{"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026view=list","next":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026page=2\u0026view=list","last":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026page=4\u0026view=list"},"meta":{"pages":{"current_page":1,"next_page":2,"prev_page":null,"total_pages":4,"limit_value":10,"offset_value":0,"total_count":40,"first_page?":true,"last_page?":false}},"data":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c01","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"[37254] Supreme Court Appellate Division – Second Department. In the matter of the Application of Isidore Balaban, Phyllis Balaban, Arthur Gottlieb and Lenore Gottlieb for an order under Artclo 78 of the Civil Practice Act v. Max J. Rubin, et al. Brief of Respondents-Appellants.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c01#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c01","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c01"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c01","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","[37254] Supreme Court Appellate Division – Second Department. In the matter of the Application of Isidore Balaban, Phyllis Balaban, Arthur Gottlieb and Lenore Gottlieb for an order under Artclo 78 of the Civil Practice Act v. Max J. Rubin, et al. Brief of Respondents-Appellants."],"title_filing_ssi":"[37254] Supreme Court Appellate Division – Second Department. In the matter of the Application of Isidore Balaban, Phyllis Balaban, Arthur Gottlieb and Lenore Gottlieb for an order under Artclo 78 of the Civil Practice Act v. Max J. Rubin, et al. Brief of Respondents-Appellants.","title_ssm":["[37254] Supreme Court Appellate Division – Second Department. In the matter of the Application of Isidore Balaban, Phyllis Balaban, Arthur Gottlieb and Lenore Gottlieb for an order under Artclo 78 of the Civil Practice Act v. Max J. Rubin, et al. Brief of Respondents-Appellants."],"title_tesim":["[37254] Supreme Court Appellate Division – Second Department. In the matter of the Application of Isidore Balaban, Phyllis Balaban, Arthur Gottlieb and Lenore Gottlieb for an order under Artclo 78 of the Civil Practice Act v. Max J. Rubin, et al. Brief of Respondents-Appellants."],"normalized_title_ssm":["[37254] Supreme Court Appellate Division – Second Department. In the matter of the Application of Isidore Balaban, Phyllis Balaban, Arthur Gottlieb and Lenore Gottlieb for an order under Artclo 78 of the Civil Practice Act v. Max J. Rubin, et al. Brief of Respondents-Appellants."],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":73,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55/components#0","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c01"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c11","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"An Ordinance to Amend Chapter XIV of the Revised Ordinance of the City of Orangeburg, [SC], adopted and ratified the Sixth Day of July, 1901.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c11#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c11","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c11"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c11","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents."],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents."],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents.","An Ordinance to Amend Chapter XIV of the Revised Ordinance of the City of Orangeburg, [SC], adopted and ratified the Sixth Day of July, 1901."],"title_filing_ssi":"An Ordinance to Amend Chapter XIV of the Revised Ordinance of the City of Orangeburg, [SC], adopted and ratified the Sixth Day of July, 1901.","title_ssm":["An Ordinance to Amend Chapter XIV of the Revised Ordinance of the City of Orangeburg, [SC], adopted and ratified the Sixth Day of July, 1901."],"title_tesim":["An Ordinance to Amend Chapter XIV of the Revised Ordinance of the City of Orangeburg, [SC], adopted and ratified the Sixth Day of July, 1901."],"normalized_title_ssm":["An Ordinance to Amend Chapter XIV of the Revised Ordinance of the City of Orangeburg, [SC], adopted and ratified the Sixth Day of July, 1901."],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":67,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#54/components#10","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c11"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c20","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"Blaustein, Albert P. :\"Civil Rights U. S. A. Public Schools. Cities in the North and West 1963. Camden and Environs\". Staff report Submitted to the Unites States Commission on Civil Rights and Authorized for Publication","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c20#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c20","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c20"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c20","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","Blaustein, Albert P. :\"Civil Rights U. S. A. Public Schools. Cities in the North and West 1963. Camden and Environs\". Staff report Submitted to the Unites States Commission on Civil Rights and Authorized for Publication"],"title_filing_ssi":"Blaustein, Albert P. :\"Civil Rights U. S. A. Public Schools. Cities in the North and West 1963. Camden and Environs\". Staff report Submitted to the Unites States Commission on Civil Rights and Authorized for Publication","title_ssm":["Blaustein, Albert P. :\"Civil Rights U. S. A. Public Schools. Cities in the North and West 1963. Camden and Environs\". Staff report Submitted to the Unites States Commission on Civil Rights and Authorized for Publication"],"title_tesim":["Blaustein, Albert P. :\"Civil Rights U. S. A. Public Schools. Cities in the North and West 1963. Camden and Environs\". Staff report Submitted to the Unites States Commission on Civil Rights and Authorized for Publication"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Blaustein, Albert P. :\"Civil Rights U. S. A. Public Schools. Cities in the North and West 1963. Camden and Environs\". Staff report Submitted to the Unites States Commission on Civil Rights and Authorized for Publication"],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":92,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55/components#19","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c20"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c13","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"Board of Education City of New York. Plan for Integration, August 23, 1963 to Dr. James E. Allen, Jr., Commissioner of Education, The University of the State of New York","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c13#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c13","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c13"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c13","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","Board of Education City of New York. Plan for Integration, August 23, 1963 to Dr. James E. Allen, Jr., Commissioner of Education, The University of the State of New York"],"title_filing_ssi":"Board of Education City of New York. Plan for Integration, August 23, 1963 to Dr. James E. Allen, Jr., Commissioner of Education, The University of the State of New York","title_ssm":["Board of Education City of New York. Plan for Integration, August 23, 1963 to Dr. James E. Allen, Jr., Commissioner of Education, The University of the State of New York"],"title_tesim":["Board of Education City of New York. Plan for Integration, August 23, 1963 to Dr. James E. Allen, Jr., Commissioner of Education, The University of the State of New York"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Board of Education City of New York. Plan for Integration, August 23, 1963 to Dr. James E. Allen, Jr., Commissioner of Education, The University of the State of New York"],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":85,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55/components#12","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c13"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c02","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"Civ. 62 C 285, USDC Eastern District of New York. Ralph Blocker, a minor by Mr. and Mrs. Albert V. Knox v. The Board of Education of Manhasset, NY, et al. Defendant's Trial Memorandum, Introduction; Complaint, March 1962; Answer, May 8, 1962.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c02#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c02","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c02"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c02","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","Civ. 62 C 285, USDC Eastern District of New York. Ralph Blocker, a minor by Mr. and Mrs. Albert V. Knox v. The Board of Education of Manhasset, NY, et al. Defendant's Trial Memorandum, Introduction; Complaint, March 1962; Answer, May 8, 1962."],"title_filing_ssi":"Civ. 62 C 285, USDC Eastern District of New York. Ralph Blocker, a minor by Mr. and Mrs. Albert V. Knox v. The Board of Education of Manhasset, NY, et al. Defendant's Trial Memorandum, Introduction; Complaint, March 1962; Answer, May 8, 1962.","title_ssm":["Civ. 62 C 285, USDC Eastern District of New York. Ralph Blocker, a minor by Mr. and Mrs. Albert V. Knox v. The Board of Education of Manhasset, NY, et al. Defendant's Trial Memorandum, Introduction; Complaint, March 1962; Answer, May 8, 1962."],"title_tesim":["Civ. 62 C 285, USDC Eastern District of New York. Ralph Blocker, a minor by Mr. and Mrs. Albert V. Knox v. The Board of Education of Manhasset, NY, et al. Defendant's Trial Memorandum, Introduction; Complaint, March 1962; Answer, May 8, 1962."],"normalized_title_ssm":["Civ. 62 C 285, USDC Eastern District of New York. Ralph Blocker, a minor by Mr. and Mrs. Albert V. Knox v. The Board of Education of Manhasset, NY, et al. Defendant's Trial Memorandum, Introduction; Complaint, March 1962; Answer, May 8, 1962."],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":74,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55/components#1","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c02"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c05","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"Civil Action File No. 63c 311 (1). USDC Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division. Simone Layne, a minor v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, et al. Complaint, Aug. 19, 1963; Separate Answer of Defendants Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Philip J. Hickey and William Kottmeyer, n.d.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c05#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c05","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c05"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c05","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","Civil Action File No. 63c 311 (1). USDC Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division. Simone Layne, a minor v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, et al. Complaint, Aug. 19, 1963; Separate Answer of Defendants Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Philip J. Hickey and William Kottmeyer, n.d."],"title_filing_ssi":"Civil Action File No. 63c 311 (1). USDC Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division. Simone Layne, a minor v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, et al. Complaint, Aug. 19, 1963; Separate Answer of Defendants Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Philip J. Hickey and William Kottmeyer, n.d.","title_ssm":["Civil Action File No. 63c 311 (1). USDC Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division. Simone Layne, a minor v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, et al. Complaint, Aug. 19, 1963; Separate Answer of Defendants Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Philip J. Hickey and William Kottmeyer, n.d."],"title_tesim":["Civil Action File No. 63c 311 (1). USDC Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division. Simone Layne, a minor v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, et al. Complaint, Aug. 19, 1963; Separate Answer of Defendants Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Philip J. Hickey and William Kottmeyer, n.d."],"normalized_title_ssm":["Civil Action File No. 63c 311 (1). USDC Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division. Simone Layne, a minor v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, et al. Complaint, Aug. 19, 1963; Separate Answer of Defendants Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Philip J. Hickey and William Kottmeyer, n.d."],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":77,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55/components#4","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c05"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c03","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"Civil Action No. 22092, USDC for the Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division. Sherrill School Parents Committee v. The Board of Education of the City of Detroit. Complaint, Answer, n.d.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c03#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c03","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c03"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c03","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","Civil Action No. 22092, USDC for the Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division. Sherrill School Parents Committee v. The Board of Education of the City of Detroit. Complaint, Answer, n.d."],"title_filing_ssi":"Civil Action No. 22092, USDC for the Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division. Sherrill School Parents Committee v. The Board of Education of the City of Detroit. Complaint, Answer, n.d.","title_ssm":["Civil Action No. 22092, USDC for the Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division. Sherrill School Parents Committee v. The Board of Education of the City of Detroit. Complaint, Answer, n.d."],"title_tesim":["Civil Action No. 22092, USDC for the Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division. Sherrill School Parents Committee v. The Board of Education of the City of Detroit. Complaint, Answer, n.d."],"normalized_title_ssm":["Civil Action No. 22092, USDC for the Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division. Sherrill School Parents Committee v. The Board of Education of the City of Detroit. Complaint, Answer, n.d."],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":75,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55/components#2","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c03"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c19","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"Civil Rights '63. Report of the United States Commission on Civil Rights","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c19#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c19","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c19"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c19","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","Civil Rights '63. Report of the United States Commission on Civil Rights"],"title_filing_ssi":"Civil Rights '63. Report of the United States Commission on Civil Rights","title_ssm":["Civil Rights '63. Report of the United States Commission on Civil Rights"],"title_tesim":["Civil Rights '63. Report of the United States Commission on Civil Rights"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Civil Rights '63. Report of the United States Commission on Civil Rights"],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":91,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55/components#18","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c19"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c22","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"Conference before the United States Commission on Civil Rights. Fourth Annual Education Conference on Problems of Segregation and Desegregation of Public Schools. Washington, D. C., May 2-4, 1962","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c22#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c22","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c22"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c22","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","Conference before the United States Commission on Civil Rights. Fourth Annual Education Conference on Problems of Segregation and Desegregation of Public Schools. Washington, D. C., May 2-4, 1962"],"title_filing_ssi":"Conference before the United States Commission on Civil Rights. Fourth Annual Education Conference on Problems of Segregation and Desegregation of Public Schools. Washington, D. C., May 2-4, 1962","title_ssm":["Conference before the United States Commission on Civil Rights. Fourth Annual Education Conference on Problems of Segregation and Desegregation of Public Schools. Washington, D. C., May 2-4, 1962"],"title_tesim":["Conference before the United States Commission on Civil Rights. Fourth Annual Education Conference on Problems of Segregation and Desegregation of Public Schools. Washington, D. C., May 2-4, 1962"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Conference before the United States Commission on Civil Rights. Fourth Annual Education Conference on Problems of Segregation and Desegregation of Public Schools. Washington, D. C., May 2-4, 1962"],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":94,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55/components#21","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c22"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c07","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"Decision of the Commissioner of Education. Charles B. Booker, et al v. The Board of Education of the City of Plainfield, Union County [NJ], June 26, 1963.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c07#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c07","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c07"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c07","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","Decision of the Commissioner of Education. Charles B. Booker, et al v. The Board of Education of the City of Plainfield, Union County [NJ], June 26, 1963."],"title_filing_ssi":"Decision of the Commissioner of Education. Charles B. Booker, et al v. The Board of Education of the City of Plainfield, Union County [NJ], June 26, 1963.","title_ssm":["Decision of the Commissioner of Education. Charles B. Booker, et al v. The Board of Education of the City of Plainfield, Union County [NJ], June 26, 1963."],"title_tesim":["Decision of the Commissioner of Education. Charles B. Booker, et al v. The Board of Education of the City of Plainfield, Union County [NJ], June 26, 1963."],"normalized_title_ssm":["Decision of the Commissioner of Education. Charles B. Booker, et al v. The Board of Education of the City of Plainfield, Union County [NJ], June 26, 1963."],"component_level_isim":[3],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"sort_isi":79,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55/components#6","timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"text":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","Virginia Law Review records","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e\n","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThis addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents","Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. ","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. ","This addition to the Records of the Virginia Law Review (1968, 1981-1996, 1999-2000, 2004-2005) was transferred to Special Collections in the Spring of 2014. The editors communicated with Kristin Glover and left a book-truck in front of her office with the new files. These files consist 8 boxes (3.3 linear ft.). The documents were organized chronologically in binders with the name of the editor-in-chief at the time. Special Collections kept the original organization."],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-20T23:33:01.301Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c07"}}],"included":[{"type":"facet","id":"repository_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Repository","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.","value":"University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.","hits":40},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=University+of+Virginia%2C+Special+Collections+Dept.\u0026view=list"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/repository_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"facet","id":"collection_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Collection","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Virginia Law Review records","value":"Virginia Law Review records","hits":40},"links":{"remove":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026view=list"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/collection_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"facet","id":"level_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Level","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Item","value":"Item","hits":40},"links":{"remove":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026view=list"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/level_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"all_fields","attributes":{"label":"All Fields"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026search_field=all_fields\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"keyword","attributes":{"label":"Keyword"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026search_field=keyword\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"name","attributes":{"label":"Name"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026search_field=name\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"place","attributes":{"label":"Place"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026search_field=place\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"subject","attributes":{"label":"Subject"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026search_field=subject\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"title","attributes":{"label":"Title"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026search_field=title\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"container","attributes":{"label":"Container"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026search_field=container\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"identifier","attributes":{"label":"Identifier"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026search_field=identifier\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"score desc, title_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"relevance"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026sort=score+desc%2C+title_sort+asc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"date_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"date (ascending)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026sort=date_sort+asc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"date_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"date (descending)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026sort=date_sort+desc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"creator_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"creator (A-Z)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026sort=creator_sort+asc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"creator_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"creator (Z-A)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026sort=creator_sort+desc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"title_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"title (A-Z)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026sort=title_sort+asc\u0026view=list"}},{"type":"sort","id":"title_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"title (Z-A)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026sort=title_sort+desc\u0026view=list"}}]}