{"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=10\u0026view=list","prev":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=9\u0026view=list","next":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=11\u0026view=list","last":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=17\u0026view=list"},"meta":{"pages":{"current_page":10,"next_page":11,"prev_page":9,"total_pages":17,"limit_value":10,"offset_value":90,"total_count":163,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false}},"data":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c03_c01","type":"Floppy disks","attributes":{"title":"Floppy disks","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c03_c01#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c03_c01","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c03_c01"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c03_c01","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c03","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c03","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c03"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c03"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203-2019 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203-2019 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203-2019 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Floppy disks","Box 19"],"title_filing_ssi":"Floppy disks ","title_ssm":["Floppy disks"],"title_tesim":["Floppy disks"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Floppy disks"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Floppy disks"],"level_ssim":["Floppy disks"],"sort_isi":162,"containers_ssim":["Box 19"],"_nest_path_":"/components#2/components#0","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c03_c01"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c14","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"Guiding Principles for Dealing with De Facto Segregation in Public Schools (Drafted by the State Education Commissioner's Advisory Committee on Human Relations and Community Tensions), n.d.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c14#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c14","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c14"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c14","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","Guiding Principles for Dealing with De Facto Segregation in Public Schools (Drafted by the State Education Commissioner's Advisory Committee on Human Relations and Community Tensions), n.d."],"title_filing_ssi":"Guiding Principles for Dealing with De Facto Segregation in Public Schools (Drafted by the State Education Commissioner's Advisory Committee on Human Relations and Community Tensions), n.d.","title_ssm":["Guiding Principles for Dealing with De Facto Segregation in Public Schools (Drafted by the State Education Commissioner's Advisory Committee on Human Relations and Community Tensions), n.d."],"title_tesim":["Guiding Principles for Dealing with De Facto Segregation in Public Schools (Drafted by the State Education Commissioner's Advisory Committee on Human Relations and Community Tensions), n.d."],"normalized_title_ssm":["Guiding Principles for Dealing with De Facto Segregation in Public Schools (Drafted by the State Education Commissioner's Advisory Committee on Human Relations and Community Tensions), n.d."],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":86,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55/components#13","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c14"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c21","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"Heyman, Ira Michael: :\"Civil Rights U. S. A. Public Schools. Cities in the North and West 1963. Oakland\". Staff report Submitted to the Unites States Commission on Civil Rights and Authorized for Publication.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c21#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c21","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c21"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c21","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","Heyman, Ira Michael: :\"Civil Rights U. S. A. Public Schools. Cities in the North and West 1963. Oakland\". Staff report Submitted to the Unites States Commission on Civil Rights and Authorized for Publication."],"title_filing_ssi":"Heyman, Ira Michael: :\"Civil Rights U. S. A. Public Schools. Cities in the North and West 1963. Oakland\". Staff report Submitted to the Unites States Commission on Civil Rights and Authorized for Publication.","title_ssm":["Heyman, Ira Michael: :\"Civil Rights U. S. A. Public Schools. Cities in the North and West 1963. Oakland\". Staff report Submitted to the Unites States Commission on Civil Rights and Authorized for Publication."],"title_tesim":["Heyman, Ira Michael: :\"Civil Rights U. S. A. Public Schools. Cities in the North and West 1963. Oakland\". Staff report Submitted to the Unites States Commission on Civil Rights and Authorized for Publication."],"normalized_title_ssm":["Heyman, Ira Michael: :\"Civil Rights U. S. A. Public Schools. Cities in the North and West 1963. Oakland\". Staff report Submitted to the Unites States Commission on Civil Rights and Authorized for Publication."],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":93,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55/components#20","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c21"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c04","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"In Equity No. 63 C 293 (3). USDC Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis v. St Louis National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Committee for Parents of Transported Pupils, West End Community Conference, Evelyn H. Roberts et al… Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Injunction; Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment: Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment and Injunction, n. d.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c04#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c04","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c04"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c04","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","In Equity No. 63 C 293 (3). USDC Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis v. St Louis National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Committee for Parents of Transported Pupils, West End Community Conference, Evelyn H. Roberts et al… Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Injunction; Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment: Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment and Injunction, n. d."],"title_filing_ssi":"In Equity No. 63 C 293 (3). USDC Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis v. St Louis National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Committee for Parents of Transported Pupils, West End Community Conference, Evelyn H. Roberts et al… Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Injunction; Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment: Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment and Injunction, n. d.","title_ssm":["In Equity No. 63 C 293 (3). USDC Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis v. St Louis National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Committee for Parents of Transported Pupils, West End Community Conference, Evelyn H. Roberts et al… Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Injunction; Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment: Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment and Injunction, n. d."],"title_tesim":["In Equity No. 63 C 293 (3). USDC Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis v. St Louis National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Committee for Parents of Transported Pupils, West End Community Conference, Evelyn H. Roberts et al… Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Injunction; Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment: Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment and Injunction, n. d."],"normalized_title_ssm":["In Equity No. 63 C 293 (3). USDC Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis v. St Louis National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Committee for Parents of Transported Pupils, West End Community Conference, Evelyn H. Roberts et al… Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Injunction; Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment: Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment and Injunction, n. d."],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":76,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55/components#3","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c04"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c03","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"In the Circuit Court of Alabama, Criminal Division No. 7964, City of Montgomery v. S. S. Sealy, Sr. Motion to Exclude City's Evidence, n.d.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c03#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c03","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c03"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c03","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents."],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents."],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents.","In the Circuit Court of Alabama, Criminal Division No. 7964, City of Montgomery v. S. S. Sealy, Sr. Motion to Exclude City's Evidence, n.d."],"title_filing_ssi":"In the Circuit Court of Alabama, Criminal Division No. 7964, City of Montgomery v. S. S. Sealy, Sr. Motion to Exclude City's Evidence, n.d.","title_ssm":["In the Circuit Court of Alabama, Criminal Division No. 7964, City of Montgomery v. S. S. Sealy, Sr. Motion to Exclude City's Evidence, n.d."],"title_tesim":["In the Circuit Court of Alabama, Criminal Division No. 7964, City of Montgomery v. S. S. Sealy, Sr. Motion to Exclude City's Evidence, n.d."],"normalized_title_ssm":["In the Circuit Court of Alabama, Criminal Division No. 7964, City of Montgomery v. S. S. Sealy, Sr. Motion to Exclude City's Evidence, n.d."],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":59,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#54/components#2","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c03"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c04","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"In the Circuit Court of Alabama, Criminal Division No. 7964, City of Montgomery v. S. S. Sealy, Sr. Motion to Exclude City's Evidence, n.d.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c04#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c04","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c04"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c04","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents."],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents."],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents.","In the Circuit Court of Alabama, Criminal Division No. 7964, City of Montgomery v. S. S. Sealy, Sr. Motion to Exclude City's Evidence, n.d."],"title_filing_ssi":"In the Circuit Court of Alabama, Criminal Division No. 7964, City of Montgomery v. S. S. Sealy, Sr. Motion to Exclude City's Evidence, n.d.","title_ssm":["In the Circuit Court of Alabama, Criminal Division No. 7964, City of Montgomery v. S. S. Sealy, Sr. Motion to Exclude City's Evidence, n.d."],"title_tesim":["In the Circuit Court of Alabama, Criminal Division No. 7964, City of Montgomery v. S. S. Sealy, Sr. Motion to Exclude City's Evidence, n.d."],"normalized_title_ssm":["In the Circuit Court of Alabama, Criminal Division No. 7964, City of Montgomery v. S. S. Sealy, Sr. Motion to Exclude City's Evidence, n.d."],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":60,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#54/components#3","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c04"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c17","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"In the Matter of Petition of Certain Residents of School District 14 of the City of Chicago, Complaining of Segregation in the Chicago Public School System. Decision, n.d.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c17#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c17","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c17"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c17","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","In the Matter of Petition of Certain Residents of School District 14 of the City of Chicago, Complaining of Segregation in the Chicago Public School System. Decision, n.d."],"title_filing_ssi":"In the Matter of Petition of Certain Residents of School District 14 of the City of Chicago, Complaining of Segregation in the Chicago Public School System. Decision, n.d.","title_ssm":["In the Matter of Petition of Certain Residents of School District 14 of the City of Chicago, Complaining of Segregation in the Chicago Public School System. Decision, n.d."],"title_tesim":["In the Matter of Petition of Certain Residents of School District 14 of the City of Chicago, Complaining of Segregation in the Chicago Public School System. Decision, n.d."],"normalized_title_ssm":["In the Matter of Petition of Certain Residents of School District 14 of the City of Chicago, Complaining of Segregation in the Chicago Public School System. Decision, n.d."],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":89,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55/components#16","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c17"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c54","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Law School Library Memorandum re Stacking Permits, regulations, undated","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c54#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c54","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c54"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c54","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Law School Library Memorandum re Stacking Permits, regulations, undated","Box 5"],"title_filing_ssi":"Law School Library Memorandum re Stacking Permits, regulations, undated","title_ssm":["Law School Library Memorandum re Stacking Permits, regulations, undated"],"title_tesim":["Law School Library Memorandum re Stacking Permits, regulations, undated"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Law School Library Memorandum re Stacking Permits, regulations, undated"],"component_level_isim":[2],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":55,"containers_ssim":["Box 5"],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#53","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c54"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c13","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"Legal Opinion from R. H. Burks City Attorney of Houston, Tx. Directed to Mayor Lewis Cutrer Re \"Authority of police officers to prevent, suppress, disperse or make an arrest of persons, numbers of whom have assembled in a public place, to-wit a lunch room, eating place or restaurant, and thereby prevented a person or persons from pursuing any labor, occupation or employment, or thereby interfering in any manner with the labor or employment of another. […]\", 3-14-1960","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c13#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c13","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c13"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c13","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents."],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents."],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents.","Legal Opinion from R. H. Burks City Attorney of Houston, Tx. Directed to Mayor Lewis Cutrer Re \"Authority of police officers to prevent, suppress, disperse or make an arrest of persons, numbers of whom have assembled in a public place, to-wit a lunch room, eating place or restaurant, and thereby prevented a person or persons from pursuing any labor, occupation or employment, or thereby interfering in any manner with the labor or employment of another. […]\", 3-14-1960"],"title_filing_ssi":"Legal Opinion from R. H. Burks City Attorney of Houston, Tx. Directed to Mayor Lewis Cutrer Re \"Authority of police officers to prevent, suppress, disperse or make an arrest of persons, numbers of whom have assembled in a public place, to-wit a lunch room, eating place or restaurant, and thereby prevented a person or persons from pursuing any labor, occupation or employment, or thereby interfering in any manner with the labor or employment of another. […]\", 3-14-1960","title_ssm":["Legal Opinion from R. H. Burks City Attorney of Houston, Tx. Directed to Mayor Lewis Cutrer Re \"Authority of police officers to prevent, suppress, disperse or make an arrest of persons, numbers of whom have assembled in a public place, to-wit a lunch room, eating place or restaurant, and thereby prevented a person or persons from pursuing any labor, occupation or employment, or thereby interfering in any manner with the labor or employment of another. […]\", 3-14-1960"],"title_tesim":["Legal Opinion from R. H. Burks City Attorney of Houston, Tx. Directed to Mayor Lewis Cutrer Re \"Authority of police officers to prevent, suppress, disperse or make an arrest of persons, numbers of whom have assembled in a public place, to-wit a lunch room, eating place or restaurant, and thereby prevented a person or persons from pursuing any labor, occupation or employment, or thereby interfering in any manner with the labor or employment of another. […]\", 3-14-1960"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Legal Opinion from R. H. Burks City Attorney of Houston, Tx. Directed to Mayor Lewis Cutrer Re \"Authority of police officers to prevent, suppress, disperse or make an arrest of persons, numbers of whom have assembled in a public place, to-wit a lunch room, eating place or restaurant, and thereby prevented a person or persons from pursuing any labor, occupation or employment, or thereby interfering in any manner with the labor or employment of another. […]\", 3-14-1960"],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":69,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#54/components#12","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c13"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c11","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"Letter from Herbert L. Ashby, Assistant District Attorney of Ventura, CA to Mr. Harold R. DePue Superintendent, Oxnard School District re Op. No. 968: De Facto School Segregation by School Construction on Culbert Site in Oxnard. April 2, 1963","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c11#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c11","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c11"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c11","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","Letter from Herbert L. Ashby, Assistant District Attorney of Ventura, CA to Mr. Harold R. DePue Superintendent, Oxnard School District re Op. No. 968: De Facto School Segregation by School Construction on Culbert Site in Oxnard. April 2, 1963"],"title_filing_ssi":"Letter from Herbert L. Ashby, Assistant District Attorney of Ventura, CA to Mr. Harold R. DePue Superintendent, Oxnard School District re Op. No. 968: De Facto School Segregation by School Construction on Culbert Site in Oxnard. April 2, 1963","title_ssm":["Letter from Herbert L. Ashby, Assistant District Attorney of Ventura, CA to Mr. Harold R. DePue Superintendent, Oxnard School District re Op. No. 968: De Facto School Segregation by School Construction on Culbert Site in Oxnard. April 2, 1963"],"title_tesim":["Letter from Herbert L. Ashby, Assistant District Attorney of Ventura, CA to Mr. Harold R. DePue Superintendent, Oxnard School District re Op. No. 968: De Facto School Segregation by School Construction on Culbert Site in Oxnard. April 2, 1963"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Letter from Herbert L. Ashby, Assistant District Attorney of Ventura, CA to Mr. Harold R. DePue Superintendent, Oxnard School District re Op. No. 968: De Facto School Segregation by School Construction on Culbert Site in Oxnard. April 2, 1963"],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":83,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55/components#10","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c11"}}],"included":[{"type":"facet","id":"repository_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Repository","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.","value":"University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.","hits":163},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=University+of+Virginia%2C+Special+Collections+Dept.\u0026view=list"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/repository_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"facet","id":"collection_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Collection","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Virginia Law Review records","value":"Virginia Law Review records","hits":163},"links":{"remove":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=list"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/collection_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"facet","id":"date_range_isim","attributes":{"label":"Date range","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"1960","value":"1960","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1960\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1961","value":"1961","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1961\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1962","value":"1962","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1962\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1963","value":"1963","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1963\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1964","value":"1964","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1964\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1965","value":"1965","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1965\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1966","value":"1966","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1966\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1967","value":"1967","hits":4},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1967\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1968","value":"1968","hits":4},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1968\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1969","value":"1969","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1969\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1970","value":"1970","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1970\u0026view=list"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/date_range_isim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"facet","id":"names_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Names","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","value":"Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Bnames%5D%5B%5D=Arthur+J.+Morris+Law+Library+Special+Collections\u0026view=list"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/names_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"facet","id":"level_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Level","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Collection","value":"Collection","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Collection\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"File","value":"File","hits":116},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Floppy disks","value":"Floppy disks","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Floppy+disks\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Item","value":"Item","hits":40},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Photographs","value":"Photographs","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Photographs\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Poster","value":"Poster","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Poster\u0026view=list"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Series","value":"Series","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Series\u0026view=list"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/level_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"all_fields","attributes":{"label":"All Fields"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=10\u0026search_field=all_fields\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"keyword","attributes":{"label":"Keyword"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=10\u0026search_field=keyword\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"name","attributes":{"label":"Name"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=10\u0026search_field=name\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"place","attributes":{"label":"Place"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=10\u0026search_field=place\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"subject","attributes":{"label":"Subject"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=10\u0026search_field=subject\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"title","attributes":{"label":"Title"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=10\u0026search_field=title\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"container","attributes":{"label":"Container"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=10\u0026search_field=container\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"identifier","attributes":{"label":"Identifier"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=10\u0026search_field=identifier\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"score desc, title_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"relevance"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=10\u0026sort=score+desc%2C+title_sort+asc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"date_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"date (ascending)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=10\u0026sort=date_sort+asc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"date_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"date (descending)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=10\u0026sort=date_sort+desc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"creator_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"creator (A-Z)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=10\u0026sort=creator_sort+asc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"creator_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"creator (Z-A)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=10\u0026sort=creator_sort+desc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"title_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"title (A-Z)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=10\u0026sort=title_sort+asc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"title_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"title (Z-A)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026page=10\u0026sort=title_sort+desc\u0026view=list"}}]}