{"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026view=compact","next":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026page=2\u0026view=compact","last":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026page=17\u0026view=compact"},"meta":{"pages":{"current_page":1,"next_page":2,"prev_page":null,"total_pages":17,"limit_value":10,"offset_value":0,"total_count":163,"first_page?":true,"last_page?":false}},"data":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c07","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"1972, 1976; Editor in Chief – Library [includes correspondence between Frances Farmer Law Librarian and John Calvin Jeffries Jr., VLR editor], 1972, 1976","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c07#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c07","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c07"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c07","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"title_filing_ssi":"1972, 1976; Editor in Chief  – Library [includes correspondence between Frances Farmer Law Librarian and John Calvin Jeffries Jr., VLR editor], 1972, 1976","title_ssm":["1972, 1976; Editor in Chief – Library [includes correspondence between Frances Farmer Law Librarian and John Calvin Jeffries Jr., VLR editor], 1972, 1976"],"title_tesim":["1972, 1976; Editor in Chief – Library [includes correspondence between Frances Farmer Law Librarian and John Calvin Jeffries Jr., VLR editor], 1972, 1976"],"normalized_title_ssm":["1972, 1976; Editor in Chief – Library [includes correspondence between Frances Farmer Law Librarian and John Calvin Jeffries Jr., VLR editor], 1972, 1976"],"text":["1972, 1976; Editor in Chief – Library [includes correspondence between Frances Farmer Law Librarian and John Calvin Jeffries Jr., VLR editor], 1972, 1976","Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985","Box 1"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985"],"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"component_level_isim":[2],"sort_isi":8,"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"containers_ssim":["Box 1"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#6","timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1960/2019"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"creator_corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"creators_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e  "],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both."],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c07"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c13","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"1974 Manual for Members; 1975 Manual for Members; 1976-1977 Manual for Members, 1974/1977","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c13#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c13","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c13"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c13","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"title_filing_ssi":"1974 Manual for Members; 1975 Manual for Members; 1976-1977 Manual for Members","title_ssm":["1974 Manual for Members; 1975 Manual for Members; 1976-1977 Manual for Members"],"title_tesim":["1974 Manual for Members; 1975 Manual for Members; 1976-1977 Manual for Members"],"normalized_title_ssm":["1974 Manual for Members; 1975 Manual for Members; 1976-1977 Manual for Members, 1974/1977"],"text":["1974 Manual for Members; 1975 Manual for Members; 1976-1977 Manual for Members, 1974/1977","Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985","Box 1"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1974/1977"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1974-1977"],"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"component_level_isim":[2],"sort_isi":14,"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"containers_ssim":["Box 1"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"date_range_isim":[1974,1975,1976,1977],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#12","timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1960/2019"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"creator_corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"creators_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e  "],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both."],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c13"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c01","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"[37254] Supreme Court Appellate Division – Second Department. In the matter of the Application of Isidore Balaban, Phyllis Balaban, Arthur Gottlieb and Lenore Gottlieb for an order under Artclo 78 of the Civil Practice Act v. Max J. Rubin, et al. Brief of Respondents-Appellants.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c01#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c01","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c01"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c01","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","parent_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"title_filing_ssi":"[37254] Supreme Court Appellate Division – Second Department. In the matter of the Application of Isidore Balaban, Phyllis Balaban, Arthur Gottlieb and Lenore Gottlieb for an order under Artclo 78 of the Civil Practice Act v. Max J. Rubin, et al. Brief of Respondents-Appellants.","title_ssm":["[37254] Supreme Court Appellate Division – Second Department. In the matter of the Application of Isidore Balaban, Phyllis Balaban, Arthur Gottlieb and Lenore Gottlieb for an order under Artclo 78 of the Civil Practice Act v. Max J. Rubin, et al. Brief of Respondents-Appellants."],"title_tesim":["[37254] Supreme Court Appellate Division – Second Department. In the matter of the Application of Isidore Balaban, Phyllis Balaban, Arthur Gottlieb and Lenore Gottlieb for an order under Artclo 78 of the Civil Practice Act v. Max J. Rubin, et al. Brief of Respondents-Appellants."],"normalized_title_ssm":["[37254] Supreme Court Appellate Division – Second Department. In the matter of the Application of Isidore Balaban, Phyllis Balaban, Arthur Gottlieb and Lenore Gottlieb for an order under Artclo 78 of the Civil Practice Act v. Max J. Rubin, et al. Brief of Respondents-Appellants."],"text":["[37254] Supreme Court Appellate Division – Second Department. In the matter of the Application of Isidore Balaban, Phyllis Balaban, Arthur Gottlieb and Lenore Gottlieb for an order under Artclo 78 of the Civil Practice Act v. Max J. Rubin, et al. Brief of Respondents-Appellants.","Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985","Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"component_level_isim":[3],"sort_isi":73,"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55/components#0","timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1960/2019"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"creator_corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"creators_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e  "],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both."],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56_c01"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c64","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Acceptances. [Correspondence with authors of accepted articles. Includes evaluation sheets]., 1974/1976","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c64#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c64","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c64"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c64","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"title_filing_ssi":"Acceptances. [Correspondence with authors of accepted articles. Includes evaluation sheets].","title_ssm":["Acceptances. [Correspondence with authors of accepted articles. Includes evaluation sheets]."],"title_tesim":["Acceptances. [Correspondence with authors of accepted articles. Includes evaluation sheets]."],"normalized_title_ssm":["Acceptances. [Correspondence with authors of accepted articles. Includes evaluation sheets]., 1974/1976"],"text":["Acceptances. [Correspondence with authors of accepted articles. Includes evaluation sheets]., 1974/1976","Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985","Box 9"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1974/1976"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1974-1976"],"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"component_level_isim":[2],"sort_isi":105,"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"containers_ssim":["Box 9"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"date_range_isim":[1974,1975,1976],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#63","timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1960/2019"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"creator_corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"creators_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e  "],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both."],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c64"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c24","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 1: Directories, facebooks, memoranda, schedules. – [Dear First Year Student Memo; Welcome remarks from Andrew Friedman to students re student organizations at the Law School]; correspondence with authors; includes Antonin Scalia remarks made at the Memorial Program for Dean Emerson Spies., 1990/1991","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c24#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c24","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c24"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c24","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02","parent_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02"],"title_filing_ssi":"Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 1: Directories, facebooks, memoranda, schedules. – [Dear First Year Student Memo; Welcome remarks from Andrew Friedman to students re student organizations at the Law School]; correspondence with authors; includes Antonin Scalia remarks made at the Memorial Program for Dean Emerson Spies.","title_ssm":["Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 1: Directories, facebooks, memoranda, schedules. – [Dear First Year Student Memo; Welcome remarks from Andrew Friedman to students re student organizations at the Law School]; correspondence with authors; includes Antonin Scalia remarks made at the Memorial Program for Dean Emerson Spies."],"title_tesim":["Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 1: Directories, facebooks, memoranda, schedules. – [Dear First Year Student Memo; Welcome remarks from Andrew Friedman to students re student organizations at the Law School]; correspondence with authors; includes Antonin Scalia remarks made at the Memorial Program for Dean Emerson Spies."],"normalized_title_ssm":["Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 1: Directories, facebooks, memoranda, schedules. – [Dear First Year Student Memo; Welcome remarks from Andrew Friedman to students re student organizations at the Law School]; correspondence with authors; includes Antonin Scalia remarks made at the Memorial Program for Dean Emerson Spies., 1990/1991"],"text":["Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 1: Directories, facebooks, memoranda, schedules. – [Dear First Year Student Memo; Welcome remarks from Andrew Friedman to students re student organizations at the Law School]; correspondence with authors; includes Antonin Scalia remarks made at the Memorial Program for Dean Emerson Spies., 1990/1991","Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014","Box 15"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1990/1991"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1990-1991"],"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"component_level_isim":[2],"sort_isi":133,"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"containers_ssim":["Box 15"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"date_range_isim":[1990,1991],"_nest_path_":"/components#1/components#23","timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1960/2019"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"creator_corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"creators_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e  "],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both."],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c24"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c25","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 2: internal Memoranda re grading procedures; writing tryouts; Virginia Plan Application; topic selections and suggestions, 1990/1991","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c25#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c25","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c25"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c25","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02","parent_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02"],"title_filing_ssi":"Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 2: internal Memoranda re grading procedures; writing tryouts; Virginia Plan Application; topic selections and suggestions","title_ssm":["Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 2: internal Memoranda re grading procedures; writing tryouts; Virginia Plan Application; topic selections and suggestions"],"title_tesim":["Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 2: internal Memoranda re grading procedures; writing tryouts; Virginia Plan Application; topic selections and suggestions"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 2: internal Memoranda re grading procedures; writing tryouts; Virginia Plan Application; topic selections and suggestions, 1990/1991"],"text":["Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 2: internal Memoranda re grading procedures; writing tryouts; Virginia Plan Application; topic selections and suggestions, 1990/1991","Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014","Box 15"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1990/1991"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1990-1991"],"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"component_level_isim":[2],"sort_isi":134,"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"containers_ssim":["Box 15"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"date_range_isim":[1990,1991],"_nest_path_":"/components#1/components#24","timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1960/2019"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"creator_corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"creators_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e  "],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both."],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c25"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c26","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 3: Law Review membership provisions, memoranda, writing competition; grading instructions; budget request, 1990/1991","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c26#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c26","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c26"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c26","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02","parent_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02"],"title_filing_ssi":"Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 3:  Law Review membership provisions, memoranda, writing competition; grading instructions; budget request","title_ssm":["Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 3: Law Review membership provisions, memoranda, writing competition; grading instructions; budget request"],"title_tesim":["Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 3: Law Review membership provisions, memoranda, writing competition; grading instructions; budget request"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 3: Law Review membership provisions, memoranda, writing competition; grading instructions; budget request, 1990/1991"],"text":["Andrew C. Friedman, Editor-in-Chief, f. 3: Law Review membership provisions, memoranda, writing competition; grading instructions; budget request, 1990/1991","Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014","Box 15"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203-2014 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1968, 1981-1997, 1999-2000, 2004-2005, 2014"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1990/1991"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1990-1991"],"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"component_level_isim":[2],"sort_isi":135,"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"containers_ssim":["Box 15"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"date_range_isim":[1990,1991],"_nest_path_":"/components#1/components#25","timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1960/2019"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"creator_corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"creators_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e  "],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both."],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c02_c26"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c11","type":"Item","attributes":{"title":"An Ordinance to Amend Chapter XIV of the Revised Ordinance of the City of Orangeburg, [SC], adopted and ratified the Sixth Day of July, 1901.","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c11#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c11","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c11"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c11","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55","parent_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents., 1960"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55"],"title_filing_ssi":"An Ordinance to Amend Chapter XIV of the Revised Ordinance of the City of Orangeburg, [SC], adopted and ratified the Sixth Day of July, 1901.","title_ssm":["An Ordinance to Amend Chapter XIV of the Revised Ordinance of the City of Orangeburg, [SC], adopted and ratified the Sixth Day of July, 1901."],"title_tesim":["An Ordinance to Amend Chapter XIV of the Revised Ordinance of the City of Orangeburg, [SC], adopted and ratified the Sixth Day of July, 1901."],"normalized_title_ssm":["An Ordinance to Amend Chapter XIV of the Revised Ordinance of the City of Orangeburg, [SC], adopted and ratified the Sixth Day of July, 1901."],"text":["An Ordinance to Amend Chapter XIV of the Revised Ordinance of the City of Orangeburg, [SC], adopted and ratified the Sixth Day of July, 1901.","Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents., 1960"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents., 1960"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985","Correspondence between Collins Denny, III, Research Editor of the Virginia Law Review and attorneys in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia relating to \"lunch-counter demonstrations\" in their cities. The information was used in \"State Counter Demonstrations: State Action and the Fourteenth Amendment, VA L. Rev., Vol. 47, p. 105 (1961). There are also some documents., 1960"],"level_ssm":["Item"],"level_ssim":["Item"],"component_level_isim":[3],"sort_isi":67,"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#54/components#10","timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1960/2019"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"creator_corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"creators_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e  "],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both."],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c55_c11"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c66","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Articles Log, 1974/1976","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c66#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c66","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c66"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c66","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"title_filing_ssi":"Articles Log","title_ssm":["Articles Log"],"title_tesim":["Articles Log"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Articles Log, 1974/1976"],"text":["Articles Log, 1974/1976","Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985","Box 9"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1974/1976"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1974-1976"],"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"component_level_isim":[2],"sort_isi":107,"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"containers_ssim":["Box 9"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"date_range_isim":[1974,1975,1976],"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#65","timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1960/2019"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"creator_corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"creators_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e  "],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both."],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c66"}},{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","ref_ssm":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"],"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01","parent_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985"],"parent_ids_ssim":["viu_repositories_4_resources_861","viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01"],"title_filing_ssi":"Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","title_ssm":["Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"title_tesim":["Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)"],"text":["Background material for \"Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools – Legislative Motive and the Constitution\", Va L. Rev., Vol. 50, p. 465, 1960s, (3 folders)","Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985","Box 6"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG 32/203 -85 Records of the Virginia Law Review, 1960/1985"],"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"component_level_isim":[2],"sort_isi":72,"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"containers_ssim":["Box 6"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":25,"_nest_path_":"/components#0/components#55","timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_ssi":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_root_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","_nest_parent_":"viu_repositories_4_resources_861","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/oai/UVA/repositories_4_resources_861.xml","aspace_url_ssi":"https://archives.lib.virginia.edu/ark:/59853/169303","title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records"],"title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records"],"unitdate_ssm":["1960-2019"],"unitdate_inclusive_ssm":["1960-2019"],"normalized_date_ssm":["1960/2019"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"text":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861","The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both.","Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","English"],"collection_title_tesim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"collection_ssim":["Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"unitid_ssm":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"unitid_tesim":["RG.32.203","Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","Previous Archival Resource Key","/repositories/4/resources/861"],"repository_ssm":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"repository_ssim":["University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept."],"creator_corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"creators_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"extent_ssm":["3 Linear Feet"],"extent_tesim":["3 Linear Feet"],"date_range_isim":[1960,1961,1962,1963,1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969,1970,1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations. \u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eInitially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both. \u003c/p\u003e  "],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Contents"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The office files of the Virginia Law Review were routinely transferred to the archives between 1978 and 1985.  The records consist primarily of administrative correspondence and other materials from the office of the editor-in-chief, and correspondence with writers of articles.  There is also some documentation related to the organization and function of law student organizations.","Initially the archives retained all editing material, but subsequently, only selected stages of the editing process were kept, and later only the work of Virginia's faculty and students was retained.  Occasionally a footnote will indicate that the journal staff is keeping source material on file for authors, but not files of that sort were transferred to the archives. \nThe editing of articles to be published is achieved in seven stages.  The first step, the departmental edit, involves checking and, if necessary, correcting organization and use of language; this editing is done by more than one board member on the original draft and several copies. Simultaneously a substantive cite-check (\"sub cite\") is made in order to examine the citation for accuracy, blue book form and reference to the text.  Corrections are marked on the departmental edit copy.  At this point, the executive editors do a final substantive edit for clarity, accuracy, spelling and grammar.  Subsequently another cite-check is noted on a copy of the executive edit.  Ultimately all corrections are incorporated onto one copy which is sent to the printer.  The printer returns galley proof for the VLR to correct.  Page proof is run in two stages: the first, called \"dirty pages,\" are without running heads and table of contents and the second, called \"clean pages\", have both."],"corpname_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"names_ssim":["Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections"],"language_ssim":["English"],"descrules_ssm":["Describing Archives: A Content Standard"],"total_component_count_is":162,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-07-23T21:41:53.535Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/viu_repositories_4_resources_861_c01_c56"}}],"included":[{"type":"facet","id":"repository_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Repository","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.","value":"University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.","hits":163},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=University+of+Virginia%2C+Special+Collections+Dept.\u0026view=compact"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/repository_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"facet","id":"collection_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Collection","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","value":"Virginia Law Review records, 1960/2019","hits":163},"links":{"remove":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026view=compact"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/collection_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"facet","id":"date_range_isim","attributes":{"label":"Date range","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"1960","value":"1960","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1960\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1961","value":"1961","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1961\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1962","value":"1962","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1962\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1963","value":"1963","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1963\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1964","value":"1964","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1964\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1965","value":"1965","hits":2},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1965\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1966","value":"1966","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1966\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1967","value":"1967","hits":4},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1967\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1968","value":"1968","hits":4},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1968\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1969","value":"1969","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1969\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"1970","value":"1970","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Bdate_range%5D%5B%5D=1970\u0026view=compact"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/date_range_isim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"facet","id":"names_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Names","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","value":"Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Bnames%5D%5B%5D=Arthur+J.+Morris+Law+Library+Special+Collections\u0026view=compact"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/names_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"facet","id":"level_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Level","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Collection","value":"Collection","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Collection\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"File","value":"File","hits":116},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Floppy disks","value":"Floppy disks","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Floppy+disks\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Item","value":"Item","hits":40},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Item\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Photographs","value":"Photographs","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Photographs\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Poster","value":"Poster","hits":1},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Poster\u0026view=compact"}},{"attributes":{"label":"Series","value":"Series","hits":3},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=Series\u0026view=compact"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/level_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"all_fields","attributes":{"label":"All Fields"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026search_field=all_fields\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"keyword","attributes":{"label":"Keyword"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026search_field=keyword\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"name","attributes":{"label":"Name"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026search_field=name\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"place","attributes":{"label":"Place"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026search_field=place\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"subject","attributes":{"label":"Subject"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026search_field=subject\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"title","attributes":{"label":"Title"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026search_field=title\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"container","attributes":{"label":"Container"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026search_field=container\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"identifier","attributes":{"label":"Identifier"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026search_field=identifier\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"sort","id":"score desc, title_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"relevance"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026sort=score+desc%2C+title_sort+asc\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"sort","id":"date_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"date (ascending)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026sort=date_sort+asc\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"sort","id":"date_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"date (descending)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026sort=date_sort+desc\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"sort","id":"creator_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"creator (A-Z)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026sort=creator_sort+asc\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"sort","id":"creator_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"creator (Z-A)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026sort=creator_sort+desc\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"sort","id":"title_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"title (A-Z)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026sort=title_sort+asc\u0026view=compact"}},{"type":"sort","id":"title_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"title (Z-A)"},"links":{"self":"https://arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Virginia+Law+Review+records%2C+1960%2F2019\u0026sort=title_sort+desc\u0026view=compact"}}]}