               prospective buyers, estate administrators, property\n               owners, real estate attorneys, and government officials.\n               Real estate agreements between Lorraine's brokerage,\n               owners, and buyers detail well-defined property\n               descriptions and often accompany the correspondence, as\n               does a profuse amount of property descriptions written\n               for purposes of promotion and distribution to\n               prospective buyers and advertisers. An extensive array\n               of photographs includes exterior, interior, and aerial\n               views of a respective plat's buildings and the adjoining\n               landscape. Copies of these photographs often were\n               distributed to prospective buyers and also occasionally\n               reappear in advertisements written by Lorraine for\n               distribution to prospective buyers, magazines and\n               newspapers. The large bulk of advertisements does not\n               contain images and exists in the form of newspaper\n               clippings from the classifieds. For some of the more\n               famed and recognized properties, clippings held in these\n               files help to establish the history of an estate or a\n               past owner of an estate. There are also obituaries that\n               often denote the death of an estate owner. Smaller maps\n               and plats also are included in these files, while larger\n               maps and plats have been removed and placed in the\n               oversize collection. These maps and plats often denote\n               acreage, architectural measurements, boundaries and\n               bordering property owners, crop and building placement,\n               natural resources, survey information, and geographical\n               location. Also of mention are handwritten notes\n               detailing various business activities including phone\n               conversations, contract negotiations, and advertising\n               drafts. Deeds also appear for a small number of\n               properties in this series.","Arranged into Virginia real estate maps and plats\n               (Sub-series A), out-of-state real estate maps and plats\n               (Sub-series B), and miscellaneous and unidentified real\n               estate maps and plats (Sub-series C). Sub-series A and\n               Sub-series B principally contain larger items that were\n               removed from Series I, Sub-series A and Sub-series B.\n               Oversized items with corresponding files in Series I\n               have been noted within each folder and catalogued in\n               this aid under identical headings. Consequently, this\n               series' sub-series are arranged congruently with Series\n               I.","Sub-series A and B mainly contain maps and blueprints\n               depicting plats purchased, bought, and sold by George B.\n               Lorraine. Of note are United States geological and\n               topographical survey maps and Virginia primary and\n               secondary highway maps denoting locations of properties,\n               survey maps, and blueprints depicting architectural\n               features, crop placement, and landscape features. While\n               maps and plats comprise the bulk of these sub-series,\n               other oversize material may be included in each folder.\n               This smaller amount of material includes advertisements,\n               deeds, floor plans, and aerial photographs.","Sub-series C is unidentified real estate maps and\n               plats and miscellaneous oversize material consisting of\n               United States Army Corps of Engineers geological survey\n               maps, Virginia highway maps, tourist road maps, a\n               genealogical chart for the Fitzhugh-Grymes family of\n               King George County, Virginia, a Stan Fenelle drawing of\n               Secretariat, and a Louisa County Soil Survey. United\n               States Army Corps of Engineers maps and Virginia highway\n               maps may contain property locations and descriptions of\n               unidentified properties.","This series contains correspondence exchanged between\n               Lorraine Real Estate and other brokers and realtors,\n               property owners and buyers, advertisers, attorneys,\n               businesses, organizations, and national, state and city\n               government officials concerning unidentified properties\n               and non-real estate related matters. There are also\n               employee and fiscal records, specifically advertising\n               correspondence and receipts, bank checks, deposits, and\n               statements, 1962-1963, employee sales and commission\n               records, 1963, employee tax records, 1962-1964,\n               interoffice correspondence, 1957, 1974, and\n               correspondence, 1942-1950, with F. Virginius Watkins,\n               Lorraine's real estate attorney. Also contains\n               promotional correspondence and pamphlets, receipts,\n               house keys, a scrapbook of unidentified property\n               photographs arranged by property value, and a list of\n               millionaires in selected states compiled by R. L. Polks\n               and Company in 1940.","Consists of government and organizational\n               publications, periodicals, tourist pamphlets and\n               guidebooks, Mary Wingfield Scott's Richmond\n               Times-Dispatch articles, 1940-1942, on historic\n               buildings, clippings of \"Old Dominion Oddities by Allen\"\n               published in the Richmond Times-Dispatch, and a speech,\n               6 June 1931, by Claude G. Bowers at the unveiling of the\n               bust of John Tyler in the State Capital in Richmond.\n               Some of the periodicals contain advertisements for\n               George Lorraine's brokerage.","This part of the collection holds file cards\n               pertaining to certain real estate properties. Arranged\n               alphabetically by property name, or in some cases\n               location or owner's surname, these cards include\n               information concerning the Historical Virginia Building\n               Survey, estates owned by New Yorkers in the United\n               States South, Virginia churches, and reference sources\n               for individual properties. This series also includes\n               some postcards of Virginia properties.","There are no restrictions.","Business Records\n         Collection, Acc. 31042","English"],"unitid_tesim":["31042"],"normalized_title_ssm":["George Bernard Lorraine Records, \n         ca.\n         1925-1976"],"collection_title_tesim":["George Bernard Lorraine Records, \n         ca.\n         1925-1976"],"collection_ssim":["George Bernard Lorraine Records, \n         ca.\n         1925-1976"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"acqinfo_ssim":["Gift of Douglas LeGrand, McClean, Virginia, 15 November\n            1978."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["85.70 cubic feet; 161 Hollinger\n         boxes, 13 file card boxes, 9 map case drawers"],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions."],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe collection is organized into the following series and\n         sub-series: Series I: Real estate records (Sub-series A:\n         Virginia real estate (bulk), Sub-series B: Out-of-state real\n         estate); Series II: Oversize (Sub- series A: Virginia real\n         estate maps and plats (bulk), Sub-series B: Out-of-state real\n         estate maps and plats, Sub-series C: Miscellaneous and\n         unidentified property maps and plats); Series III:\n         Miscellaneous business correspondence and records; Series IV:\n         Publications; Series V: File cards.\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Organization"],"arrangement_tesim":["The collection is organized into the following series and\n         sub-series: Series I: Real estate records (Sub-series A:\n         Virginia real estate (bulk), Sub-series B: Out-of-state real\n         estate); Series II: Oversize (Sub- series A: Virginia real\n         estate maps and plats (bulk), Sub-series B: Out-of-state real\n         estate maps and plats, Sub-series C: Miscellaneous and\n         unidentified property maps and plats); Series III:\n         Miscellaneous business correspondence and records; Series IV:\n         Publications; Series V: File cards."],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eGeorge Bernard Lorraine (12 January 1887- 7 January 1976),\n         son of Charles Lorraine (1853-1939) and Martha Bohannan\n         Lorraine (1852-1930), was a real estate broker and agent in\n         Richmond and later Heathsville, Northumberland County,\n         Virginia. He specialized in the sale of large private estates\n         in Tidewater and eastern Virginia; although, he also did\n         business in other Virginia locales and out-of-state. He was\n         married to Estelle LeGrand Lorraine (1896-1978), and the pair\n         had two children, John Knowles Lorraine and Margaret Lorraine\n         Bleser. He died in Tappahannock Hospital in Essex and was\n         interred in St. Stephens Episcopal Church Cemetery in\n         Heathsville.\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Biographical/Historical Information"],"bioghist_tesim":["George Bernard Lorraine (12 January 1887- 7 January 1976),\n         son of Charles Lorraine (1853-1939) and Martha Bohannan\n         Lorraine (1852-1930), was a real estate broker and agent in\n         Richmond and later Heathsville, Northumberland County,\n         Virginia. He specialized in the sale of large private estates\n         in Tidewater and eastern Virginia; although, he also did\n         business in other Virginia locales and out-of-state. He was\n         married to Estelle LeGrand Lorraine (1896-1978), and the pair\n         had two children, John Knowles Lorraine and Margaret Lorraine\n         Bleser. He died in Tappahannock Hospital in Essex and was\n         interred in St. Stephens Episcopal Church Cemetery in\n         Heathsville."],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eGeorge Bernard Lorraine Records, ca. 1925-1976.\n            Accession 31042, Business records collection, The Library\n            of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["George Bernard Lorraine Records, ca. 1925-1976.\n            Accession 31042, Business records collection, The Library\n            of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia."],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe records, ca. 1925-1976, of George Bernard Lorraine,\n         real estate broker and agent in the City of Richmond and\n         Northumberland County, Virginia, consist of advertising, real\n         estate agreements, blueprints, checks, clippings,\n         correspondence (letters), house keys, maps, notes, obituaries,\n         pamphlets, periodicals, photographs, plats, postcards,\n         receipts, and surveys. They generally relate to Lorraine's\n         real estate business, an enterprise encompassing a broad array\n         of purchases and sales for land, businesses, houses, farms,\n         and private estates both in Virginia and out-of-state. A\n         significant number of these properties date their construction\n         to the 19th, 18th and even 17th centuries. Notable properties\n         Lorraine brokered include: Christ's Cross (Criss Cross),\n         Dewberry, Edgewood, Keswick, Kingsmill Plantation, Locksley\n         Hall, Mitchie Tavern, Powhite, Scotchtown, Wilton, and many\n         Virginia Landmarks Register, National Register of Historic\n         Properties, Historic American Building Survey, and Historic\n         Virginia Building Survey properties.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged into Virginia and out-of-state sub-series,\n               this series contains advertising, clippings,\n               correspondence, deeds, maps, notes, obituaries,\n               photographs, plats, postcards, property descriptions,\n               surveys, and real estate agreements pertaining to\n               properties George B. Lorraine brokered, purchased,\n               advertised, or sold. The Virginia sub-series consists of\n               real estate listings arranged alphabetically by county\n               or township. The out-of-state sub-series is arranged\n               alphabetically by state. Within both the Virginia and\n               out-of-state sub-series, properties are arranged\n               alphabetically first according to name. Properties\n               without names follow second and are arranged\n               alphabetically by property owner's surname. For most\n               counties and states, there also exists miscellaneous\n               letter and miscellaneous real estate listings files. The\n               file arrangement for Series I remains consistent with\n               the order established by the brokerage.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMaterial within this series highlights the buying and\n               selling process undertaken by Lorraine and his real\n               estate brokerage for each property. The correspondence\n               principally consists of letters exchanged between\n               Lorraine's brokerage and other brokers and realtors,\n               prospective buyers, estate administrators, property\n               owners, real estate attorneys, and government officials.\n               Real estate agreements between Lorraine's brokerage,\n               owners, and buyers detail well-defined property\n               descriptions and often accompany the correspondence, as\n               does a profuse amount of property descriptions written\n               for purposes of promotion and distribution to\n               prospective buyers and advertisers. An extensive array\n               of photographs includes exterior, interior, and aerial\n               views of a respective plat's buildings and the adjoining\n               landscape. Copies of these photographs often were\n               distributed to prospective buyers and also occasionally\n               reappear in advertisements written by Lorraine for\n               distribution to prospective buyers, magazines and\n               newspapers. The large bulk of advertisements does not\n               contain images and exists in the form of newspaper\n               clippings from the classifieds. For some of the more\n               famed and recognized properties, clippings held in these\n               files help to establish the history of an estate or a\n               past owner of an estate. There are also obituaries that\n               often denote the death of an estate owner. Smaller maps\n               and plats also are included in these files, while larger\n               maps and plats have been removed and placed in the\n               oversize collection. These maps and plats often denote\n               acreage, architectural measurements, boundaries and\n               bordering property owners, crop and building placement,\n               natural resources, survey information, and geographical\n               location. Also of mention are handwritten notes\n               detailing various business activities including phone\n               conversations, contract negotiations, and advertising\n               drafts. Deeds also appear for a small number of\n               properties in this series.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArranged into Virginia real estate maps and plats\n               (Sub-series A), out-of-state real estate maps and plats\n               (Sub-series B), and miscellaneous and unidentified real\n               estate maps and plats (Sub-series C). Sub-series A and\n               Sub-series B principally contain larger items that were\n               removed from Series I, Sub-series A and Sub-series B.\n               Oversized items with corresponding files in Series I\n               have been noted within each folder and catalogued in\n               this aid under identical headings. Consequently, this\n               series' sub-series are arranged congruently with Series\n               I.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSub-series A and B mainly contain maps and blueprints\n               depicting plats purchased, bought, and sold by George B.\n               Lorraine. Of note are United States geological and\n               topographical survey maps and Virginia primary and\n               secondary highway maps denoting locations of properties,\n               survey maps, and blueprints depicting architectural\n               features, crop placement, and landscape features. While\n               maps and plats comprise the bulk of these sub-series,\n               other oversize material may be included in each folder.\n               This smaller amount of material includes advertisements,\n               deeds, floor plans, and aerial photographs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSub-series C is unidentified real estate maps and\n               plats and miscellaneous oversize material consisting of\n               United States Army Corps of Engineers geological survey\n               maps, Virginia highway maps, tourist road maps, a\n               genealogical chart for the Fitzhugh-Grymes family of\n               King George County, Virginia, a Stan Fenelle drawing of\n               Secretariat, and a Louisa County Soil Survey. United\n               States Army Corps of Engineers maps and Virginia highway\n               maps may contain property locations and descriptions of\n               unidentified properties.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis series contains correspondence exchanged between\n               Lorraine Real Estate and other brokers and realtors,\n               property owners and buyers, advertisers, attorneys,\n               businesses, organizations, and national, state and city\n               government officials concerning unidentified properties\n               and non-real estate related matters. There are also\n               employee and fiscal records, specifically advertising\n               correspondence and receipts, bank checks, deposits, and\n               statements, 1962-1963, employee sales and commission\n               records, 1963, employee tax records, 1962-1964,\n               interoffice correspondence, 1957, 1974, and\n               correspondence, 1942-1950, with F. Virginius Watkins,\n               Lorraine's real estate attorney. Also contains\n               promotional correspondence and pamphlets, receipts,\n               house keys, a scrapbook of unidentified property\n               photographs arranged by property value, and a list of\n               millionaires in selected states compiled by R. L. Polks\n               and Company in 1940.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConsists of government and organizational\n               publications, periodicals, tourist pamphlets and\n               guidebooks, Mary Wingfield Scott's Richmond\n               Times-Dispatch articles, 1940-1942, on historic\n               buildings, clippings of \"Old Dominion Oddities by Allen\"\n               published in the Richmond Times-Dispatch, and a speech,\n               6 June 1931, by Claude G. Bowers at the unveiling of the\n               bust of John Tyler in the State Capital in Richmond.\n               Some of the periodicals contain advertisements for\n               George Lorraine's brokerage.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis part of the collection holds file cards\n               pertaining to certain real estate properties. Arranged\n               alphabetically by property name, or in some cases\n               location or owner's surname, these cards include\n               information concerning the Historical Virginia Building\n               Survey, estates owned by New Yorkers in the United\n               States South, Virginia churches, and reference sources\n               for individual properties. This series also includes\n               some postcards of Virginia properties.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content Information"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The records, ca. 1925-1976, of George Bernard Lorraine,\n         real estate broker and agent in the City of Richmond and\n         Northumberland County, Virginia, consist of advertising, real\n         estate agreements, blueprints, checks, clippings,\n         correspondence (letters), house keys, maps, notes, obituaries,\n         pamphlets, periodicals, photographs, plats, postcards,\n         receipts, and surveys. They generally relate to Lorraine's\n         real estate business, an enterprise encompassing a broad array\n         of purchases and sales for land, businesses, houses, farms,\n         and private estates both in Virginia and out-of-state. A\n         significant number of these properties date their construction\n         to the 19th, 18th and even 17th centuries. Notable properties\n         Lorraine brokered include: Christ's Cross (Criss Cross),\n         Dewberry, Edgewood, Keswick, Kingsmill Plantation, Locksley\n         Hall, Mitchie Tavern, Powhite, Scotchtown, Wilton, and many\n         Virginia Landmarks Register, National Register of Historic\n         Properties, Historic American Building Survey, and Historic\n         Virginia Building Survey properties.","Arranged into Virginia and out-of-state sub-series,\n               this series contains advertising, clippings,\n               correspondence, deeds, maps, notes, obituaries,\n               photographs, plats, postcards, property descriptions,\n               surveys, and real estate agreements pertaining to\n               properties George B. Lorraine brokered, purchased,\n               advertised, or sold. The Virginia sub-series consists of\n               real estate listings arranged alphabetically by county\n               or township. The out-of-state sub-series is arranged\n               alphabetically by state. Within both the Virginia and\n               out-of-state sub-series, properties are arranged\n               alphabetically first according to name. Properties\n               without names follow second and are arranged\n               alphabetically by property owner's surname. For most\n               counties and states, there also exists miscellaneous\n               letter and miscellaneous real estate listings files. The\n               file arrangement for Series I remains consistent with\n               the order established by the brokerage.","Material within this series highlights the buying and\n               selling process undertaken by Lorraine and his real\n               estate brokerage for each property. The correspondence\n               principally consists of letters exchanged between\n               Lorraine's brokerage and other brokers and realtors,\n               prospective buyers, estate administrators, property\n               owners, real estate attorneys, and government officials.\n               Real estate agreements between Lorraine's brokerage,\n               owners, and buyers detail well-defined property\n               descriptions and often accompany the correspondence, as\n               does a profuse amount of property descriptions written\n               for purposes of promotion and distribution to\n               prospective buyers and advertisers. An extensive array\n               of photographs includes exterior, interior, and aerial\n               views of a respective plat's buildings and the adjoining\n               landscape. Copies of these photographs often were\n               distributed to prospective buyers and also occasionally\n               reappear in advertisements written by Lorraine for\n               distribution to prospective buyers, magazines and\n               newspapers. The large bulk of advertisements does not\n               contain images and exists in the form of newspaper\n               clippings from the classifieds. For some of the more\n               famed and recognized properties, clippings held in these\n               files help to establish the history of an estate or a\n               past owner of an estate. There are also obituaries that\n               often denote the death of an estate owner. Smaller maps\n               and plats also are included in these files, while larger\n               maps and plats have been removed and placed in the\n               oversize collection. These maps and plats often denote\n               acreage, architectural measurements, boundaries and\n               bordering property owners, crop and building placement,\n               natural resources, survey information, and geographical\n               location. Also of mention are handwritten notes\n               detailing various business activities including phone\n               conversations, contract negotiations, and advertising\n               drafts. Deeds also appear for a small number of\n               properties in this series.","Arranged into Virginia real estate maps and plats\n               (Sub-series A), out-of-state real estate maps and plats\n               (Sub-series B), and miscellaneous and unidentified real\n               estate maps and plats (Sub-series C). Sub-series A and\n               Sub-series B principally contain larger items that were\n               removed from Series I, Sub-series A and Sub-series B.\n               Oversized items with corresponding files in Series I\n               have been noted within each folder and catalogued in\n               this aid under identical headings. Consequently, this\n               series' sub-series are arranged congruently with Series\n               I.","Sub-series A and B mainly contain maps and blueprints\n               depicting plats purchased, bought, and sold by George B.\n               Lorraine. Of note are United States geological and\n               topographical survey maps and Virginia primary and\n               secondary highway maps denoting locations of properties,\n               survey maps, and blueprints depicting architectural\n               features, crop placement, and landscape features. While\n               maps and plats comprise the bulk of these sub-series,\n               other oversize material may be included in each folder.\n               This smaller amount of material includes advertisements,\n               deeds, floor plans, and aerial photographs.","Sub-series C is unidentified real estate maps and\n               plats and miscellaneous oversize material consisting of\n               United States Army Corps of Engineers geological survey\n               maps, Virginia highway maps, tourist road maps, a\n               genealogical chart for the Fitzhugh-Grymes family of\n               King George County, Virginia, a Stan Fenelle drawing of\n               Secretariat, and a Louisa County Soil Survey. United\n               States Army Corps of Engineers maps and Virginia highway\n               maps may contain property locations and descriptions of\n               unidentified properties.","This series contains correspondence exchanged between\n               Lorraine Real Estate and other brokers and realtors,\n               property owners and buyers, advertisers, attorneys,\n               businesses, organizations, and national, state and city\n               government officials concerning unidentified properties\n               and non-real estate related matters. There are also\n               employee and fiscal records, specifically advertising\n               correspondence and receipts, bank checks, deposits, and\n               statements, 1962-1963, employee sales and commission\n               records, 1963, employee tax records, 1962-1964,\n               interoffice correspondence, 1957, 1974, and\n               correspondence, 1942-1950, with F. Virginius Watkins,\n               Lorraine's real estate attorney. Also contains\n               promotional correspondence and pamphlets, receipts,\n               house keys, a scrapbook of unidentified property\n               photographs arranged by property value, and a list of\n               millionaires in selected states compiled by R. L. Polks\n               and Company in 1940.","Consists of government and organizational\n               publications, periodicals, tourist pamphlets and\n               guidebooks, Mary Wingfield Scott's Richmond\n               Times-Dispatch articles, 1940-1942, on historic\n               buildings, clippings of \"Old Dominion Oddities by Allen\"\n               published in the Richmond Times-Dispatch, and a speech,\n               6 June 1931, by Claude G. Bowers at the unveiling of the\n               bust of John Tyler in the State Capital in Richmond.\n               Some of the periodicals contain advertisements for\n               George Lorraine's brokerage.","This part of the collection holds file cards\n               pertaining to certain real estate properties. Arranged\n               alphabetically by property name, or in some cases\n               location or owner's surname, these cards include\n               information concerning the Historical Virginia Building\n               Survey, estates owned by New Yorkers in the United\n               States South, Virginia churches, and reference sources\n               for individual properties. This series also includes\n               some postcards of Virginia properties."],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions"],"userestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions."],"physloc_html_tesm":["\u003cphysloc label=\"Physical Location\"\u003eBusiness Records\n         Collection, Acc. 31042\u003c/physloc\u003e"],"physloc_tesim":["Business Records\n         Collection, Acc. 31042"],"language_ssim":["English"],"total_component_count_is":3386,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T09:04:39.709Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi00158_c03_c02_c17"}},{"id":"vi_vi00946_c01_c1173","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Zero-Base Budgeting,\n\t1977-1978.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi00946_c01_c1173#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi00946_c01_c1173","ref_ssm":["vi_vi00946_c01_c1173"],"id":"vi_vi00946_c01_c1173","ead_ssi":"vi_vi00946","_root_":"vi_vi00946","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi00946_c01","parent_ssi":"vi_vi00946_c01","parent_ssim":["vi_vi00946","vi_vi00946_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi00946","vi_vi00946_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Secretary of Public Safety Director's Correspondence and Subject Files, \n1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981)","Director's Correspondence and Subject Files,  \n            \n              1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981)."],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Secretary of Public Safety Director's Correspondence and Subject Files, \n1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981)","Director's Correspondence and Subject Files,  \n            \n              1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981)."],"text":["Virginia Secretary of Public Safety Director's Correspondence and Subject Files, \n1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981)","Director's Correspondence and Subject Files,  \n            \n              1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981).","Zero-Base Budgeting,\n\t1977-1978.","box 6"],"title_filing_ssi":"Zero-Base Budgeting,\n\t 1977-1978 .\n\t","title_ssm":["Zero-Base Budgeting,\n\t1977-1978."],"title_tesim":["Zero-Base Budgeting,\n\t1977-1978."],"normalized_title_ssm":["Zero-Base Budgeting,\n\t1977-1978."],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Secretary of Public Safety Director's Correspondence and Subject Files, \n1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981)"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":1174,"containers_ssim":["box 6"],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#1172","timestamp":"2026-05-21T09:56:51.643Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi00946","ead_ssi":"vi_vi00946","_root_":"vi_vi00946","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi00946","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi00946.xml","title_ssm":["Virginia Secretary of Public Safety Director's Correspondence and Subject Files, \n1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981)"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Secretary of Public Safety Director's Correspondence and Subject Files, \n1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981)"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["31516\n"],"text":["31516\n","Virginia Secretary of Public Safety Director's Correspondence and Subject Files, \n1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981)","35 cu. ft. (35 boxes)","Privacy protected and other protected information is considered confidential and restricted from public access for 75 years. It may be necessary for an archivist to review any unprocessed, modern record collections (those collections less than 75 years old) that may contain confidential information before the records can be used by patrons for research purposes or before any copies of records can be made for patrons.  If you are planning to use these records, please contact Archives Reference Services for more details before planning your research trip. ","If a request for copies is made for material containing confidential information, it is understood that this information will be redacted from the copies, if it is possible to do so.  If redaction is not possible, the records will be withheld.  Researchers must also agree that no direct or indirect contact will be made with the individuals to whom any personal or confidential information relates.  Improper use and/or re-disclosure of privacy protected information is a breach of confidentiality which could result in the loss of access to the archival collections housed and maintained by The Library of Virginia, and could result in legal penalties (Code of Virginia, 18.2-186.3).\n","This collection is arranged into the one series:","Director's Correspondence and Subject Files, 1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981)","The original order of this material during its use is unknown.  Whether the current physical order is indeed the original order, remains undetermined as well.  There is no readily apparent series structure or other arrangement method.  The physical arrangement of this collection has been maintained, but arrangement in the finding aid is alphabetical by folder title.  ","In 1970, the Governor's Management Commission Study recommended the creation of six \"Deputy Governors\" to assist the Chief Executive in his managerial duties. Compatible functions of government were grouped under these administrative heads, who would serve as the Governors top management team or \"secretariats,\" as they are called now.  Governor Linwood Holton's top priority for the 1972 session of the General Assembly was a proposal for a Governor's Cabinet, reorganizing state agencies into six major departments, each headed by a secretary appointed by the governor. Transportation and public safety was one of these six departments. The office of Secretary of Transportation and Public Safety was created on April 8, 1972, by an act passed by the General Assembly. ","Governor Holton appointed Wayne A. Whitham, a member of the Winchester City Council, as the first Secretary of Transportation and Public Safety. Secretary Whitham took office on July 1, 1972, and was responsible for State Highway Commission, Divsion of Motor Vehicles, Department of State Police, Highway Safety Division, Office of Emergency Services, Department of Military Affairs, Virginia State Crime Commission and the Law Enforcement Officers Training Standards Commission. The Office has undergone a series of administrative reorganizations since. On April 12, 1976, the Legislature established separate secretariats for transportation and for public safety, effective July 1, 1976. ","Wayne A. Whitham, the first Secretary of Transportation and Public Safety, was reappointed by Governor-elect Miles E. Godwin, Jr., in December 1973. On June 10, 1976, Governor Godwin appointed H. Selwyn Smith, a former Prince William County commonwealth's attorney (1960-1968) and former state senator (1972-1975), as the first Secretary of Public Safety. Smith was reappointed by Governor-elect John N. Dalton in December 1977. Smith resigned effective July 1, 1980 after he was appointed judge of the 31st Judicial Circuit of Virginia. Governor Dalton named T. Rodman Layman, an Alcoholic Beverage and Control Board Commissioner (1970-1980), to succeed Smith as Secretary of Public Safety. Layman served until the end of Dalton's term in January 1982. ","This collection has been processed using minimal processing standards: the original arrangement has been maintained, the container list is brief and simple, and the records have not been refoldered and fasteners have not been removed. \n","Material found loose in the boxes was foldered and given a title determined by the archivist.  In cases where folder titles were inaccurate, the titles have been corrected to more adequately describe the material.","Contains a variety of correspondence and subject files relating to the agencies and boards that were under the supervision of the Secretary of Public Safety.  Files include those related to activities of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, the Department of Corrections, and the State Police.  The records also include fire safety inspections, state and federal legislation files, budget and capital outlay documents, and records on a variety of other public safety-related topics.  Most of the material is in the form of correspondence, memorandums, and reports.\n","There are no restrictions.\n","English\n"],"unitid_tesim":["31516\n"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Secretary of Public Safety Director's Correspondence and Subject Files, \n1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981)"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Secretary of Public Safety Director's Correspondence and Subject Files, \n1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981)"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Secretary of Public Safety Director's Correspondence and Subject Files, \n1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981)"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"creator_ssm":["Virginia Secretary of Public Safety\n"],"creator_ssim":["Virginia Secretary of Public Safety\n"],"acqinfo_ssim":["Accession 31516 transferred by Audrey B. Burton, Office of the Secretary of Public Safety, Ninth Street Office Building, Richmond, Va., 7 October 1982.\n"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["35 cu. ft. (35 boxes)"],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003ePrivacy protected and other protected information is considered confidential and restricted from public access for 75 years. It may be necessary for an archivist to review any unprocessed, modern record collections (those collections less than 75 years old) that may contain confidential information before the records can be used by patrons for research purposes or before any copies of records can be made for patrons.  If you are planning to use these records, please contact Archives Reference Services for more details before planning your research trip. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIf a request for copies is made for material containing confidential information, it is understood that this information will be redacted from the copies, if it is possible to do so.  If redaction is not possible, the records will be withheld.  Researchers must also agree that no direct or indirect contact will be made with the individuals to whom any personal or confidential information relates.  Improper use and/or re-disclosure of privacy protected information is a breach of confidentiality which could result in the loss of access to the archival collections housed and maintained by The Library of Virginia, and could result in legal penalties (Code of Virginia, 18.2-186.3).\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions\n"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["Privacy protected and other protected information is considered confidential and restricted from public access for 75 years. It may be necessary for an archivist to review any unprocessed, modern record collections (those collections less than 75 years old) that may contain confidential information before the records can be used by patrons for research purposes or before any copies of records can be made for patrons.  If you are planning to use these records, please contact Archives Reference Services for more details before planning your research trip. ","If a request for copies is made for material containing confidential information, it is understood that this information will be redacted from the copies, if it is possible to do so.  If redaction is not possible, the records will be withheld.  Researchers must also agree that no direct or indirect contact will be made with the individuals to whom any personal or confidential information relates.  Improper use and/or re-disclosure of privacy protected information is a breach of confidentiality which could result in the loss of access to the archival collections housed and maintained by The Library of Virginia, and could result in legal penalties (Code of Virginia, 18.2-186.3).\n"],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThis collection is arranged into the one series:\u003c/p\u003e","\u003clist type=\"simple\"\u003e\n        \u003citem\u003eDirector's Correspondence and Subject Files, 1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981)\u003c/item\u003e\n      \u003c/list\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe original order of this material during its use is unknown.  Whether the current physical order is indeed the original order, remains undetermined as well.  There is no readily apparent series structure or other arrangement method.  The physical arrangement of this collection has been maintained, but arrangement in the finding aid is alphabetical by folder title.  \u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["This collection is arranged into the one series:","Director's Correspondence and Subject Files, 1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981)","The original order of this material during its use is unknown.  Whether the current physical order is indeed the original order, remains undetermined as well.  There is no readily apparent series structure or other arrangement method.  The physical arrangement of this collection has been maintained, but arrangement in the finding aid is alphabetical by folder title.  "],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eIn 1970, the Governor's Management Commission Study recommended the creation of six \"Deputy Governors\" to assist the Chief Executive in his managerial duties. Compatible functions of government were grouped under these administrative heads, who would serve as the Governors top management team or \"secretariats,\" as they are called now.  Governor Linwood Holton's top priority for the 1972 session of the General Assembly was a proposal for a Governor's Cabinet, reorganizing state agencies into six major departments, each headed by a secretary appointed by the governor. Transportation and public safety was one of these six departments. The office of Secretary of Transportation and Public Safety was created on April 8, 1972, by an act passed by the General Assembly. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eGovernor Holton appointed Wayne A. Whitham, a member of the Winchester City Council, as the first Secretary of Transportation and Public Safety. Secretary Whitham took office on July 1, 1972, and was responsible for State Highway Commission, Divsion of Motor Vehicles, Department of State Police, Highway Safety Division, Office of Emergency Services, Department of Military Affairs, Virginia State Crime Commission and the Law Enforcement Officers Training Standards Commission. The Office has undergone a series of administrative reorganizations since. On April 12, 1976, the Legislature established separate secretariats for transportation and for public safety, effective July 1, 1976. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWayne A. Whitham, the first Secretary of Transportation and Public Safety, was reappointed by Governor-elect Miles E. Godwin, Jr., in December 1973. On June 10, 1976, Governor Godwin appointed H. Selwyn Smith, a former Prince William County commonwealth's attorney (1960-1968) and former state senator (1972-1975), as the first Secretary of Public Safety. Smith was reappointed by Governor-elect John N. Dalton in December 1977. Smith resigned effective July 1, 1980 after he was appointed judge of the 31st Judicial Circuit of Virginia. Governor Dalton named T. Rodman Layman, an Alcoholic Beverage and Control Board Commissioner (1970-1980), to succeed Smith as Secretary of Public Safety. Layman served until the end of Dalton's term in January 1982. \u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Historical Information\n"],"bioghist_tesim":["In 1970, the Governor's Management Commission Study recommended the creation of six \"Deputy Governors\" to assist the Chief Executive in his managerial duties. Compatible functions of government were grouped under these administrative heads, who would serve as the Governors top management team or \"secretariats,\" as they are called now.  Governor Linwood Holton's top priority for the 1972 session of the General Assembly was a proposal for a Governor's Cabinet, reorganizing state agencies into six major departments, each headed by a secretary appointed by the governor. Transportation and public safety was one of these six departments. The office of Secretary of Transportation and Public Safety was created on April 8, 1972, by an act passed by the General Assembly. ","Governor Holton appointed Wayne A. Whitham, a member of the Winchester City Council, as the first Secretary of Transportation and Public Safety. Secretary Whitham took office on July 1, 1972, and was responsible for State Highway Commission, Divsion of Motor Vehicles, Department of State Police, Highway Safety Division, Office of Emergency Services, Department of Military Affairs, Virginia State Crime Commission and the Law Enforcement Officers Training Standards Commission. The Office has undergone a series of administrative reorganizations since. On April 12, 1976, the Legislature established separate secretariats for transportation and for public safety, effective July 1, 1976. ","Wayne A. Whitham, the first Secretary of Transportation and Public Safety, was reappointed by Governor-elect Miles E. Godwin, Jr., in December 1973. On June 10, 1976, Governor Godwin appointed H. Selwyn Smith, a former Prince William County commonwealth's attorney (1960-1968) and former state senator (1972-1975), as the first Secretary of Public Safety. Smith was reappointed by Governor-elect John N. Dalton in December 1977. Smith resigned effective July 1, 1980 after he was appointed judge of the 31st Judicial Circuit of Virginia. Governor Dalton named T. Rodman Layman, an Alcoholic Beverage and Control Board Commissioner (1970-1980), to succeed Smith as Secretary of Public Safety. Layman served until the end of Dalton's term in January 1982. "],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eVirginia Secretary of Public Safety Director's Correspondence and Subject Files, 1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981). Accession 31516, State government records collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Virginia Secretary of Public Safety Director's Correspondence and Subject Files, 1971-1982 (bulk 1976-1981). Accession 31516, State government records collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n"],"processinfo_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThis collection has been processed using minimal processing standards: the original arrangement has been maintained, the container list is brief and simple, and the records have not been refoldered and fasteners have not been removed. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMaterial found loose in the boxes was foldered and given a title determined by the archivist.  In cases where folder titles were inaccurate, the titles have been corrected to more adequately describe the material.\u003c/p\u003e"],"processinfo_heading_ssm":["Processing Information\n"],"processinfo_tesim":["This collection has been processed using minimal processing standards: the original arrangement has been maintained, the container list is brief and simple, and the records have not been refoldered and fasteners have not been removed. \n","Material found loose in the boxes was foldered and given a title determined by the archivist.  In cases where folder titles were inaccurate, the titles have been corrected to more adequately describe the material."],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eContains a variety of correspondence and subject files relating to the agencies and boards that were under the supervision of the Secretary of Public Safety.  Files include those related to activities of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, the Department of Corrections, and the State Police.  The records also include fire safety inspections, state and federal legislation files, budget and capital outlay documents, and records on a variety of other public safety-related topics.  Most of the material is in the form of correspondence, memorandums, and reports.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Contains a variety of correspondence and subject files relating to the agencies and boards that were under the supervision of the Secretary of Public Safety.  Files include those related to activities of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, the Department of Corrections, and the State Police.  The records also include fire safety inspections, state and federal legislation files, budget and capital outlay documents, and records on a variety of other public safety-related topics.  Most of the material is in the form of correspondence, memorandums, and reports.\n"],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions\n"],"userestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions.\n"],"language_ssim":["English\n"],"total_component_count_is":1174,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T09:56:51.643Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi00946_c01_c1173"}},{"id":"vi_vi04891_c01_c09","type":"Series","attributes":{"title":"Zero-Base Budgeting, 1977 Aug.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi04891_c01_c09#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi04891_c01_c09","ref_ssm":["vi_vi04891_c01_c09"],"id":"vi_vi04891_c01_c09","ead_ssi":"vi_vi04891","_root_":"vi_vi04891","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi04891_c01","parent_ssi":"vi_vi04891_c01","parent_ssim":["vi_vi04891","vi_vi04891_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi04891","vi_vi04891_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, Virginia, Project Records","Project Records, \n1975-1985 (Accession 34596)."],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, Virginia, Project Records","Project Records, \n1975-1985 (Accession 34596)."],"text":["Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, Virginia, Project Records","Project Records, \n1975-1985 (Accession 34596).","Zero-Base Budgeting, 1977 Aug."],"title_filing_ssi":"Zero-Base Budgeting, 1977 Aug. ","title_ssm":["Zero-Base Budgeting, 1977 Aug."],"title_tesim":["Zero-Base Budgeting, 1977 Aug."],"normalized_title_ssm":["Zero-Base Budgeting, 1977 Aug."],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, Virginia, Project Records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":1,"level_ssm":["Series"],"level_ssim":["Series"],"sort_isi":44,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#8","timestamp":"2026-05-21T09:02:27.500Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi04891","ead_ssi":"vi_vi04891","_root_":"vi_vi04891","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi04891","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi04891.xml","title_ssm":["Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, Virginia, Project Records"],"title_tesim":["Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, Virginia, Project Records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1975-1985."],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1975-1985."],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["34596"],"text":["34596","Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, Virginia, Project Records","8 cubic feet","Arranged chronologically by report date.  Records have been kept in their original order.","The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission (JLARC) is responsible for legislative oversight and government accountability. The Commission studies and makes recommendations regarding program and agency savings, helps to improve agency efficiency and effectiveness, works to maintain an informed citizenry and legislature, and oversees agency compliance with legislative intent. The work of the Commission ensures that funds appropriated by the Virginia General Assembly are used effectively and efficiently by State and local agencies."," The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission was created in 1973 and became operational in early 1974. The Commission is composed of nine members of the House of Delegates and five members of the Senate. At least five of the Delegates also serve on the House Appropriations Committee, and two of the Senators also serve on the Senate Finance Committee. Delegates are appointed by the Speaker of the House, and Senators by the Senate Rules Committee. The Chair is elected by a majority of Commission members and usually rotates every two years between the House and Senate. The Auditor of Public Accounts is a nonvoting, ex officio member. The Commission has a full-time staff led by a Director who is appointed by the Commission and confirmed by the General Assembly for a six-year term of office.","A fundamental change in evaluation authority occurred in 1977 with enactment of the Legislative Program Review and Evaluation Act. This act provided for a more systematic process of legislative oversight through a better defined topic selection process and direct involvement of General Assembly standing committees.","This collection has been processed using minimal processing standards: the original arrangement has been maintained, the container list is brief and simple, and the records have not been refoldered and fasteners have not been removed. \n","These records document the research activities used to develop and write drafts and final reports on study issues. The studies focus around state agency functions and programs and evaluate their effectiveness and efficiency. They are retained to substantiate study findings, conclusions, recommendations and methodology, and to provide the data needed for comparative studies. Records include correspondence, working papers, survey instruments, reference materials, copies of data runs, extant agency documents and reports.\n"],"unitid_tesim":["34596"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, Virginia, Project Records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, Virginia, Project Records"],"collection_ssim":["Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, Virginia, Project Records"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"creator_ssm":["Virginia. Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission."],"creator_ssim":["Virginia. Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission."],"acqinfo_ssim":["Accession 34596 was transferred by the Virginia Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, March 16, 1994."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["8 cubic feet"],"date_range_isim":[1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eArranged chronologically by report date.  Records have been kept in their original order.\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_tesim":["Arranged chronologically by report date.  Records have been kept in their original order."],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission (JLARC) is responsible for legislative oversight and government accountability. The Commission studies and makes recommendations regarding program and agency savings, helps to improve agency efficiency and effectiveness, works to maintain an informed citizenry and legislature, and oversees agency compliance with legislative intent. The work of the Commission ensures that funds appropriated by the Virginia General Assembly are used effectively and efficiently by State and local agencies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission was created in 1973 and became operational in early 1974. The Commission is composed of nine members of the House of Delegates and five members of the Senate. At least five of the Delegates also serve on the House Appropriations Committee, and two of the Senators also serve on the Senate Finance Committee. Delegates are appointed by the Speaker of the House, and Senators by the Senate Rules Committee. The Chair is elected by a majority of Commission members and usually rotates every two years between the House and Senate. The Auditor of Public Accounts is a nonvoting, ex officio member. The Commission has a full-time staff led by a Director who is appointed by the Commission and confirmed by the General Assembly for a six-year term of office.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA fundamental change in evaluation authority occurred in 1977 with enactment of the Legislative Program Review and Evaluation Act. This act provided for a more systematic process of legislative oversight through a better defined topic selection process and direct involvement of General Assembly standing committees.\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Biographical/Historical Information"],"bioghist_tesim":["The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission (JLARC) is responsible for legislative oversight and government accountability. The Commission studies and makes recommendations regarding program and agency savings, helps to improve agency efficiency and effectiveness, works to maintain an informed citizenry and legislature, and oversees agency compliance with legislative intent. The work of the Commission ensures that funds appropriated by the Virginia General Assembly are used effectively and efficiently by State and local agencies."," The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission was created in 1973 and became operational in early 1974. The Commission is composed of nine members of the House of Delegates and five members of the Senate. At least five of the Delegates also serve on the House Appropriations Committee, and two of the Senators also serve on the Senate Finance Committee. Delegates are appointed by the Speaker of the House, and Senators by the Senate Rules Committee. The Chair is elected by a majority of Commission members and usually rotates every two years between the House and Senate. The Auditor of Public Accounts is a nonvoting, ex officio member. The Commission has a full-time staff led by a Director who is appointed by the Commission and confirmed by the General Assembly for a six-year term of office.","A fundamental change in evaluation authority occurred in 1977 with enactment of the Legislative Program Review and Evaluation Act. This act provided for a more systematic process of legislative oversight through a better defined topic selection process and direct involvement of General Assembly standing committees."],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eProject Records of the Virginia Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, 1975-1985.  Accession 34596, State records collection, The Library of Virginia, Archives Branch, Richmond, Va. 23219.\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Project Records of the Virginia Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, 1975-1985.  Accession 34596, State records collection, The Library of Virginia, Archives Branch, Richmond, Va. 23219."],"processinfo_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThis collection has been processed using minimal processing standards: the original arrangement has been maintained, the container list is brief and simple, and the records have not been refoldered and fasteners have not been removed. \n\u003c/p\u003e"],"processinfo_heading_ssm":["Processing Information\n"],"processinfo_tesim":["This collection has been processed using minimal processing standards: the original arrangement has been maintained, the container list is brief and simple, and the records have not been refoldered and fasteners have not been removed. \n"],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThese records document the research activities used to develop and write drafts and final reports on study issues. The studies focus around state agency functions and programs and evaluate their effectiveness and efficiency. They are retained to substantiate study findings, conclusions, recommendations and methodology, and to provide the data needed for comparative studies. Records include correspondence, working papers, survey instruments, reference materials, copies of data runs, extant agency documents and reports.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["These records document the research activities used to develop and write drafts and final reports on study issues. The studies focus around state agency functions and programs and evaluate their effectiveness and efficiency. They are retained to substantiate study findings, conclusions, recommendations and methodology, and to provide the data needed for comparative studies. Records include correspondence, working papers, survey instruments, reference materials, copies of data runs, extant agency documents and reports.\n"],"total_component_count_is":334,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T09:02:27.500Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi04891_c01_c09"}},{"id":"vi_vi04152_c01_c120","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Zetta [__] and Len Stokes Butts.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi04152_c01_c120#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi04152_c01_c120","ref_ssm":["vi_vi04152_c01_c120"],"id":"vi_vi04152_c01_c120","ead_ssi":"vi_vi04152","_root_":"vi_vi04152","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi04152_c01","parent_ssi":"vi_vi04152_c01","parent_ssim":["vi_vi04152","vi_vi04152_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi04152","vi_vi04152_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Rudy Nothdurft Collection of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family Genealogical Records","The Rudy Nothdurft Collection of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family Genealogical Records."],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Rudy Nothdurft Collection of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family Genealogical Records","The Rudy Nothdurft Collection of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family Genealogical Records."],"text":["Rudy Nothdurft Collection of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family Genealogical Records","The Rudy Nothdurft Collection of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family Genealogical Records.","Zetta [__] and Len Stokes Butts.","box 3","folder 20"],"title_filing_ssi":"Zetta [__] and Len Stokes Butts.","title_ssm":["Zetta [__] and Len Stokes Butts."],"title_tesim":["Zetta [__] and Len Stokes Butts."],"normalized_title_ssm":["Zetta [__] and Len Stokes Butts."],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Rudy Nothdurft Collection of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family Genealogical Records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":121,"containers_ssim":["box 3","folder 20"],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#119","timestamp":"2026-05-21T09:22:54.892Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi04152","ead_ssi":"vi_vi04152","_root_":"vi_vi04152","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi04152","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi04152.xml","title_ssm":["Rudy Nothdurft Collection of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family Genealogical Records"],"title_tesim":["Rudy Nothdurft Collection of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family Genealogical Records"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["43744\n"],"text":["43744\n","Rudy Nothdurft Collection of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family Genealogical Records","3 cubic feet (3 boxes)","There are no restrictions.\n","Collection is maintained in the original folder groupings established by Rudolph J. Nothdurft, Jr. The file folders retain the same labels as his originals. Additional information recorded in the Contents List was copied from Nothdurft's notes on the original file folders. The folders have been arranged alphabetically, with a separate section at the end for folders labeled with state name abbreviations. By and large, Nothdurft organized these notes under the name of the person from whom he received information, or for whom he provided information, not according to the individual or individuals being researched.","Genealogical research files of Rudolph J. Nothdurft, Jr. (1927- ), focusing on the Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum family, mostly of the Southeast and Midwest. The bulk of the collection consists of correspondence between Nothdurft and others who either had or sought information on the family, and copies of primary source documents gathered during his research. Also included are two bound compilations done by Nothdurft,  Compiled Histories of Newsom, Newsham, Newsum, Newsome, and Nuzum Families Who Came to America , and  The Newsom Newsome Family Genealogy and History , both completed in 2004.\n","\"Nathaniel Newsom, Elizabeth Ann Whitehead\"","\"Green Berry Newsom VA\"\n\t\t","\"I never met Louise Vann Boone because she had passed on. She did leave behind some of her good research. RJN\"\n\t\t","\"TX, CA, Brandy? in CA\"\n\t\t","\"Moses E. Newsom, maybe Hertford Co., NC\"\n\t\t","\"TX\"\n\t\t","\"This is the other Newsom line. John Newsom - Margaret Reason.\"\n\t\t","\"Stokes Co. NC\"\n\t\t","\"Harrison Newsom\"\n\t\t","\"3094 William Jordan Newsom, b. 1838, Wayne Co. NC -\u003e Carroll Co. MO. Has details of his Civil War pensions. See Darla Myers.\"\n\t\t","\"Simon Newsom -\u003e Kincheon Newsom\"\n\t\t","\"Clairborne Newsom. Also Thomas Wyche Newsome. See St. Arnaul.\"\n\t\t","\"Will of Rebecca Newsom.\"\n\t\t","\"Norfleet. John Newsom.\"\n\t\t","\"Silas Newsom. Solomon Newsom. Sent some of Dr. George Newsome papers to her.\"\n\t\t","\"Solomon Newsom, GA\"\n\t\t","\"Eldridge Newsom #802 Surry County, VA -\u003e Madison Co. TN\"\n\t\t","\"Moses Newsome GA, NC, LA, TX\"\n\t\t","\"Allen Lawson Newsome\"\n\t\t","\"William Newsome, Stokes Co. NC\"\n\t\t","\"GA\"\n\t\t","\"Re: Shirley Perkins, Wayne Co. NC\"\n\t\t","\"Joel Newsom #854 and Rebecca Dickerson\"\n\t\t","\"Pearson Newsom IN, Harrison D. Newsom #2519?\"\n\t\t","\"3514 James Newsom - see Boone -\u003e KY\"\n\t\t","\"Thomas Newsom VA\"\n\t\t","\"Ransome Newsom\"\n\t\t","\"Newsom Town, Davidson Co. NC\"\n\t\t","\"Randolph Co. NC. Davidson Co. NC, Newsome Town.\n\t\t","\"Moses Newsom. Hosea Newsom. Charles Newsom m. Pruden.\"\n\t\t","\"Re: Tom Kasinger. Newsom - Ahoskie, NC. Boone. Britton.\"\n\t\t","\"Carroll Co. MO\"\n\t\t","\"Hartford Co. NC\"\n\t\t","\"Photo of Davenport and Arminda Newsom\"\n\t\t","\"Balaam Newsom b. 1824\"\n\t\t","\"I always thought that Hosea Newsom of Hertford Co. NC was the key to one of the Newsom branches I was researching. This is a special collection of emails.\"\n\t\t","\"TN. A collection of emails.\"\n\t\t","\"Bertie Co. NC\"\n\t\t","\"Harold Edward Newsom b. California. Trying to find father's relatives.\"\n\t\t","\"Researchers interested in Lucy Newsom.\"\n\t\t","\"GA-\u003eTX. Probably related to Alfred Alford Newsom 4133\"\n\t\t","\"Papers sent by Dr. George Newsome Jr. Map of Richneck Plantation, Surry Co. VA\"\n\t\t","\"Mary Ann Thomas. TX. Manuscript by Carl Newsome. Purley TX\"\n\t\t","\"Genealogy\"\n\t\t","\"Harrison Newsom #2519. KY. FM Bob Newsome Moorhead KY\"\n\t\t","\"Lewis N. -\u003e Tivis Newberry Newsom\"\n\t\t","\"Mayor San Francisco\"\n\t\t","\"John Newsome b. 1764. Clairborne Newsom. 3718 John Newsome.\"\n\t\t","\"Good book on the Newsome line from William Newsom through Hertford Co. NC\"\n\t\t","\"Ahoskie NC\"\n\t\t","\"Figgures (sic) Newsom  NC\"\n\t\t","\"Early research paper for the Newsome family book.\"\n\t\t","\"Jane Newsom TN\"\n\t\t","\"Joab N-. Norfleet N-. Elizabeth Ancillly N- m. James Ireland Rippetoe MO. William went to Texas.\"\n\t\t","\"Harrison Newsom KY. Contains photos of her family.\"\n\t\t","\"Re: Don Dunnington\"\n\t\t","\"James William Newsom TN - Book. Lewis Newsom genealogy. William Newsom genealogy.\"\n\t\t","\"Hosea. Hertford Co. and KY - Caldwell\"\n\t\t","\"John Newsom b. c. 1797 in NC. McCracken Co. KY\"\n\t\t","\"John Newsom #3304. Patsy Alford #3305\"\n\t\t","\"Jefferson Davis Newsom. Grayson Co. TX\"\n\t","\"Julian Newsom 662\"\n\t","\"Ann Newsom b. TN d. MO\"\n\t","\"James Newsom b. 1792 GA. Joseph Ducksworth Newsom b. 1828 LA\"\n\t","\"TX\"\n\t","\"Athens, GA\"\n\t","\"Hosea Newsom genealogy. Charles2144 Newsom. John Newsom\" \n\t","\"Isaac Newsom GA -\u003e MS\"\n\t","\"Indiana Newsom. Joel Newsom genealogy. David Newsom Jr. genealogy. Amanda Newsom genealogy. Willis Newsom genealogy. Cader (sic?) Newsom genealogy. Daniel Newsom genealogy.\"\n\t","\"See Linda Edwards. Kinchen Newsom. Washington Co. GA\"\n\t","\"P. Wink. Gilliam see Paul Murauskas\"\n\t","\"I left this state to Dr. George Newsome Jr. but collected odd emails on Newsom's in the state.\"","\"Newsom genealogy is really messed up in KY\"","\"Where my Newsom family is located but never connected to Newsom's main branch.\"","\"William Newsom genealogy\"","\"House haunted by a Newsom\"","\"William Joel Newsom genealogy\"","\"Map to Newsom Mill west of Nashville, TN. William Newsom genealogy\"","\"William Newsom genealogy from 1400 -\u003e VA\"","Two documents that Nothdurft included with the collection when it was given to the Library of Virginia: \"Interesting Things about the Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family\" and \"Inventory of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Files\"","There are no restrictions.\n","English\n"],"unitid_tesim":["43744\n"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Rudy Nothdurft Collection of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family Genealogical Records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Rudy Nothdurft Collection of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family Genealogical Records"],"collection_ssim":["Rudy Nothdurft Collection of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family Genealogical Records"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"creator_ssm":["Nothdurft, Rudolph J., 1927-  \n"],"creator_ssim":["Nothdurft, Rudolph J., 1927-  \n"],"acqinfo_ssim":["Gift of Rudolph J. Nothdurft, Jr., Richland, South Carolina, 22 April 2008.\n"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["3 cubic feet (3 boxes)"],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions\n"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions.\n"],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eCollection is maintained in the original folder groupings established by Rudolph J. Nothdurft, Jr. The file folders retain the same labels as his originals. Additional information recorded in the Contents List was copied from Nothdurft's notes on the original file folders. The folders have been arranged alphabetically, with a separate section at the end for folders labeled with state name abbreviations. By and large, Nothdurft organized these notes under the name of the person from whom he received information, or for whom he provided information, not according to the individual or individuals being researched.\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["Collection is maintained in the original folder groupings established by Rudolph J. Nothdurft, Jr. The file folders retain the same labels as his originals. Additional information recorded in the Contents List was copied from Nothdurft's notes on the original file folders. The folders have been arranged alphabetically, with a separate section at the end for folders labeled with state name abbreviations. By and large, Nothdurft organized these notes under the name of the person from whom he received information, or for whom he provided information, not according to the individual or individuals being researched."],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe Rudy Nothdurft Collection of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family Genealogical Records. Accession 43744. Personal papers collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["The Rudy Nothdurft Collection of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family Genealogical Records. Accession 43744. Personal papers collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n"],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eGenealogical research files of Rudolph J. Nothdurft, Jr. (1927- ), focusing on the Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum family, mostly of the Southeast and Midwest. The bulk of the collection consists of correspondence between Nothdurft and others who either had or sought information on the family, and copies of primary source documents gathered during his research. Also included are two bound compilations done by Nothdurft, \u003ctitle type=\"simple\" render=\"italic\" href=\"\"\u003eCompiled Histories of Newsom, Newsham, Newsum, Newsome, and Nuzum Families Who Came to America\u003c/title\u003e, and \u003ctitle type=\"simple\" render=\"italic\" href=\"\"\u003eThe Newsom Newsome Family Genealogy and History\u003c/title\u003e, both completed in 2004.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Nathaniel Newsom, Elizabeth Ann Whitehead\"\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Green Berry Newsom VA\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"I never met Louise Vann Boone because she had passed on. She did leave behind some of her good research. RJN\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"TX, CA, Brandy? in CA\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Moses E. Newsom, maybe Hertford Co., NC\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"TX\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"This is the other Newsom line. John Newsom - Margaret Reason.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Stokes Co. NC\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Harrison Newsom\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"3094 William Jordan Newsom, b. 1838, Wayne Co. NC -\u0026gt; Carroll Co. MO. Has details of his Civil War pensions. See Darla Myers.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Simon Newsom -\u0026gt; Kincheon Newsom\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Clairborne Newsom. Also Thomas Wyche Newsome. See St. Arnaul.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Will of Rebecca Newsom.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Norfleet. John Newsom.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Silas Newsom. Solomon Newsom. Sent some of Dr. George Newsome papers to her.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Solomon Newsom, GA\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Eldridge Newsom #802 Surry County, VA -\u0026gt; Madison Co. TN\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Moses Newsome GA, NC, LA, TX\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Allen Lawson Newsome\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"William Newsome, Stokes Co. NC\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"GA\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Re: Shirley Perkins, Wayne Co. NC\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Joel Newsom #854 and Rebecca Dickerson\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Pearson Newsom IN, Harrison D. Newsom #2519?\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"3514 James Newsom - see Boone -\u0026gt; KY\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Thomas Newsom VA\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Ransome Newsom\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Newsom Town, Davidson Co. NC\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Randolph Co. NC. Davidson Co. NC, Newsome Town.\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Moses Newsom. Hosea Newsom. Charles Newsom m. Pruden.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Re: Tom Kasinger. Newsom - Ahoskie, NC. Boone. Britton.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Carroll Co. MO\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Hartford Co. NC\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Photo of Davenport and Arminda Newsom\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Balaam Newsom b. 1824\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"I always thought that Hosea Newsom of Hertford Co. NC was the key to one of the Newsom branches I was researching. This is a special collection of emails.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"TN. A collection of emails.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Bertie Co. NC\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Harold Edward Newsom b. California. Trying to find father's relatives.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Researchers interested in Lucy Newsom.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"GA-\u0026gt;TX. Probably related to Alfred Alford Newsom 4133\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Papers sent by Dr. George Newsome Jr. Map of Richneck Plantation, Surry Co. VA\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Mary Ann Thomas. TX. Manuscript by Carl Newsome. Purley TX\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Genealogy\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Harrison Newsom #2519. KY. FM Bob Newsome Moorhead KY\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Lewis N. -\u0026gt; Tivis Newberry Newsom\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Mayor San Francisco\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"John Newsome b. 1764. Clairborne Newsom. 3718 John Newsome.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Good book on the Newsome line from William Newsom through Hertford Co. NC\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Ahoskie NC\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Figgures (sic) Newsom  NC\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Early research paper for the Newsome family book.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Jane Newsom TN\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Joab N-. Norfleet N-. Elizabeth Ancillly N- m. James Ireland Rippetoe MO. William went to Texas.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Harrison Newsom KY. Contains photos of her family.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Re: Don Dunnington\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"James William Newsom TN - Book. Lewis Newsom genealogy. William Newsom genealogy.\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Hosea. Hertford Co. and KY - Caldwell\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"John Newsom b. c. 1797 in NC. McCracken Co. KY\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"John Newsom #3304. Patsy Alford #3305\"\n\t\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Jefferson Davis Newsom. Grayson Co. TX\"\n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Julian Newsom 662\"\n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Ann Newsom b. TN d. MO\"\n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"James Newsom b. 1792 GA. Joseph Ducksworth Newsom b. 1828 LA\"\n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"TX\"\n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Athens, GA\"\n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Hosea Newsom genealogy. Charles2144 Newsom. John Newsom\" \n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Isaac Newsom GA -\u0026gt; MS\"\n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Indiana Newsom. Joel Newsom genealogy. David Newsom Jr. genealogy. Amanda Newsom genealogy. Willis Newsom genealogy. Cader (sic?) Newsom genealogy. Daniel Newsom genealogy.\"\n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"See Linda Edwards. Kinchen Newsom. Washington Co. GA\"\n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"P. Wink. Gilliam see Paul Murauskas\"\n\t\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"I left this state to Dr. George Newsome Jr. but collected odd emails on Newsom's in the state.\"\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Newsom genealogy is really messed up in KY\"\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Where my Newsom family is located but never connected to Newsom's main branch.\"\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"William Newsom genealogy\"\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"House haunted by a Newsom\"\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"William Joel Newsom genealogy\"\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"Map to Newsom Mill west of Nashville, TN. William Newsom genealogy\"\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\"William Newsom genealogy from 1400 -\u0026gt; VA\"\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTwo documents that Nothdurft included with the collection when it was given to the Library of Virginia: \"Interesting Things about the Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family\" and \"Inventory of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Files\"\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Genealogical research files of Rudolph J. Nothdurft, Jr. (1927- ), focusing on the Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum family, mostly of the Southeast and Midwest. The bulk of the collection consists of correspondence between Nothdurft and others who either had or sought information on the family, and copies of primary source documents gathered during his research. Also included are two bound compilations done by Nothdurft,  Compiled Histories of Newsom, Newsham, Newsum, Newsome, and Nuzum Families Who Came to America , and  The Newsom Newsome Family Genealogy and History , both completed in 2004.\n","\"Nathaniel Newsom, Elizabeth Ann Whitehead\"","\"Green Berry Newsom VA\"\n\t\t","\"I never met Louise Vann Boone because she had passed on. She did leave behind some of her good research. RJN\"\n\t\t","\"TX, CA, Brandy? in CA\"\n\t\t","\"Moses E. Newsom, maybe Hertford Co., NC\"\n\t\t","\"TX\"\n\t\t","\"This is the other Newsom line. John Newsom - Margaret Reason.\"\n\t\t","\"Stokes Co. NC\"\n\t\t","\"Harrison Newsom\"\n\t\t","\"3094 William Jordan Newsom, b. 1838, Wayne Co. NC -\u003e Carroll Co. MO. Has details of his Civil War pensions. See Darla Myers.\"\n\t\t","\"Simon Newsom -\u003e Kincheon Newsom\"\n\t\t","\"Clairborne Newsom. Also Thomas Wyche Newsome. See St. Arnaul.\"\n\t\t","\"Will of Rebecca Newsom.\"\n\t\t","\"Norfleet. John Newsom.\"\n\t\t","\"Silas Newsom. Solomon Newsom. Sent some of Dr. George Newsome papers to her.\"\n\t\t","\"Solomon Newsom, GA\"\n\t\t","\"Eldridge Newsom #802 Surry County, VA -\u003e Madison Co. TN\"\n\t\t","\"Moses Newsome GA, NC, LA, TX\"\n\t\t","\"Allen Lawson Newsome\"\n\t\t","\"William Newsome, Stokes Co. NC\"\n\t\t","\"GA\"\n\t\t","\"Re: Shirley Perkins, Wayne Co. NC\"\n\t\t","\"Joel Newsom #854 and Rebecca Dickerson\"\n\t\t","\"Pearson Newsom IN, Harrison D. Newsom #2519?\"\n\t\t","\"3514 James Newsom - see Boone -\u003e KY\"\n\t\t","\"Thomas Newsom VA\"\n\t\t","\"Ransome Newsom\"\n\t\t","\"Newsom Town, Davidson Co. NC\"\n\t\t","\"Randolph Co. NC. Davidson Co. NC, Newsome Town.\n\t\t","\"Moses Newsom. Hosea Newsom. Charles Newsom m. Pruden.\"\n\t\t","\"Re: Tom Kasinger. Newsom - Ahoskie, NC. Boone. Britton.\"\n\t\t","\"Carroll Co. MO\"\n\t\t","\"Hartford Co. NC\"\n\t\t","\"Photo of Davenport and Arminda Newsom\"\n\t\t","\"Balaam Newsom b. 1824\"\n\t\t","\"I always thought that Hosea Newsom of Hertford Co. NC was the key to one of the Newsom branches I was researching. This is a special collection of emails.\"\n\t\t","\"TN. A collection of emails.\"\n\t\t","\"Bertie Co. NC\"\n\t\t","\"Harold Edward Newsom b. California. Trying to find father's relatives.\"\n\t\t","\"Researchers interested in Lucy Newsom.\"\n\t\t","\"GA-\u003eTX. Probably related to Alfred Alford Newsom 4133\"\n\t\t","\"Papers sent by Dr. George Newsome Jr. Map of Richneck Plantation, Surry Co. VA\"\n\t\t","\"Mary Ann Thomas. TX. Manuscript by Carl Newsome. Purley TX\"\n\t\t","\"Genealogy\"\n\t\t","\"Harrison Newsom #2519. KY. FM Bob Newsome Moorhead KY\"\n\t\t","\"Lewis N. -\u003e Tivis Newberry Newsom\"\n\t\t","\"Mayor San Francisco\"\n\t\t","\"John Newsome b. 1764. Clairborne Newsom. 3718 John Newsome.\"\n\t\t","\"Good book on the Newsome line from William Newsom through Hertford Co. NC\"\n\t\t","\"Ahoskie NC\"\n\t\t","\"Figgures (sic) Newsom  NC\"\n\t\t","\"Early research paper for the Newsome family book.\"\n\t\t","\"Jane Newsom TN\"\n\t\t","\"Joab N-. Norfleet N-. Elizabeth Ancillly N- m. James Ireland Rippetoe MO. William went to Texas.\"\n\t\t","\"Harrison Newsom KY. Contains photos of her family.\"\n\t\t","\"Re: Don Dunnington\"\n\t\t","\"James William Newsom TN - Book. Lewis Newsom genealogy. William Newsom genealogy.\"\n\t\t","\"Hosea. Hertford Co. and KY - Caldwell\"\n\t\t","\"John Newsom b. c. 1797 in NC. McCracken Co. KY\"\n\t\t","\"John Newsom #3304. Patsy Alford #3305\"\n\t\t","\"Jefferson Davis Newsom. Grayson Co. TX\"\n\t","\"Julian Newsom 662\"\n\t","\"Ann Newsom b. TN d. MO\"\n\t","\"James Newsom b. 1792 GA. Joseph Ducksworth Newsom b. 1828 LA\"\n\t","\"TX\"\n\t","\"Athens, GA\"\n\t","\"Hosea Newsom genealogy. Charles2144 Newsom. John Newsom\" \n\t","\"Isaac Newsom GA -\u003e MS\"\n\t","\"Indiana Newsom. Joel Newsom genealogy. David Newsom Jr. genealogy. Amanda Newsom genealogy. Willis Newsom genealogy. Cader (sic?) Newsom genealogy. Daniel Newsom genealogy.\"\n\t","\"See Linda Edwards. Kinchen Newsom. Washington Co. GA\"\n\t","\"P. Wink. Gilliam see Paul Murauskas\"\n\t","\"I left this state to Dr. George Newsome Jr. but collected odd emails on Newsom's in the state.\"","\"Newsom genealogy is really messed up in KY\"","\"Where my Newsom family is located but never connected to Newsom's main branch.\"","\"William Newsom genealogy\"","\"House haunted by a Newsom\"","\"William Joel Newsom genealogy\"","\"Map to Newsom Mill west of Nashville, TN. William Newsom genealogy\"","\"William Newsom genealogy from 1400 -\u003e VA\"","Two documents that Nothdurft included with the collection when it was given to the Library of Virginia: \"Interesting Things about the Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Family\" and \"Inventory of Newsom-Newsome-Nuzum Files\""],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions\n"],"userestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions.\n"],"language_ssim":["English\n"],"total_component_count_is":140,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T09:22:54.892Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi04152_c01_c120"}}],"included":[{"type":"facet","id":"repository_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Repository","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Library of Virginia","value":"Library of Virginia","hits":475431},"links":{"remove":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/repository_ssim.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2"}},{"type":"facet","id":"collection_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Collection","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"124th Virginia Militia Infantry Regiment Records,\n1833-1848","value":"124th Virginia Militia Infantry Regiment Records,\n1833-1848","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=124th+Virginia+Militia+Infantry+Regiment+Records%2C%0A1833-1848\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"2300 Club, Records, \n         \n         1965-2000","value":"2300 Club, Records, \n         \n         1965-2000","hits":20},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=2300+Club%2C+Records%2C+%0A+++++++++%0A+++++++++1965-2000\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"A Guide to Correspondence, vouchers, pay and muster rolls - Mexican War Volunteers, \n1846-1860","value":"A Guide to Correspondence, vouchers, pay and muster rolls - Mexican War Volunteers, \n1846-1860","hits":10},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=A+Guide+to+Correspondence%2C+vouchers%2C+pay+and+muster+rolls+-+Mexican+War+Volunteers%2C+%0A1846-1860\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"A Guide to Minutes and Records - Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission, \n1966-1973","value":"A Guide to Minutes and Records - Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission, \n1966-1973","hits":8},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=A+Guide+to+Minutes+and+Records+-+Virginia+Historic+Landmarks+Commission%2C+%0A1966-1973\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"A Guide to Prince Edward County (Va.) Register of Colored Persons cohabiting together as Husband and Wife,\n27th February 1866","value":"A Guide to Prince Edward County (Va.) Register of Colored Persons cohabiting together as Husband and Wife,\n27th February 1866","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=A+Guide+to+Prince+Edward+County+%28Va.%29+Register+of+Colored+Persons+cohabiting+together+as+Husband+and+Wife%2C%0A27th+February+1866\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"A Guide to an Unidentified Blacksmith Account Book,\n1879-1885","value":"A Guide to an Unidentified Blacksmith Account Book,\n1879-1885","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=A+Guide+to+an+Unidentified+Blacksmith+Account+Book%2C%0A1879-1885\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"A Guide to an Unidentified Confederate Soldier Letters,\n1863","value":"A Guide to an Unidentified Confederate Soldier Letters,\n1863","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=A+Guide+to+an+Unidentified+Confederate+Soldier+Letters%2C%0A1863\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"A Guide to an Unidentified General Store Account Book,\n1884-1886","value":"A Guide to an Unidentified General Store Account Book,\n1884-1886","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=A+Guide+to+an+Unidentified+General+Store+Account+Book%2C%0A1884-1886\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"A Guide to an Unidentified General Store Ledger B,\n1882-1884","value":"A Guide to an Unidentified General Store Ledger B,\n1882-1884","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=A+Guide+to+an+Unidentified+General+Store+Ledger+B%2C%0A1882-1884\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"A Guide to an Unidentified Livery Ledger,\n1876-1878","value":"A Guide to an Unidentified Livery Ledger,\n1876-1878","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=A+Guide+to+an+Unidentified+Livery+Ledger%2C%0A1876-1878\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"A Guide to an Unidentified Merchant Daybook,\n1806-1807","value":"A Guide to an Unidentified Merchant Daybook,\n1806-1807","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=A+Guide+to+an+Unidentified+Merchant+Daybook%2C%0A1806-1807\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/collection_ssim.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2"}},{"type":"facet","id":"date_range_isim","attributes":{"label":"Date range","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"1000","value":"1000","hits":7},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1000\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1775","value":"1775","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1775\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1776","value":"1776","hits":8},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1776\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1777","value":"1777","hits":9},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1777\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1778","value":"1778","hits":10},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1778\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1779","value":"1779","hits":14},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1779\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1780","value":"1780","hits":16},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1780\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1781","value":"1781","hits":19},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1781\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1782","value":"1782","hits":14},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1782\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1783","value":"1783","hits":12},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1783\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1784","value":"1784","hits":16},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1784\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/date_range_isim.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2"}},{"type":"facet","id":"creator_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Creator","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"","value":"","hits":5},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcreators%5D%5B%5D=\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"\nEssex County (Va.) Circuit Court\n","value":"\nEssex County (Va.) Circuit Court\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcreators%5D%5B%5D=%0AEssex+County+%28Va.%29+Circuit+Court%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"\nVirginia General Assembly Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission \n","value":"\nVirginia General Assembly Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission \n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcreators%5D%5B%5D=%0AVirginia+General+Assembly+Joint+Legislative+Audit+and+Review+Commission+%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"  Richmond (Va.) Circuit Court; Richmond (Va.) Hustings Court I; Court of Law and Equity II\n","value":"  Richmond (Va.) Circuit Court; Richmond (Va.) Hustings Court I; Court of Law and Equity II\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcreators%5D%5B%5D=++Richmond+%28Va.%29+Circuit+Court%3B+Richmond+%28Va.%29+Hustings+Court+I%3B+Court+of+Law+and+Equity+II%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":" Alleghany County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n","value":" Alleghany County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcreators%5D%5B%5D=+Alleghany+County+%28Va.%29+Circuit+Court.%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":" Amelia County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n","value":" Amelia County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcreators%5D%5B%5D=+Amelia+County+%28Va.%29+Circuit+Court.%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":" Lynchburg (Va.) Circuit Court.\n","value":" Lynchburg (Va.) Circuit Court.\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcreators%5D%5B%5D=+Lynchburg+%28Va.%29+Circuit+Court.%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":" Patrick County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n","value":" Patrick County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcreators%5D%5B%5D=+Patrick+County+%28Va.%29+Circuit+Court.%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":" State Corporation Commission\n","value":" State Corporation Commission\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcreators%5D%5B%5D=+State+Corporation+Commission%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":" Virginia Office of the Secretary of Agriculture and Forestry\n","value":" Virginia Office of the Secretary of Agriculture and Forestry\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcreators%5D%5B%5D=+Virginia+Office+of+the+Secretary+of+Agriculture+and+Forestry%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":" Virginia. Dept. of Military Affairs. \n","value":" Virginia. Dept. of Military Affairs. \n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcreators%5D%5B%5D=+Virginia.+Dept.+of+Military+Affairs.+%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/creator_ssim.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2"}},{"type":"facet","id":"names_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Names","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"\n                  G[eorge] W[ashington] C[ustis] Lee","value":"\n                  G[eorge] W[ashington] C[ustis] Lee","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bnames%5D%5B%5D=%0A++++++++++++++++++G%5Beorge%5D+W%5Bashington%5D+C%5Bustis%5D+Lee\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"\n                  H[umphreys]","value":"\n                  H[umphreys]","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bnames%5D%5B%5D=%0A++++++++++++++++++H%5Bumphreys%5D\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"\n                  Mrs. J. W. Johnston","value":"\n                  Mrs. J. W. Johnston","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bnames%5D%5B%5D=%0A++++++++++++++++++Mrs.+J.+W.+Johnston\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"\n                  [P]. G. T. Beauregard","value":"\n                  [P]. G. T. Beauregard","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bnames%5D%5B%5D=%0A++++++++++++++++++%5BP%5D.+G.+T.+Beauregard\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"\n               Baker","value":"\n               Baker","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bnames%5D%5B%5D=%0A+++++++++++++++Baker\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"\n               Ewell","value":"\n               Ewell","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bnames%5D%5B%5D=%0A+++++++++++++++Ewell\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"\n               Jemison","value":"\n               Jemison","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bnames%5D%5B%5D=%0A+++++++++++++++Jemison\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"\n               Kemper","value":"\n               Kemper","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bnames%5D%5B%5D=%0A+++++++++++++++Kemper\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"\n               Moore","value":"\n               Moore","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bnames%5D%5B%5D=%0A+++++++++++++++Moore\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"\n               Patrick","value":"\n               Patrick","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bnames%5D%5B%5D=%0A+++++++++++++++Patrick\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"\n               Richardson","value":"\n               Richardson","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bnames%5D%5B%5D=%0A+++++++++++++++Richardson\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/names_ssim.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2"}},{"type":"facet","id":"geogname_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Places","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Albemarle County (Va.)--History--19th century.\n","value":"Albemarle County (Va.)--History--19th century.\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bplaces%5D%5B%5D=Albemarle+County+%28Va.%29--History--19th+century.%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Albemarle County (Va.)--History--Civil War, 1861-1865.\n","value":"Albemarle County (Va.)--History--Civil War, 1861-1865.\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bplaces%5D%5B%5D=Albemarle+County+%28Va.%29--History--Civil+War%2C+1861-1865.%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Albemarle County (Va.)--History--Revolution, 1775-1783.\n","value":"Albemarle County (Va.)--History--Revolution, 1775-1783.\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bplaces%5D%5B%5D=Albemarle+County+%28Va.%29--History--Revolution%2C+1775-1783.%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Albemarle County (Va.)--History--War of 1812.\n","value":"Albemarle County (Va.)--History--War of 1812.\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bplaces%5D%5B%5D=Albemarle+County+%28Va.%29--History--War+of+1812.%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Albemarle County (Va.)--History--World War, 1914-1918.\n","value":"Albemarle County (Va.)--History--World War, 1914-1918.\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bplaces%5D%5B%5D=Albemarle+County+%28Va.%29--History--World+War%2C+1914-1918.%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Albemarle County (Va.)--History.\n","value":"Albemarle County (Va.)--History.\n","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bplaces%5D%5B%5D=Albemarle+County+%28Va.%29--History.%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Amherst County (Va.)--History--18th century.\n","value":"Amherst County (Va.)--History--18th century.\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bplaces%5D%5B%5D=Amherst+County+%28Va.%29--History--18th+century.%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Amherst County (Va.)--History.\n","value":"Amherst County (Va.)--History.\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bplaces%5D%5B%5D=Amherst+County+%28Va.%29--History.%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Arkansas. -- Politics and government -- 19th century","value":"Arkansas. -- Politics and government -- 19th century","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bplaces%5D%5B%5D=Arkansas.+--+Politics+and+government+--+19th+century\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Augusta County (Va.)--History--18th century.\n","value":"Augusta County (Va.)--History--18th century.\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bplaces%5D%5B%5D=Augusta+County+%28Va.%29--History--18th+century.%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Augusta County (Va.)--History.\n","value":"Augusta County (Va.)--History.\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bplaces%5D%5B%5D=Augusta+County+%28Va.%29--History.%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/geogname_ssim.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2"}},{"type":"facet","id":"access_subjects_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Subjects","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"  Household supplies -- Virginia -- Arlington County. ","value":"  Household supplies -- Virginia -- Arlington County. ","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Baccess_subjects%5D%5B%5D=++Household+supplies+--+Virginia+--+Arlington+County.+\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":" Barter -- Virginia -- Bland County.","value":" Barter -- Virginia -- Bland County.","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Baccess_subjects%5D%5B%5D=+Barter+--+Virginia+--+Bland+County.\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":" Barter -- Virginia -- Powhatan County.","value":" Barter -- Virginia -- Powhatan County.","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Baccess_subjects%5D%5B%5D=+Barter+--+Virginia+--+Powhatan+County.\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":" Daybooks -- Virginia -- Arlington County.","value":" Daybooks -- Virginia -- Arlington County.","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Baccess_subjects%5D%5B%5D=+Daybooks+--+Virginia+--+Arlington+County.\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":" Dry-goods -- Virginia -- Bland County.","value":" Dry-goods -- Virginia -- Bland County.","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Baccess_subjects%5D%5B%5D=+Dry-goods+--+Virginia+--+Bland+County.\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":" Dry-goods -- Virginia -- Powhatan County.","value":" Dry-goods -- Virginia -- Powhatan County.","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Baccess_subjects%5D%5B%5D=+Dry-goods+--+Virginia+--+Powhatan+County.\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":" Machinists -- Virginia -- Fredericksburg. ","value":" Machinists -- Virginia -- Fredericksburg. ","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Baccess_subjects%5D%5B%5D=+Machinists+--+Virginia+--+Fredericksburg.+\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":" Slaves -- Virginia -- Albemarle County ","value":" Slaves -- Virginia -- Albemarle County ","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Baccess_subjects%5D%5B%5D=+Slaves+--+Virginia+--+Albemarle+County+\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Abandonment (maritime law)--Washington (D.C.)--Alexandria County.","value":"Abandonment (maritime law)--Washington (D.C.)--Alexandria County.","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Baccess_subjects%5D%5B%5D=Abandonment+%28maritime+law%29--Washington+%28D.C.%29--Alexandria+County.\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Abortion--Virginia--Tazewell County.\n","value":"Abortion--Virginia--Tazewell County.\n","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Baccess_subjects%5D%5B%5D=Abortion--Virginia--Tazewell+County.%0A\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Absentee voting--Virginia--Henry County.","value":"Absentee voting--Virginia--Henry County.","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Baccess_subjects%5D%5B%5D=Absentee+voting--Virginia--Henry+County.\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/access_subjects_ssim.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2"}},{"type":"facet","id":"level_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Level","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Collection","value":"Collection","hits":5404},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Collection\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"File","value":"File","hits":409728},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Fonds","value":"Fonds","hits":6},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Fonds\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Item","value":"Item","hits":39259},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Record group","value":"Record group","hits":9},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Record+group\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Series","value":"Series","hits":6653},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Series\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Subgroup","value":"Subgroup","hits":21},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Subgroup\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Subseries","value":"Subseries","hits":11348},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Subseries\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/level_ssim.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2"}},{"type":"facet","id":"access","attributes":{"label":"Access","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Online access","value":"online","hits":639},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Baccess%5D%5B%5D=online\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/access.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"all_fields","attributes":{"label":"All Fields"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47532\u0026search_field=all_fields"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"keyword","attributes":{"label":"Keyword"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47532\u0026search_field=keyword"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"name","attributes":{"label":"Name"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47532\u0026search_field=name"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"place","attributes":{"label":"Place"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47532\u0026search_field=place"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"subject","attributes":{"label":"Subject"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47532\u0026search_field=subject"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"title","attributes":{"label":"Title"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47532\u0026search_field=title"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"container","attributes":{"label":"Container"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47532\u0026search_field=container"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"identifier","attributes":{"label":"Identifier"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47532\u0026search_field=identifier"}},{"type":"sort","id":"score desc, title_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"relevance"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47532\u0026sort=score+desc%2C+title_sort+asc"}},{"type":"sort","id":"date_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"date (ascending)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47532\u0026sort=date_sort+asc"}},{"type":"sort","id":"date_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"date (descending)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47532\u0026sort=date_sort+desc"}},{"type":"sort","id":"creator_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"creator (A-Z)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47532\u0026sort=creator_sort+asc"}},{"type":"sort","id":"creator_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"creator (Z-A)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47532\u0026sort=creator_sort+desc"}},{"type":"sort","id":"title_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"title (A-Z)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47532\u0026sort=title_sort+asc"}},{"type":"sort","id":"title_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"title (Z-A)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia\u0026facet.page=2\u0026page=47532\u0026sort=title_sort+desc"}}]}