{"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=13\u0026view=compact","prev":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=12\u0026view=compact","next":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=14\u0026view=compact","last":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=17\u0026view=compact"},"meta":{"pages":{"current_page":13,"next_page":14,"prev_page":12,"total_pages":17,"limit_value":10,"offset_value":120,"total_count":163,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false}},"data":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c51","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Note procedures, undated","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c51#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c51","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c51"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c51","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Note procedures, undated","Box 5"],"title_filing_ssi":"Note procedures, undated","title_ssm":["Note procedures, undated"],"title_tesim":["Note procedures, undated"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Note procedures, undated"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":52,"containers_ssim":["Box 5"],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#50","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c51"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c12","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"Ordinance No. 4457. An Ordinance to Amend the Official Code of Chattanooga, 1949, by Adding Section 10-a to Chapter 30 Therof. 8-19-58","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c12#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c12","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c12"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c12","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents."],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents."],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents.","Ordinance No. 4457. An Ordinance to Amend the Official Code of Chattanooga, 1949, by Adding Section 10-a to Chapter 30 Therof. 8-19-58"],"title_filing_ssi":"Ordinance No. 4457. An Ordinance to Amend the Official Code of Chattanooga, 1949, by Adding Section 10-a to Chapter 30 Therof. 8-19-58","title_ssm":["Ordinance No. 4457. An Ordinance to Amend the Official Code of Chattanooga, 1949, by Adding Section 10-a to Chapter 30 Therof. 8-19-58"],"title_tesim":["Ordinance No. 4457. An Ordinance to Amend the Official Code of Chattanooga, 1949, by Adding Section 10-a to Chapter 30 Therof. 8-19-58"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Ordinance No. 4457. An Ordinance to Amend the Official Code of Chattanooga, 1949, by Adding Section 10-a to Chapter 30 Therof. 8-19-58"],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":68,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#54/components#11","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c12"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c08","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"Ordinance No. 874. An Ordinance to Regulate Picketing in the City of Raleigh and to provide for the punishment of such pickets in the event of violation of the regulations prescribed for pickets and of those who unlawfully, by word or deed, interfere with or threaten the peaceful activities or pickets, 4-15-1960","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c08#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c08","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c08"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c08","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents."],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents."],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents.","Ordinance No. 874. An Ordinance to Regulate Picketing in the City of Raleigh and to provide for the punishment of such pickets in the event of violation of the regulations prescribed for pickets and of those who unlawfully, by word or deed, interfere with or threaten the peaceful activities or pickets, 4-15-1960"],"title_filing_ssi":"Ordinance No. 874. An Ordinance to Regulate Picketing in the City of Raleigh and to provide for the punishment of such pickets in the event of violation of the regulations prescribed for pickets and of those who unlawfully, by word or deed, interfere with or threaten the peaceful activities or pickets, 4-15-1960","title_ssm":["Ordinance No. 874. An Ordinance to Regulate Picketing in the City of Raleigh and to provide for the punishment of such pickets in the event of violation of the regulations prescribed for pickets and of those who unlawfully, by word or deed, interfere with or threaten the peaceful activities or pickets, 4-15-1960"],"title_tesim":["Ordinance No. 874. An Ordinance to Regulate Picketing in the City of Raleigh and to provide for the punishment of such pickets in the event of violation of the regulations prescribed for pickets and of those who unlawfully, by word or deed, interfere with or threaten the peaceful activities or pickets, 4-15-1960"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Ordinance No. 874. An Ordinance to Regulate Picketing in the City of Raleigh and to provide for the punishment of such pickets in the event of violation of the regulations prescribed for pickets and of those who unlawfully, by word or deed, interfere with or threaten the peaceful activities or pickets, 4-15-1960"],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":64,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#54/components#7","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c08"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c42","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Phil Busch articles and correspondence sent to Ronald J. Fisher, articles editor of VLR, to commemorate the 100th years of Virginia Law Review, 2014 (1987-1988)","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c42#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c42","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c42"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c42","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014","Phil Busch articles and correspondence sent to Ronald J. Fisher, articles editor of VLR, to commemorate the 100th years of Virginia Law Review, 2014 (1987-1988)","Box 18"],"title_filing_ssi":"Phil Busch articles and correspondence sent to Ronald J. Fisher, articles editor of VLR, to commemorate the 100th years of Virginia Law Review, 2014 (1987-1988)","title_ssm":["Phil Busch articles and correspondence sent to Ronald J. Fisher, articles editor of VLR, to commemorate the 100th years of Virginia Law Review, 2014 (1987-1988)"],"title_tesim":["Phil Busch articles and correspondence sent to Ronald J. Fisher, articles editor of VLR, to commemorate the 100th years of Virginia Law Review, 2014 (1987-1988)"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Phil Busch articles and correspondence sent to Ronald J. Fisher, articles editor of VLR, to commemorate the 100th years of Virginia Law Review, 2014 (1987-1988)"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":151,"containers_ssim":["Box 18"],"_nest_path_":"/components#1/components#41","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c42"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c44","type":"Photographs","attributes":{"title":"Photographs","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c44#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c44","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c44"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c44","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014","Photographs","Special Collections Photograph Collection Cabinets"],"title_filing_ssi":"Photographs","title_ssm":["Photographs"],"title_tesim":["Photographs"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1996-1997"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1996/1997"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Photographs"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":6,"level_ssm":["Photographs"],"level_ssim":["Photographs"],"sort_isi":153,"date_range_isim":[1996,1997],"containers_ssim":["Special Collections Photograph Collection Cabinets"],"_nest_path_":"/components#1/components#43","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c44"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c45","type":"Poster","attributes":{"title":"Poster: Virginia Law Review Centennial Symposium, Friday March 28, Saturday March 29, 2014","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c45#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c45","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c45"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c45","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014","Poster: Virginia Law Review Centennial Symposium, Friday March 28, Saturday March 29, 2014","Oversized file cabinet in Special Collections Repository"],"title_filing_ssi":"Poster: Virginia Law Review Centennial Symposium, Friday March 28, Saturday March 29, 2014","title_ssm":["Poster: Virginia Law Review Centennial Symposium, Friday March 28, Saturday March 29, 2014"],"title_tesim":["Poster: Virginia Law Review Centennial Symposium, Friday March 28, Saturday March 29, 2014"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Poster: Virginia Law Review Centennial Symposium, Friday March 28, Saturday March 29, 2014"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Poster"],"level_ssim":["Poster"],"sort_isi":160,"containers_ssim":["Oversized file cabinet in Special Collections Repository"],"_nest_path_":"/components#1/components#44","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c45"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c50","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Rejected Article from George Anastaplo","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c50#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c50","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c50"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c50","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Rejected Article from George Anastaplo","Box 5"],"title_filing_ssi":"Rejected Article from George Anastaplo","title_ssm":["Rejected Article from George Anastaplo"],"title_tesim":["Rejected Article from George Anastaplo"],"unitdate_other_ssim":["1979"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1979"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Rejected Article from George Anastaplo"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":51,"date_range_isim":[1979],"containers_ssim":["Box 5"],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#49","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c50"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c24","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Equal Educational Opportunity Made to the Los Angeles City Board of Education on September 12, 1963","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c24#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c24","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c24"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c24","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Equal Educational Opportunity Made to the Los Angeles City Board of Education on September 12, 1963"],"title_filing_ssi":"Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Equal Educational Opportunity Made to the Los Angeles City Board of Education on September 12, 1963","title_ssm":["Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Equal Educational Opportunity Made to the Los Angeles City Board of Education on September 12, 1963"],"title_tesim":["Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Equal Educational Opportunity Made to the Los Angeles City Board of Education on September 12, 1963"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Equal Educational Opportunity Made to the Los Angeles City Board of Education on September 12, 1963"],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":96,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55/components#23","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c24"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02","type":"Series","attributes":{"title":"RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014","abstract_or_scope":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02#abstract_or_scope","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":"\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e","label":"Abstract Or Scope"}},"breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"title_filing_ssi":"RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014","title_ssm":["RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"title_tesim":["RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"normalized_title_ssm":["RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"component_level_isim":[1],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":45,"level_ssm":["Series"],"level_ssim":["Series"],"sort_isi":109,"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"_nest_path_":"/components#1","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c03","type":"Series","attributes":{"title":"RG 32/203-2019 Records of the Virginia Law Review","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c03#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c03","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c03"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c03","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203-2019 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"title_filing_ssi":"RG 32/203-2019 Records of the Virginia Law Review","title_ssm":["RG 32/203-2019 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"title_tesim":["RG 32/203-2019 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"normalized_title_ssm":["RG 32/203-2019 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"component_level_isim":[1],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":1,"level_ssm":["Series"],"level_ssim":["Series"],"sort_isi":161,"acqinfo_ssim":["Kareem Ramadan, managing editor of the VLR transferred this box of old Virginia Law Review floppy disks to the archives in 2019."],"_nest_path_":"/components#2","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c03"}}],"included":[{"type":"facet","id":"repository_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Repository","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.","value":"University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.","hits":163},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=University+of+Virginia%2C+Special+Collections+Dept.\u0026view=compact"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/repository_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"facet","id":"collection_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Collection","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Virginia Law Review records","value":"Virginia Law Review records","hits":163},"links":{"remove":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=compact"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/collection_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"facet","id":"date_range_isim","attributes":{"label":"Date range","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"1960","value":"1960","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1960\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1961","value":"1961","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1961\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1962","value":"1962","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1962\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1963","value":"1963","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1963\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1964","value":"1964","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1964\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1965","value":"1965","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1965\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1966","value":"1966","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1966\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1967","value":"1967","hits":4},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1967\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1968","value":"1968","hits":4},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1968\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1969","value":"1969","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1969\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1970","value":"1970","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1970\u0026view=compact"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/date_range_isim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"facet","id":"names_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Names","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","value":"Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bnames%5D%5B%5D=Arthur+J.+Morris+Law+Library+Special+Collections\u0026view=compact"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/names_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"facet","id":"level_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Level","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Collection","value":"Collection","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Collection\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"File","value":"File","hits":116},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Floppy disks","value":"Floppy disks","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Floppy+disks\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Item","value":"Item","hits":40},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Photographs","value":"Photographs","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Photographs\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Poster","value":"Poster","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Poster\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Series","value":"Series","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Series\u0026view=compact"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/level_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"all_fields","attributes":{"label":"All Fields"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=13\u0026search_field=all_fields\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"keyword","attributes":{"label":"Keyword"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=13\u0026search_field=keyword\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"name","attributes":{"label":"Name"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=13\u0026search_field=name\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"place","attributes":{"label":"Place"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=13\u0026search_field=place\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"subject","attributes":{"label":"Subject"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=13\u0026search_field=subject\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"title","attributes":{"label":"Title"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=13\u0026search_field=title\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"container","attributes":{"label":"Container"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=13\u0026search_field=container\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"identifier","attributes":{"label":"Identifier"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=13\u0026search_field=identifier\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"sort","id":"score desc, title_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"relevance"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=13\u0026sort=score+desc%2C+title_sort+asc\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"sort","id":"date_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"date (ascending)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=13\u0026sort=date_sort+asc\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"sort","id":"date_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"date (descending)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=13\u0026sort=date_sort+desc\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"sort","id":"creator_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"creator (A-Z)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=13\u0026sort=creator_sort+asc\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"sort","id":"creator_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"creator (Z-A)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=13\u0026sort=creator_sort+desc\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"sort","id":"title_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"title (A-Z)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=13\u0026sort=title_sort+asc\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"sort","id":"title_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"title (Z-A)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=13\u0026sort=title_sort+desc\u0026view=compact"}}]}