{"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=6\u0026view=list","prev":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=5\u0026view=list","next":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=7\u0026view=list","last":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=17\u0026view=list"},"meta":{"pages":{"current_page":6,"next_page":7,"prev_page":5,"total_pages":17,"limit_value":10,"offset_value":50,"total_count":163,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false}},"data":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c48","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Editor in Chief – Correspondence (John C. Ale)","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c48#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c48","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c48"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c48","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Editor in Chief – Correspondence (John C. Ale)","Box 5"],"title_filing_ssi":"Editor in Chief – Correspondence (John C. Ale)","title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Correspondence (John C. Ale)"],"title_tesim":["Editor in Chief – Correspondence (John C. Ale)"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1978-1979"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1978/1979"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Correspondence (John C. Ale)"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":49,"date_range_isim":[1978,1979],"containers_ssim":["Box 5"],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#47","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c48"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c42","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Editor in Chief – Correspondence [Jonathan B. Sallet] (3 folders)","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c42#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c42","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c42"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c42","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Editor in Chief – Correspondence [Jonathan B. Sallet] (3 folders)","Box 3"],"title_filing_ssi":"Editor in Chief – Correspondence [Jonathan B. Sallet] (3 folders)","title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Correspondence [Jonathan B. Sallet] (3 folders)"],"title_tesim":["Editor in Chief – Correspondence [Jonathan B. Sallet] (3 folders)"],"unitdate_other_ssim":["1977"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1977"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Correspondence [Jonathan B. Sallet] (3 folders)"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":43,"date_range_isim":[1977],"containers_ssim":["Box 3"],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#41","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c42"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c27","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Editor in Chief – Dean Search","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c27#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c27","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c27"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c27","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Editor in Chief – Dean Search","Box 2"],"title_filing_ssi":"Editor in Chief – Dean Search","title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Dean Search"],"title_tesim":["Editor in Chief – Dean Search"],"unitdate_other_ssim":["1976"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1976"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Dean Search"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":28,"date_range_isim":[1976],"containers_ssim":["Box 2"],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#26","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c27"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c28","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Editor in Chief – Editorial Board. Lists and memo re The Current Literature on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c28#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c28","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c28"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c28","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Editor in Chief – Editorial Board. Lists and memo re The Current Literature on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel","Box 2"],"title_filing_ssi":"Editor in Chief – Editorial Board. Lists and memo re The Current Literature on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel","title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Editorial Board. Lists and memo re The Current Literature on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel"],"title_tesim":["Editor in Chief – Editorial Board. Lists and memo re The Current Literature on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel"],"unitdate_other_ssim":["1976"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1976"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Editorial Board. Lists and memo re The Current Literature on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":29,"date_range_isim":[1976],"containers_ssim":["Box 2"],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#27","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c28"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c24","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Editor in Chief – Editorial Board Selection. [Selection processes for law reviews; selection of third year members; decision procedure; comments]","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c24#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c24","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c24"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c24","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Editor in Chief – Editorial Board Selection. [Selection processes for law reviews; selection of third year members; decision procedure; comments]","Box 2"],"title_filing_ssi":"Editor in Chief – Editorial Board Selection. [Selection processes for law reviews; selection of third year members; decision procedure; comments]","title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Editorial Board Selection. [Selection processes for law reviews; selection of third year members; decision procedure; comments]"],"title_tesim":["Editor in Chief – Editorial Board Selection. [Selection processes for law reviews; selection of third year members; decision procedure; comments]"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1975-1976"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1975/1976"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Editorial Board Selection. [Selection processes for law reviews; selection of third year members; decision procedure; comments]"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":25,"date_range_isim":[1975,1976],"containers_ssim":["Box 2"],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#23","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c24"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c29","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Editor in Chief – Faculty Liason","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c29#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c29","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c29"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c29","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Editor in Chief – Faculty Liason","Box 2"],"title_filing_ssi":"Editor in Chief – Faculty Liason","title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Faculty Liason"],"title_tesim":["Editor in Chief – Faculty Liason"],"unitdate_other_ssim":["1976"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1976"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Faculty Liason"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":30,"date_range_isim":[1976],"containers_ssim":["Box 2"],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#28","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c29"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c30","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Editor in Chief – Farmington Issue. Memorandum re the segregation of Farmington Club in Charlottesville and the impact on the VLR members; Report from the Committee to Study the Farmington Issue 2-23-1976","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c30#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c30","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c30"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c30","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Editor in Chief – Farmington Issue. Memorandum re the segregation of Farmington Club in Charlottesville and the impact on the VLR members; Report from the Committee to Study the Farmington Issue 2-23-1976","Box 2"],"title_filing_ssi":"Editor in Chief – Farmington Issue. Memorandum re the segregation of Farmington Club in Charlottesville and the impact on the VLR members; Report from the Committee to Study the Farmington Issue 2-23-1976","title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Farmington Issue. Memorandum re the segregation of Farmington Club in Charlottesville and the impact on the VLR members; Report from the Committee to Study the Farmington Issue 2-23-1976"],"title_tesim":["Editor in Chief – Farmington Issue. Memorandum re the segregation of Farmington Club in Charlottesville and the impact on the VLR members; Report from the Committee to Study the Farmington Issue 2-23-1976"],"unitdate_other_ssim":["1976"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1976"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Farmington Issue. Memorandum re the segregation of Farmington Club in Charlottesville and the impact on the VLR members; Report from the Committee to Study the Farmington Issue 2-23-1976"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":31,"date_range_isim":[1976],"containers_ssim":["Box 2"],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#29","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c30"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c43","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Editor in Chief – Frances Farmer Dedicatory Issue. [Handwriiten article by Bernard Chamberlain and draft of article by Hardy C. Dillard]","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c43#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c43","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c43"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c43","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Editor in Chief – Frances Farmer Dedicatory Issue. [Handwriiten article by Bernard Chamberlain and draft of article by Hardy C. Dillard]","Box 3"],"title_filing_ssi":"Editor in Chief – Frances Farmer Dedicatory Issue. [Handwriiten article by Bernard Chamberlain and draft of article by Hardy C. Dillard]","title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Frances Farmer Dedicatory Issue. [Handwriiten article by Bernard Chamberlain and draft of article by Hardy C. Dillard]"],"title_tesim":["Editor in Chief – Frances Farmer Dedicatory Issue. [Handwriiten article by Bernard Chamberlain and draft of article by Hardy C. Dillard]"],"unitdate_other_ssim":["1977"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1977"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Frances Farmer Dedicatory Issue. [Handwriiten article by Bernard Chamberlain and draft of article by Hardy C. Dillard]"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":44,"date_range_isim":[1977],"containers_ssim":["Box 3"],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#42","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c43"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c15","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Editor in Chief – Guidelines for the Selection of Editorial Board Members on the basis of grades; grades, memoranda","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c15#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c15","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c15"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c15","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Editor in Chief – Guidelines for the Selection of Editorial Board Members on the basis of grades; grades, memoranda","Box 2"],"title_filing_ssi":"Editor in Chief – Guidelines for the Selection of Editorial Board Members on the basis of grades; grades, memoranda","title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Guidelines for the Selection of Editorial Board Members on the basis of grades; grades, memoranda"],"title_tesim":["Editor in Chief – Guidelines for the Selection of Editorial Board Members on the basis of grades; grades, memoranda"],"unitdate_other_ssim":["1975"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1975"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – Guidelines for the Selection of Editorial Board Members on the basis of grades; grades, memoranda"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":16,"date_range_isim":[1975],"containers_ssim":["Box 2"],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#14","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c15"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c16","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Editor in Chief – \"Legal Transplants\".  Correspondence with Prof. Alan Watson re possible symposium","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c16#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c16","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c16"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c16","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Editor in Chief – \"Legal Transplants\".  Correspondence with Prof. Alan Watson re possible symposium","Box 2"],"title_filing_ssi":"Editor in Chief – \"Legal Transplants\".  Correspondence with Prof. Alan Watson re possible symposium","title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – \"Legal Transplants\".  Correspondence with Prof. Alan Watson re possible symposium"],"title_tesim":["Editor in Chief – \"Legal Transplants\".  Correspondence with Prof. Alan Watson re possible symposium"],"unitdate_other_ssim":["1975"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1975"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Editor in Chief – \"Legal Transplants\".  Correspondence with Prof. Alan Watson re possible symposium"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":17,"date_range_isim":[1975],"containers_ssim":["Box 2"],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#15","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c16"}}],"included":[{"type":"facet","id":"repository_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Repository","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.","value":"University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.","hits":163},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=University+of+Virginia%2C+Special+Collections+Dept.\u0026view=list"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/repository_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"facet","id":"collection_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Collection","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Virginia Law Review records","value":"Virginia Law Review records","hits":163},"links":{"remove":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=list"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/collection_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"facet","id":"date_range_isim","attributes":{"label":"Date range","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"1960","value":"1960","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1960\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1961","value":"1961","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1961\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1962","value":"1962","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1962\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1963","value":"1963","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1963\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1964","value":"1964","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1964\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1965","value":"1965","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1965\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1966","value":"1966","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1966\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1967","value":"1967","hits":4},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1967\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1968","value":"1968","hits":4},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1968\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1969","value":"1969","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1969\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1970","value":"1970","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1970\u0026view=list"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/date_range_isim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"facet","id":"names_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Names","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","value":"Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bnames%5D%5B%5D=Arthur+J.+Morris+Law+Library+Special+Collections\u0026view=list"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/names_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"facet","id":"level_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Level","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Collection","value":"Collection","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Collection\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"File","value":"File","hits":116},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Floppy disks","value":"Floppy disks","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Floppy+disks\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Item","value":"Item","hits":40},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Photographs","value":"Photographs","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Photographs\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Poster","value":"Poster","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Poster\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Series","value":"Series","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Series\u0026view=list"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/level_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"all_fields","attributes":{"label":"All Fields"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=6\u0026search_field=all_fields\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"keyword","attributes":{"label":"Keyword"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=6\u0026search_field=keyword\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"name","attributes":{"label":"Name"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=6\u0026search_field=name\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"place","attributes":{"label":"Place"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=6\u0026search_field=place\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"subject","attributes":{"label":"Subject"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=6\u0026search_field=subject\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"title","attributes":{"label":"Title"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=6\u0026search_field=title\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"container","attributes":{"label":"Container"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=6\u0026search_field=container\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"identifier","attributes":{"label":"Identifier"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=6\u0026search_field=identifier\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"score desc, title_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"relevance"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=6\u0026sort=score+desc%2C+title_sort+asc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"date_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"date (ascending)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=6\u0026sort=date_sort+asc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"date_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"date (descending)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=6\u0026sort=date_sort+desc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"creator_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"creator (A-Z)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=6\u0026sort=creator_sort+asc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"creator_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"creator (Z-A)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=6\u0026sort=creator_sort+desc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"title_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"title (A-Z)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=6\u0026sort=title_sort+asc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"title_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"title (Z-A)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=6\u0026sort=title_sort+desc\u0026view=list"}}]}